- When we are declaring a function in local scope, we can merge with
a visible declaration from an outer scope if that declaration
refers to an entity with linkage. This behavior now works in C++
and properly ignores entities without linkage.
- Diagnose the use of "static" on a function declaration in local
scope.
- Diagnose the declaration of a static function after a non-static
declaration of the same function.
- Propagate the storage specifier to a function declaration from a
prior declaration (PR3425)
- Don't name-mangle "main"
llvm-svn: 65360
information about types. We often print diagnostics where we say
"foo_t" is bad, but the user doesn't know how foo_t is declared
(because it is a typedef). Fix this by expanding sugar when present
in a diagnostic (and not one of a few special cases, like vectors).
Before:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' and 'typeof(F)')
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
After:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' (aka 'struct mystruct') and 'typeof(F)' (aka 'float'))
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
llvm-svn: 65081
(as GCC does), except when we've performed overload resolution and
found an unavailable function: in this case, we actually error.
Merge the checking of unavailable functions with the checking for
deprecated functions. This unifies a bit of code, and makes sure that
we're checking for unavailable functions in the right places. Also,
this check can cause an error. We may, eventually, want an option to
make "unavailable" warnings into errors.
Implement much of the logic needed for C++0x deleted functions, which
are effectively the same as "unavailable" functions (but always cause
an error when referenced). However, we don't have the syntax to
specify deleted functions yet :)
llvm-svn: 64955
to do in this area, since there are other places that reference
FunctionDecls.
Don't allow "overloadable" functions (in C) to be declared without a
prototype.
llvm-svn: 64897
complex conversions where the conversion between the real types is an
integral promotion. This is how G++ handles complex promotions for its
complex integer extension.
llvm-svn: 64344
system. Since C99 doesn't have overloading and C++ doesn't have
_Complex, there is no specification for this. Here's what I think
makes sense.
Complex conversions come in several flavors:
- Complex promotions: a complex -> complex conversion where the
underlying real-type conversion is a floating-point promotion. GCC
seems to call this a promotion, EDG does something else. This is
given "promotion" rank for determining the best viable function.
- Complex conversions: a complex -> complex conversion that is
not a complex promotion. This is given "conversion" rank for
determining the best viable function.
- Complex-real conversions: a real -> complex or complex -> real
conversion. This is given "conversion" rank for determining the
best viable function.
These rules are the same for C99 (when using the "overloadable"
attribute) and C++. However, there is one difference in the handling
of floating-point promotions: in C99, float -> long double and double
-> long double are considered promotions (so we give them "promotion"
rank), while C++ considers these conversions ("conversion" rank).
llvm-svn: 64343
Also, put Objective-C protocols into their own identifier
namespace. Otherwise, we find protocols when we don't want to in C++
(but not in C).
llvm-svn: 63877
extension. The interaction with designated initializers is a
bit... interesting... but we follow GNU's lead and don't permit too
much crazy code in this area.
Also, make the "excess initializers" error message a bit more
informative.
Addresses PR2561: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2561
llvm-svn: 63785
unqualified-id '('
in C++. The unqualified-id might not refer to any declaration in our
current scope, but declarations by that name might be found via
argument-dependent lookup. We now do so properly.
As part of this change, CXXDependentNameExpr, which was previously
designed to express the unqualified-id in the above constructor within
templates, has become UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr, which does
effectively the same thing but will work for both templates and
non-templates.
Additionally, we cope with all unqualified-ids, since ADL also applies
in cases like
operator+(x, y)
llvm-svn: 63733
a.k.a. Koenig lookup) in C++. Most of the pieces are in place, but for
two:
- In an unqualified call g(x), even if the name does not refer to
anything in the current scope, we can still find functions named
"g" based on ADL. We don't yet have this ability.
- ADL will need updating for friend functions and templates.
llvm-svn: 63692
direct-initialization following a user-defined conversion can select
any constructor; it just can't employ any user-defined
conversions. So we ban those conversions and classify the constructor
call based on the relationship between the "from" and "to" types in
the conversion.
llvm-svn: 63554
sequence. Previously, we weren't permitting the second step to call
copy constructors, which left user-defined conversion sequences
surprisingly broken.
Now, we perform overload resolution among all of the constructors, but
only accept the result if it makes the conversion a standard
conversion. Note that this behavior is different from both GCC and EDG
(which don't agree with each other, either); I've submitted a core
issue on the matter.
llvm-svn: 63450
- Support initialization of reference members; complain if any
reference members are left uninitialized.
- Use C++ copy-initialization for initializing each element (falls
back to constraint checking in C)
- Make sure we diagnose when one tries to provide an initializer
list for a non-aggregate.
- Don't complain about empty initializers in C++ (they are permitted)
- Unrelated but necessary: don't bother trying to convert the
decl-specifier-seq to a type when we're dealing with a C++
constructor, destructor, or conversion operator; it results in
spurious warnings.
llvm-svn: 63431
Fix a stupid mistake in UnwrapSimilarPointers that made any two member pointers compatible as long as the pointee was the same.
Make a few style corrections as suggested by Chris.
llvm-svn: 63215
new DiagnoseIncompleteType. It provides additional information about
struct/class/union/enum types when possible, either by pointing to the
forward declaration of that type or by pointing to the definition (if
we're in the process of defining that type).
Fixes <rdar://problem/6500531>.
llvm-svn: 62521
even when we are still defining the TagDecl. This is required so that
qualified name lookup of a class name within its definition works (see
the new bits in test/SemaCXX/qualified-id-lookup.cpp).
As part of this, move the nested redefinition checking code into
ActOnTag. This gives us diagnostics earlier (when we try to perform
the nested redefinition, rather than when we try to complete the 2nd
definition) and removes some code duplication.
llvm-svn: 62386
Douglas Gregor