Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Kruse 0865585eab [ScopInfo] Add support for wrap-around of integers in unsigned comparisons.
This is one possible solution to implement wrap-arounds for integers in
unsigned icmp operations. For example,

    store i32 -1, i32* %A_addr
    %0 = load i32, i32* %A_addr
    %1 = icmp ult i32 %0, 0

%1 should hold false, because under the assumption of unsigned integers,
-1 should wrap around to 2^32-1. However, previously. it was assumed
that the MSB (Most Significant Bit - aka the Sign bit) was never set for
integers in unsigned operations.

This patch modifies the buildConditionSets function in ScopInfo.cpp to
give better information about the integers in these unsigned
comparisons.

Contributed-by: Annanay Agarwal <cs14btech11001@iith.ac.in>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35464

llvm-svn: 308608
2017-07-20 12:37:02 +00:00
Eli Friedman 286c5a76ba [SCEVAffinator] Make precise modular math more correct.
Integer math in LLVM IR is modular. Integer math in isl is
arbitrary-precision. Modeling LLVM IR math correctly in isl requires
either adding assumptions that math doesn't actually overflow, or
explicitly wrapping the math. However, expressions with the "nsw" flag
are special; we can pretend they're arbitrary-precision because it's
undefined behavior if the result wraps. SCEV expressions based on IR
instructions with an nsw flag also carry an nsw flag (roughly; actually,
the real rule is a bit more complicated, but the details don't matter
here).

Before this patch, SCEV flags were also overloaded with an additional
function: the ZExt code was mutating SCEV expressions as a hack to
indicate to checkForWrapping that we don't need to add assumptions to
the operand of a ZExt; it'll add explicit wrapping itself. This kind of
works... the problem is that if anything else ever touches that SCEV
expression, it'll get confused by the incorrect flags.

Instead, with this patch, we make the decision about whether to
explicitly wrap the math a bit earlier, basing the decision purely on
the SCEV expression itself, and not its users.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25287

llvm-svn: 284848
2016-10-21 18:08:02 +00:00
Tobias Grosser 7cb809983d [tests] Force invariant load hoisting for test cases that need it -- III
llvm-svn: 278673
2016-08-15 15:56:24 +00:00
Johannes Doerfert 6f1bb7a9d9 Support truncate operations
Truncate operations are basically modulo operations, thus we can model
  them that way. However, for large types we assume the operand to fit
  in the new type size instead of introducing a modulo with a very large
  constant.

llvm-svn: 269300
2016-05-12 15:13:49 +00:00