This addresses the flakyness of (at least) TestMultilineNavigation,
which was failing when the editline history of a concurrently executing
test made leaked in. Using a test-specific home directory ensures the
tests are independent.
Test dependent on pexpect fail randomly with timeouts on Arm/AArch64 Linux
buildbots. I am setting pexpect timeout from 30 to 60.
I will revert this back if this doesnt improve random failures.
This test supposed to check the test base we are using for pexpect tests, but instead it used the normal TestBase
class we use for all other tests. TestBase already had the substrs type check since D88792 so this
test was passing because of that.
This just changes the test base of the test to the pexpect one so that the `expect` calls find their intended
target function. Also moves the check to the very start so that we can check the argument without
actually having to start a terminal and all that jazz.
(I found this by accident as D88792 got somehow reverted in a downstream branch so this test started
failing).
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96556
This is a follow up to D88792 which found an issue in a call to PExpectTest's
expect function that allows passing a string to the `substrs` parameter. However
this issue was found by just grepping and TestPExpect's expect function is still
accepting a single string as a value to `substrs`.
This patch adds the same sanity check that D88792 added to the PExpectTest's
implementation of `expect` and also adds a small test for it.
Reviewed By: kastiglione, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89302
Annotating `PExpectTest` with `@skipIfWindows` instead of marking it as an empty class will make the test runner recognize it as a test class, which should allow me to reland adb5c23f8c.
I don't have a windows machine to verify this works, but I did some tests using `@skipIfLinux` and they all worked as expected. In case the `pexpect` import is not at all available on windows, I moved it to within the method where it's used.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86745
This is relanding D81001. The patch originally failed as on newer editline
versions it seems CC_REFRESH will move the cursor to the start of the line via
\r and then back to the original position. On older editline versions like
the one used by default on macOS, CC_REFRESH doesn't move the cursor at all.
As the patch changed the way we handle tab completion (previously we did
REDISPLAY but now we're doing CC_REFRESH), this caused a few completion tests
to receive this unexpected cursor movement in the output stream.
This patch updates those tests to also accept output that contains the specific
cursor movement commands (\r and then \x1b[XC). lldbpexpect.py received an
utility method for generating the cursor movement escape sequence.
Original summary:
I implemented autosuggestion if there is one possible suggestion.
I set the keybinds for every character. When a character is typed, Editline::TypedCharacter is called.
Then, autosuggestion part is displayed in gray, and you can actually input by typing C-k.
Editline::Autosuggest is a function for finding completion, and it is like Editline::TabCommand now, but I will add more features to it.
Testing does not work well in my environment, so I can't confirm that it goes well, sorry. I am dealing with it now.
Reviewed By: teemperor, JDevlieghere, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81001
This patch modifies the skipIfRemote decorator so it can apply to a
whole class, which allows us to skip all PExpect tests as a whole.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85365
In some environments (typically, buildbots), this variable may not be
available. This can cause tests to behave differently.
Explicitly set the variable to "vt100" to ensure consistent test
behavior. It should not matter that we do not inherit the process TERM
variable, as the child process runs in a new virtual terminal anyway.
Summary:
A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`.
Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file.
I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives).
I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
Summary:
expect() forwards its command to sendline(). This can be problematic if the command already contains a newline: sendline() unconditionally adds a newline to the command, which causes the command to run twice (hitting enter in lldb runs the previous command). The expect() helper looks for the prompt and finds the first one, but because the command has run a second time, the buffer will contain the contents of the second time the command ran, causing potential erroneous matching.
Simplify the editline test, which was using different commands to workaround this misunderstanding.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70324
Summary:
I'm doing this mainly for consistency, but there are also other cleanups
that will be enabled by this (e.g., the automatic setting of
clang-modules-cache-path setting).
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67082
llvm-svn: 370858
Currently tests using expect_prompt are failing on the Python 3 bot with
an error saying "argument must be str, not bytes". I don't have a Python
3 build handy, but I suspect this might fix that.
llvm-svn: 370526
Summary:
While working on r370054, i've found it frustrating that the test output
was compeletely unhelpful in case of failures. Therefore I've decided to
improve that. In this I reuse the PExpectTest class, which was one of
our mechanisms for running pexpect tests, but which has gotten orhpaned
in the mean time.
