Commit Graph

36 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Juergen Ributzka 384c3b5c03 Provide convenient access to the zext/sext attributes of function arguments. NFC.
llvm-svn: 214843
2014-08-05 05:43:41 +00:00
Hal Finkel b0407ba071 Add a dereferenceable attribute
This attribute indicates that the parameter or return pointer is
dereferenceable. Practically speaking, loads from such a pointer within the
associated byte range are safe to speculatively execute. Such pointer
parameters are common in source languages (C++ references, for example).

llvm-svn: 213385
2014-07-18 15:51:28 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool 4e63fc498c TableGen: introduce support for MSBuiltin
Add MSBuiltin which is similar in vein to GCCBuiltin.  This allows for adding
intrinsics for Microsoft compatibility to individual instructions.  This is
needed to permit the creation of ARM specific MSVC extensions.

This is not currently in use, and requires an associated change in clang to
enable use of the intrinsics defined by this new class.  This merely sets the
LLVM portion of the infrastructure in place to permit the use of this
functionality.  A separate set of changes will enable the new intrinsics.

llvm-svn: 212350
2014-07-04 18:42:25 +00:00
Nick Lewycky d52b1528c0 Add 'nonnull', a new parameter and return attribute which indicates that the pointer is not null. Instcombine will elide comparisons between these and null. Patch by Luqman Aden!
llvm-svn: 209185
2014-05-20 01:23:40 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 99e05cf163 Split GlobalValue into GlobalValue and GlobalObject.
This allows code to statically accept a Function or a GlobalVariable, but
not an alias. This is already a cleanup by itself IMHO, but the main
reason for it is that it gives a lot more confidence that the refactoring to fix
the design of GlobalAlias is correct. That will be a followup patch.

llvm-svn: 208716
2014-05-13 18:45:48 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 7941856445 Allow sret on the second parameter as well as the first
MSVC always places the implicit sret parameter after the implicit this
parameter of instance methods.  We used to handle this for
x86_thiscallcc by allocating the sret parameter on the stack and leaving
the this pointer in ecx, but that doesn't handle alternative calling
conventions like cdecl, stdcall, fastcall, or the win64 convention.

Instead, change the verifier to allow sret on the second parameter.

This also requires changing the Mips and X86 backends to return the
argument with the sret parameter, instead of assuming that the sret
parameter comes first.

The Sparc backend also returns sret parameters in a register, but I
wasn't able to update it to handle secondary sret parameters.  It
currently calls report_fatal_error if you feed it an sret in the second
parameter.

Reviewers: rafael.espindola, majnemer

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3617

llvm-svn: 208453
2014-05-09 22:32:13 +00:00
Rafael Espindola b2ea33975f Run clang-format in small sections of code to make a patch easier to read.
llvm-svn: 208419
2014-05-09 15:49:02 +00:00
Craig Topper c620761ca5 [C++11] More 'nullptr' conversion or in some cases just using a boolean check instead of comparing to nullptr.
llvm-svn: 205831
2014-04-09 06:08:46 +00:00
Tim Northover 4516de3412 Intrinsics: add LLVMHalfElementsVectorType constraint
This is like the LLVMMatchType, except the verifier checks that the
second argument is a vector with the same base type and half the
number of elements.

This will be used by the ARM64 backend.

llvm-svn: 205079
2014-03-29 07:04:54 +00:00
Tim Northover aa3cf1e691 Intrinsics: expand semantics of LLVMExtendedVectorType (& trunc)
These are used in the ARM backends to aid type-checking on patterns involving
intrinsics. By making sure one argument is an extended/truncated version of
another.

However, there's no reason to limit them to just vectors types. For example
AArch64 has the instruction "uqshrn sD, dN, #imm" which would naturally use an
intrinsic taking an i64 and returning an i32.

llvm-svn: 205003
2014-03-28 12:31:39 +00:00
Evan Cheng ad6efbfa0f Revert r203488 and r203520.
llvm-svn: 203687
2014-03-12 18:09:37 +00:00
Evan Cheng 0e8f4612a9 For functions with ARM target specific calling convention, when simplify-libcall
optimize a call to a llvm intrinsic to something that invovles a call to a C
library call, make sure it sets the right calling convention on the call.

e.g.
extern double pow(double, double);
double t(double x) {
  return pow(10, x);
}

Compiles to something like this for AAPCS-VFP:
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @t(double %x) #0 {
entry:
  %0 = call double @llvm.pow.f64(double 1.000000e+01, double %x)
  ret double %0
}

declare double @llvm.pow.f64(double, double) #1

Simplify libcall (part of instcombine) will turn the above into:
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @t(double %x) #0 {
entry:
  %__exp10 = call double @__exp10(double %x) #1
  ret double %__exp10
}

declare double @__exp10(double)

The pre-instcombine code works because calls to LLVM builtins are special.
Instruction selection will chose the right calling convention for the call.
However, the code after instcombine is wrong. The call to __exp10 will use
the C calling convention.

