Summary:
Clangd is returning current working directory for overriden commands.
This can cause inconsistencies between:
- header and the main files, as OverlayCDB only contains entries for the main
files it direct any queries for the headers to the base, creating a
discrepancy between the two.
- different clangd instances, as the results will be different depending on the
timing of execution of the query and override of the command. hence clangd
might see two different project infos for the same file between different
invocations.
- editors and the way user has invoked it, as current working directory of
clangd will depend on those, hence even when there's no underlying base CWD
might change depending on the editor, or the directory user has started the
editor in.
This patch gets rid of that discrepency by always directing queries to base or
returning llvm::None in absence of it.
For a sample bug see https://reviews.llvm.org/D83099#2154185.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83934
Vector bitwise selects are matched by pseudo VBSP instruction
and expanded to VBSL/VBIT/VBIF after register allocation
depend on operands registers to minimize extra copies.
This adds a peephole optimisation to turn a t2MOVccr that could not be
folded into any other instruction into a CSEL on 8.1-m. The t2MOVccr
would usually be expanded into a conditional mov, that becomes an IT;
MOV pair. We can instead generate a CSEL instruction, which can
potentially be smaller and allows better register allocation freedom,
which can help reduce codesize. Performance is more variable and may
depend on the micrarchitecture details, but initial results look good.
If we need to control this per-cpu, we can add a subtarget feature as we
need it.
Original patch by David Penry.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83566
Summary:
This patch modifies IncrementMemoryAddress to use a vscale
when calculating the new address if the data type is scalable.
Also adds tablegen patterns which match an extract_subvector
of a legal predicate type with zip1/zip2 instructions
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, david-arm
Reviewed By: efriedma, david-arm
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83137
Currently the backends cannot lower the matrix intrinsics directly and
rely on the lowering to vector instructions happening in the middle-end.
At the moment, this means the backend crashes when matrix types
extension code is compiled with -O0, e.g.
http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/test-suite-verify-machineinstrs-aarch64-O0-g/7902/
This patch enables also runs the lowering with -O0 in the middle-end as
a temporary solution. Long term, a lightweight version of the lowering
should run in the backend, on demand.
Summary:
This adds missing definitions for functions in the Lower directory
that were causing failures in shared library builds.
The definitions for these are taken from the fir-dev branch on github.
Reviewers: sscalpone, schweitz, jeanPerier, klausler
Reviewed By: schweitz
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83771
This reverts commit b2018198c3.
This commit introduced a Dependency Cycle between Transforms/Scalar and
Transforms/Utils. Transforms/Scalar already depends on Transforms/Utils,
so if SimplifyCFGOptions.h is moved to Scalar, and Utils/Local.h still
depends on it, we have a cycle.
This reverts commit 90c1b0442a.
This is based on another commit which also needs to be reverted.
The other commit introduced a Dependency Cycle between Transforms/Scalar
and TransformUtils. Scalar already depends (in many ways) on
TransformUtils, so making TransformUtils depend on Scalar should be
avoided.
Template specializations are not handled in many of the
TypeSystemClang methods. For example, GetNumChildren does not handle
the TemplateSpecialization type class, so template specializations
always look like empty objects.
This patch just desugars template specializations in the existing
RemoveWrappingTypes desugaring helper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83858
Previously, the vins* intrinsic was incorrectly defined to have its second and
third argument arguments as an i64. This patch fixes the second and third
argument of the vins* instruction and intrinsic to have i32s instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83497
This patch adds simplification for pattern:
```
if (cond)
/ \
... ...
\ /
p = phi [true] [false]
...
br p, succ_1, succ_2
```
If we can prove that top block's branches dominate respective
inputs of a block that has a Phi with constant inputs, we can
use the branch condition (maybe inverted) instead of Phi.
This will make proofs of implication for further jump threading
more transparent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81375
Reviewed By: xbolva00
This reverts most of the following patches due to reports of miscompiles.
I've left the added test cases with comments updated to be FIXMEs.
1cf6f210a2 [IR] Disable select ? C : undef -> C fold in ConstantFoldSelectInstruction unless we know C isn't poison.
469da663f2 [InstSimplify] Re-enable select ?, undef, X -> X transform when X is provably not poison
122b0640fc [InstSimplify] Don't fold vectors of partial undef in SimplifySelectInst if the non-undef element value might produce poison
ac0af12ed2 [InstSimplify] Add test cases for opportunities to fold select ?, X, undef -> X when we can prove X isn't poison
9b1e95329a [InstSimplify] Remove select ?, undef, X -> X and select ?, X, undef -> X transforms
Summary:
This patch enhances parser support for taskwait construct to OpenMP 5.0.
2.17.5 taskwait Construct
!$omp taskwait [clause[ [,] clause] ... ]
where clause is one of the following:
depend([depend-modifier,]dependence-type : locator-list)
The patch includes code changes and testcase modifications.
Reviewed By: Valentin Clement, Kiran Chandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82255
This also fixes the outdated use of `n_views` in the documentation.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83795
Previously, for large-enough values, getSLEB128 would attempt to shift
a signed int in the range [0..0x7f] by 28, 35, 42... bits, which is
undefined behavior and likely to fail.