I've replaced the existing send methods with a "expect" method, which
I've tried to design so that it has a similar interface to the expect
method in regular non-pexpect dotest tests (as it essentially does
something very similar). I've kept the ability to dump the transcript of
the pexpect communication to stdout in the "trace" mode, as that is a
very handy way to figure out what the test is doing. I've also removed
the "expect_string" method used in the existing tests -- I've found this
to be unhelpful because it hides the message that would be normally
displayed by the EOF exception. Although vebose, this message includes
some important information, like what strings we were searching for,
what were the last bits of lldb output, etc. I've also beefed up the
class to automatically disable the debug info test duplication, and
auto-skip tests when the host platform does not support pexpect.
This patch ports TestMultilineCompletion and TestIOHandlerCompletion to
the new class. It also deletes TestFormats as it is not testing anything
(definitely not formats) -- it was committed with the test code
commented out (r228207), and then the testing code was deleted in
r356000.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66954
llvm-svn: 370449
I'm not sure why this surfaced at this particular point, but
TestCommandScriptImmediateOutput (a pexpect test) had a synchronization
issue, where the (lldb) promts it was expecting were getting out of
sync. This happened for two reasons:
- it did not expect the initial (lldb) prompt we print at startup
- launchArgs() returned None, which resulted in an extra "target create
None" command being issued to lldb (and an extra unhandled prompt
being printed).
Resolving these two issues seems to fix (or at least, improve) the test.
llvm-svn: 357459
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
1 - If you plan on looking for the "(lldb) " prompt as a regular expression, look for "\(lldb\) " so you don't just find "lldb".
2 - Make sure to not use colors (specify --no-use-colors as an option to lldb when launching it) as our editline will print:
"(lldb) <color junk>(lldb) "
where "<color junk>" is a work around that is used to allow us to colorize our prompts. The bad thing is this will make pexepct code like this not execute as you would expect:
prompt = "\(lldb\) "
self.child.sendline("breakpoint set ...", prompt)
self.child.sendline("breakpoint clear ...", prompt)
The problem is the first "sendline" will create two lldb prompts and will match both the first and second prompts and you output will get off. So be sure to disable colors if you need to.
Fixed a case where "TestCommandScriptImmediateOutput.py" would fail if you have spaces in your directory names. I modified custom_command.py to use shlex to parse arguments and I quoted the file path we sent down to the custom_command.write_file function.
llvm-svn: 264810
Since pexpect doesn't exist on Windows, tests which are xfail'ed
are not being run at all because they are failing when the file
is imported due to the `import pexpect`. This puts the import
behind a conditional and makes an empty base class in the case
where pexpect is not present.
llvm-svn: 258965
Absolute imports were introduced in Python 2.5 as a feature
(e.g. from __future__ import absolute_import), and made default
in Python 3.
When absolute imports are enabled, the import system changes in
a couple of ways:
1) The `import foo` syntax will *only* search sys.path. If `foo`
isn't in sys.path, it won't be found. Period. Without absolute
imports, the import system will also search the same directory
that the importing file resides in, so that you can easily
import from the same folder.
2) From inside a package, you can use a dot syntax to refer to higher
levels of the current package. For example, if you are in the
package lldbsuite.test.utility, then ..foo refers to
lldbsuite.test.foo. You can use this notation with the
`from X import Y` syntax to write intra-package references. For
example, using the previous locationa s a starting point, writing
`from ..support import seven` would import lldbsuite.support.seven
Since this is now the default behavior in Python 3, this means that
importing from the same directory with `import foo` *no longer works*.
As a result, the only way to have portable code is to force absolute
imports for all versions of Python.
See PEP 0328 [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0328/] for more
information about absolute and relative imports.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14342
Reviewed By: Todd Fiala
llvm-svn: 252191
This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level
scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party
libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it,
because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level
script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just
adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this
patch is essentially no functional change.
To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the
`use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the
original copy still remains in `lldb/test`
llvm-svn: 251963
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
Pavel Labath