These tests were unconditionally asserting that optional and unique_ptr declare throwing hashes, but MSVC++ implements conditional noexcept forwarding that of the underlying hash function. As a result we were failing these tests but there's nothing forbidding strengthening noexcept in that way.
Changed the ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT asserts to use types which themselves have non-noexcept hash functions.
llvm-svn: 299734
The tests for libc++ specify -target on the command-line to the
compiler, but this is problematic for a few reasons.
Firstly, the -target option isn't supported on Apple platforms. Parts
of the triple get dropped and ignored. Instead, software should be
compiled with a combination of the -arch and -m<name>-version-min
options.
Secondly, the generic "darwin" target references a kernel version
instead of a platform version. Each platform has its own independent
versions (with different versions of libc++.1.dylib), independent of the
version of the Darwin kernel.
This commit adds support to the LIT infrastructure for testing against
Apple platforms using -arch and -platform options.
If the host is not on OS X, or the compiler type is not clang or apple-clang, then this commit has NFC.
If the host is on OS X and --param=target_triple=... is specified, then a warning is emitted to use arch and platform instead. Besides the warning, there's NFC.
If the host is on OS X and *no* target-triple is specified, then use the new deployment target logic. This uses two new lit parameters, --param=arch=<arch> and --param=platform=<platform>. <platform> has the form <name>[<version>].
By default, arch is auto-detected from clang -dumpmachine, and platform is "macosx".
If the platform doesn't have a version:
For "macosx", the version is auto-detected from the host system using sw_vers. This may give a different version than the SDK, since new SDKs can be installed on older hosts.
Otherwise, the version is auto-detected from the SDK version using xcrun --show-sdk-path.
-arch <arch> -m<name>-version-min=<version> is added to the compiler flags.
The target triple is computed as <arch>-apple-<platform>. It is *not* passed to clang, but it is available for XFAIL and UNSUPPORTED (as is with_system_cxx_lib=<target>).
For convenience, apple-darwin and <arch>-apple-darwin are added to the set of available features.
There were a number of tests marked to XFAIL on x86_64-apple-darwin11
and x86_64-apple-darwin12. I updated these to
x86_64-apple-macosx10.7 and x86_64-apple-macosx10.8.
llvm-svn: 297798
These tests are failing in XCode 8.0, 8.1, and 8.2, but not in Xcode
8.3. Annoyingly the version numbering for clang does not follow Xcode
and is bumped to 8.1 only in Xcode 8.3. So Xfailing apple-clang-8.0
should catch all cases here.
llvm-svn: 296704
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR32097 by using the __is_abstract
builtin type-trait instead of the previous library-only implementation.
All supported compilers provide this trait. I've tested as far
back as Clang 3.2, GCC 4.6 and MSVC trunk.
llvm-svn: 296561
Summary:
`ConstexprTestTypes::NoCtors` is an aggregate type (and consequently a literal type) in C++17,
but not in C++14 since it has a base class. This patch updates the comment to accurately describe the reason for the XFAIL.
Reviewers: EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30481
llvm-svn: 296558
A static assertion was misfiring since it checked
is_callable<Visitor, decltype(__variant_alt<T>.value)>. However
the decltype expression doesn't capture the value category as
required. This patch applies extra braces to decltype to fix
that.
llvm-svn: 294612
In addition to the PR for LWG 2773 this patch also ensures
that each of std::ignores constructors or assignment operators
are constexpr.
llvm-svn: 294165
When compiled with Clang for Windows, this was emitting "enumerator value
evaluates to 4294967295, which cannot be narrowed to type 'int' [-Wc++11-narrowing]".
The test should more strenuously avoid poking this ABI deficiency (and it
already has coverage for explicitly specified underlying types).
Fixes D29140.
llvm-svn: 294159
test/std/strings/string.classes/typedefs.pass.cpp
Actually test what basic_string's typedefs stand for.
test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/result_of11.pass.cpp
NotDerived and ND were completely unused.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.pair/default.pass.cpp
P2 was mistakenly not being used. Yes, that's
right: -Wunused-local-typedef CAUGHT A MISTAKE! AMAZING!
