The current FOUND_VAR for FindLibEdit is libedit_FOUND but wasn't set by
find_package_handle_standard_args. However this isn't valid for the
package name.
The argument for FOUND_VAR is "libedit_FOUND", but only "LibEdit_FOUND" and
"LIBEDIT_FOUND" are valid names.
This fixes all the variables set by FindLibEdit to match the desired
naming scheme.
The `-r` option for `command script import` is there for legacy
compatibility, however the can_reload flag is always set to true. This
patch removes the flag and any code that relies on it being false.
- Fix enum entry order.
- Fix missing enum case in CommandObjectBreakpointCommand.
- Add Lua entry to swtich in LanguageToString and simplify the code.
The "none" script interpreter does not depend on Python so it doesn't
make sense to have it withing the if-block. The only goal seems to be to
have a slightly different error for when there's no script interpreter,
but as per the comment this doesn't make sense for more than one
scripting language. I think the existing error is perfectly clear, so I
just removed this altogether.
As suggested by Pavel in a code review:
> Can we replace this (and maybe python too, while at it) with a
> Host/Config.h entry? A global definition means that one has to
> recompile everything when these change in any way, whereas in
> practice only a handful of files need this..
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71280
options class. This value was hanging around so for instance if you made a scripted breakpoint
resolver, then went to set another breakpoint, it would still think you had passed in a class
name and the breakpoint wouldn't do what you expected.
For example, it is pretty easy to write a breakpoint command that implements "stop when my caller is Foo", and
it is pretty easy to write a breakpoint command that implements "stop when my caller is Bar". But there's no
way to write a generic "stop when my caller is..." function, and then specify the caller when you add the
command to a breakpoint.
With this patch, you can pass this data in a SBStructuredData dictionary. That will get stored in
the PythonCommandBaton for the breakpoint, and passed to the implementation function (if it has the right
signature) when the breakpoint is hit. Then in lldb, you can say:
(lldb) break com add -F caller_is -k caller_name -v Foo
More generally this will allow us to write reusable Python breakpoint commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68671
PyClass_Check and everything it relied on seems gone from Python3.7. So
I won't check whether it is a class first...
Also cleaned up a couple of warnings.
llvm-svn: 373679
Use this in the scripted breakpoint command. Added some tests for parsing
the key/value options. This uncovered a bug in handling parsing errors mid-line.
I also fixed that bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68363
llvm-svn: 373673
Summary:
This patch removes File::SetStream() and File::SetDescriptor(),
and replaces most direct uses of File with pointers to File.
Instead of calling SetStream() on a file, we make a new file and
replace it.
My ultimate goal here is to introduce a new API class SBFile, which
has full support for python io.IOStream file objects. These can
redirect read() and write() to python code, so lldb::Files will
need a way to dispatch those methods. Additionally it will need some
form of sharing and assigning files, as a SBFile will be passed in and
assigned to the main IO streams of the debugger.
In my prototype patch queue, I make File itself copyable and add a
secondary class FileOps to manage the sharing and dispatch. In that
case SBFile was a unique_ptr<File>.
(here: https://github.com/smoofra/llvm-project/tree/files)
However in review, Pavel Labath suggested that it be shared_ptr instead.
(here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67793)
In order for SBFile to use shared_ptr<File>, everything else should
as well.
If this patch is accepted, I will make SBFile use a shared_ptr
I will remove FileOps from future patches and use subclasses of File
instead.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, zturner, jingham, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67891
llvm-svn: 373090
Summary:
This patch converts FileSystem::Open from this prototype:
Status
Open(File &File, const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
to this one:
llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<File>>
Open(const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
This is beneficial on its own, as llvm::Expected is a more modern
and recommended error type than Status. It is also a necessary step
towards https://reviews.llvm.org/D67891, and further developments
for lldb_private::File.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67996
llvm-svn: 373003
Summary: Usually, SIGINT and SIGSTOP don't imply a crash, e.g. SIGSTOP is sent on process launch and attach on some platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67776
llvm-svn: 372961
They both return the same result as another function (GetCursorArgumentPrefix
and GetRawLine). They were only added because the old API allowed to look
(in theory) behind the cursor position which is no longer possible.
llvm-svn: 372861
This is the only legitimate use we currently have for modifying
a CompletionRequest. Add a utility function for this purpose
and remove the remaining setters which go against the idea of
having an immutable CompletionRequest.
llvm-svn: 372858
The cursor position is always at the end of the current argument (as the
argument cut off after the cursor position). So this code is a no-op and
can be removed.
llvm-svn: 372851
We currently have two lists in the CompletionRequest that we
inherited from the old API: The complete list of arguments ignoring
where the user requested completion and the list of arguments that
stops at the cursor. Having two lists of arguments is confusing
and can lead to subtle errors, so let's remove the complete list
until we actually need it.
llvm-svn: 372692
The fact that index==-1 means "no arguments" is not obvious and only
used in one place from what I can tell. Also fixes several warnings
about using the cursor index as if it was a size_t when comparing.
