As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Just as as llvm IR supports explicitly specifying numeric value ids
for instructions, and emits them by default in textual output, now do
the same for blocks.
This is a slightly incompatible change in the textual IR format.
Previously, llvm would parse numeric labels as string names. E.g.
define void @f() {
br label %"55"
55:
ret void
}
defined a label *named* "55", even without needing to be quoted, while
the reference required quoting. Now, if you intend a block label which
looks like a value number to be a name, you must quote it in the
definition too (e.g. `"55":`).
Previously, llvm would print nameless blocks only as a comment, and
would omit it if there was no predecessor. This could cause confusion
for readers of the IR, just as unnamed instructions did prior to the
addition of "%5 = " syntax, back in 2008 (PR2480).
Now, it will always print a label for an unnamed block, with the
exception of the entry block. (IMO it may be better to print it for
the entry-block as well. However, that requires updating many more
tests.)
Thus, the following is supported, and is the canonical printing:
define i32 @f(i32, i32) {
%3 = add i32 %0, %1
br label %4
4:
ret i32 %3
}
New test cases covering this behavior are added, and other tests
updated as required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58548
llvm-svn: 356789
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38807, which occurred
while compiling SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp with clang and GVNHoist
enabled. In the following example:
1=def(entry)
/ \
2=def(1) 4=def(1)
3=def(2) 5=def(4)
When removing the MemoryDef 2=def(1) from its basic block, and just
before adding it to the end of the parent basic block, we first
replace all its uses with the defining memory access:
3=def(2) -> 3=def(1)
Then we call insertDef for adding 2=def(1) to the parent basic block,
where we replace the uses of 1=def(entry) with 2=def(1). Doing so we
create a self reference:
2=def(1) -> 2=def(2) (bad)
3=def(1) -> 3=def(2) (ok)
4=def(1) -> 4=def(2) (ok)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51801
llvm-svn: 341947
This patch makes the DoesKMove argument non-optional, to force people
to think about it. Most cases where it is false are either code hoisting
or code sinking, where we pick one instruction from a set of
equal instructions among different code paths.
Reviewers: dberlin, nlopes, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47475
llvm-svn: 340606
Bug fix for PR37445. The underlying problem and its fix are similar to PR37808.
The bug lies in MemorySSAUpdater::getPreviousDefRecursive(), where PhiOps is
computed before the call to tryRemoveTrivialPhi() and it ends up being out of
date, pointing to stale data. We have now turned each of the PhiOps into a
TrackingVH<MemoryAccess>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49425
llvm-svn: 337680
Bug fix for PR36787. When reasoning if it's safe to hoist a load we
want to make sure that the defining memory access dominates the new
insertion point of the hoisted instruction. safeToHoistLdSt calls
firstInBB(InsertionPoint,DefiningAccess) which returns false if
InsertionPoint == DefiningAccess, and therefore it falsely thinks
it's safe to hoist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49555
llvm-svn: 337674
Bug fix for PR37808. The regression test is a reduced version of the
original reproducer attached to the bug report. As stated in the report,
the problem was that InsertedPHIs was keeping dangling pointers to
deleted Memory-Phis. MemoryPhis are created eagerly and sometimes get
zapped shortly afterwards. I've used WeakVH instead of an expensive
removal operation from the active workset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48372
llvm-svn: 337149
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
Fix PR36484, as suggested:
<quote>
during moves, mark the direct users of the erased things that were phis as "not to be optimized"
<quote>
llvm-svn: 329621
MemorySSAUpdater::getPreviousDefRecursive is a recursive algorithm, for
each block, it computes the previous definition for each predecessor,
then takes those definitions and combines them. But currently it doesn't
remember results which it already computed; this means it can visit the
same block multiple times, which adds up to exponential time overall.
To fix this, this patch adds a cache. If we computed the result for a
block already, we don't need to visit it again because we'll come up
with the same result. Well, unless we RAUW a MemoryPHI; in that case,
the TrackingVH will be updated automatically.
This matches the original source paper for this algorithm.