Fixes D29137.
llvm-svn: 294156
Pending LIT changes are about to remove the REQUIRES-ANY keyword
in place of supporting boolean && and || within "REQUIRES". This
patch prepares libc++ for that change so that when applied
the bots don't lose their mind.
llvm-svn: 292901
Summary:
Exactly what the title says.
This patch also adds a `std::hash<nullptr_t>` specialization in C++17, but it was not added by this paper and I can't find the actual paper that adds it.
See http://wg21.link/P0513R0 for more info.
If there are no comments in the next couple of days I'll commit this
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28938
llvm-svn: 292684
MSVC has compiler warnings C4127 "conditional expression is constant" (enabled
by /W4) and C6326 "Potential comparison of a constant with another constant"
(enabled by /analyze). They're potentially useful, although they're slightly
annoying to library devs who know what they're doing. In the latest version of
the compiler, C4127 is suppressed when the compiler sees simple tests like
"if (name_of_thing)", so extracting comparison expressions into named
constants is a workaround. At the same time, using std::integral_constant
avoids C6326, which doesn't look at template arguments.
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/emplace.pass.cpp
Replace 1 == 1 with true, which is the same as far as the library is concerned.
Fixes D28837.
llvm-svn: 292432
This is the subject of an active NB comment. Regardless of what the Working
Paper currently says, asking this question is morally wrong, because the
answer can change when the type is completed. C1XX now detects such
precondition violations and complains about them; perhaps Clang should too.
Fixes D28591.
llvm-svn: 292281
The test was previously set to XFAIL if __cpp_structured_bindings
wasn't defined. However there are Clang 4.0 versions which do not
define this macro but do provide structured bindings, which causes
the test to pass unexpectedly.
This patch changes the XFAIL to an UNSUPPORTED.
llvm-svn: 291060
In ABI v1 libc++ implements std::pointer_safety as a class type instead
of an enumeration. However this class type does not provide
a default constructor as it should. This patch adds that default constructor.
llvm-svn: 291059
In the C++ standard `std::pointer_safety` is defined
as a C++11 strongly typed enum. However libc++ currently defines
it as a class type which simulates a C++11 enumeration. This
can be detected in valid C++ code.
This patch introduces an the _LIBCPP_ABI_POINTER_SAFETY_ENUM_TYPE ABI option.
When defined `std::pointer_safety` is implemented as an enum type.
Unfortunatly this also means it can no longer be provided as an extension
in C++03.
Additionally this patch moves the definition for `get_pointer_safety()`
out of the dylib, and into the headers. New usages of `get_pointer_safety()`
will now use the inline version instead of the dylib version. However in
order to keep the dylib ABI compatible the old definition is explicitly
compiled into it.
llvm-svn: 291046
Summary:
This patch attempts to re-implement a fix for LWG 2770, but not the actual specified PR.
The PR for 2770 specifies tuple_size<T const> as only conditionally providing a `::value` member. However C++17 structured bindings require `tuple_size<T const>` to be complete only if `tuple_size<T>` is also complete. Therefore this patch implements only provides the specialization `tuple_size<T CV>` iff `tuple_size<T>` is a complete type.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR31513.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, mpark
Subscribers: mpark, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28222
llvm-svn: 291019
These tests were using malloc()'s return value without checking for null,
which MSVC's /analyze rightly warns about. Asserting that the pointer is
non-null both expresses the test's intention and silences the warning.
Fixes D27785.
llvm-svn: 290921
This patch implements the correct PR for LWG 2770. It also makes the primary
tuple_size template incomplete again which fixes part of llvm.org/PR31513.
llvm-svn: 290846
This patch reverts the changes to tuple which fixed construction from
types derived from tuple. It breaks the code mentioned in llvm.org/PR31384.
I'll follow this commit up with a test case.
llvm-svn: 289773
Summary:
The standard requires tuple have the following constructors:
```
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> const&);
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> &&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> const&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> &&);
tuple(array<T, N> const&);
tuple(array<T, N> &&);
```
However libc++ implements these as a single constructor with the signature:
```
template <class TupleLike, enable_if_t<__is_tuple_like<TupleLike>::value>>
tuple(TupleLike&&);
```
This causes the constructor to reject types derived from tuple-like types; Unlike if we had all of the concrete overloads, because they cause the derived->base conversion in the signature.
