As noticed on D58965
DAGCombiner::visitSELECT has something similar, so we should be able to move this to DAGCombiner and support VSELECT as well at some point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58974
llvm-svn: 355494
Apparently GCC allows this, and there's code relying on it (see bug).
The idea is to allow expression that would have been allowed if they
were cast to int. So I based the code on how such a cast would be done
(the CK_PointerToIntegral case in IntExprEvaluator::VisitCastExpr()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58821
llvm-svn: 355491
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a
jump table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump
table, for the switch value being outside the jump table range and a
conditional branch is inserted to jump to the default block. In case the
default block is unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This
patch implements omitting this conditional branch for unreachable
defaults.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52002
Reviewers: Hans Wennborg, Eli Freidman, Roman Lebedev
llvm-svn: 355490
Summary:
This reverts rL352390 / D57280.
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112#inline-506781,
'flush' clause does not exist in the OpenMP spec, it can not be
specified, and `OMPFlushClause` class is just a helper class.
Now, here's the caveat. I have read @ABataev's
> Well, I think it would be good to filter out OMPC_flush somehow
> because there is no such clause actually, it is a pseudo clause
> for better handling of the flush directive.
as if that clause is pseudo clause that only exists for the sole
purpose of simplifying the parser. As in, it never reaches AST.
I did not however try to verify that. Too bad, i was wrong.
It absolutely *does* reach AST. Therefore my understanding/justification
for the change was flawed, which makes the patch a regression which **must** be reverted.
@gribozavr has brought that up again in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112#inline-521238
> > ...
> Sorry to be late for this discussion, but I don't think this conclusion
> follows. ASTMatchers are supposed to match the AST as it is.
> Even if OMPC_flush is synthetic, it exists in the AST, and users might
> want to match it. I think users would find anything else (trying to filter
> out AST nodes that are not in the source code) to be surprising. For example,
> there's a matcher materializeTemporaryExpr even though this AST node is a
> Clang invention and is not a part of the C++ spec.
>
> Matching only constructs that appear in the source code is not feasible with
> ASTMatchers, because they are based on Clang's AST that exposes tons of semantic
> information, and its design is dictated by the structure of the semantic information.
> See "RFC: Tree-based refactorings with Clang" in cfe-dev for a library that will
> focus on representing source code as faithfully as possible.
>
> Not to even mention that this code is in ASTTypeTraits, a general library for
> handling AST nodes, not specifically for AST Matchers...
Reviewers: gribozavr, ABataev, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: gribozavr, ABataev
Subscribers: dylanmckay, guansong, arphaman, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, gribozavr, ABataev
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58979
llvm-svn: 355486
This allows us to use an 8-bit sign extended immediate instead of a 16 or 32 bit immediate.
Also do similar for 0x80000000 with 64-bit adds to avoid having to use a movabsq.
llvm-svn: 355485
128 won't fit in a sign extended 8-bit immediate, but we can negate it to -128 and use the other operation. This results in a shorter encoding since the move would have used 16 or 32 bits for the immediate.
llvm-svn: 355484
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a
jump table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump
table, for the switch value being outside the jump table range and a
conditional branch is inserted to jump to the default block. In case the
default block is unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This
patch implements omitting this conditional branch for unreachable
defaults.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52002
Reviewers: Hans Wennborg, Eli Freidman, Roman Lebedev
llvm-svn: 355483
We're going to need a separate VersionNeedSection for each partition, and
the partition data structure won't be templated.
With this the VersionTableSection class no longer needs ELFT, so detemplate it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58808
llvm-svn: 355478
Add a remark for importing modules. Depending on whether this is a
direct import (into the TU being built by this compiler instance) or
transitive import (into an already-imported module), the diagnostic has
two forms:
importing module 'Foo' from 'path/to/Foo.pcm'
importing module 'Foo' into 'Bar' from 'path/to/Foo.pcm'
Also drop a redundant FileCheck invocation in Rmodule-build.m that was
using -Reverything, since the notes from -Rmodule-import were confusing
it.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58891
llvm-svn: 355477
Currently when lldb might be doing a kernel debug session, it scans through
memory by taking the current pc value and looking for a kernel at megabyte
boundaries, up to 32MB behind $pc. This adjusts the algorithm to
scan back at every 16k page boundary and to stop scanning as soon
as we hit a memory read error. The addition of stopping at a memory read
error saves us from tons of unnecessary packet traffic on generic
targets where lldb might look for a kernel binary.
I've been trying to think of how to construct a test for this; it's a bit
tricky. A gdb-remote protocol test with the contents of a fake tiny kernel
mach-o binary would satisify part of it, but this kernel path also directly
calls over to dsymForUUID or DebugSymbols framework lookups to find the
kernel binary as well. I'll keep thinking about this one, but it's so
intertangled with these two external systems that it may be hard to do.
<rdar://problem/48578197>
llvm-svn: 355476
Some target might try to subclass the PostGenericScheduler to custom the scheduling strategy.
We need to declare the member data of PostGenericScheduler as "protected", which acts the same as "GenericScheduler".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58949
llvm-svn: 355475
The function signature of ComputeClangResourceDirectory for windows
wasn't updated when the others changed, causing the windows build to
fail. This should fix that.
llvm-svn: 355471
Now that the LLDB instrumentation macros are in place, we should use
that to test reproducer replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58565
llvm-svn: 355470
Summary:
This tag is documented in https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/817-1984/chapter6-42444/index.html
Though I could not find some docs that describe it in detail, I found some code snippets.
