The routine that facilitated symbols to be explicitly allowed asked
the name of the called function, which resulted in a crash when the
check was accidentally run on non-trivial C++ code.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D123992
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Adds a flag to `ClangTidyContext` that is used to indicate to checks that fixes will only be applied one at a time.
This is to indicate to checks that each fix emitted should not depend on any other fixes emitted across the translation unit.
I've currently implemented the `IncludeInserter`, `LoopConvertCheck` and `PreferMemberInitializerCheck` to use these support these modes.
Reasoning behind this is in use cases like `clangd` it's only possible to apply one fix at a time.
For include inserter checks, the include is only added once for the first diagnostic that requires it, this will result in subsequent fixes not having the included needed.
A similar issue is seen in the `PreferMemberInitializerCheck` where the `:` will only be added for the first member that needs fixing.
Fixes emitted in `StandaloneDiagsMode` will likely result in malformed code if they are applied all together, conversely fixes currently emitted may result in malformed code if they are applied one at a time.
For this reason invoking `clang-tidy` from the binary will always with `StandaloneDiagsMode` disabled, However using it as a library its possible to select the mode you wish to use, `clangd` always selects `StandaloneDiagsMode`.
This is an example of the current behaviour failing
```lang=c++
struct Foo {
int A, B;
Foo(int D, int E) {
A = D;
B = E; // Fix Here
}
};
```
Incorrectly transformed to:
```lang=c++
struct Foo {
int A, B;
Foo(int D, int E), B(E) {
A = D;
// Fix Here
}
};
```
In `StandaloneDiagsMode`, it gets transformed to:
```lang=c++
struct Foo {
int A, B;
Foo(int D, int E) : B(E) {
A = D;
// Fix Here
}
};
```
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97121
Report use of `std::vector<const T>` (and similar containers of const
elements). These are now allowed in standard C++ due to undefined
`std::allocator<const T>`. They do not compile with libstdc++ or MSVC.
Future libc++ will remove the extension (D120996).
See docs/clang-tidy/checks/portability-std-allocator-const.rst for detail.
I have attempted clean-up in a large code base. Here are some statistics:
* 98% are related to the container `std::vector`, among `deque/forward_list/list/multiset/queue/set/stack/vector`.
* 24% are related to `std::vector<const std::string>`.
* Both `std::vector<const absl::string_view>` and `std::vector<const int>` contribute 2%. The other contributors spread over various class types.
The check can be useful to other large code bases and may serve as an example
for future libc++ strictness improvement.
Note: on MSVC where -fdelayed-template-parsing is the default, the check cannot
catch cases in uninstantiated templates.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123655
Report use of ``std::vector<const T>`` (and similar containers of const
elements). These are now allowed in standard C++ due to undefined
``std::allocator<const T>``. They do not compile with libstdc++ or MSVC.
Future libc++ will remove the extension (D120996).
See docs/clang-tidy/checks/portability-std-allocator-const.rst for detail.
I have attempted clean-up in a large code base. Here are some statistics:
* 98% are related to the container `std::vector`, among `deque/forward_list/list/multiset/queue/set/stack/vector`.
* 24% are related to `std::vector<const std::string>`.
* Both `std::vector<const absl::string_view>` and `std::vector<const int>` contribute 2%. The other contributors spread over various class types.
The check can be useful to other large code bases and may serve as an example
for future libc++ strictness improvement.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123655
[buildbot issues fixed]
This check performs basic analysis of macros and replaces them
with an anonymous unscoped enum. Using an unscoped anonymous enum
ensures that everywhere the macro token was used previously, the
enumerator name may be safely used.
Potential macros for replacement must meet the following constraints:
- Macros must expand only to integral literal tokens. The unary
operators plus, minus and tilde are recognized to allow for positive,
negative and bitwise negated integers.
- Macros must be defined on sequential source file lines, or with
only comment lines in between macro definitions.
- Macros must all be defined in the same source file.
- Macros must not be defined within a conditional compilation block.
- Macros must not be defined adjacent to other preprocessor directives.
- Macros must not be used in preprocessor conditions
Each cluster of macros meeting the above constraints is presumed to
be a set of values suitable for replacement by an anonymous enum.
From there, a developer can give the anonymous enum a name and
continue refactoring to a scoped enum if desired. Comments on the
same line as a macro definition or between subsequent macro definitions
are preserved in the output. No formatting is assumed in the provided
replacements.