This patch fixes this issue by detecting derived types and the tuple-like base they are derived from. It does this by creating an overloaded function with signatures for each of tuple/pair/array and checking if the possibly derived type can convert to any of them.
This patch fixes [PR17550]( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17550)
This patch
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, mpark, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27606
llvm-svn: 289727
test/support/test_macros.h
For convenience/greppability, add macros for libcxx-specific static_asserts about noexceptness.
(Moving the definitions of ASSERT_NOEXCEPT/ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT isn't technically necessary
because they're macros, but I think it's better style to define stuff before using it.)
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.apply/apply.pass.cpp
There was a completely unused `TrackedCallable obj;`.
apply() isn't depicted with conditional noexcept in C++17.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.apply/make_from_tuple.pass.cpp
Now that we have LIBCPP_ASSERT_NOEXCEPT, use it.
Fixes D27622.
llvm-svn: 289264
This patch removes libc++'s tuple extension which allowed it to be
constructed from fewer initializers than elements; with the remaining
elements being default constructed. However the implicit version of
this extension breaks conforming code. For example:
int fun(std::string);
int fun(std::tuple<std::string, int>);
int x = fun("hello"); // ambigious
Because existing code may already depend on this extension it can be re-enabled
by defining _LIBCPP_ENABLE_TUPLE_IMPLICIT_REDUCED_ARITY_EXTENSION.
Note that the explicit version of this extension is still supported,
although it's somewhat less useful than the implicit one.
llvm-svn: 289158
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/input.streams/istream.unformatted/get.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because basic_istream::get() returns int_type (N4606 27.7.2.3 [istream.unformatted]/4).
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/output.streams/ostream.formatted/ostream.inserters.arithmetic/minus1.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because toupper() returns int (C11 7.4.2.2/1).
test/std/iterators/stream.iterators/ostream.iterator/ostream.iterator.ops/assign_t.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing doubles to ostream_iterator<int>.
It's silencing -Wliteral-conversion for Clang, so I'm adding C4244 silencing for MSVC.
test/std/language.support/support.limits/limits/numeric.limits.members/infinity.pass.cpp
Given `extern float zero;`, the expression `1./zero` has type double, which emits a truncation warning
when being passed to test<float>() taking float. The fix is to say `1.f/zero` which has type float.
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/arg.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/norm.pass.cpp
These tests were constructing std::complex<double>(x, 0), emitting truncation warnings when x is long long.
Saying static_cast<double>(x) avoids this.
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/seed_result_type.pass.cpp
This was using `int s` to construct and seed a linear_congruential_engine<T, stuff>, where T is
unsigned short/unsigned int/unsigned long/unsigned long long. That emits a truncation warning in the
unsigned short case. Because the range [0, 20) is tiny and we aren't doing anything else with the index,
we can just iterate with `T s`.
test/std/re/re.traits/value.pass.cpp
regex_traits<wchar_t>::value()'s first parameter is wchar_t (N4606 28.7 [re.traits]/13). This loop is
using int to iterate through ['g', 0xFFFF), emitting a truncation warning from int to wchar_t
(which is 16-bit for some of us). Because the bound is exclusive, we can just iterate with wchar_t.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/size_char_alloc.pass.cpp
This test is a little strange. It's trying to verify that basic_string's (InIt, InIt) range constructor
isn't confused by "N copies of C" when N and C have the same integral type. To do this, it was
testing (100, 65), but that eventually emits truncation warnings from int to char. There's a simple way
to avoid this - passing (static_cast<char>(100), static_cast<char>(65)) also exercises the disambiguation.
(And 100 is representable even when char has a signed range.)
test/std/strings/string.view/string.view.hash/string_view.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char_type> because `'0' + i` has type int.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/bind/func.bind/func.bind.bind/nested.pass.cpp
What's more horrible than nested bind()? pow() overloads! This operator()(T a, T b) was assuming that
std::pow(a, b) can be returned as T. (In this case, T is int.) However, N4606 26.9.1 [cmath.syn]/2
says that pow(int, int) returns double, so this was truncating double to int.
Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/unord.hash/integral.pass.cpp
This was iterating `for (int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i)` and constructing `T t(i);` but that's truncating
when T is short. (And super truncating when T is bool.) Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/utility/exchange/exchange.pass.cpp
First, this was exchanging 67.2 into an int, but that's inherently truncating.
