1358, 1360, 1452 and 1453.
- Instantiations of constexpr functions are always constexpr. This removes the
need for separate declaration/definition checking, which is now gone.
- This makes it possible for a constexpr function to be virtual, if they are
only dependently virtual. Virtual calls to such functions are not constant
expressions.
- Likewise, it's now possible for a literal type to have virtual base classes.
A constexpr constructor for such a type cannot actually produce a constant
expression, though, so add a special-case diagnostic for a constructor call
to such a type rather than trying to evaluate it.
- Classes with trivial default constructors (for which value initialization can
produce a fully-initialized value) are considered literal types.
- Classes with volatile members are not literal types.
- constexpr constructors can be members of non-literal types. We do not yet use
static initialization for global objects constructed in this way.
llvm-svn: 150359
empty union. This still rejects anonymous member structs or unions which only
contain such empty class types, pending standard wording defining exactly what
an empty class type is.
llvm-svn: 150157
can't produce a constant expression is not ill-formed (so long as some
instantiation of that function can produce a constant expression).
llvm-svn: 149802
* support the gcc __builtin_constant_p() ? ... : ... folding hack in C++11
* check for unspecified values in pointer comparisons and pointer subtractions
llvm-svn: 149578
function definition can produce a constant expression. This also provides the
last few checks for [dcl.constexpr]p3 and [dcl.constexpr]p4.
llvm-svn: 149108
variable is initialized by a non-constant expression, and pass in the variable
being declared so that earlier-initialized fields' values can be used.
Rearrange VarDecl init evaluation to make this possible, and in so doing fix a
long-standing issue in our C++ constant expression handling, where we would
mishandle cases like:
extern const int a;
const int n = a;
const int a = 5;
int arr[n];
Here, n is not initialized by a constant expression, so can't be used in an ICE,
even though the initialization expression would be an ICE if it appeared later
in the TU. This requires computing whether the initializer is an ICE eagerly,
and saving that information in PCH files.
llvm-svn: 146856
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
or MemberExpr which refers to it. As a side-effect, MemberExprs which refer to
static member functions and static data members are now emitted as constant
expressions.
llvm-svn: 144468
initializer; all other constexpr variables are merely required to be
initialized. In particular, a user-provided constexpr default constructor can be
used for such initialization.
llvm-svn: 144028
constexpr constructor templates. Such checking is optional, and currently hard
to get right since clang doesn't generate implicit member initializers until
instantiation (even for non-dependent members).
This is needed for clang to accept libstdc++ from g++4.6 in c++0x mode.
llvm-svn: 141547
part on patches by Peter Collingbourne.
We diverge from the C++11 standard in a few areas, mostly related to checking
constexpr function declarations, and not just definitions. See WG21 paper
N3308=11-0078 for details.
Function invocation substitution is not available in this patch; constexpr
functions cannot yet be used from within constant expressions.
llvm-svn: 140926
We had an extension which allowed const static class members of floating-point type to have in-class initializers, 'as a C++0x extension'. However, C++0x does not allow this. The extension has been kept, and extended to all literal types in C++0x mode (with a fixit to add the 'constexpr' specifier).
llvm-svn: 140801
Richard Smith