In some cases the analyzer didn't expect an array-type variable to be
initialized with anything other than a string literal. The patch essentially
removes the assertion, and ensures relatively sane behavior.
There is a bigger problem with these initializers. Currently our memory model
(RegionStore) is being ordered to initialize the array with a region that
is assumed to be storing the initializer rvalue, and it guesses to copy
the contents of that region to the array variable. However, it would make
more sense for RegionStore to receive the correct initializer in the first
place. This problem isn't addressed with this patch.
rdar://problem/27248428
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23963
llvm-svn: 315750
The analyzer now realizes that C++ std::initializer_list objects and
Objective-C boxed structure/array/dictionary expressions can potentially
maintain a reference to the objects that were put into them. This avoids
false memory leak posivites and a few other issues.
This is a conservative behavior; for now, we do not model what actually happens
to the objects after being passed into such initializer lists.
rdar://problem/32918288
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35216
llvm-svn: 314975
In ProgramState::getSVal(Location, Type) API which dereferences a pointer value,
when the optional Type parameter is not supplied and the Location is not typed,
type should have been guessed on a best-effort basis by inspecting the Location
more deeply. However, this never worked; the auto-detected type was instead
a pointer type to the correct type.
Fixed the issue and added various test cases to demonstrate which parts of the
analyzer were affected (uninitialized pointer argument checker, C++ trivial copy
modeling, Google test API modeling checker).
Additionally, autodetected void types are automatically replaced with char,
in order to simplify checker APIs. Which means that if the location is a void
pointer, getSVal() would read the first byte through this pointer
and return its symbolic value.
Fixes pr34305.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38358
llvm-svn: 314910
This function can now track null pointer through simple pointer arithmetic,
such as '*&*(p + 2)' => 'p' and so on, displaying intermediate diagnostic pieces
for the user to understand where the null pointer is coming from.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37025
llvm-svn: 314290
This API is used by checkers (and other entities) in order to track where does
a value originate from, by jumping from an expression value of which is equal
to that value to the expression from which this value has "appeared". For
example, it may be an lvalue from which the rvalue was loaded, or a function
call from which the dereferenced pointer was returned.
The function now avoids incorrectly unwrapping implicit lvalue-to-rvalue casts,
which caused crashes and incorrect intermediate diagnostic pieces. It also no
longer relies on how the expression is written when guessing what it means.
Fixes pr34373 and pr34731.
rdar://problem/33594502
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37023
llvm-svn: 314287
This patch fixes analyzer's crash on the newly added test case
(see also https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34374).
Pointers subtraction appears to be modeled incorrectly
in the following example:
char* p;
auto n = p - reinterpret_cast<char*>((unsigned long)1);
In this case the analyzer (built without this patch)
tries to create a symbolic value for the difference
treating reinterpret_cast<char*>((unsigned long)1)
as an integer, that is not correct.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38214
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 314141
The implementation is in AnalysisDeclContext.cpp and the class is called
AnalysisDeclContext.
Making those match up has numerous benefits, including:
- Easier jump from header to/from implementation.
- Easily identify filename from class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37500
llvm-svn: 312671
This diff fixes modeling of arithmetic
expressions where pointers are treated as integers
(i.e. via C-style / reinterpret casts).
For now we return UnknownVal unless the operation is a comparison.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37120
llvm-svn: 311935
This way the unrolling can be restricted for loops which will take at most a
given number of steps. It is defined as 128 in this patch and it seems to have
a good number for that purpose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37181
llvm-svn: 311883
Added check if the execution of the last step of the given unrolled loop has
generated more branches. If yes, than treat it as a normal (non-unrolled) loop
in the remaining part of the analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36962
llvm-svn: 311881
1. The LoopUnrolling feature needs the LoopExit included in the CFG so added this
dependency via the config options
2. The LoopExit element can be encountered even if we haven't encountered the
block of the corresponding LoopStmt. So the asserts were not right.
3. If we are caching out the Node then we get a nullptr from generateNode which
case was not handled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37103
llvm-svn: 311880
The LoopExit CFG information provides the opportunity to not mark the loops but
having a stack which tracks if a loop is unrolled or not. So in case of
simulating a loop we just add it and the information if it meets the
requirements to be unrolled to the top of the stack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35684
llvm-svn: 311346
This patch adds handling of the LoopExit CFGElements to the StaticAnalyzer.
This is reached by introducing a new ProgramPoint.
Tests will be added in a following commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35670
llvm-svn: 311344
This patch introduces a new CFG element CFGLoopExit that indicate when a loop
ends. It does not deal with returnStmts yet (left it as a TODO).
It hidden behind a new analyzer-config flag called cfg-loopexit (false by
default).
Test cases added.
The main purpose of this patch right know is to make loop unrolling and loop
widening easier and more efficient. However, this information can be useful for
future improvements in the StaticAnalyzer core too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35668
llvm-svn: 311235
Adding escape check for the counter variable of the loop.
It is achieved by jumping back on the ExplodedGraph to its declStmt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35657
llvm-svn: 311234
This diff fixes analyzer's crash (triggered assert) on the newly added test case.
The assert being discussed is assert(!B.lookup(R, BindingKey::Direct))
in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp, however the root cause is different.
For classes with empty bases the offsets might be tricky.
For example, let's assume we have
struct S: NonEmptyBase, EmptyBase {
...
};
In this case Clang applies empty base class optimization and
the offset of EmptyBase will be 0, it can be verified via
clang -cc1 -x c++ -v -fdump-record-layouts main.cpp -emit-llvm -o /dev/null.
When the analyzer tries to perform zero initialization of EmptyBase
it will hit the assert because that region
has already been "written" by the constructor of NonEmptyBase.