The check cppcoreguidelines-macro-to-enum is an alias for this check.
Fixes#27408
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117522
This check performs basic analysis of macros and replaces them
with an anonymous unscoped enum. Using an unscoped anonymous enum
ensures that everywhere the macro token was used previously, the
enumerator name may be safely used.
Potential macros for replacement must meet the following constraints:
- Macros must expand only to integral literal tokens. The unary
operators plus, minus and tilde are recognized to allow for positive,
negative and bitwise negated integers.
- Macros must be defined on sequential source file lines, or with
only comment lines in between macro definitions.
- Macros must all be defined in the same source file.
- Macros must not be defined within a conditional compilation block.
- Macros must not be defined adjacent to other preprocessor directives.
- Macros must not be used in preprocessor conditions
Each cluster of macros meeting the above constraints is presumed to
be a set of values suitable for replacement by an anonymous enum.
From there, a developer can give the anonymous enum a name and
continue refactoring to a scoped enum if desired. Comments on the
same line as a macro definition or between subsequent macro definitions
are preserved in the output. No formatting is assumed in the provided
replacements.
The check cppcoreguidelines-macro-to-enum is an alias for this check.
Fixes#27408
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117522
Create a PrettyStackTraceEvent that will dump the current `MatchCallback` id as well as the `BoundNodes` if the 'run' method of a `MatchCallback` results in a crash.
The purpose of this is sometimes clang-tidy checks can crash in the `check` method. And in a large codebase with alot of checks enabled and in a release build, it can be near impossible to figure out which check as well as the source code that caused the crash. Without that information a reproducer is very hard to create.
This is a more generalised version of D118520 which has a nicer integration and should be useful to clients other than clang-tidy.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120185
It cannot match a `pure virtual function`. This patch fixes this behavior.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116439
Commit 416e689ecd introduced a fix to
`readability-suspicious-call-argument` which added an entry to the
Release Notes, but the same change was backported to **14.0** in commit
e89602b7b2ec12f20f2618cefb864c2b22d0048a.
Hence, this change is not a new thing of the to-be 15.0 release.
As originally reported by @steakhal in
http://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54074, the name extraction logic of
`readability-suspicious-call-argument` crashes if the argument passed to a
function was a function call to a non-trivially named entity (e.g. an operator).
Fixed this crash case by ignoring such constructs and considering them as having
no name.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, steakhal
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D120555
The checker missed a check for a case when the parameter is referenced by an lvalue and this could cause build breakages.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117090
This updates all the non-runtime project release notes to use the
version number from CMake instead of the hard-coded version numbers
in conf.py.
It also hides warnings about pre-releases when the git suffix
is dropped from the LLVM version in CMake.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112181
This reverts commit 36892727e4 which
breaks the build when LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY is enabled with:
CMake Error at cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:683 (add_dependencies):
The dependency target "clang-tidy-headers" of target "CTTestTidyModule"
does not exist.
- Sort new checks by check name
- Sort changes to existing checks by check name
- Add docs for changes to readability-simplify-boolean-expr
- Move check changes from "Improvements to clang-tidy" to
"Changes in existing checks" section
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118519
A semicolon-separated list of the names of functions or methods to be considered as not having side-effects was added for bugprone-assert-side-effect. It can be used to exclude methods like iterator::begin/end from being considered as having side-effects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116478
This commit introduces a new check `readability-container-contains` which finds
usages of `container.count()` and `container.find() != container.end()` and
instead recommends the `container.contains()` method introduced in C++20.
For containers which permit multiple entries per key (`multimap`, `multiset`,
...), `contains` is more efficient than `count` because `count` has to do
unnecessary additional work.
While this this performance difference does not exist for containers with only
a single entry per key (`map`, `unordered_map`, ...), `contains` still conveys
the intent better.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun, whisperity
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D112646
Looks for duplicate includes and removes them.
Every time an include directive is processed, check a vector of filenames
to see if the included file has already been included. If so, it issues
a warning and a replacement to remove the entire line containing the
duplicated include directive.
When a macro is defined or undefined, the vector of filenames is cleared.
