Following r363007, which reverted r362998, r362996, and r362994,
reapply with adjustments for the CRLF differences encountered with
Windows. Namely, the `-b` option of `diff` is employed, and the `grep`
patterns have `$` replaced with `[[:space:]]*$`.
llvm-svn: 363069
Reverts r362998, r362996, and r362994 because the tests do not pass on
Windows due to CRLF changes. Adding back `-w` to diff is not enough, the
new grep substitution doesn't work on Windows, and fixing it is
non-trivial.
llvm-svn: 363007
Summary:
The `%diff_plist` lit substitution invokes `diff` with a non-portable
`-I` option. The intended effect can be achieved by normalizing the
inputs to `diff` beforehand. Such normalization can be done with
`grep -Ev`, which is also used by other tests.
This patch applies the change (adjusted for review comments) described
in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-April/061904.html
mechanically to the cases where the output file is piped to
`%diff_plist` via `cat`.
The changes were applied via a script, except that
`clang/test/Analysis/NewDelete-path-notes.cpp` and
`clang/test/Analysis/plist-macros-with-expansion.cpp` were each adjusted
for the line-continuation on the relevant `RUN` step.
Reviewers: NoQ, sfertile, xingxue, jasonliu, daltenty
Subscribers: xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, Charusso, jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62950
llvm-svn: 362996
As suggested in the review for D62949, this patch pre-normalizes the
reference expected output plist files by removing lines containing
fields for which we expect differences that should be ignored.
llvm-svn: 362877
Asserting on invalid input isn't very nice, hence the patch to emit an error
instead.
This is the first of many patches to overhaul the way we handle checker options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57850
llvm-svn: 355704
The current argument order has "expected" and "actual" the wrong way around,
so that the diff shows the change from expected to actual, not from actual to expected.
Namely, if the expected diagnostics contains the string "foo", but the analyzer emits "bar",
we really want to see:
```
- foo
+ bar
```
not
```
- bar
+ foo
```
since adapting to most changes would require applying that diff to the expected output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56340
llvm-svn: 350866
This patch defines a new substitution and uses it to reduce
duplication in the Clang Analyzer test cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52036
llvm-svn: 342365
Some of the analyzer tests check the exact plist output, in order to
verify that the diagnostics produced is correct.
Current testing setup has many issues:
plist output clobbers tests, making them harder to read
it is impossible to debug test failures given error messages from FileCheck.
The only recourse is manually creating the files and using the diff
again, it is impossible to update the tests given the error message:
the only process is a tedious manual one,
going from a separate plist file to CHECK directives.
This patch offers a much better approach of using "diff" directly in place of FileCheck,
and moving tests to separate files.
Generated using the following script:
```
import os
import glob
import re
import subprocess
diagnostics_key = "// CHECK: <key>diagnostics</key>"
def process_file(f, data):
idx = data.index(diagnostics_key)
plist_out_f = 'ExpectedOutputs/plists/%s.plist' % f
plist_out_folder = os.path.join('ExpectedOutputs/plists/', os.path.dirname(f))
plist_data = data[idx:]
plist_data = plist_data.replace('// CHECK: ', '')
plist_data = plist_data.replace('// CHECK-NEXT: ', '')
plist_data += "</dict>\n</plist>\n"
data = data[:idx]
ptn = re.compile("FileCheck --?input-file(=| )(%t|%t\.plist) %s")
if not ptn.findall(data):
print "none found =/ skipping..."
return
data = ptn.sub(lambda m: "tail -n +11 %s | diff -u -w - %%S/../%s" % (m.group(2), plist_out_f), data)
with open(f, 'w') as out_f:
out_f.write(data)
subprocess.check_call(["mkdir", "-p", plist_out_folder])
with open(plist_out_f, 'w') as out_f:
out_f.write(plist_data)
def main():
files = glob.glob("**/*.*")
for f in files:
with open(f) as f_handler:
data = f_handler.read()
if diagnostics_key in data:
print "Converting %s" %f
process_file(f, data)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50545
llvm-svn: 339475
Note diagnostic pieces are an additional way of highlighting code sections to
the user. They aren't part of the normal path diagnostic sequence. They can
also be attached to path-insensitive reports.
