Summary:
Removes:
* All LLVM-IR level debug info using StripDebugInfo()
* All debugify metadata
* 'Debug Info Version' module flag
* All (valid*) DEBUG_VALUE MachineInstrs
* All DebugLocs from MachineInstrs
This is a more complete solution than the previous MIRPrinter
option that just causes it to neglect to print debug-locations.
* The qualifier 'valid' is used here because AArch64 emits
an invalid one and tests depend on it
Reviewers: vsk, aprantl, bogner
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77747
Summary:
Re-used the IR-level debugify for the most part. The MIR-level code then
adds locations to the MachineInstrs afterwards based on the LLVM-IR debug
info.
It's worth mentioning that the resulting locations make little sense as
the range of line numbers used in a Function at the MIR level exceeds that
of the equivelent IR level function. As such, MachineInstrs can appear to
originate from outside the subprogram scope (and from other subprogram
scopes). However, it doesn't seem worth worrying about as the source is
imaginary anyway.
There's a few high level goals this pass works towards:
* We should be able to debugify our .ll/.mir in the lit tests without
changing the checks and still pass them. I.e. Debug info should not change
codegen. Combining this with a strip-debug pass should enable this. The
main issue I ran into without the strip-debug pass was instructions with MMO's and
checks on both the instruction and the MMO as the debug-location is
between them. I currently have a simple hack in the MIRPrinter to
resolve that but the more general solution is a proper strip-debug pass.
* We should be able to test that GlobalISel does not lose debug info. I
recently found that the legalizer can be unexpectedly lossy in seemingly
simple cases (e.g. expanding one instr into many). I have a verifier
(will be posted separately) that can be integrated with passes that use
the observer interface and will catch location loss (it does not verify
correctness, just that there's zero lossage). It is a little conservative
as the line-0 locations that arise from conflicts do not track the
conflicting locations but it can still catch a fair bit.
Depends on D77439, D77438
Reviewers: aprantl, bogner, vsk
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77446
Daniel Sanders