Being passed -z notext is a pretty strong indication that the user is
OK with text relocations. This is not the same behavior as bfd, but
bfd defaults to -z notext, so it has to try to avoid text relocations
and use them as a last resort.
llvm-svn: 297789
That moves all members that s possible to move for now (all which
does not depend on ELFT templating).
After that change LinkerScript contains only 8 methods in total,
and I believe it is possible to move them all after tweaking other
parts of linker. And we will be able to have single class for
linkerscript at the end.
llvm-svn: 297735
We can move all not templated functionality to LinkerScriptBase.
Patch do that for hasPhdrsCommands() and shows how it helps to detemplate
things in other places.
Probably we should be able to merge these 2 classes into single one after such steps.
Even if not, it still looks as reasonable cleanup for me.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30895
llvm-svn: 297714
lld crashes when .eh_frame or .eh_frame_hdr section is discarded
in linker script and there is no PHDRS directive.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30885
llvm-svn: 297712
Synthetic sections don't belong to any input file, but still they
are input sections. Whenever problem occurs with relocations in
these sections lld crashes in error reporting, trying to print
input file name.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30889
llvm-svn: 297711
Previously, it created a temporary directory and then failed when
FileOutputBuffer tried to rename that file to the destination file
(which is actually a directory name).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30912
llvm-svn: 297679
Patch from James Henderson.
If a user has a long link, e.g. due to a large LTO link, they do not
wish to run it and find that it failed because there was a mistake in
their command-line, after they waited for some significant amount of
time. This change adds some basic checking of the linker output file
path, which is run shortly after parsing the command-line and linker
script. An error is emitted if LLD cannot write to the specified path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30449
llvm-svn: 297645
Fix a bug introduced in r297313 which caused them to resolve to the end
of the ELF header in PIEs and DSOs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30843
llvm-svn: 297638
Options can start with `-` or `--` unless they start with "o".
Any option that starts with `-o` should be interpreted as an output
file name. This is a quote from the GNU ld man page.
Note -- there is one exception to this rule. Multiple letter
options that start with a lower case 'o' can only be preceded by
two dashes. This is to reduce confusion with the -o option.
So for example -omagic sets the output file name to magic whereas
--omagic sets the NMAGIC flag on the output.
We didn't handle that properly before.
llvm-svn: 297508
Using .eh_frame input section pattern in linker script currently
causes a crash; this is because .eh_frame input sections require
special handling since they're all combined into a synthetic
section rather than regular output section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30627
llvm-svn: 297501
gold linker manual describes them as:
-z text Do not permit relocations in read-only segments
-z notext Permit relocations in read-only segments (default)
In LLD default is to not permit them. Patch implements -z notext.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30530
llvm-svn: 297366
.eh_frame_hdr is a header constructed for .eh_frame sections.
We do not proccess .eh_frame when doing relocatable output,
so should not try to create .eh_frame_hdr too.
Previous behavior without this patch is segfault.
Fixes PR32118.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30566
llvm-svn: 297365
Previously, if you have foo=bar in a definition file, this assertion
could fire because when symbols are read from file they could be mangled.
It seems that due to historical reasons underscore mangling scheme is
really ad-hoc, and I cannot find a clean way to handle this. I had
to just de-mangle symbols to search again.
llvm-svn: 297357
With this we have a single section hierarchy. It is a bit less code,
but the main advantage will be in a future patch being able to handle
foo = symbol_in_obj;
in a linker script. Currently that fails since we try to find the
output section of symbol_in_obj. With this we should be able to just
return an InputSection from the expression.
llvm-svn: 297313
This change moves the calls to finalizeContent() for each synthetic section
before createThunks(). This will allow us to assign addresses prior to
calling createThunks(). As addition of thunks may add to the static
symbol table and may affect the size of the mips got section we introduce a
couple of additional member functions to update these values.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29983
llvm-svn: 297277
Some archive files created during chromium build contains both BC
and native files. If that's the case, we want to pass the archive
file to link.exe. Otherwise, the MSVC linker would complain that
there's an unresolved symbol in a given set of files.
I cannot explain why link.exe doesn't complain about the presence
of bitcode files in this case, but it seems link.exe doesn't touch BC.
llvm-svn: 297229
If /msvclto is specified, we compile bitcode files and pass it to the
MSVC linker, stripping all bitcode files. We haven't stripped archive
files, because I was thinking that the MSVC linker wouldn't touch files
in archive files. When we pass an object file to link.exe, all symbols
have been resolved already, so link.exe shoulnd't need any of the files
in archives.
It turns out that even though link.exe doesn't need to do that, it
seems to try to read each file in all archives. And if there's a non-
COFF file in an archive, it exists with an error message. So we need
to remove archives from the command line too.
llvm-svn: 297191
This change fixes a bug in which the Mips LA25 Thunks are always assigned
to the same Output section as the caller and not the callee as expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30637
llvm-svn: 297135
Rafael Espindola