The testcase isn't really a test for the bug, but it adds coverage for
the case where tryRemoveTrivialPhi erases an existing PHI node. (It's
hard to write a good regression test for a performance issue.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44715
llvm-svn: 328577
w.r.t. the paper
"A Practical Improvement to the Partial Redundancy Elimination in SSA Form"
(https://sites.google.com/site/jongsoopark/home/ssapre.pdf)
Proper dominance check was missing here, so having a loopinfo should not be required.
Committing this diff as this fixes the bug, if there are
further concerns, I'll be happy to work on them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39781
llvm-svn: 320607
This patch implements Chandler's idea [0] for supporting languages that
require support for infinite loops with side effects, such as Rust, providing
part of a solution to bug 965 [1].
Specifically, it adds an `llvm.sideeffect()` intrinsic, which has no actual
effect, but which appears to optimization passes to have obscure side effects,
such that they don't optimize away loops containing it. It also teaches
several optimization passes to ignore this intrinsic, so that it doesn't
significantly impact optimization in most cases.
As discussed on llvm-dev [2], this patch is the first of two major parts.
The second part, to change LLVM's semantics to have defined behavior
on infinite loops by default, with a function attribute for opting into
potential-undefined-behavior, will be implemented and posted for review in
a separate patch.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-July/088103.html
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965
[2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118632.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38336
llvm-svn: 317729
Factor out the reachability such that multiple queries to find reachability of values are fast. This is based on finding
the ANTIC points
in the CFG which do not change during hoisting. The ANTIC points are basically the dominance-frontiers in the inverse
graph. So we introduce a data structure (CHI nodes)
to keep track of values flowing out of a basic block. We only do this for values with multiple occurrences in the
function as they are the potential hoistable candidates.
This patch allows us to hoist instructions to a basic block with >2 successors, as well as deal with infinite loops in a
trivial way.
Relevant test cases are added to show the functionality as well as regression fixes from PR32821.
Regression from previous GVNHoist:
We do not hoist fully redundant expressions because fully redundant expressions are already handled by NewGVN
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35918
Reviewers: dberlin, sebpop, gberry,
llvm-svn: 313116
also a discussion about exactly what we should do prior to re-enabling
it.
The current bug is http://llvm.org/PR32821 and the discussion about this
is in the review thread for r300200.
llvm-svn: 301505
A block with an UnreachableInst does not transfer execution to a successor.
The problem was exposed by GVN-hoist. This patch fixes bug 32153.
Patch by Aditya Kumar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30667
llvm-svn: 297254
This re-applies r289696, which caused TSan perf regression, which has
since been addressed in separate changes (see PR for details).
See PR31382.
llvm-svn: 296759
This reverts commit r294250. It caused PR31891.
Add a test case that shows that inlinable calls retain location
information with an accurate scope.
llvm-svn: 294317
Summary:
GVNHoist performs all the optimizations that MLSM does to loads, in a
more general way, and in a faster time bound (MLSM is N^3 in most
cases, N^4 in a few edge cases).
This disables the load portion.
Note that the way ld_hoist_st_sink.ll is written makes one think that
the loads should be moved to the while.preheader block, but
1. Neither MLSM nor GVNHoist do it (they both move them to identical places).
2. MLSM couldn't possibly do it anyway, as the while.preheader block
is not the head of the diamond, while.body is. (GVNHoist could do it
if it was legal).
3. At a glance, it's not legal anyway because the in-loop load
conflict with the in-loop store, so the loads must stay in-loop.
I am happy to update the test to use update_test_checks so that
checking is tighter, just was going to do it as a followup.
Note that i can find no particular benefit to the store portion on any
real testcase/benchmark i have (even size-wise). If we really still
want it, i am happy to commit to writing a targeted store sinker, just
taking the code from the MemorySSA port of MergedLoadStoreMotion
(which is N^2 worst case, and N most of the time).
We can do what it does in a much better time bound.
We also should be both hoisting and sinking stores, not just sinking
them, anyway, since whether we should hoist or sink to merge depends
basically on luck of the draw of where the blockers are placed.
Nonetheless, i have left it alone for now.
Reviewers: chandlerc, davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29079
llvm-svn: 292971
Summary:
Move GVNHoist to later in the optimization pipeline, specifically, to
the function simplification part of the pipeline. The new pipeline
location allows GVNHoist to run on a function after its callees have
been inlined but before the function has been considered for inlining
into its callers, exposing more opportunities for hoisting.