Changing this to static_cast<short>(67) avoids the truncation while preserving the
"what if T and U are different" test coverage.
Second, this was exchanging {} with the explicit type float into an int, and that's also
inherently truncating. Specifying short is just as good.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.spec/make_pair.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<short>. Note that this affects template argument deduction for make_pair(),
better fulfilling the test's intent. For example, this was saying
`typedef std::pair<int, short> P1; P1 p1 = std::make_pair(3, 4);` but that was asking
make_pair() to return pair<int, int>, which was then being converted to pair<int, short>.
(pair's converting constructors are tested elsewhere.)
Now, std::make_pair(3, static_cast<short>(4)) actually returns pair<int, short>.
(There's still a conversion from pair<nullptr_t, short> to pair<unique_ptr<int>, short>.)
Fixes D27544.
llvm-svn: 289111
Instead of storing double in double and then truncating to int, store int in long
and then widen to long long. This preserves test coverage (as these tests are
interested in various tuple conversions) while avoiding truncation warnings.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/const_pair.pass.cpp
Since we aren't physically truncating anymore, t1 is equal to p0.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/convert_copy.pass.cpp
One edit is different from the usual pattern. Previously, we were storing
double in double and then converting to A, which has an implicitly converting
constructor from int. Now, we're storing int in int and then converting to A,
avoiding the truncation.
Fixes D27542.
llvm-svn: 289109
Change char to long and remove some char casts. This preserves test coverage for tuple's
heterogeneous comparisons, while avoiding int-to-char truncation warnings.
Fixes D27541.
llvm-svn: 289108
These tests for some guy's transparent operator functors were needlessly truncating their
double results to int. Preserving the doubleness makes compilers happier. I'm following
existing practice by adding an "// exact in binary" comment when the result isn't a whole number.
(The changes from 6 to 6.0 and so forth are stylistic, not critical.)
Fixes D27539.
llvm-svn: 289106
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/copy_alloc.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/copy_alloc.pass.cpp
Change "unsigned s = x.size();" to "typename C::size_type s = x.size();"
because that's what it returns.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/pointer_alloc.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef>, then change "unsigned n = T::length(s);"
to "std::size_t n = T::length(s);" because that's what char_traits returns.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/substr.pass.cpp
Change unsigned to typename S::size_type because that's what str.size() returns.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
This was needlessly truncating std::size_t to unsigned.
It's being used to compare and initialize std::size_t.
llvm-svn: 288753
Use static_cast<int> when storing size_t in int (or passing size_t to int).
Also, remove a spurious semicolon in test/support/archetypes.hpp.
test/support/count_new.hpp
Additionally, change data members (and parameters) to size_t.
llvm-svn: 288752
Various changes:
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.merge/inplace_merge.pass.cpp
This is comparing value_type to unsigned. value_type is sometimes int and sometimes struct S (implicitly constructible from int).
static_cast<value_type>(unsigned) silences the warning and doesn't do anything bad (as the values in question are small).
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.nth.element/nth_element_comp.pass.cpp
This is comparing an int remote-element to size_t. The values in question are small and non-negative,
so either type is fine. I think that converting int to size_t is marginally better here than the reverse.
test/std/containers/sequences/deque/deque.cons/size.pass.cpp
DefaultOnly::count is int (and non-negative). When comparing to unsigned, use static_cast<unsigned>.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.access/index.pass.cpp
We're comparing char to '0' through '9', but formed with the type size_t. Add static_cast<char>.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef> for pedantic correctness (this test was already mentioning std::size_t).
"v[i] == (i & 1)" was comparing bool to size_t. Saying "v[i] == ((i & 1) != 0)" smashes the RHS to bool.
llvm-svn: 288749
This patch overhalls the libc++ test format/configuration in order to fully support modules. By "fully support" I mean get almost all of the tests passing. The main hurdle for doing this is handling tests that `#define _LIBCPP_FOO` macros to test a different configuration. This patch deals with these tests in the following ways:
1. For tests that define single `_LIBCPP_ABI_FOO` macros have been annotated with `// MODULES_DEFINES: _LIBCPP_ABI_FOO`. This allows the test suite to define the macro on the command line so it uses a different set of modules.
