This option takes the name of the basic block you want to visualize
with -view-*-dags
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6948
llvm-svn: 225953
In case folding a node end up with a NaN as operand for the select,
the folding of the condition of the selectcc node returns "UNDEF".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6889
llvm-svn: 225952
If there is no associated immediate (MS style inline asm), do not try to access
the operand, assume that it is valid. This should fix the buildbots after SVN
r225941.
llvm-svn: 225950
When processing an array, every Elt has the same layout, it is
useless to recursively call each ComputeLinearIndex on each element.
Just do it once and multiply by the number of elements.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6832
llvm-svn: 225949
Copy the `GVMap` over to a standard `ValueToValueMapTy` so that we can
reuse the `MapMetadata()` logic. Unfortunately the `GVMap` can't just
be replaced, since `MapMetadata()` likes to modify the map, but at least
this will prevent NVPTX from bitrotting.
llvm-svn: 225944
The int instruction takes as an operand an 8-bit immediate value. Validate that
the input is valid rather than silently truncating the value.
llvm-svn: 225941
class members are implicitly "inline", no key word needed.
Naturally, this could change how LLVM inlines these functions because
<GRR>, but that's not an excuse to use the keyword. ;]
llvm-svn: 225939
significantly. Clean it up with the help of clang-format.
I've touched this up by hand in a couple of places that weren't quite
right (IMO). I think most of these actually have bugs open about
already.
llvm-svn: 225938
Correct, we have *zero* basic testing of the dominator tree in the
regression test suite. There is a single test that even prints it out,
and that test only checks a single line of the output. There are
a handful of tests that check post dominators, but all of those are
looking for bugs rather than just exercising the basic machinery.
This test is super boring and unexciting. But hey, it's something.
I needed there to be something so I could switch the basic test to run
with both the old and new pass manager.
llvm-svn: 225936
The form of nops used is CPU-specific (some CPUs, such as the POWER7, have
special group-terminating nops). We probably want a different callback for this
kind of nop insertion (something more like MCAsmBackend::writeNopData), or for
PPC to use a different mechanism for scheduling nops, but this will stop the
test from failing for now.
llvm-svn: 225928
Don't do the v4i8 -> v4f32 combine if the load will need to
be expanded due to alignment. This stops adding instructions
to repack into a single register that the v_cvt_ubyteN_f32
instructions read.
llvm-svn: 225926
Now that the source and destination types can be specified,
allow doing an expansion that doesn't use an EXTLOAD of the
result type. Try to do a legal extload to an intermediate type
and extend that if possible.
This generalizes the special case custom lowering of extloads
R600 has been using to work around this problem.
This also happens to fix a bug that would incorrectly use more
aligned loads than should be used.
llvm-svn: 225925
This re-applies r225808, fixed to avoid problems with SDAG dependencies along
with the preceding fix to ScheduleDAGSDNodes::RegDefIter::InitNodeNumDefs.
These problems caused the original regression tests to assert/segfault on many
(but not all) systems.
Original commit message:
This commit does two things:
1. Refactors PPCFastISel to use more of the common infrastructure for call
lowering (this lets us take advantage of this common code for lowering some
common intrinsics, stackmap/patchpoint among them).
2. Adds support for stackmap/patchpoint lowering. For the most part, this is
very similar to the support in the AArch64 target, with the obvious differences
(different registers, NOP instructions, etc.). The test cases are adapted
from the AArch64 test cases.
One difference of note is that the patchpoint call sequence takes 24 bytes, so
you can't use less than that (on AArch64 you can go down to 16). Also, as noted
in the docs, we take the patchpoint address to be the actual code address
(assuming the call is local in the TOC-sharing sense), which should yield
higher performance than generating the full cross-DSO indirect-call sequence
and is likely just as useful for JITed code (if not, we'll change it).
StackMaps and Patchpoints are still marked as experimental, and so this support
is doubly experimental. So go ahead and experiment!
llvm-svn: 225909
A pass that adds random noops to X86 binaries to introduce diversity with the goal of increasing security against most return-oriented programming attacks.
Command line options:
-noop-insertion // Enable noop insertion.
-noop-insertion-percentage=X // X% of assembly instructions will have a noop prepended (default: 50%, requires -noop-insertion)
-max-noops-per-instruction=X // Randomly generate X noops per instruction. ie. roll the dice X times with probability set above (default: 1). This doesn't guarantee X noop instructions.
In addition, the following 'quick switch' in clang enables basic diversity using default settings (currently: noop insertion and schedule randomization; it is intended to be extended in the future).
-fdiversify
This is the llvm part of the patch.
clang part: D3393
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3392
Patch by Stephen Crane (@rinon)
llvm-svn: 225908
PATCHPOINT is a strange pseudo-instruction. Depending on how it is used, and
whether or not the AnyReg calling convention is being used, it might or might
not define a value. However, its TableGen definition says that it defines one
value, and so when it doesn't, the code in ScheduleDAGSDNodes::RegDefIter
becomes confused and the code that uses the RegDefIter will try to get the
register class of the MVT::Other type associated with the PATCHPOINT's chain
result (under certain circumstances).
This will be covered by the PPC64 PatchPoint test cases once that support is
re-committed.
llvm-svn: 225907
This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the
x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have
already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter
functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info
operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will
catch the exception.
The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into
one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all
possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by
synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in
the EH selector that the landing pad block expects.
Missing functionality:
- Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters
- Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require
outlining and parent frame access
- Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH
In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to
catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300
llvm-svn: 225904
Although this makes the `cast<>` assert more often, the
`assert(Node->isResolved())` on the following line would assert in all
those cases. So, no functionality change here.
llvm-svn: 225903
It turns out, all callsites of the simplifier are guarded by a check for
CallInst::getCalledFunction (i.e., to make sure the callee is direct).
This check wasn't done when trying to further optimize a simplified fortified
libcall, introduced by a refactoring in r225640.
Fix that, add a testcase, and document the requirement.
llvm-svn: 225895
David Majnemer