Summary:
This allows callers of Diags.Report() to append a value to the name of
the flag associated with the diagnostic. This is useful in cases like
the -Rpass flag, where we want the diagnostic to show the name of the
pass that matched the pattern. Instead of showing "... [-Rpass]", this
allows us to show "... [-Rpass=passname]".
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3441
llvm-svn: 206826
Summary:
This patch adds a new flag -Rpass=. The flag indicates the name
of the optimization pass that should emit remarks stating when it
made a transformation to the code.
This implements the design I proposed in:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FYUatSjZZO-zmFBxjOiuOzAy9mhHA8hqdvklZv68WuQ/edit?usp=sharing
Other changes:
- Add DiagnosticIDs::isRemark(). Use it in printDiagnosticOptions to
print "-R" instead of "-W" in the diagnostic message.
- In BackendConsumer::OptimizationRemarkHandler, get a SourceLocation
object out of the file name, line and column number. Use that location
in the call to Diags.Report().
- When -Rpass is used without debug info a note is emitted alerting
the user that they need to use -gline-tables-only -gcolumn-info to
get this information.
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3226
llvm-svn: 206401
This solves two problems:
1) MSBuild will not flag the build as unsuccessful just because we print
an error in the output, since "error(clang):" doesn't seem to match
the regex it's using.
2) It becomes more clear that the diagnostic is coming from clang as
supposed to cl.exe.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1735
llvm-svn: 191250
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
the various stakeholders bump up the reference count. In particular,
the diagnostics engine now keeps the DiagnosticOptions object alive.
llvm-svn: 166508
- Split pedantic driver flag test into separate test file, and XFAIL on cygwin,mingw32
- Fix bug in tablegen logic where a missing '{' caused errors to be included in -Wpedantic.
llvm-svn: 159892
I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test.
> 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp
llvm-svn: 159886
This patch introduces some magic in tablegen to create a "Pedantic" diagnostic
group which automagically includes all warnings that are extensions. This
allows a user to suppress specific warnings traditionally under -pedantic used
an ordinary warning flag. This also allows users to use #pragma to silence
specific -pedantic warnings, or promote them to errors, within blocks of text
(just like any other warning).
-Wpedantic is NOT an alias for -pedantic. Instead, it provides another way
to (a) activate -pedantic warnings and (b) disable them. Where they differ
is that -pedantic changes the behavior of the preprocessor slightly, whereas
-Wpedantic does not (it just turns on the warnings).
The magic in the tablegen diagnostic emitter has to do with computing the minimal
set of diagnostic groups and diagnostics that should go into -Wpedantic, as those
diagnostics that already members of groups that themselves are (transitively) members
of -Wpedantic do not need to be included in the Pedantic group directly. I went
back and forth on whether or not to magically generate this group, and the invariant
was that we always wanted extension warnings to be included in -Wpedantic "some how",
but the bookkeeping would be very onerous to manage by hand.
-no-pedantic (and --no-pedantic) is included for completeness, and matches many of the
same kind of flags the compiler already supports. It does what it says: cancels out
-pedantic. One discrepancy is that if one specifies --no-pedantic and -Weverything or
-Wpedantic the pedantic warnings are still enabled (essentially the -W flags win). We
can debate the correct behavior here.
Along the way, this patch nukes some code in TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp and CXStoredDiagnostic.cpp
that determine whether to include the "-pedantic" flag in the warning output. This is
no longer needed, as all extensions now have a -W flag.
This patch also significantly reduces the number of warnings not under flags from 229
to 158 (all extension warnings). That's a 31% reduction.
llvm-svn: 159875
from the frontend when the location is invalid and the SourceManager null.
Instead of keeping the SourceManager object in DiagnosticRenderer, propagate it
to the calls accordingly (as reference when it is expected to not be null, or pointer
when it may be null).
This effectively makes DiagnosticRenderer not tied to a specific SourceManager,
removing a hack from TextDiagnosticPrinter.
rdar://11386874
llvm-svn: 156536
This option was added in r129614 and doesn't have any use case that I'm aware
of. It's possible that external tools are using these names - and if that's
the case we can certainly reassess the functionality, but for now it lets us
shave out a few unneeded bits from clang.
Move the "StaticDiagNameIndex" table into the only remaining consumer, diagtool.
This removes the actual diagnostic name strings from clang entirely.
Reviewed by Chris Lattner & Ted Kremenek.
llvm-svn: 150612
the SourceManager doesn't change, and the source files don't change.
This greatly simplifies the interfaces and interactions. The lifetime of
the TextDiagnostic object forms the 'session' over which we attempt to
condense and deduplicate information in diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 142104
making it accessible to anyone from the Frontend library. Still a good
bit of cleanup to do here, but its a good milestone. This ensures that
*all* of the functionality needed to implement the DiagnosticConsumer is
exposed via the generic interface in some form. No sneaky re-use of
static functions.
llvm-svn: 142086
diagnostics to control suppression of redundant information. It now
follows the same model as all the other state, and has a bit more clear
semantics.