2. Tests for libc++'s debug mode (which define custom `_LIBCPP_ASSERT`) are automatically detected by the test suite and are compiled and run with modules disabled.
This patch also cleans up how the `CXXCompiler` helper class handles enabling/disabling language features.
NOTE: This patch uses `LIT` features which were only committed to LLVM today. If this patch breaks running the libc++ tests you probably need to update LLVM.
llvm-svn: 288728
The Standard doesn't provide any guarantees beyond "valid but unspecified" for
moved-from std::functions. libcxx moves from small targets and leaves them
there, while MSVC's STL empties out the source. Mark these assertions as
libcxx-specific.
llvm-svn: 287382
N4582 17.6.3.5 [allocator.requirements] says that allocators are given
cv-unqualified object types, and N4582 20.9.9 [default.allocator]
implies that allocator<const T> is ill-formed (due to colliding
address() overloads). Therefore, tests for allocator<const T>
should be marked as libcxx-specific (if not removed outright).
llvm-svn: 287381
Bitset tests feature a sequence of tests of increasing bitset sizes,
but these tests rely on exceptions when the bitset size is less than
50 elements.
This change adds a flag to tell whether a test should throw. If it must
throw it will be skipped under no-exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26140
llvm-svn: 286474
This replaces every occurrence of _LIBCPP_STD_VER in the tests with
TEST_STD_VER. Additionally, for every affected
file, #include "test_macros.h" is being added explicitly if it wasn't
already there.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26294
llvm-svn: 286007
Previously __libcpp_is_constructible checked the validity of reference
construction using 'eat<To>(declval<From>())' but this doesn't consider
From's explicit conversion operators. This patch teaches __libcpp_is_constructible
how to handle these cases. To do this we need to check the validity
using 'static_cast<To>(declval<From>())'. Unfortunately static_cast allows
additional base-to-derived and lvalue-to-rvalue conversions, which have to be
checked for and manually rejected.
While implementing these changes I discovered that Clang incorrectly
rejects `static_cast<int&&>(declval<float&>())` even though
`int &&X(declval<float&>())` is well formed. In order to tolerate this bug
the `__eat<T>(...)` needs to be left in-place. Otherwise it could be replaced
entirely with the new static_cast implementation.
Thanks to Walter Brown for providing the test cases.
llvm-svn: 285786
This is a follow up of D24562.
These tests do not check anything but exceptions, so it makes sense to mark
them as UNSUPPORTED under a library built without exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26075
llvm-svn: 285550
Fixes MS issues 63, 64, and 65.
test/std/utilities/any/any.class/any.cons/move.pass.cpp:
* "Moves are always destructive" is not a portable assumption; check with LIBCPP_ASSERT.
test/std/utilities/any/any.class/any.cons/value.pass.cpp:
* The standard does not forbid initializing std::any from any pointer-to-function type. Remove the non-conforming "DecayTag" test.
test/std/utilities/any/any.class/any.modifiers/swap.pass.cpp:
* Self-swap is not specified to perform no moves; check with LIBCPP_ASSERT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26007
llvm-svn: 285234
Summary:
On FreeBSD, for ABI compatibility reasons, the pair trivial copy
constructor is disabled, using the aptly-named
`_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_ABI_DISABLE_PAIR_TRIVIAL_COPY_CTOR` define.
Disable the related tests when this define is on, so they don't fail
unexpectedly.
Reviewers: emaste, rsmith, theraven, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25449
llvm-svn: 284047
Summary:
Adapt implementation of Library Fundamentals TS optional into an implementation of N4606 optional.
- Update relational operators per http://wg21.link/P0307
- Update to requirements of http://wg21.link/P0032
- Extension: Implement trivial copy/move construction/assignment for `optional<T>` when `T` is trivially copyable.
Audit P/Rs for optional LWG issues:
- 2756 "C++ WP optional<T> should 'forward' T's implicit conversions" Implemented, which also resolves 2753 "Optional's constructors and assignments need constraints" (modulo my refusal to explicitly delete the move operations, which is a design error that I'm working on correcting in the 2756 P/R).
- 2736 "nullopt_t insufficiently constrained" Already conforming. I've added a test ensuring that `nullopt_t` is not copy-initializable from an empty braced-init-list, which I believe is the root intent of the issue, to avoid regression.