This enables including the same file multiple times, but getting
different expansions based on the set of active macros at the time of
inclusion. For example:
#undef NDEBUG
#include "assertion.h"
// ...code with assertions enabled
#define NDEBUG
#include "assertion.h"
// ...code with assertions disabled
Since macros are redefined between the inclusion of assertion.h,
they are not flagged as redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D7982
Currently the fix hint is hardcoded to gsl::at(). This poses
a problem for people who, for a number of reasons, don't want
or cannot use the GSL library (introducing a new third-party
dependency into a project is not a minor task).
In these situations, the fix hint does more harm than good
as it creates confusion as to what the fix should be. People
can even misinterpret the fix "gsl::at" as e.g. "std::array::at",
which can lead to even more trouble (e.g. when having guidelines
that disallow exceptions).
Furthermore, this is not a requirement from the C++ Core Guidelines.
simply that array indexing needs to be safe. Each project should
be able to decide upon a strategy for safe indexing.
The fix-it is kept for people who want to use the GSL library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117857
Previously, any macro that didn't look like a varargs macro
or a function style macro was reported with a warning that
it should be replaced with a constexpr const declaration.
This is only reasonable when the macro body contains constants
and not expansions like ",", "[[noreturn]]", "__declspec(xxx)",
etc.
So instead of always issuing a warning about every macro that
doesn't look like a varargs or function style macro, examine the
tokens in the macro and only warn about the macro if it contains
only comment and constant tokens.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116386Fixes#39945
The cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-array-to-pointer-decay check currently
accepts:
const char *b = i ? "foo" : "foobar";
but not
const char *a = i ? "foo" : "bar";
This is because the AST is slightly different in the latter case (see
https://godbolt.org/z/MkHVvs).
This eliminates the inconsistency by making it accept the latter form
as well.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/31155.
Currently, it's inconsistent that warnings are disabled if they
come from system headers, unless they come from macros.
Typically a user cannot act upon these warnings coming from
system macros, so clang-tidy should ignore them unless the
user specifically requests warnings from system headers
via the corresponding configuration.
This change broke the ProTypeVarargCheck check, because it
was checking for the usage of va_arg indirectly, expanding it
(it's a system macro) to detect the usage of __builtin_va_arg.
The check has been fixed by checking directly what the rule
is about: "do not use va_arg", by adding a PP callback that
checks if any macro with name "va_arg" is expanded. The old
AST matcher is still kept for compatibility with Windows.
Add unit test that ensures warnings from macros are disabled
when not using the -system-headers flag. Document the change
in the Release Notes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116378
We want to deal with non-default constructors that just happen to
contain constant initializers. There was already a negative test case,
it is now a positive one. We find and refactor this case:
struct PositiveNotDefaultInt {
PositiveNotDefaultInt(int) : i(7) {}
int i;
};
This change adds an option to disable warnings from the
cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions check on integer to floating-
point conversions which may be narrowing.
An example of a case where this might be useful:
```
std::vector<double> v = {1, 2, 3, 4};
double mean = std::accumulate(v.cbegin(), v.cend(), 0.0) / v.size();
```
The conversion from std::size_t to double is technically narrowing on
64-bit systems, but v almost certainly does not have enough elements
for this to be a problem.
This option would allow the cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions
check to be enabled on codebases which might otherwise turn it off
because of cases like the above.
The purpose of this checker is to flag a missing throw keyword, and does so by checking for the construction of an exception class that is then unused.
This works great except that placement new expressions are also flagged as those lead to the construction of an object as well, even though they are not temporary (as that is dependent on the storage).
This patch fixes the issue by exempting the match if it is within a placement-new.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51939
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115576
Checks for various ways that the `const CharT*` constructor of `std::basic_string_view` can be passed a null argument and replaces them with the default constructor in most cases. For the comparison operators, braced initializer list does not compile so instead a call to `.empty()` or the empty string literal are used, where appropriate.
This prevents code from invoking behavior which is unconditionally undefined. The single-argument `const CharT*` constructor does not check for the null case before dereferencing its input. The standard is slated to add an explicitly-deleted overload to catch some of these cases: wg21.link/p2166
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114823 is a companion change to prevent duplicate warnings from the `bugprone-string-constructor` check.
Reviewed By: ymandel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113148
Fixes PR#47614. Deduction guides, implicit or user-defined, look like
function declarations in the AST. They aren't really functions, though,
and they always have a trailing return type, so it doesn't make sense
to issue this warning for them.
Fabian Wolff