Avoid shifting (-1ULL) by 70 for large values. e.g. For INT64_MAX, the
last two bytes will be:
- 0x7f [bit==56]
- 0x00 [bit==63]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83742
- For CIE version 1 (e.g. in DWARF 2.0.0), the return_address_register
field is a ubyte [0..255].
- For CIE version 3 (e.g. in DWARF 3), the field is instead a ULEB128
constant.
Previously, libunwind accepted a CIE version of 1 or 3, but always
parsed the field as ULEB128.
Clang always outputs CIE version 1 into .eh_frame. (It can output CIE
version 3 or 4, but only into .debug_frame.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83741
This patch implements the code generation to use OpenMP 5.0 declare mapper (a.k.a. user-defined mapper) constructs.
Patch written by Lingda Li.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67833
Libomptarget patch adding runtime support for "declare mapper".
Patch co-developed by Lingda Li and George Rokos.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68100
When we calculate the weight of a live-interval, add some code to
check if the original live-interval was markied as not spillable and
if so, progagate that information down to the new interval.
Previously we would just recompute a weight for the new interval,
thus, we could in theory just spill live-intervals marked as not
spillable by just splitting them. That goes against the spirit of
a non-spillable live-interval.
E.g., previously we could do:
v1 = // v1 must not be spilled
...
= v1
Split:
v1 = // v1 must not be spilled
...
v2 = v1 // v2 can be spilled
...
v3 = v2 // v3 can be spilled
= v3
There's no test case for that one as we would need to split a
non-spillable live-interval without using LiveRangeEdit to see this
happening.
RegAlloc inserts non-spillable intervals only as part of the spilling
mechanism, thus at this point the intervals are not splittable anymore.
On top of that, RegAlloc uses the LiveRangeEdit API, which already
properly propagate that information.
In other words, this could only happen if a target was to mark
a live-interval as not spillable before register allocation and
split it without using LRE, e.g., through
LiveIntervals::splitSeparateComponent.
Summary:
If result of fmul(b,c) has one use, in almost all cases (except denormals are
IEEE) the pair of operations will be fused in one fma/mad/mac/etc.
Reviewers: rampitec
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits, kerbowa
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83919
Summary:
test_terminate_commands is flaky on LLDB Arm buildbot as well. It was already
being skipped for aarch64. I am going to mark it skipped for Arm too.
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81978
Taking so many parameters is simply unmaintainable.
We don't want to include the entire llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h into
llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h so i've split SimplifyCFGOptions into
it's own header.
Previously we only accepted a 32-bit source with a 64-bit dest.
Accepting 64-bit as well is more consistent with gas behavior. I
think maybe we should accept 16 bit register as well, but I'm not
sure.
When an intrinsic is referenced in a module scope, a symbol for it is
added. When that module is USEd, the intrinsic should not be included.
Otherwise we can get ambiguous reference errors with the same intrinsic
coming from two difference modules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83905
llvm function is marked nounwind
This fixes cases where an invoke is emitted, despite the called llvm
function being marked nounwind, because ConstructAttributeList failed to
add the attribute to the attribute list. llvm optimization passes turn
invokes into calls and optimize away the exception handling code, but
it's better to avoid emitting the code in the front-end if the called
function is known not to raise an exception.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83906
Some dialects have semantics which is not well represented by common
SSA structures with dominance constraints. This patch allows
operations to declare the 'kind' of their contained regions.
Currently, two kinds are allowed: "SSACFG" and "Graph". The only
difference between them at the moment is that SSACFG regions are
required to have dominance, while Graph regions are not required to
have dominance. The intention is that this Interface would be
generated by ODS for existing operations, although this has not yet
been implemented. Presumably, if someone were interested in code
generation, we might also have a "CFG" dialect, which defines control
flow, but does not require SSA.
The new behavior is mostly identical to the previous behavior, since
registered operations without a RegionKindInterface are assumed to
contain SSACFG regions. However, the behavior has changed for
unregistered operations. Previously, these were checked for
dominance, however the new behavior allows dominance violations, in
order to allow the processing of unregistered dialects with Graph
regions. One implication of this is that regions in unregistered
operations with more than one op are no longer CSE'd (since it
requires dominance info).
I've also reorganized the LangRef documentation to remove assertions
about "sequential execution", "SSA Values", and "Dominance". Instead,
the core IR is simply "ordered" (i.e. totally ordered) and consists of
"Values". I've also clarified some things about how control flow
passes between blocks in an SSACFG region. Control Flow must enter a
region at the entry block and follow terminator operation successors
or be returned to the containing op. Graph regions do not define a
notion of control flow.
see discussion here:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-allowing-dialects-to-relax-the-ssa-dominance-condition/833/53
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80358
Summary: This adds the basic support for GOT in elf x86.
Was able to just get away using the macho code by generalising the edges.
There will be a follow up patch to turn that into a generic utility for both of the x86 and Mach-O code.
This patch also lands support for relocations relative to symbol.
Reviewers: lhames
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83748
This came up in a recent review, someone was wondering were was
this all documented and I couldn't find a reference to provide.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83816
Kadir Cetinkaya