This reverts commit r327566, it breaks
test/ExecutionEngine/OrcMCJIT/test-global-ctors.ll.
The test doesn't crash with a stack trace, unfortunately. It merely
returns 1 as the exit code.
ASan didn't produce a report, and I reproduced this on my Linux machine
and Windows box.
llvm-svn: 327576
As shown in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27151
...the existing fold could miscompile when X is NaN.
The fold was also dependent on 'ninf' but that's not necessary.
From IEEE-754 (with default rounding which we can assume for these opcodes):
"When the sum of two operands with opposite signs (or the difference of two
operands with like signs) is exactly zero, the sign of that sum (or difference)
shall be +0...However, x + x = x − (−x) retains the same sign as x even when
x is zero."
llvm-svn: 327575
I definitely didn't run the tests before committing :(
Most of these tests failed because the LLD map file output changed,
moving the functions from the main text section to a new per-function
section.
ICF also started to fire in a few cases, leading to new layouts.
llvm-svn: 327571
Optionally allow the order of restoring the callee-saved registers in the
epilogue to be reversed.
The flag -reverse-csr-restore-seq generates the following code:
```
stp x26, x25, [sp, #-64]!
stp x24, x23, [sp, #16]
stp x22, x21, [sp, #32]
stp x20, x19, [sp, #48]
; [..]
ldp x24, x23, [sp, #16]
ldp x22, x21, [sp, #32]
ldp x20, x19, [sp, #48]
ldp x26, x25, [sp], #64
ret
```
Note how the CSRs are restored in the same order as they are saved.
One exception to this rule is the last `ldp`, which allows us to merge
the stack adjustment and the ldp into a post-index ldp. This is done by
first generating:
ldp x26, x27, [sp]
add sp, sp, #64
which gets merged by the arm64 load store optimizer into
ldp x26, x25, [sp], #64
The flag is disabled by default.
llvm-svn: 327569
Layer implementations typically mutate module state, and this is better
reflected by having layers own the Module they are operating on.
llvm-svn: 327566
This is an option to print out a table of symbols and filenames.
The output format of this option is the same as GNU, so that it can be
processed by the same scripts as before after migrating from GNU to lld.
This option is mildly useful; we can live without it. But it is pretty
convenient sometimes, and it can be implemented in 50 lines of code, so
I think lld should support this option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44336
llvm-svn: 327565
Summary:
I noticed that clang will emit variables such as %indirect-arg-temp when
running update_cc1_test_checks.py and therefore update_cc1_test_checks.py
wasn't adding FileCheck captures for those variables.
Reviewers: MaskRay
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44459
llvm-svn: 327564
GNU ld has got a number of different flags for adjusting how to
behave around stdcall functions. The --kill-at flag strips the
trailing sdcall suffix from exported functions (which otherwise
is included by default in MinGW setups).
This also strips it from the corresponding import library though.
That makes it hard to link to such an import library from code
that calls the functions - but this matches what GNU ld does with
this flag. Therefore, this flag is probably not sensibly used
together with import libraries, but probably mostly when creating
some sort of plugin, or if creating the import library separately
with dlltool.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44292
llvm-svn: 327561
This tests that LLVM emits the relocations that /guard:cf needs to
identify address taken.
This was PR36624, which was fixed in r327557.
llvm-svn: 327559
Summary:
Let's suppose the `-Weverything` is passed.
Given code like
```
void F() {}
;
```
If the code is compiled with `-std=c++03`, it would diagnose that extra sema:
```
<source>:2:1: warning: extra ';' outside of a function is a C++11 extension [-Wc++11-extra-semi]
;
^~
```
If the code is compiled with `-std=c++11`, it also would diagnose that extra sema:
```
<source>:2:1: warning: extra ';' outside of a function is incompatible with C++98 [-Wc++98-compat-pedantic]
;
^~
```
But, let's suppose the C++11 or higher is used, and the used does not care
about `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic`, so he disables that diagnostic.
And that silences the complaint about extra `;` too.
And there is no way to re-enable that particular diagnostic, passing `-Wextra-semi` does nothing...
Now, there is also a related `no newline at end of file` diagnostic, which is also emitted by `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic`
```
<source>:2:2: warning: C++98 requires newline at end of file [-Wc++98-compat-pedantic]
;
^
```
But unlike the previous case, if `-Wno-c++98-compat-pedantic` is passed, that diagnostic stays displayed:
```
<source>:2:2: warning: no newline at end of file [-Wnewline-eof]
;
^
```
This diff refactors the code so `-Wc++98-compat-extra-semi` can be re-enabled, after the `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic` was disabled.
This seems ugly, but there does not seem to be any saner way.
Testing: `$ ninja check-clang`
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jordan_rose, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43162
llvm-svn: 327558
Summary:
We already emit relocations in this case when the "incremental linker
compatible" flag is set, but it turns out these relocations are also
required for /guard:cf. Now that we have two use cases for this
behavior, let's make it unconditional to try to keep things simple.