Performance results on AArch64 kryo:
Improvements:
Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench -24.952%
spec2006/bzip2 -4.071%
internal bmark -3.177%
Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p -1.754%
spec2000/perlbmk -1.328%
spec2006/h264ref -1.140%
Regressions:
internal bmark +1.818%
Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign +1.084%
Reviewers: sebpop, dberlin, hiraditya
Subscribers: aemerson, mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27722
llvm-svn: 289696
This is with an extra change to avoid calling MemoryLocation::get() on a call instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25542
llvm-svn: 284098
This CL didn't actually address the test case in PR30499, and clang
still crashes.
Also revert dependent change "Memory-SSA cleanup of clobbers interface, NFC"
Reverts r283965 and r283967.
llvm-svn: 284093
This is a refreshed version of a patch that was reverted: it fixes
the problems reported in both PR30216 and PR30499, and
contains all the test-cases from both bugs.
To hoist stores past loads, we used to search for potential
conflicting loads on the hoisting path by following a MemorySSA
def-def link from the store to be hoisted to the previous
defining memory access, and from there we followed the def-use
chains to all the uses that occur on the hoisting path. The
problem is that the def-def link may point to a store that does
not alias with the store to be hoisted, and so the loads that are
walked may not alias with the store to be hoisted, and even as in
the testcase of PR30216, the loads that may alias with the store
to be hoisted are not visited.
The current patch visits all loads on the path from the store to
be hoisted to the hoisting position and uses the alias analysis
to ask whether the store may alias the load. I was not able to
use the MemorySSA functionality to ask for whether load and
store are clobbered: I'm not sure which function to call, so I
used a call to AA->isNoAlias().
Store past store is still working as before using a MemorySSA
query: I added an extra test to pr30216.ll to make sure store
past store does not regress.
Tested on x86_64-linux with check and a test-suite run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25476
llvm-svn: 283965
and also the dependent r282175 "GVN-hoist: do not dereference null pointers"
It's causing compiler crashes building Harfbuzz (PR30499).
llvm-svn: 282199
To hoist stores past loads, we used to search for potential
conflicting loads on the hoisting path by following a MemorySSA
def-def link from the store to be hoisted to the previous
defining memory access, and from there we followed the def-use
chains to all the uses that occur on the hoisting path. The
problem is that the def-def link may point to a store that does
not alias with the store to be hoisted, and so the loads that are
walked may not alias with the store to be hoisted, and even as in
the testcase of PR30216, the loads that may alias with the store
to be hoisted are not visited.
The current patch visits all loads on the path from the store to
be hoisted to the hoisting position and uses the alias analysis
to ask whether the store may alias the load. I was not able to
use the MemorySSA functionality to ask for whether load and
store are clobbered: I'm not sure which function to call, so I
used a call to AA->isNoAlias().
Store past store is still working as before using a MemorySSA
query: I added an extra test to pr30216.ll to make sure store
past store does not regress.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24517
llvm-svn: 282168
Without this patch, GVN-hoist would think that a branch instruction is a scalar instruction
and would try to value number it. The patch filters out all such kind of irrelevant instructions.
A bit frustrating is that there is no easy way to discard all those very infrequent instructions,
a bit like isa<TerminatorInst> that stands for a large family of instructions. I'm thinking that
checking for those very infrequent other instructions would cost us more in compilation time
than just letting those instructions getting numbered, so I'm still thinking that a simpler check:
if (isa<TerminatorInst>(I))
return false;
is better than listing all the other less frequent instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23929
llvm-svn: 282160
It is invalid to hoist stores or loads if they are not executed on all paths
from the hoisting point to the exit of the function. In the testcase, there are
paths in the loop that do not execute the stores or the loads, and so hoisting
them within the loop is unsafe.
The problem is that the current implementation of hoistingFromAllPaths is
incomplete: it walks all blocks dominated by the hoisting point, and does not
return false when the loop contains a path on which the hoisted ld/st is
not executed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23843
llvm-svn: 279732
Eric Christopher