It was written as "Memory Error" in most places and as "Memory error" in a few
other places, however it is the latter that is more consistent with
other categories (such as "Logic error").
rdar://problem/31718115
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32702
llvm-svn: 302016
This patch adds hashes to the plist and html output to be able to identfy bugs
for suppressing false positives or diff results against a baseline. This hash
aims to be resilient for code evolution and is usable to identify bugs in two
different snapshots of the same software. One missing piece however is a
permanent unique identifier of the checker that produces the warning. Once that
issue is resolved, the hashes generated are going to change. Until that point
this feature is marked experimental, but it is suitable for early adoption.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305
Original patch by: Bence Babati!
llvm-svn: 251011
Emit warning when operand to `delete` is allocated with `new[]` or
operand to `delete[]` is allocated with `new`.
rev 2 update:
`getNewExprFromInitListOrExpr` should return `dyn_cast_or_null`
instead of `dyn_cast`, since `E` might be null.
Reviewers: rtrieu, jordan_rose, rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4661
llvm-svn: 237608
This reverts commit 742dc9b6c9686ab52860b7da39c3a126d8a97fbc.
This is generating multiple segfaults in our internal builds.
Test case coming up shortly.
llvm-svn: 237391
Emit warning when operand to `delete` is allocated with `new[]` or
operand to `delete[]` is allocated with `new`.
Reviewers: rtrieu, jordan_rose, rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4661
llvm-svn: 237368
to the plist output. This check_name field does not guaranteed to be the
same as the name of the checker in the future.
Reviewer: Anna Zaks
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6841
llvm-svn: 228624
...but don't yet migrate over the existing plist tests. Some of these
would be trivial to migrate; others could use a bit of inspection first.
In any case, though, the new edge algorithm seems to have proven itself,
and we'd like more coverage (and more usage) of it going forwards.
llvm-svn: 183165
Test that the path notes do not change. I don’t think we should print a note on escape.
Also, I’ve removed a check that assumed that the family stored in the RefStete could be
AF_None and added an assert in the constructor.
llvm-svn: 179075
Artem Dergachev