(defined by the x32 ABI) mode, in which case its pointers are 32-bits
in size. This knowledge is also added to X86RegisterInfo that now
returns the appropriate registers in getPointerRegClass.
There are many outcomes to this change. In order to keep the patches
separate and manageable, we start by focusing on some simple testable
cases. The patch adds a test with passing a pointer to a function -
focusing on the difference between the two data models for x86-64.
Another test is added for handling of 'sret' arguments (and
functionality is added in X86ISelLowering to make it work).
A note on naming: the "x32 ABI" document refers to the AMD64
architecture (in LLVM it's distinguished by being is64Bits() in the
x86 subtarget) with two variations: the LP64 (default) data model, and
the ILP32 data model. This patch adds predicates to the subtarget
which are consistent with this naming scheme.
llvm-svn: 173503
Only for integers, pointers, and vectors of those. No floats.
Instrumentation seems very heavy, and may need to be replaced
with some approximation in the future.
llvm-svn: 173452
loops over instructions in the basic block or the use-def list of the
value, neither of which are really efficient when repeatedly querying
about values in the same basic block.
What's more, we already know that the CondBB is small, and so we can do
a much more efficient test by counting the uses in CondBB, and seeing if
those account for all of the uses.
Finally, we shouldn't blanket fail on any such instruction, instead we
should conservatively assume that those instructions are part of the
cost.
Note that this actually fixes a bug in the pass because
isUsedInBasicBlock has a really terrible bug in it. I'll fix that in my
next commit, but the fix for it would make this code suddenly take the
compile time hit I thought it already was taking, so I wanted to go
ahead and migrate this code to a faster & better pattern.
The bug in isUsedInBasicBlock was also causing other tests to test the
wrong thing entirely: for example we weren't actually disabling
speculation for floating point operations as intended (and tested), but
the test passed because we failed to speculate them due to the
isUsedInBasicBlock failure.
llvm-svn: 173417
Original commit message:
Plug TTI into the speculation logic, giving it a real cost interface
that can be specialized by targets.
The goal here is not to be more aggressive, but to just be more accurate
with very obvious cases. There are instructions which are known to be
truly free and which were not being modeled as such in this code -- see
the regression test which is distilled from an inner loop of zlib.
Everywhere the TTI cost model is insufficiently conservative I've added
explicit checks with FIXME comments to go add proper modelling of these
cost factors.
If this causes regressions, the likely solution is to make TTI even more
conservative in its cost estimates, but test cases will help here.
llvm-svn: 173357
We use constant folding to see if an intrinsic evaluates to the same value as a
constant that we know. If we don't take the undefinedness into account we get a
value that doesn't match the actual implementation, and miscompiled code.
This was uncovered by Chandler's simplifycfg changes.
llvm-svn: 173356
that can be specialized by targets.
The goal here is not to be more aggressive, but to just be more accurate
with very obvious cases. There are instructions which are known to be
truly free and which were not being modeled as such in this code -- see
the regression test which is distilled from an inner loop of zlib.
Everywhere the TTI cost model is insufficiently conservative I've added
explicit checks with FIXME comments to go add proper modelling of these
cost factors.
If this causes regressions, the likely solution is to make TTI even more
conservative in its cost estimates, but test cases will help here.
llvm-svn: 173342
a cost fuction that seems both a bit ad-hoc and also poorly suited to
evaluating constant expressions.
Notably, it is missing any support for trivial expressions such as
'inttoptr'. I could fix this routine, but it isn't clear to me all of
the constraints its other users are operating under.
The core protection that seems relevant here is avoiding the formation
of a select instruction wich a further chain of select operations in
a constant expression operand. Just explicitly encode that constraint.
Also, update the comments and organization here to make it clear where
this needs to go -- this should be driven off of real cost measurements
which take into account the number of constants expressions and the
depth of the constant expression tree.
llvm-svn: 173340
Allow Mips16 routines to call Mips32 routines that have abi requirements
that either arguments or return values are passed in floating point
registers. This handles only the pic case. We have not done non pic
for Mips16 yet in any form.
The libm functions are Mips32, so with this addition we have a complete
Mips16 hard float implementation.
We still are not able to complete mix Mip16 and Mips32 with hard float.
That will be the next phase which will have several steps. For Mips32
to freely call Mips16 some stub functions must be created.
llvm-svn: 173320
The requirements of the strong heuristic are:
* A Protector is required for functions which contain an array, regardless of
type or length.
* A Protector is required for functions which contain a structure/union which
contains an array, regardless of type or length. Note, there is no limit to
the depth of nesting.
* A protector is required when the address of a local variable (i.e., stack
based variable) is exposed. (E.g., such as through a local whose address is
taken as part of the RHS of an assignment or a local whose address is taken as
part of a function argument.)
llvm-svn: 173231
SSPStrong applies a heuristic to insert stack protectors in these situations:
* A Protector is required for functions which contain an array, regardless of
type or length.
* A Protector is required for functions which contain a structure/union which
contains an array, regardless of type or length. Note, there is no limit to
the depth of nesting.
* A protector is required when the address of a local variable (i.e., stack
based variable) is exposed. (E.g., such as through a local whose address is
taken as part of the RHS of an assignment or a local whose address is taken as
part of a function argument.)
This patch implements the SSPString attribute to be equivalent to
SSPRequired. This will change in a subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 173230
- Add list of physical registers clobbered in pseudo atomic insts
Physical registers are clobbered when pseudo atomic instructions are
expanded. Add them in clobber list to prevent DAG scheduler to
mis-schedule them after these insns are declared side-effect free.
- Add test case from Michael Kuperstein <michael.m.kuperstein@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 173200
the body does not use them and it appears the body has positional parameters.
This can cause unexpected results as in the added test case. As the darwin
version of gas(1) which only supported positional parameters, happened to
ignore the named parameters. Now that we want to support both styles of
macros we issue a warning in this specific case.
rdar://12861644
llvm-svn: 173199
It is not possible to distinguish 3r instructions from 2r / rus instructions
using only the fixed bits. Therefore if an instruction doesn't match the
2r / rus format try to decode it as a 3r instruction before returning Fail.
llvm-svn: 172984
The optimization handles esoteric cases but adds a lot of complexity both to the X86 backend and to other backends.
This optimization disables an important canonicalization of chains of SEXT nodes and makes SEXT and ZEXT asymmetrical.
Disabling the canonicalization of consecutive SEXT nodes into a single node disables other DAG optimizations that assume
that there is only one SEXT node. The AVX mask optimizations is one example. Additionally this optimization does not update the cost model.
llvm-svn: 172968
Eli Bendersky