I can think of 3 options to fix this.

1. Make "C" calling convention just work since the target should know what CC
   is being used.

   This doesn't work because each function can use different CC with the "pcs"
   attribute.

2. Have Clang add the right CC keyword on the calls to LLVM builtin.

   This will work but it doesn't match the LLVM IR specification which states
   these are "Standard C Library Intrinsics".

3. Fix simplify libcall so the resulting calls to the C routines will have the
   proper CC keyword. e.g.
   %__exp10 = call arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @__exp10(double %x) #1

   This works and is the solution I implemented here.

Both solutions #2 and #3 would work. After carefully considering the pros and
cons, I decided to implement #3 for the following reasons.

1. It doesn't change the "spec" of the intrinsics.
2. It's a self-contained fix.

There are a couple of potential downsides.
1. There could be other places in the optimizer that is broken in the same way
   that's not addressed by this.
2. There could be other calling conventions that need to be propagated by
   simplify-libcall that's not handled.

But for now, this is the fix that I'm most comfortable with.

llvm-svn: 203488
2014-03-10 20:49:45 +00:00
Chandler Carruth cdf4788401 [C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
   detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
   iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
   Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
   they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
   needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
   opaque.

Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.

The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.

However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]

llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 03:16:01 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 4b6845c7e7 [Modules] Move the LeakDetector header into the IR library where the
source file had already been moved. Also move the unittest into the IR
unittest library.

This may seem an odd thing to put in the IR library but we only really
use this with instructions and it needs the LLVM context to work, so it
is intrinsically tied to the IR library.

llvm-svn: 202842
2014-03-04 12:46:06 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 219b89b987 [Modules] Move CallSite into the IR library where it belogs. It is
abstracting between a CallInst and an InvokeInst, both of which are IR
concepts.

llvm-svn: 202816
2014-03-04 11:01:28 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 8394857f43 [Modules] Move InstIterator out of the Support library, where it had no
business.

This header includes Function and BasicBlock and directly uses the
interfaces of both classes. It has to do with the IR, it even has that
in the name. =] Put it in the library it belongs to.

This is one step toward making LLVM's Support library survive a C++
modules bootstrap.

llvm-svn: 202814
2014-03-04 10:30:26 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 436c42ec3d Add an inalloca flag to allocas
Summary:
The only current use of this flag is to mark the alloca as dynamic, even
if its in the entry block.  The stack adjustment for the alloca can
never be folded into the prologue because the call may clear it and it
has to be allocated at the top of the stack.

Reviewers: majnemer

CC: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2571

llvm-svn: 199525
2014-01-17 23:58:17 +00:00
Mark Seaborn 8271118a65 Fix llc to not reuse spill slots in functions that invoke setjmp()
We need to ensure that StackSlotColoring.cpp does not reuse stack
spill slots in functions that call "returns_twice" functions such as
setjmp(), otherwise this can lead to miscompiled code, because a stack
slot would be clobbered when it's still live.

This was already handled correctly for functions that call setjmp()
(though this wasn't covered by a test), but not for functions that
invoke setjmp().

We fix this by changing callsFunctionThatReturnsTwice() to check for
invoke instructions.

This fixes PR18244.

llvm-svn: 199180
2014-01-14 04:20:01 +00:00
Reid Kleckner a534a38130 Begin adding docs and IR-level support for the inalloca attribute
The inalloca attribute is designed to support passing C++ objects by
value in the Microsoft C++ ABI.  It behaves the same as byval, except
that it always implies that the argument is in memory and that the bytes
are never copied.  This attribute allows the caller to take the address
of an outgoing argument's memory and execute arbitrary code to store
into it.

This patch adds basic IR support, docs, and verification.  It does not
attempt to implement any lowering or fix any possibly broken transforms.