This is making the duality of the state a bit annoying, and I've added
a FIXME to resolve it. The problem is that I need to lift the
TextDiagnostic up into an externally visible layer before that can
happen.
llvm-svn: 142083
TextDiagnosticPrinter argument to the TextDiagnostic helper class. This
cements the proper ordering of things: TextDiagnostic is now a viable
stand-alone class for emitting pretty-printed textual diagnostics to
a terminal.
llvm-svn: 142070
utility. This is a particularly nice win because it removes a pile of
parameters from these routines. Also name them a bit better. I'm trying
to follow the pattern of 'emit' routines writing directly to what is
expected to be the final output, while 'print' routines take a output
stream argument and can be used to build up intermediate buffers, etc.
Also, fix a bug I spotted by inspection from my last commit where
'LastLoc' and 'LastNonNoteLoc' were reversed. It's really scary that
this didn't trigger a single test failure. Will be working on tests for
more of this functionality now.
llvm-svn: 142069
across emissions.
1) The include stack printing is conditioned on non-note diagnostics,
not just on warning diagnostics.
2) Those should be full source locations as they're tied to a source
manager.
3) We should pass in the prior state to the TextDiagnostic constructor,
allow it to mutate as diagnostics are emitted, and then cache the
final state before tearing it down.
Some of this remains incomplete, specifically #3 isn't finished for the
non-note location. That'll come when the include stack printing sinks
down a level.
This also highlights how *completely* bug-ridden this code is. For
example, we currently do all these comparisons of a FullSourceLoc and
a SourceLocation... which silently does a SourceLocation to
SourceLocation comparison, completely disregarding the source manager
from whence one of the arguments came. Oops! Good thing in practice this
wasn't important, but it could in theory be suppressing caret
diagnostics in a second TU on a single clang invocation. I'm hoping to
hammer these bugs out as the refactorings occur, although for so many of
them it's really unlikely I can dream up a test case that would show the
potentially buggy behavior.
llvm-svn: 142067
consumer. The TextDiagnostic interface now has a generic entry point for
emitting a diagnostic which uses a minimal interface that should be
compatible with StoredDiagnostics such as are available in libclang etc.
Some unfortunate shuffling of static functions as things get relocated.
Also some unfortunate public interface points added to
TextDiagnosticPrinter, but those are the next bits to get moved so they
won't last long.
llvm-svn: 142064
to operate directly on the source location and ranges associated with
a diagnostic rather than digging them out of the diagnostic. This had
a side benefit of cleaning up its code a tiny bit by using the ArrayRef
interface.
No functionality changed.
llvm-svn: 142063
Also note that it is actually doing much more than it should. This paves
the way for building a more generic 'Emit' routine that is the real
entry point here.
llvm-svn: 142035
- The TextDiagnosticPrinter code is still fragile as it is just "reverse engineering" what the diagnostic engine is doing. Not my current priority to fix though.
llvm-svn: 140752
we have the ability to create a new, distict diagnostic consumer when
we go off and build a module. This avoids the currently horribleness
where the same diagnostic consumer sees diagnostics for multiple
translation units (and multiple SourceManagers!) causing all sorts of havok.
llvm-svn: 140743
message. Specifically, we now only line-wrap the first line of te
diagnostic message and assume the remainder is manually formatted. While
adding it back, simplify the logic for doing this.
Finally, add a test that ensures we actually preserve this feature. =D
*Now* its not dead code. Thanks to Doug for the test case.
llvm-svn: 140538
when working with a diagnostic attached to a source location. Also
comment more thoroughly why its important to handle non-location
diagnostic messages separately.
Finally, hoist the creation of the TextDiagnostic object up to the
beginning of the location-based diagnostics. This paves the way for
sinking more and more of the logic into this class. When everything
below this constructor is sunk into the TextDiagnostic class it should
be sufficiently "feature complete" to accomplish my two goals:
1) Have the printing of a macro expansion note use the exact same code
as any other note.
2) Be able to implement clang_formatDiagnostic in terms of this class.
llvm-svn: 140526
a dedicated path. The logic for such diagnostics is much simpler than
for others.
This begins to make an important separation in this routine. We expect
most (and most interesting) textual diagnostics to be made in the
presence of at least *some* source locations and a source manager.
However the DiagnosticConsumer must be prepared to diagnose errors even
when the source manager doesn't (yet) exist or when there is no location
information at all. In order to sink more and more logic into the
TextDiagnostic class while minimizing its complexity, my plan is to
force the DiagnosticConsumer to special case diagnosing any locationless
messages and then hand the rest to the TextDiagnostic class. I'd
appreciate any comments on this design. It requires a bit of code
duplication in order to keep interfaces simple. Alternatively, if we
really need TextDiagnostic to be capable of handling diagnostics even in
the absence of a viable SourceManager, then this split isn't necessary.
llvm-svn: 140525
function. Doing this conveniently requires moving the word wrapping to
use a StringRef which seems generally an improvement. There is a lot
that could be simplified in the word wrapping by using StringRef that
I haven't looked at yet...
llvm-svn: 140524
characters. I could find no newline character in a diagnostic message,
and adding an assert to this code never fires in the testsuite.
I think this code is essentially dead, and was previously used for
a different purpose. If I just don't understand how it is we can end up
with a newline here please let me know (with a test case?) and I'll
revert.
llvm-svn: 140497
Diego Novillo