Notes are already supported by the text output and scan-build.
Expanding our machine-readable plist output format to be able to represent notes
opens up the possibility for various analyzer GUIs to pick them up.
Patch by Umann Kristóf!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45407
llvm-svn: 330766
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
Summary:
So far we used a value of 10 which was useful for testing but produces many false-positives in real programs. The usual suspicious clones we find seem to be at around a complexity value of 70 and for normal clone-reporting everything above 50 seems to be a valid normal clone for users, so let's just go with 50 for now and set this as the new default value.
This patch also explicitly sets the complexity value for the regression tests as they serve more of a regression testing/debugging purpose and shouldn't really be reported by default in real programs. I'll add more tests that reflect actual found bugs that then need to pass with the default setting in the future.
Reviewers: NoQ
Subscribers: cfe-commits, javed.absar, xazax.hun, v.g.vassilev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34178
llvm-svn: 312468
Highlight code clones referenced by the warning message with the help of
the extra notes feature recently introduced in r283092.
Change warning text to more clang-ish. Remove suggestions from the copy-paste
error checker diagnostics, because currently our suggestions are strictly 50%
wrong (we do not know which of the two code clones contains the error), and
for that reason we should not sound as if we're actually suggesting this.
Hopefully a better solution would bring them back.
Make sure the suspicious clone pair structure always mentions
the correct variable for the second clone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24916
llvm-svn: 283094
If a call expression represents a method call of a class template,
and the method itself isn't templated, then the method may be considered
to be a template instantiation without template specialization arguments.
No longer crash when we could not find template specialization arguments.
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23780
llvm-svn: 279529
So far macro-generated code was treated by the CloneDetector as normal code.
This caused that some macros where reported as false-positive clones because
large chunks of code coming from otherwise concise macro expansions were treated
as copy-pasted code.
This patch ensures that macros are treated in the same way as literals/function
calls. This prevents macros that expand into multiple statements
from being reported as clones.
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23316
llvm-svn: 279367
For example, code samples `isa<Stmt>(S)' and `isa<Expr>(S)'
are no longer considered to be clones.
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23555
llvm-svn: 279366
The original clone checker tries to find copy-pasted code that is exactly
identical to the original code, up to minor details.
As an example, if the copy-pasted code has all references to variable 'a'
replaced with references to variable 'b', it is still considered to be
an exact clone.
The new check finds copy-pasted code in which exactly one variable seems
out of place compared to the original code, which likely indicates
a copy-paste error (a variable was forgotten to be renamed in one place).
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23314
llvm-svn: 279056
CallExpr may have a null direct callee when the callee function is not
known in compile-time. Do not try to take callee name in this case.
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23320
llvm-svn: 278238
CloneDetector should be able to detect clones with renamed variables.
However, if variables are referenced multiple times around the code sample,
the usage patterns need to be recognized.
For example, (x < y ? y : x) and (y < x ? y : x) are no longer clones,
however (a < b ? b : a) is still a clone of the former.
Variable patterns are computed and compared during a separate filtering pass.
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22982
llvm-svn: 277757
If a target triple is not specified, the default host triple is used,
which is not good for compiling inline assembler code.
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
llvm-svn: 277473
So far the CloneDetector only respected the kind of each statement when
searching for clones. This patch refines the way the CloneDetector collects data
from each statement by providing methods for each statement kind,
that will read the kind-specific attributes.
For example, statements 'a < b' and 'a > b' are no longer considered to be
clones, because they are different in operation code, which is an attribute
specific to the BinaryOperator statement kind.
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22514
llvm-svn: 277449
This patch adds the CloneDetector class which allows searching source code
for clones.
For every statement or group of statements within a compound statement,
CloneDetector computes a hash value, and finds clones by detecting
identical hash values.
This initial patch only provides a simple hashing mechanism
that hashes the kind of each sub-statement.
This patch also adds CloneChecker - a simple static analyzer checker
that uses CloneDetector to report copy-pasted code.
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20795
llvm-svn: 276782
Hubert Tong