When this patch lands, a complete description of this feature should
appear at http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.html .

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2173

llvm-svn: 197645
2013-12-19 02:14:12 +00:00
Andrew Trick a2efd99bdf Enable variable arguments support for intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 193766
2013-10-31 17:18:11 +00:00
Jiangning Liu 63dc840fc5 Initial support for Neon scalar instructions.
Patch by Ana Pazos.

1.Added support for v1ix and v1fx types.
2.Added Scalar Pairwise Reduce instructions.
3.Added initial implementation of Scalar Arithmetic instructions.

llvm-svn: 191263
2013-09-24 02:47:27 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 3fa50f9b05 Implement function prefix data as an IR feature.
Previous discussion:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-July/063909.html

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1191

llvm-svn: 190773
2013-09-16 01:08:15 +00:00
Nick Lewycky c2ec0725ce Extend 'readonly' and 'readnone' to work on function arguments as well as
functions. Make the function attributes pass add it to known library functions
and when it can deduce it.

llvm-svn: 185735
2013-07-06 00:29:58 +00:00
Stephen Lin b8bd232a3d Add CodeGen support for functions that always return arguments via a new parameter attribute 'returned', which is taken advantage of in target-independent tail call opportunity detection and in ARM call lowering (when placed on an integral first parameter).
llvm-svn: 179925
2013-04-20 05:14:40 +00:00
Chris Lattner f83a664a40 minor code style cleanup.
llvm-svn: 177576
2013-03-20 21:04:53 +00:00
Michael Ilseman 516d70399e Cache the result of Function::getIntrinsicID() in a DenseMap attached to the LLVMContext.
This reduces the time actually spent doing string to ID conversion and shows a 10% improvement in compile time for a particularly bad case that involves ARM Neon intrinsics (these have many overloads).

Patch by Jean-Luc Duprat!

llvm-svn: 176365
2013-03-01 18:48:54 +00:00
Bill Wendling efbbbfd384 Don't assert on empty attributes.
llvm-svn: 175785
2013-02-21 19:46:51 +00:00
Bill Wendling 1c20ff028e Add and remove the attribute from the correct slot.
The slot that we're adding/removing the attribute from may not be the same as
the attribute coming in. Make sure that they match up before we try to
add/remove them.
PR15313

llvm-svn: 175684
2013-02-20 23:04:11 +00:00
Bill Wendling 49bc76cbb3 Remove the last of uses that use the Attribute object as a collection of attributes.
Collections of attributes are handled via the AttributeSet class now. This
finally frees us up to make significant changes to how attributes are structured.

llvm-svn: 173228
2013-01-23 06:14:59 +00:00
Bill Wendling 430fa9bfb3 Use the AttributeSet when removing multiple attributes. Use Attribute::AttrKind
when removing one attribute. This further encapsulates the use of the attributes.

llvm-svn: 173214
2013-01-23 00:45:55 +00:00
Bill Wendling c0e2a1f457 Use the AttributeSet when adding multiple attributes and an Attribute::AttrKind
when adding a single attribute to the function.

llvm-svn: 173210
2013-01-23 00:20:53 +00:00
Bill Wendling 09175b39f2 More encapsulation work.
Use the AttributeSet when we're talking about more than one attribute. Add a
function that adds a single attribute. No functionality change intended.

llvm-svn: 173196
2013-01-22 21:15:51 +00:00
Michael Ilseman 6c6d715c15 Support for half intrinsics. Pushes MMX into slower encoding path.
llvm-svn: 172159
2013-01-11 01:45:05 +00:00
Chandler Carruth db25c6cf8e Actually update the CMake and Makefile builds correctly, and update the
code that includes Intrinsics.gen directly.

This never showed up in my testing because the old Intrinsics.gen was
still kicking around in the make build system and was correct there. =[
Thankfully, some of the bots to clean rebuilds and that caught this.

llvm-svn: 171373
2013-01-02 12:09:16 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 9fb823bbd4 Move all of the header files which are involved in modelling the LLVM IR
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.

There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.

The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.

I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).

I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.

llvm-svn: 171366
2013-01-02 11:36:10 +00:00
Chandler Carruth ef860a2488 Rename VMCore directory to IR.
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.

I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.

While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.

Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)

llvm-svn: 171359
2013-01-02 09:10:48 +00:00