- Besides used in SjLj exception handling, __builtin_setjmp/__longjmp is also
used as a light-weight replacement of setjmp/longjmp which are used to
implementation continuation, user-level threading, and etc. The support added
in this patch ONLY addresses this usage and is NOT intended to support SjLj
exception handling as zero-cost DWARF exception handling is used by default
in X86.
llvm-svn: 165989
We use the enums to query whether an Attributes object has that attribute. The
opaque layer is responsible for knowing where that specific attribute is stored.
llvm-svn: 165488
X86DAGToDAGISel::PreprocessISelDAG(), isel is moving load inside
callseq_start / callseq_end so it can be folded into a call. This can
create a cycle in the DAG when the call is glued to a copytoreg. We
have been lucky this hasn't caused too many issues because the pre-ra
scheduler has special handling of call sequences. However, it has
caused a crash in a specific tailcall case.
rdar://12393897
llvm-svn: 165072
- Merge the processing of LOAD_ADD with other atomic load-arith
operations
- Separate the logic getting target constant for atomic-load-op and add
an optimization for atomic-load-add on i16 with negative value
- Optimize a minor case for atomic-fetch-add i16 with negative operand. Test
case is revised.
llvm-svn: 164243
We don't have enough GR64_TC registers when calling a varargs function
with 6 arguments. Since %al holds the number of vector registers used,
only %r11 is available as a scratch register.
This means that addressing modes using both base and index registers
can't be folded into TCRETURNmi64.
<rdar://problem/12282281>
llvm-svn: 163761
- BlockAddress has no support of BA + offset form and there is no way to
propagate that offset into machine operand;
- Add BA + offset support and a new interface 'getTargetBlockAddress' to
simplify target block address forming;
- All targets are modified to use new interface and X86 backend is enhanced to
support BA + offset addressing.
llvm-svn: 163743
We perform the following:
1> Use SUB instead of CMP for i8,i16,i32 and i64 in ISel lowering.
2> Modify MachineCSE to correctly handle implicit defs.
3> Convert SUB back to CMP if possible at peephole.
Removed pattern matching of (a>b) ? (a-b):0 and like, since they are handled
by peephole now.
rdar://11873276
llvm-svn: 161462
are targeting an ELF platform. Only fold gs-relative (and fs-relative) loads
if it is actually sensible to do so for the target platform.
This fixes PR13438.
llvm-svn: 160687
Corrected type for index of llvm.x86.avx2.gather.d.pd.256
from 256-bit to 128-bit.
Corrected types for src|dst|mask of llvm.x86.avx2.gather.q.ps.256
from 256-bit to 128-bit.
Support the following intrinsics:
llvm.x86.avx2.gather.d.q, llvm.x86.avx2.gather.q.q
llvm.x86.avx2.gather.d.q.256, llvm.x86.avx2.gather.q.q.256
llvm.x86.avx2.gather.d.d, llvm.x86.avx2.gather.q.d
llvm.x86.avx2.gather.d.d.256, llvm.x86.avx2.gather.q.d.256
llvm-svn: 159402
x86 addressing modes. This allows PIE-based TLS offsets to fit directly
into an addressing mode immediate offset, which is the last remaining
code quality issue from PR12380. With this patch, that PR is completely
fixed.
To understand why this patch is correct to match these offsets into
addressing mode immediates, break it down by cases:
1) 32-bit is trivially correct, and unmodified here.
2) 64-bit non-small mode is unchanged and never matches.
3) 64-bit small PIC code which is RIP-relative is handled specially in
the match to try to fit RIP into the base register. If it fails, it
now early exits. This behavior is unchanged by the patch.
4) 64-bit small non-PIC code which is not RIP-relative continues to work
as it did before. The reason these immediates are safe is because the
ABI ensures they fit in small mode. This behavior is unchanged.
5) 64-bit small PIC code which is *not* using RIP-relative addressing.
This is the only case changed by the patch, and the primary place you
see it is in TLS, either the win64 section offset TLS or Linux
local-exec TLS model in a PIC compilation. Here the ABI again ensures
that the immediates fit because we are in small mode, and any other
operations required due to the PIC relocation model have been handled
externally to the Wrapper node (extra loads etc are made around the
wrapper node in ISelLowering).
I've tested this as much as I can comparing it with GCC's output, and
everything appears safe. I discussed this with Anton and it made sense
to him at least at face value. That said, if there are issues with PIC
code after this patch, yell and we can revert it.
llvm-svn: 154304
This allows us to keep passing reduced masks to SimplifyDemandedBits, but
know about all the bits if SimplifyDemandedBits fails. This allows instcombine
to simplify cases like the one in the included testcase.
llvm-svn: 154011
This is a code change to add support for changing instruction sequences of the form:
load
inc/dec of 8/16/32/64 bits
store
into the appropriate X86 inc/dec through memory instruction:
inc[qlwb] / dec[qlwb]
The checks that were in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node)>>ISD::STORE have been extracted to isLoadIncOrDecStore and reworked to use the better
named wrappers for getOperand(unsigned) (e.g. getOffset()) and replaced Chain.getNode() with LoadNode. The comments have also been expanded.
llvm-svn: 153635
This is a code change to add support for changing instruction sequences of the form:
load
inc/dec of 8/16/32/64 bits
store
into the appropriate X86 inc/dec through memory instruction:
inc[qlwb] / dec[qlwb]
The checks that were in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node)>>ISD::STORE have been extracted to isLoadIncOrDecStore and reworked to use the better
named wrappers for getOperand(unsigned) (e.g. getOffset()) and replaced Chain.getNode() with LoadNode. The comments have also been expanded.
llvm-svn: 153617
If the DEC node had more than one user, it was doing this lowering but
leaving the original DEC node around and so decrementing twice.
Fixes PR11964.
llvm-svn: 150356
same pattern. We already had this pattern is a few places, but others
tried to make a rough approximation of an actual DAG structure. As not
everywhere went to this trouble, nothing could rely on this being done.
In fact, I've checked all references to these node Ids, and the ones
that are using the topo-sort properties are actually satisfied with
a strict-weak-ordering. The requirement appears to be that Use >= Def.
I've added a big blurb of comments to this bit of the transform to
clarify why the order is so important for the next reader of the code.
I'm starting with this change as it is very small, and trivially
reverted if something breaks or the >= above really does need to be >.
If that proves the case, we can hide the problem by reverting this
patch, but the problem exists elsewhere as well, and so a more
comprehensive solution will be needed.
llvm-svn: 148001
hoped this would revive one of the llvm-gcc selfhost build bots, but it
didn't so it doesn't appear that my transform is the culprit.
If anyone else is seeing failures, please let me know!
llvm-svn: 147957
strange build bot failures that look like a miscompile into an infloop.
I'll investigate this tomorrow, but I'd both like to know whether my
patch is the culprit, and get the bots back to green.
llvm-svn: 147945
Michael Liao