We never hit this problem in Clang because it always sets the
"incremental linker compatible" flag when targeting MSVC. However, LLD
LTO doesn't set this flag, so we'd get CFG failures at runtime when
using ThinLTO and /guard:cf. We probably don't want LLD LTO to set the
"incremental linker compatible" assembler flag, since this has nothing
to do with incremental linking, and we don't need to timestamp LTO
temporary objects.
Fixes PR36624.
Reviewers: inglorion, espindola, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44485
llvm-svn: 327557
This is a first pass at removing some lldb-mi tests which have been
xfailed and unmaintained for a while. We have open PRs for most of these
tests already. I've opened up the following additional PRs:
llvm.org/PR36739 - lldb-mi driver exits properly
llvm.org/PR36740 - lldb-mi -gdb-set and -gdb-show
llvm.org/PR36741 - lldb-mi -symbol-xxx
The motivation here is to address timeout and pexpect-related issues in
the test suite. This was discussed on lldb-dev in the thread: "increase
timeout for tests?".
After this change, the lldb-mi tests seem to be in better health (on
Darwin at least). I consistently get:
$ ./bin/llvm-dotest -p TestMi
===================
Test Result Summary
===================
Test Methods: 101
Reruns: 0
Success: 88
Expected Failure: 0
Failure: 0
Error: 0
Exceptional Exit: 0
Unexpected Success: 0
Skip: 13
Timeout: 0
Expected Timeout: 0
llvm-svn: 327552
Summary:
ClangdServer::{codeComplete,signatureHelp} both use the Contents from
the draft manager. Since we want to move the draft manager from
ClangdServer to ClangdLSPServer, this patch changes those methods to
find the file contents from InputsAndPreamble, which contains the source
passed in previously.
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44484
llvm-svn: 327550
In this particular case it would be possible to just add an else with
CGM.setDSOLocal(GV), but it seems better to have as many callers as
possible just call setGVProperties so that we can centralize the logic
there.
This patch then makes setGVProperties able to handle null Decls.
llvm-svn: 327543
This "fixes" PR36678 by just producing an error when we find a case
where we would produce an plt entry that used ebx but ebx would not be
set.
llvm-svn: 327542
I removed this in r316797 because the coverage report showed no coverage and I thought it should have been handled by the auto generated table. I now see that there is code that bypasses the table if the shift amount is out of bounds.
This adds back the code. We'll codegen out of bounds i8 shifts to effectively (amount & 0x1f). The 0x1f is a strange quirk of x86 that shift amounts are always masked to 5-bits(except 64-bits). So if the masked value is still out bounds the result will be 0.
Fixes PR36731.
llvm-svn: 327540
Summary:
It was previously an easy way to concurrently access a mutable vfs,
which is a recipe for disaster.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits, ioeric
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44463
llvm-svn: 327537
Summary:
This pattern came up in PR36682 / D44390
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36682https://reviews.llvm.org/D44390https://godbolt.org/g/oKvT5H
Looking at the IR pattern in question, as per [[ https://github.com/rutgers-apl/alive-nj | alive-nj ]], for all the type combinations i checked
(input: `i16`, `i32`, `i64`; intermediate: `half`/`i16`, `float`/`i32`, `double`/`i64`)
for the following `icmp` comparisons the `uitofp`+`bitcast`+`icmp` can be evaluated to a boolean:
* `slt 0`
* `sgt -1`
I did not check vectors, but i'm guessing it's the same there.
{F5889242}
Thus all these cases are in the testcase (along with the vector variant with additional `undef` element in the middle).
There are no negative patterns here (unless alive-nj lied/is broken), all of these should be optimized.
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, efriedma, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44421
llvm-svn: 327535
Summary:
This pattern came up in PR36682 / D44390
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36682https://reviews.llvm.org/D44390https://godbolt.org/g/oKvT5H
Looking at the IR pattern in question, as per [[ https://github.com/rutgers-apl/alive-nj | alive-nj ]], for all the type combinations i checked
(input: `i16`, `i32`, `i64`; intermediate: `half`/`i16`, `float`/`i32`, `double`/`i64`)
for the following `icmp` comparisons the `uitofp`+`bitcast` can be dropped:
* `eq 0`
* `ne 0`
I did not check vectors, but i'm guessing it's the same there.
{F5889189}
Thus all these cases are in the testcase (along with the vector variant with additional `undef` element in the middle).
There are no negative patterns here (unless alive-nj lied/is broken), all of these should be optimized.
Generated with
{F5889196}
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, efriedma, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44416
llvm-svn: 327534
I had to modify the bswap recognition to allow unshrunk masks to make this work.
Fixes PR36689.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44442
llvm-svn: 327530
Summary:
Getting this to work is not particularly obvious, and having it as an example should be helpful.
Portions of this could be placed into LLVM, but as a whole it seems necessary to do this a higher level.
Reviewers: lhames, mehdi_amini
Reviewed By: lhames
Subscribers: mgrang, martell, cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35103
llvm-svn: 327528
Reid Kleckner