Test plan:
make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36851
llvm-svn: 311182
This diff fixes a crash (triggered assert) on the newly added test case.
In the method Simplifier::VisitSymbolData we check the type of S and return
Loc/NonLoc accordingly.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36564
llvm-svn: 310887
This change adds support for cross-file diagnostic paths in html output. If the
diagnostic path is not cross-file, there is no change in the output.
Patch by Vlad Tsyrklevich!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30406
llvm-svn: 309968
This feature allows the analyzer to consider loops to completely unroll.
New requirements/rules (for unrolling) can be added easily via ASTMatchers.
Right now it is hidden behind a flag, the aim is to find the correct heuristic
and create a solution which results higher coverage % and more precise
analysis, thus can be enabled by default.
Right now the blocks which belong to an unrolled loop are marked by the
LoopVisitor which adds them to the ProgramState.
Then whenever we encounter a CFGBlock in the processCFGBlockEntrance which is
marked then we skip its investigating. That means, it won't be considered to
be visited more than the maximal bound for visiting since it won't be checked.
llvm-svn: 309006
Because since r308957 the suppress-on-sink feature contains its own
mini-analysis, it also needs to become aware that C++ unhandled exceptions
cause sinks. Unfortunately, for now we treat all exceptions as unhandled in
the analyzer, so suppress-on-sink needs to do the same.
rdar://problem/28157554
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35674
llvm-svn: 308961
If a certain memory leak (or other similar bug) found by the analyzer is known
to be happening only before abnormal termination of the program ("sink", eg.
assertion failure in the code under analysis, or another bug that introduces
undefined behavior), such leak warning is discarded. However, if the analysis
has never reaches completion (due to complexity of the code), it may be
failing to notice the sink.
This commit further extends the partial solution introduced in r290341 to cover
cases when a complicated control flow occurs before encountering a no-return
statement (which anyway inevitably leads to such statement(s)) by traversing
the respective section of the CFG in a depth-first manner. A complete solution
still seems elusive.
rdar://problem/28157554
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35673
llvm-svn: 308957
requirements/rules (for unrolling) can be added easily via ASTMatchers.
The current implementation is hidden behind a flag.
Right now the blocks which belong to an unrolled loop are marked by the
LoopVisitor which adds them to the ProgramState. Then whenever we encounter a
CFGBlock in the processCFGBlockEntrance which is marked then we skip its
investigating. That means, it won't be considered to be visited more than the
maximal bound for visiting since it won't be checked.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34260
llvm-svn: 308558
Summary:
This mimics the implementation for the implicit destructors. The
generation of this scope leaving elements is hidden behind
a flag to the CFGBuilder, thus it should not affect existing code.
Currently, I'm missing a test (it's implicitly tested by the clang-tidy
lifetime checker that I'm proposing).
I though about a test using debug.DumpCFG, but then I would
have to add an option to StaticAnalyzer/Core/AnalyzerOptions
to enable the scope leaving CFGElement,
which would only be useful to that particular test.
Any other ideas how I could make a test for this feature?
Reviewers: krememek, jordan_rose
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15031
llvm-svn: 307759
This is a follow up for one of
the previous diffs https://reviews.llvm.org/D32328.
getTypeSize and with getIntWidth are not equivalent for bool
(see https://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/ASTContext_8cpp_source.html#l08444),
this causes a number of issues
(for instance, if APint X representing a bool is created
with the wrong bit width then X is not comparable against Min/Max
(because of the different bit width), that results in crashes
(triggered asserts) inside assume* methods),
for examples see the newly added test cases.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35041
llvm-svn: 307604
This makes the analyzer around 10% slower by default,
allowing it to find deeper bugs.
Default values for the following -analyzer-config change:
max-nodes: 150000 -> 225000;
max-inlinable-size: 50 -> 100.
rdar://problem/32539666
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34277
llvm-svn: 305900
Memory region allocated by alloca() carries no implicit type information.
Don't crash when resolving the init message for an Objective-C object
that is being constructed in such region.
rdar://problem/32517077
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33828
llvm-svn: 305211
In plist output mode with alternate path diagnostics, when entering a function,
we draw an arrow from the caller to the beginning of the callee's declaration.
Upon exiting, however, we draw the arrow from the last statement in the
callee function. The former makes little sense when the declaration is
not a definition, i.e. has no body, which may happen in case the body
is coming from a body farm, eg. Objective-C autosynthesized property accessor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33671
llvm-svn: 304713
Nullable-to-nonnull checks used to crash when the custom bug visitor was trying
to add its notes to autosynthesized accessors of Objective-C properties.
Now we avoid this, mostly automatically outside of checker control, by
moving the diagnostic to the parent stack frame where the accessor has been
called.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32437
llvm-svn: 304710
This should fix the leaks found by asan buildbot in r304162.
Also don't store a reference to the factory with every map value,
which is the only difference between ImmutableMap and ImmutableMapRef.
llvm-svn: 304170
The analyzer's taint analysis can now reason about structures or arrays
originating from taint sources in which only certain sections are tainted.
In particular, it also benefits modeling functions like read(), which may
read tainted data into a section of a structure, but RegionStore is incapable of
expressing the fact that the rest of the structure remains intact, even if we
try to model read() directly.
Patch by Vlad Tsyrklevich!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28445
llvm-svn: 304162
Even though the shouldInlineCall function returns true, it can happen that the
function is not going to be inlined (as it can be seen at line 913 and below).
Moved the bumpNumTimesInlined(D) (the counter increaser) call to the inlineCall
function where it logically belongs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32179
llvm-svn: 303158
It was written as "Memory Error" in most places and as "Memory error" in a few
other places, however it is the latter that is more consistent with
other categories (such as "Logic error").
rdar://problem/31718115
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32702
llvm-svn: 302016
Gabor Horvath