I don't see GNU dlltool supporting doing this; with only a -d option
and no -l option, GNU dlltool runs successfully but doesn't write any
output file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65645
llvm-svn: 370655
ExtName should not be decorated, just like Name.
This avoids double decoration on symbols in import libraries
that use = for renaming functions. (Weak aliases, which use ==,
worked fine with respect to decoration.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66617
llvm-svn: 369747
The parameter to the -D (--dllname) option is the name of the dll
that llvm-dlltool produces an import library for. Even though this
is named "OutputFile" in the COFFModuleDefinition class, it's not
an output file name in the context of llvm-dlltool, but the name
of the DLL to create an import library for.
llvm-svn: 367676
Since OPT_UNKNOWN args never have any values and consist only of
spelling (and are never aliased), this doesn't make any difference in
practice, but it's more consistent with Arg's guidance to use
getAsString() for diagnostics, and it matches what clang does.
Also tweak two tests to use an unknown option that contains '=' for
additional coverage while here. (The new tests pass fine with the old
code too though.)
llvm-svn: 365200
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Before, "[options] <inputs>" is unconditionally appended to the `Name` parameter. It is more flexible to change its semantic to `Usage` and let user customize the usage line.
% llvm-objcopy
...
USAGE: llvm-objcopy <input> [ <output> ] [options] <inputs>
With this patch:
% llvm-objcopy
...
USAGE: llvm-objcopy input [output]
Reviewers: rupprecht, alexshap, jhenderson
Reviewed By: rupprecht
Subscribers: jakehehrlich, mehdi_amini, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51009
llvm-svn: 344097
The operator == used for exporting a function with a different
name in the DLL compared to the name in the import library
(which is useful for adding linker level aliases for function
in the import library) is a feature distinct and different from
the operator = used for exporting a function with a different
name (both in import library and DLL) than in the implementation
producing the DLL.
When creating an import library using dlltool, from a def file that
contains forwards (Func = OtherDll.Func), this shouldn't affect the
produced import library, which should still behave just as if it
was a normal exported function.
This clears a lot of confusion and subtle misunderstandings, and
avoids a parameter that was used to avoid creating weak aliases
when invoked from lld. (This parameter was added previously due to
the existing conflation of the two features.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46245
llvm-svn: 331859
This (together with the corresponding LLD commit, that contains the
testcase updates) fixes PR35733.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41631
llvm-svn: 323035
This fixes exporting functions starting with an underscore, and
fully decorated fastcall/vectorcall functions.
Tests will be added in the lld repo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39168
llvm-svn: 316316
When creating an import library from lld, the cases with
Name != ExtName shouldn't end up as a weak alias, but as a real
export of the new name, which is what actually is exported from
the DLL.
This restores the behaviour of renamed exports to what it was in
4.0.
The other half of this commit, including test, goes into lld.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36633
llvm-svn: 310991
Hook up the -k option (that in the original GNU dlltool removes the
@n suffix from the symbol that the final executable ends up linked to).
In llvm-dlltool, make sure that functions end up with the undecorate
name type if this option is set and they are decorated. In mingw, when
creating import libraries from def files instead of creating an import
library as a side effect of linking a DLL, the symbol names in the def
contain the stdcall/fastcall decoration (but no leading underscore).
By setting the undecorate name type, a linker linking to the import
library will omit the decoration from the DLL import entry.
With this in place, mingw-w64 for i386 built with llvm-dlltool/clang
produces import libraries that actually work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36548
llvm-svn: 310990
A PE COFF spec compliant import library generator.
Intended to be used with mingw-w64.
Supports:
PE COFF spec (section 8, Import Library Format)
PE COFF spec (Aux Format 3: Weak Externals)
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29892
This reapplies rL308329, which was reverted in rL308374
llvm-svn: 308379
A PE COFF spec compliant import library generator.
Intended to be used with mingw-w64.
Supports:
PE COFF spec (section 8, Import Library Format)
PE COFF spec (Aux Format 3: Weak Externals)
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29892
llvm-svn: 308329
Martin Storsjo