Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Arthur Eubanks d0acd97c68 [NewPM][LoopUnswitch] Pin loop-unswitch to legacy PM or use simple-loop-unswitch
As mentioned in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143395.html,
loop-unswitch has not been ported to the NPM. Instead people are using
simple-loop-unswitch.

Pin all tests in Transforms/LoopUnswitch to legacy PM and replace all
other uses of loop-unswitch with simple-loop-unswitch.

One test that didn't fit into the above was
2014-06-21-congruent-constant.ll which seems to only pass with
loop-unswitch. That is also pinned to legacy PM.

Now all tests containing "-loop-unswitch" anywhere in the test succeed with
NPM turned on by default.

Reviewed By: ychen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85360
2020-08-06 10:56:00 -07:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea a496143c9e Update MemorySSA in LoopUnswitch.
Summary:
Update MemorySSA in old LoopUnswitch pass.
Actual dependency and update is disabled by default.

Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45301

llvm-svn: 341984
2018-09-11 19:19:21 +00:00
Sanjoy Das a37bb4a65d [LoopUnswitch] Unswitch on conditions feeding into guards
Summary:
This is a straightforward extension of what LoopUnswitch does to
branches to guards.  That is, we unswitch

```
for (;;) {
  ...
  guard(loop_invariant_cond);
  ...
}
```

into

```
if (loop_invariant_cond) {
  for (;;) {
    ...
    // There is no need to emit guard(true)
    ...
  }
} else {
  for (;;) {
    ...
    guard(false);
    // SimplifyCFG will clean this up by adding an
    // unreachable after the guard(false)
    ...
  }
}
```

Reviewers: majnemer

Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21725

llvm-svn: 273801
2016-06-26 05:10:45 +00:00