Mention the deployment target, and don't say "partial" which doesn't
really mean anything to users.
rdar://problem/33601513
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56523
llvm-svn: 351108
Summary:
Remove the call to DiagnoseUseOfDecl in LookupMemberExpr because:
1. LookupMemberExpr eagerly lookup both getter and setter, reguardless
if they are used or not. It causes wrong diagnostics if you are only
using getter.
2. LookupMemberExpr only diagnoses getter, but not setter.
3. ObjCPropertyOpBuilder already DiagnoseUseOfDecl when building getter
and setter. Doing it again in LookupMemberExpr causes duplicated
diagnostics.
rdar://problem/38479756
Reviewers: erik.pilkington, arphaman, doug.gregor
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47280
llvm-svn: 333148
This commit adds a traversal of the AST after Sema of a function that diagnoses
unguarded references to declarations that are partially available (based on
availability attributes). This traversal is only done when we would otherwise
emit -Wpartial-availability.
This commit is part of a feature I proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049851.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23003
llvm-svn: 278826
This warns when using decls that are not available on all deployment targets.
For example, a call to
- (void)ppartialMethod __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.8)));
will warn if -mmacosx-version-min is set to less than 10.8.
To silence the warning, one has to explicitly redeclare the method like so:
@interface Whatever(MountainLionAPI)
- (void)ppartialMethod;
@end
This way, one cannot accidentally call a function that isn't available
everywhere. Having to add the redeclaration will hopefully remind the user
to add an explicit respondsToSelector: call as well.
Some projects build against old SDKs to get this effect, but building against
old SDKs suppresses some bug fixes -- see http://crbug.com/463171 for examples.
The hope is that SDK headers are annotated well enough with availability
attributes that new SDK + this warning offers the same amount of protection
as using an old SDK.
llvm-svn: 232750
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
New rule:
- Method decls in @implementation are considered "redeclarations"
and inherit deprecated/availability from the @interface.
- All other cases are consider overrides, which do not inherit
deprecated/availability. For example:
(a) @interface redeclares a method in an adopted protocol.
(b) A subclass redeclares a method in a superclass.
(c) A protocol redeclares a method from another protocol it adopts.
The idea is that API authors should have the ability to easily
move availability/deprecated up and down a class/protocol hierarchy.
A redeclaration means that the availability/deprecation is a blank
slate.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13574571>
llvm-svn: 178937
Then, switch users of PropertyIfSetterOrGetter and LookupPropertyDecl
(the latter by name) over to findPropertyDecl. This actually makes
-Wreceiver-is-weak a bit stronger than it was before.
llvm-svn: 165628
Old algorithm:
1. See if the name looks like a getter or setter.
2. Use the name to look up a property in the current ObjCContainer
and all its protocols.
3. If the current container is an interface, also look in all categories
and superclasses (and superclass categories, and so on).
New algorithm:
1. See if the method is marked as a property accessor. If so, look through
all properties in the current container and find one that has a matching
selector.
2. Find all overrides of the method using ObjCMethodDecl's
getOverriddenMethods. This collects methods in superclasses and protocols
(as well as superclass categories, which isn't really necessary), and
checks if THEY are accessors. This part is not done recursively, since
getOverriddenMethods is already recursive.
This lets us handle getters and setters that do not match the property
names.
llvm-svn: 165627
Erik Pilkington