need an error term for the CFG. I suspect we'll always have to cope
with getCFG returning 0, though, I'd love to see even that possibility
removed.
llvm-svn: 93411
LookupVisibleDecls, unifying the name lookup mechanisms used by code
completion and typo correction. Aside from the software-engineering
improvements, this makes code-completion see through using directives
and see ivars when performing unqualified name lookup in an
Objective-C instance method.
llvm-svn: 93397
the "typed" text, first, then take into account
nested-name-specifiers, name hiding, etc. This means that the
resulting sort is actually alphabetical :)
llvm-svn: 93370
to be considering user-defined conversions in the first place.
Doug, please review; I'm not sure what we should be doing if we see a real
ambiguity in selecting a copy constructor when otherwise suppressing
user-defined conversions.
Fixes PR6014.
llvm-svn: 93365
provide completions for @ keywords. Previously, we only provided
@-completions after an @ was actually typed, which is useful but
probably not the common case.
Also, make sure a few Objective-C 2.0 completions only show up when
Objective-C 2.0 support is enabled (the default).
llvm-svn: 93354
that name constructors, the endless joys of out-of-line constructor
definitions, and various other corner cases that the previous hack
never imagined. Fixes PR5688 and tightens up semantic analysis for
constructor names.
Additionally, fixed a problem where we wouldn't properly enter the
declarator scope of a parenthesized declarator. We were entering the
scope, then leaving it when we saw the ")"; now, we re-enter the
declarator scope before parsing the parameter list.
Note that we are forced to perform some tentative parsing within a
class (call it C) to tell the difference between
C(int); // constructor
and
C (f)(int); // member function
which is rather unfortunate. And, although it isn't necessary for
correctness, we use the same tentative-parsing mechanism for
out-of-line constructors to improve diagnostics in icky cases like:
C::C C::f(int); // error: C::C refers to the constructor name, but
// we complain nicely and recover by treating it as
// a type.
llvm-svn: 93322
information to feed diagnostics instead of regenerating it. Much room for
improvement here, but fixes some unfortunate problems reporting on method calls.
llvm-svn: 93316
disabled with the intent that users can start with them now and not have to change
a thing to have them work when we implement the features.
llvm-svn: 93312
clang -cc1 logic for running an action against a set of options.
- This should make it easier to build tools that have a clang -cc1 like
interface, but aren't actually part of clang -cc1.
llvm-svn: 93282
why the candidate is non-viable. There's a lot we can do to improve this, but
it's a good start. Further improvements should probably be integrated with the
bad-initialization reporting routines.
llvm-svn: 93277
unevaluated contexts, because they only matter for code that will
actually be evaluated at runtime.
As part of this, I had to extend PartialDiagnostic to support fix-it
hints.
llvm-svn: 93266
name a template, when they occur in a base-specifier. This is one of
the (few) places where we know for sure that an identifier followed by
a '<' must be a template name, so we can diagnose and recover well:
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp:9:16: error: missing
'template'
keyword prior to dependent template name 'T::apply'
struct X1 : T::apply<U> { }; // expected-error{{missing 'template' ...
^
template
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp:12:13: error: unknown
template name
'vector'
struct X2 : vector<T> { }; // expected-error{{unknown template name
'vector'}}
^
2 diagnostics generated.
llvm-svn: 93257
correctly look through arrays to see cv-qualifiers. Also enhances the routine
for doing this to preserve more type sugaring for diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 93252
initializers. This isn't actually in the C++ grammar (in any version),
but that's clearly an oversight: both GCC and EDG support this syntax,
and it's used within Boost code. I'll file a core issue proposing
precisely the change made here. Fixes PR6008.
llvm-svn: 93243
context, do not attempt typo correction. This harms performance (as
Abramo noted) and can cause some amusing errors, as in this new
testcase.
llvm-svn: 93240
I said to myself, self, why don't you go add a couple of parameters to a method
and then fail to use them, and I thought that sounded like a pretty good idea,
so I did it.
llvm-svn: 93233
John McCall