Not fully NFC as we now also correctly update the partial argument list
when injecting the fake empty argument in the CompletionRequest
constructor.
llvm-svn: 372566
We should in general not allow external code to fiddle with the internals of
CompletionRequest, but until this is gone let's at least provide a utility
function that makes this less dangerous.
This also now correct updates the partially parsed argument list,
but it doesn't seem to be used by anything that is behind one of
the current shift/SetCursorIndex calls, so this doesn't seeem to
fix any currently used completion.
llvm-svn: 372556
The StringRef should always be identical to the C string, so we
might as well just create the StringRef from the C-string. This
might be slightly slower until we implement the storage of ArgEntry
with a string instead of a std::unique_ptr<char[]>. Until then we
have to do the additional strlen on the C string to construct the
StringRef.
llvm-svn: 371842
The bugreport command exists to create domain-specific bug reports.
Currently it has one implementation for filing bugs on the unwinder. As
far as we can tell, it has never been of use. Although not exactly the
same as the reproducers, it's a bit confusing to have two parallel
command trees for (kind of) the same thing.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65469
llvm-svn: 371132
Summary:
Right now our argument completions are rather cryptic for command options as they only list the letters:
```
(lldb) breakpoint set -
Available completions:
-G
-C
-c
-d
-i
-o
-q
-t
-x
[...]
```
With the new completion API we can easily extend this with the flag description so that it looks like this now:
```
(lldb) breakpoint set -
Available completions:
-G -- The breakpoint will auto-continue after running its commands.
-C -- A command to run when the breakpoint is hit, can be provided more than once, the commands will get run in order left to right.
-c -- The breakpoint stops only if this condition expression evaluates to true.
-d -- Disable the breakpoint.
-i -- Set the number of times this breakpoint is skipped before stopping.
-o -- The breakpoint is deleted the first time it stop causes a stop.
-q -- The breakpoint stops only for threads in the queue whose name is given by this argument.
-t -- The breakpoint stops only for the thread whose TID matches this argument.
-x -- The breakpoint stops only for the thread whose index matches this argument.
```
The same happens with --long-options now.
Reviewers: #lldb, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67063
llvm-svn: 370628
Summary:
We currently have several CommandObjects that manually reimplement the checking for a selected target
or a target in the execution context (which is the selected target when they are invoked). This patch removes
all these checks and replaces them by setting the eCommandRequiresTarget flag that Pavel suggested. With
this flag we are doing the same check but without having to duplicate this code in all these CommandObjects.
I also added a `GetSelectedTarget()` variant of the `GetSelectedOrDummyTarget()` function to the
CommandObject that checks that the flag is set and then returns a reference to the target. I didn't rewrite
all the `target` variables from `Target *` to `Target &` in this patch as last time this change caused a lot of merge
conflicts in Swift and I would prefer having that in a separate NFC commit.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, jingham, amccarth, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66863
llvm-svn: 370571
The refactoring patch for the option completion broke the completion
for ambiguous long options. As this feature was also untested (as
testing ambiguous options with the current test methods is impossible),
I just noticed now. This patch restores the old behavior and adds a
test for this feature.
llvm-svn: 370185
Summary:
We always have a dummy target, so any error handling regarding a missing dummy target is dead code now.
Also makes the CommandObject methods that return Target& to express this fact in the API.
This patch just for the CommandObject part of LLDB. I'll migrate the rest of LLDB in a follow-up patch that's WIP.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66737
llvm-svn: 369939
This patch is also motivated by the Swift branch and is effectively NFC for the single-TypeSystem llvm.org branch.
In multi-language projects it is extremely common to have, e.g., a
Clang type and a similarly-named rendition of that same type in
another language. When searching for a type It is much cheaper to pass
a set of supported languages to the SymbolFile than having it
materialize every result and then rejecting the materialized types
that have the wrong language.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66546
<rdar://problem/54471165>
This reapplies r369690 with a previously missing constructor for LanguageSet.
llvm-svn: 369710
This patch is also motivated by the Swift branch and is effectively NFC for the single-TypeSystem llvm.org branch.
In multi-language projects it is extremely common to have, e.g., a
Clang type and a similarly-named rendition of that same type in
another language. When searching for a type It is much cheaper to pass
a set of supported languages to the SymbolFile than having it
materialize every result and then rejecting the materialized types
that have the wrong language.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66546
<rdar://problem/54471165>
llvm-svn: 369690
Summary:
We currently have a bunch of code that is supposed to handle invalid command options, but
all this code is unreachable because invalid options are already handled in `Options::Parse`.
The only way we can reach this code is when we declare but then not implement an option
(which will be made impossible with D65386, which is also when we can completely remove
the `default` cases).
This patch replaces all this code with `llvm_unreachable` to make clear this is dead code
that can't be reached.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66522
llvm-svn: 369625
Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:
* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.
I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.
A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:
* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.
Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).
* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).
* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).
This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.
For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).
I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536
llvm-svn: 369624
Jonas Devlieghere