This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<vector>`.
I now added tests for the current offending cases. I wonder whether it
would be better to add one addressof test per directory and test all
possible violations. Also to guard against possible future errors?
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111961
Instead of overloading `__to_address`, let's specialize `pointer_traits`.
Function overloads need to be in scope at the point where they're called,
whereas template specializations do not. (User code can provide pointer_traits
specializations to be used by already-included library code, so obviously
`__wrap_iter` can do the same.)
`pointer_traits<__wrap_iter<It>>` cannot provide `pointer_to`, because
you generally cannot create a `__wrap_iter` without also knowing the
identity of the container into which you're trying to create an iterator.
I believe this is OK; contiguous iterators are required to provide
`to_address` but *not* necessarily `pointer_to`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110198
In other places in the code, we use lowercase spelling for things that
are not available in prior standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109435
The `insert_iterator::iter` member is defined as `Container::iterator` but
the standard requires `iter` to be defined in terms of `ranges::iterator_t` as
of C++20. So, if in C++20 or later, define the `iter` member as
`ranges::iterator_t`.
Original patch by Joe Loser!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108575
`contiguous_iterator` requires the iterator type passed is either a
pointer type or that the element type of the iterator is a complete
object type. These constraints are not part of the current wording in
defining the `contiguous_iterator` concept - adjust the concept to
reflect this.
Inspired from discussion at https://reviews.llvm.org/D108645.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108855
This must have been meant to be friend-declaring operator!=, but it
turns out that it's not even necessary to make it a friend since it
does not access any private state.
rdar://82568613
All supported compilers have supported deduction guides in C++17 for a
while, so this isn't necessary anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108213
Feedback requested in D106735 applied in Diff 3 seem to have
reverted in Diff 4. This patch fixes that up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106829
See LWG reflector thread of 2021-07-23 titled
'Question on ranges::advance and "past-the-sentinel iterators"'.
Test case heavily based on one graciously provided by Casey Carter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106735
This started as fixing a typo in a ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS directive
which turned out to uncover a few places where we warned about signedness
changes.
As a fly-by fix, this updates the various __advance overloads
for style consistency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106372
`__function_like` wasn't being exported, so certain properties of the
`ranges` functions weren't being propagated in modules land.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105078
We've been forgetting to add those to most of the <ranges> review.
To avoid forgetting in the future, I added an item in the pre-commit
checklist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106287
It turns out that D105040 broke `std::rel_ops`; we actually do need
both a one-template-parameter and a two-template-parameter version of
all the comparison operators, because if we have only the heterogeneous
two-parameter version, then `x > x` is ambiguous:
template<class T, class U> int f(S<T>, S<U>) { return 1; }
template<class T> int f(T, T) { return 2; } // rel_ops
S<int> s; f(s,s); // ambiguous between #1 and #2
Adding the one-template-parameter version fixes the ambiguity:
template<class T, class U> int f(S<T>, S<U>) { return 1; }
template<class T> int f(T, T) { return 2; } // rel_ops
template<class T> int f(S<T>, S<T>) { return 3; }
S<int> s; f(s,s); // #3 beats both #1 and #2
We have the same problem with `reverse_iterator` as with `__wrap_iter`.
But so do libstdc++ and Microsoft, so we're not going to worry about it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105894
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
This has been broken out of D104170 since it should be merged whether or
not we go ahead with the module map changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104175
This started as an attempt to fix a GCC 11 warning of misplaced parentheses.
I then noticed that trying to fix the parentheses warning actually triggered
errors in the tests, showing that we were incorrectly assuming that the
implementation of ranges::advance was using operator+= or operator-=.
This commit fixes that issue and makes the tests easier to follow by
localizing the assertions it makes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103272
Most of our private headers need to be treated as submodules so that
Clang modules can export things correctly. Previous commits that split
monolithic headers into smaller chunks were unaware of this requirement,
and so this is being addressed in one fell swoop. Moving forward, most
new headers will need to have their own submodule (anything that's
conditionally included is exempt from this rule, which means `__support`
headers aren't made into submodules).
This hasn't been marked NFC, since I'm not 100% sure that's the case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103551
Implements part of P0896 'The One Ranges Proposal'.
Implements [range.iter.op.prev].
Depends on D102563.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102564
Implements part of P0896 'The One Ranges Proposal'.
Implements [range.iter.op.next].
Depends on D101922.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102563
Not only do we conscientiously avoid using `__wrap_iter` for non-contiguous
iterators (in vector, string, span...) but also we make the assumption
(in regex) that `__wrap_iter<_Iter>` is contiguous for all `_Iter`.
So `__wrap_iter<reverse_iterator<int*>>` should be considered IFNDR,
and every `__wrap_iter` should correctly advertise contiguity in C++20.
Drive-by simplify some type traits.
Reviewed as part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D102781
This commit alphabetizes all includes in libcxx. This is a NFC.
This can also serve as a pseudo "announcement" for how we should order these headers going forward (note: double underscores go before other headers).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102941
Mark de Wever