- 2740 "constexpr optional<T>::operator->" Already conforming.
- 2746 "Inconsistency between requirements for emplace between optional and variant" No P/R, but note that the author's '"suggested resolution" is already implemented.
- 2748 "swappable traits for optionals" Already conforming.
- 2753 "Optional's constructors and assignments need constraints" Implemented.
Most of the work for this patch was done by Casey Carter @ Microsoft. Thank you Casey!
Reviewers: mclow.lists, CaseyCarter, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22741
llvm-svn: 283980
This patch is largely thanks to Casey Carter @ Microsoft. He did the initial
work of porting our experimental implementation and tests over to namespace
std.
llvm-svn: 283977
__builtin_addressof was added to the GCC trunk in the past week. This patch
teaches libc++ about it so it can correctly provide constexpr addressof.
Unfortunately this patch will break users of earlier GCC 7 builds, since
we expect __builtin_addressof but one won't be provided. One option would be
to only use __builtin_addressof for GCC 7.1 and above, but that means
waiting for another release.
Instead I've specifically chosen to break older GCC 7 versions. Since GCC 7
has yet to be released, and the 7.0 release is a development release, I
believe that anybody currently using GCC 7.0 will have no issue upgrading.
llvm-svn: 283715
* Fix self-swap. Patch from Casey Carter.
* Remove workarounds and tests for types with deleted move constructors. This
was originally added as part of a LWG proposed resolution that has since
changed.
* Re-apply most recent PR for LWG 2769.
* Re-apply most recent PR for LWG 2754. Specifically fix the SFINAE checks to
use the decayed type.
* Fix tests to allow moved-from std::any's to have a non-empty state. This is
the behavior of MSVC's std::any.
* Various whitespace and test fixes.
llvm-svn: 283606
Summary:
`std::move` and `std::forward` were not marked constexpr in C++11. This can be very damaging because it makes otherwise constant expressions non-constant. For example:
```
#include <utility>
template <class T>
struct Foo {
constexpr Foo(T&& tx) : t(std::move(tx)) {}
T t;
};
[[clang::require_constant_initialization]] Foo<int> f(42); // Foo should be constant initialized but C++11 move is not constexpr. As a result `f` is an unsafe global.
```
This patch applies `constexpr` to `move` and `forward` as an extension in C++11. Normally the library is not allowed to add `constexpr` because it may be observable to the user. In particular adding constexpr may cause valid code to stop compiling. However these problems only happen in more complex situations, like making `__invoke(...)` constexpr. `forward` and `move` are simply enough that applying `constexpr` is safe.
Note that libstdc++ has offered this extension since at least 4.8.1.
Most of the changes in this patch are simply test cleanups or additions. The main changes in the tests are:
* Fold all `forward_N.fail.cpp` tests into a single `forward.fail.cpp` test using -verify.
* Delete most `move_only_N.fail.cpp` tests because they weren't actually testing anything.
* Fold `move_copy.pass.cpp` and `move_only.pass.cpp` into a single `move.pass.cpp` test.
* Add return type and noexcept tests for `forward` and `move`.
Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: K-ballo, loladiro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24637
llvm-svn: 282439
Summary:
Libc++ still uses per-feature configuration macros when configuring for C++11. However libc++ requires a feature-complete C++11 compiler so there is no reason to check individual features. This patch starts the process of removing the feature specific macros and replacing their usage with `_LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG`.
This patch removes the __config macros:
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_TRAILING_RETURN
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_TEMPLATE_ALIASES
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ADVANCED_SFINAE
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_DEFAULT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGS
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_STATIC_ASSERT
As a drive I also changed our C++03 static_assert to use _Static_assert if available.
I plan to commit this without review if nobody voices an objection.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24895
llvm-svn: 282347
This assignment operator was previously broken since the SFINAE always resulted
in substitution failure. This caused assignments to turn into
copy construction + assignment.
This patch was originally committed as r279953 but was reverted due to warnings
in the test-suite. This new patch corrects those warnings.
llvm-svn: 279955
This assignment operator was previously broken since the SFINAE always resulted
in substitution failure. This caused assignments to turn into
copy construction + assignment.
llvm-svn: 279953
Marshall Clow