LR was undefined entering outlined functions that contain calls. This made the
machine verifier unhappy when expensive checks were enabled. This fixes that.
llvm-svn: 321014
Summary:
Update this error message indicate this test only ensures experimental
targets were passed via LLVM_EXPERIMENTAL_TARGETS_TO_BUILD.
Originally, this test validated all targets, but in r184923, it was moved
after the LLVMBUILDTOOL test, which also validates all targets, making
that part of the test redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41273
llvm-svn: 321012
Adds missing support for DW_FORM_data16.
Update of r320852/r320886, fixing the unittest again, this time use a
raw char string for the test data.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41090
llvm-svn: 321011
Modify test so that it passes in the reverse-iteration bot.
We use DenseMap instead of std::map for the summaries to emit into
distributed index files. The iteration order is not defined, but
it is deterministic, which is good enough.
llvm-svn: 321000
LLVM IR function names which disable mangling start with '\01'
(https://www.llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#identifiers).
When an identifier like "\01@abc@" gets dumped to MIR, it is quoted, but
only with single quotes.
http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html#id2770814:
"The allowed character range explicitly excludes the C0 control block
allowed), the surrogate block #xD800-#xDFFF, #xFFFE, and #xFFFF."
http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html#id2776092:
"All non-printable characters must be escaped.
[...]
Note that escape sequences are only interpreted in double-quoted scalars."
This patch adds support for printing escaped non-printable characters
between double quotes if needed.
Should also fix PR31743.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41290
llvm-svn: 320996
Summary: Patch [4/4] in a series to add parsing of predicates and properly parse SVE ZIP1/ZIP2 instructions. This patch further improves diagnostic messages for when the SVE feature is not specified.
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, olista01, echristo, efriedma
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: sdardis, aemerson, javed.absar, tschuett, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40363
llvm-svn: 320992
Fix an off by one error in the bounds checking for 'dinsu' and update
the ranges in the test comments so that they are accurate.
This version has the correct commit message.
Reviewers: atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41183
llvm-svn: 320991
There could be a situation when a specific DSO was built with FORTIFY_SOURCE option. In case asan-ed binary link against that DSO,
libasan can't handle the possible memory error because it does not have interceptors for spinrtf_chk, snprintf_chk, vprintf_chk,
vsnprintf_chk, __fprintf_chk functions. Let's interceptors for them.
Patch by Denis Khalikov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40951
llvm-svn: 320990
A more efficient PLT sequence can be used when the distance between the
.plt and the end of the .plt.got is less than 128 Megabytes, which is
frequently true. We fall back to the old sequence when the offset is larger
than 128 Megabytes. This gives us an alternative to forcing the longer
entries with --long-plt as we gracefully fall back to it as needed.
See ELF for the ARM Architecture Appendix A for details of the PLT sequence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41246
llvm-svn: 320987
Summary:
When emitting a diagnostic for an invalid operand, a specific diagnostic
should only be reported when the instruction being matched is actually
enabled by the feature flags.
Patch [3/4] in a series to add parsing of predicates and properly parse SVE
ZIP1/ZIP2 instructions. This patch fixes bogus diagnostic messages for when
the SVE feature is not specified.
Reviewers: rengolin, craig.topper, olista01, sdardis, stoklund
Reviewed By: olista01, sdardis
Subscribers: fhahn, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40362
llvm-svn: 320986
The recent UUID cleanups exposed a bug in the parsing code for the
jModulesInfo response, which was passing wrong value for the second
argument to UUID::SetFromStringRef (it passed the length of the string,
whereas the correct value should be the number of decoded bytes we
expect to receive).
This was not picked up by tests, because they test with 16-byte uuids,
for which the function happens to do the right thing even if the length
does not match (if the length does not match, the function does not
update m_num_uuid_bytes member, but that member is already 16 to begin
with).
I fix that and add a test with 20-byte uuid to catch if this regresses.
