macOS
Summary:
In https://bugs.freebsd.org/215125 I was notified that some configure
scripts attempt to test for the Linux-specific `mallinfo` and `mallopt`
functions by compiling and linking small programs which references the
functions, and observing whether that results in errors.
FreeBSD and macOS do not have the `mallinfo` and `mallopt` functions, so
normally these tests would fail, but when sanitizers are enabled, they
incorrectly succeed, because the sanitizers define interceptors for
these functions. This also applies to some other malloc-related
functions, such as `memalign`, `pvalloc` and `cfree`.
Fix this by not intercepting `mallinfo`, `mallopt`, `memalign`,
`pvalloc` and `cfree` for FreeBSD and macOS, in all sanitizers.
Also delete the non-functional `cfree` wrapper for Windows, to fix the
test cases on that platform.
Reviewers: emaste, kcc, rnk
Subscribers: timurrrr, eugenis, hans, joerg, llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27654
llvm-svn: 293536
This reverts r293337, which breaks tests on Windows:
malloc-no-intercept-499eb7.o : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _mallinfo referenced in function _main
llvm-svn: 293346
Summary:
In https://bugs.freebsd.org/215125 I was notified that some configure
scripts attempt to test for the Linux-specific `mallinfo` and `mallopt`
functions by compiling and linking small programs which references the
functions, and observing whether that results in errors.
FreeBSD and macOS do not have the `mallinfo` and `mallopt` functions, so
normally these tests would fail, but when sanitizers are enabled, they
incorrectly succeed, because the sanitizers define interceptors for
these functions. This also applies to some other malloc-related
functions, such as `memalign`, `pvalloc` and `cfree`.
Fix this by not intercepting `mallinfo`, `mallopt`, `memalign`,
`pvalloc` and `cfree` for FreeBSD and macOS, in all sanitizers.
Reviewers: emaste, kcc
Subscribers: hans, joerg, llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27654
llvm-svn: 293337
This patch tries to fix https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27310 by using the same hack for malloc as we use for calloc: allocate corresponding memory from internal buffer when ASan is not initialized.
This way we could avoid nasty '==6987==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../libsanitizer/asan/asan_rtl.cc:556 "((!asan_init_is_running && "ASan init calls itself!")) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)' errors in
environments with glibc 2.23+ in use, where _dl_signal_error, called from dlsym for undefined symbols calls malloc in order to get a buffer for error message.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20235
llvm-svn: 269633
Calloc interceptor initially allocates memory from temp buffer (to serve dlsyms called during asan_init). There is a chance that some non-instrumented library (or executable) has allocated memory with calloc before asan_init and got pointer from the same temporary buffer which later caused problems with free.
Inspired by https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/626
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14979
llvm-svn: 254395
Format of __libc_malloc_dispatch has changed in Android L.
While we are moving towards a solution that does not depend on bionic
internals, here is something to support both K* and L releases.
llvm-svn: 213263
Invoke a fatal stack trace unwinder when ASan prints allocator-relevant
error reports (double-free, alloc-dealloc-mismatch, invalid-free).
Thus we'll be able to print complete stack trace even if allocation/free
stacks are not stored (malloc_context_size=0).
Based on the patch by Yuri Gribov!
llvm-svn: 194579
At the moment, asan internal Printf() uses %l modifier for printing
values of size_t and related types. This works, because we control
both the implementation of Printf and all its uses, but can be a
little misleading.
This change adds support for %z to Printf(). All callers that print
sizes and pointers as integers are switched to %zu / %zx.
llvm-svn: 153177
Dimitry Andric