I have also added more safeguards into the parsing code to fail if we
cannot parse the entire uuid field we recieve. While testing the latter
part, I noticed that the "negative" jModulesInfo tests were succeeding
because we were sending malformed json (and not because the json
contents was invalid), so I make those tests a bit more robuts as well.
llvm-svn: 320985
Summary:
We were failing to propagate the environment when lldb-server was
started with a pre-loaded process
(e.g.: lldb-server gdbserver -- inferior --inferior_args)
This patch makes sure the environment is propagated. Instead of adding a
new GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS::SetLaunchEnvironment function to
complement SetLaunchArgs and SetLaunchFlags, I replace these with a
more generic SetLaunchInfo, which can be used to set any launch-related
property.
The accompanying test also verifies that the server correctly terminates
the connection after sending the exit packet (specifically, that it does
not send the exit packet twice).
Reviewers: clayborg, eugene
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41070
llvm-svn: 320984
Enhance LVI to analyze the ‘ashr’ binary operation. This leverages the infrastructure in ConstantRange for the ashr operation.
Patch by Surya Kumari Jangala!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40886
llvm-svn: 320983
At least <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/
builds/6013/steps/annotate/logs/stdio> complains about
__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_function_type_mismatch_abort (compiler-rt
lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cc) returning now despite being declared 'noreturn', so
looks like a different approach is needed for the function_type_mismatch check
to be called also in cases that may ultimately succeed.
llvm-svn: 320982
At least <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/
builds/6013/steps/annotate/logs/stdio> complains about
__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_function_type_mismatch_abort (compiler-rt
lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cc) returning now despite being declared 'noreturn', so
looks like a different approach is needed for the function_type_mismatch check
to be called also in cases that may ultimately succeed.
llvm-svn: 320981
r319524 has made more G_MERGE_VALUES/G_UNMERGE_VALUES pairs legal than
are supported by the rest of the pipeline. Restrict that to only the
cases that we can currently handle: packing 32-bit values into 64-bit
ones, when we have hardware FP.
llvm-svn: 320980
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
There is no cheap check whether two function type_infos only differ in noexcept,
so pass those two type_infos as additional data to the function_type_mismatch
handler (with the optimization of passing a null "static callee type" info when
that is already noexcept, so the additional check can be avoided anyway). For
the Itanium ABI (which appears to be the only one that happens to be used on
platforms that support -fsanitize=function, and which appears to only record
noexcept information for pointer-to-function type_infos, not for function
type_infos themselves), we then need to check the mangled names for occurrence
of "Do" representing "noexcept".
This is the cfe part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 320978
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
There is no cheap check whether two function type_infos only differ in noexcept,so pass those two type_infos as additional data to the function_type_mismatch
handler (with the optimization of passing a null "static callee type" info when that is already noexcept, so the additional check can be avoided anyway). For
the Itanium ABI (which appears to be the only one that happens to be used on
platforms that support -fsanitize=function, and which appears to only record
noexcept information for pointer-to-function type_infos, not for function
type_infos themselves), we then need to check the mangled names for occurrence
of "Do" representing "noexcept".
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 320977
Extend the ConstantRange implementation to compute the range of possible values resulting from an arithmetic right shift operation.
There will be a follow up patch to leverage this constant range infrastructure in LazyValueInfo.
Patch by Surya Kumari Jangala!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40881
llvm-svn: 320976
Fix an off by one error in the bounds checking for 'dinsu' and update
the ranges in the test comments so that they are accurate.
Reviewers: atanasyan
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41183
llvm-svn: 320974
Summary:
The filtering wasn't previously working as intended - the string list is
interpreted as a list of editor modes, not file extensions.
(It happens to mostly work as "c" and "cpp" are the names of modes, but we're
missing objective-c)
The file: restriction is new - clangd needs to be able to convert URI<->path
in order to determine how to build.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41343
llvm-svn: 320972
Summary:
The x86 FPR struct was defined as a struct containing a union between
two members: XSAVE and FXSAVE. This patch makes FPR a union directly to
remove one layer of indirection when trying to access the members.
The initial layout of these two structs is identical, which is
recognised by the fact that XSAVE has FXSAVE as its first member, so we
also considered removing one more layer and leave FPR identical to XSAVE
struct, but stopped short of doing that, as the FPR may be used to store
different layouts in the future (e.g., ones generated by the FSAVE
instruction).
Reviewers: clayborg, krytarowski
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41245
llvm-svn: 320966
Craig Topper