1.
```
/*
* Look up the string in the string table and get its offset. If
* this succeeds, then it is possible that there is a DT_NEEDED
* dynamic entry that references it.
*/
have_string = elfedit_sec_findstr(argstate->str.sec,
strpad_elt.dn_dyn.d_un.d_val, arg, &str_offset) != 0;
if (have_string) {
dyn = argstate->dynamic.data;
for (ndx = 0; ndx < numdyn; dyn++, ndx++) {
if (((dyn->d_tag == DT_NEEDED) ||
(dyn->d_tag == DT_USED)) &&
(dyn->d_un.d_val == str_offset))
goto done;
}
}
```
80192cd83b/usr/src/cmd/sgs/elfedit/modules/common/syminfo.c (L512)
2.
```
case DT_USED:
case DT_INIT_ARRAY:
case DT_FINI_ARRAY:
if (do_dynamic)
{
if (entry->d_tag == DT_USED
&& VALID_DYNAMIC_NAME (entry->d_un.d_val))
{
char *name = GET_DYNAMIC_NAME (entry->d_un.d_val);
if (*name)
{
printf (_("Not needed object: [%s]\n"), name);
break;
}
}
print_vma (entry->d_un.d_val, PREFIX_HEX);
putchar ('\n');
}
break;
```
http://web.mit.edu/freebsd/head/contrib/binutils/binutils/readelf.c
3.
```
#define DT_USED 0x7ffffffe /* ignored - same as needed */
```
https://github.com/switchbrew/switch-tools/blob/master/src/elf_common.h
Reviewers: jhenderson, grimar
Reviewed By: jhenderson, grimar
Subscribers: emaste, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58762
llvm-svn: 355468
Summary:
I'm doing this because I plan on implementing `ComputeClangResourceDirectory`
on windows so that `GetClangResourceDir` will work. Additionally, I made
test_paths make sure that the directory member of the returned FileSpec is not
none. This will fail on windows since `ComputeClangResourceDirectory` isn't
implemented yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58748
llvm-svn: 355463
This patch includes the necessary code for converting between a fixed point type and integer.
This also includes constant expression evaluation for conversions with these types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56900
llvm-svn: 355462
This uses the infrastructure added in rL353152 to sink zext and sexts to
sub/add users, to enable vsubl/vaddl generation when NEON is available.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58063
llvm-svn: 355460
This patch adds the SBReproducer macros needed to capture and reply the
corresponding calls. This patch was generated by running the lldb-instr
tool on the API source files.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57475
llvm-svn: 355459
When running the test suite with the instrumentation macros, I noticed
two lldb-mi tests regressed. The issue was the copy constructor of
SBLineEntry. Without the macros the returned value would be elided, but
with the macros the copy constructor was called. The latter using ::IsValid
to determine whether the underlying opaque pointer should be set. This
is likely a remnant of when ::IsValid would only check the validity of the
smart pointer. In SBLineEntry however, it actually forwards to
LineEntry::IsValid().
So what happened here was that because of the macros the copy
constructor was called. The opaque pointer was valid but the LineEntry
didn't consider itself valid. So the copied-to object ended up default
initialized.
This patch replaces all checks for IsValid in copy (assignment)
constructors with checks for the opaque pointer itself.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58946
llvm-svn: 355458
When dumping ToT clan's debug info with dwarfdump, we were seeing an
error saying that that the location list overflows the debug_loc
section. After reducing the testcase we figured out that we were
interpreting the DW_FORM_data4 as a section offset.
In DWARF3 DW_FORM_data4 and DW_FORM_data8 served also as a section
offset. Until now we didn't check check for the DWARF version, because
some producers (read old versions of clang) were still emitting this.
The relevant code/comment was added in 2013, and I believe it's now
reasonable to start checking the version.
The FormValue class is a little bit of a mess because it cashes the
DWARF unit and context when it extracted the value itself. Several
methods of the class rely on it being present, or return an Optional for
the code path that needs it. At the same time the FormValue class also
used in places where there's no DWARF unit.
For this patch I went with the least invasive change: checking the
version from the CU when it's available. If it's not (because the form
value was created from a value directly) we default to the old behavior.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58698
llvm-svn: 355456
Partly addresses PR15026.
There are a few tests that passed in invalid architectures, which are fixed in: rL355349 and D58931
Reviewers: echristo, efriedma, rengolin, atrick
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58933
llvm-svn: 355455
Be consistent about how we treat atomics in non-zero address spaces. If we get to the backend, we tend to lower them as if in address space 0. Do the same if we need to insert a libcall instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58760
llvm-svn: 355453
There was no proper test for that code in X86TargetLowering::LowerSELECT().
Noticed accidentally while trying to modify the last branch in that function.
llvm-svn: 355452
Otherwise, when testing trunk libc++ on an older system, lit will think
that the dylib features are disabled. Ideally, we'd have a notion of
running the tests with/without a deployment target (or, equivalently,
a deployment target representing trunk where everything is as recent
as can be). Since we always have a deployment target right now (which
defaults to the current system), we only enable those features when
we're going to also be testing with the system libc++.
We also need to disable the availability markup when we are not running
a system library flavor, because availability markup does not make sense
when building against the trunk libc++ (which has everything regardless
of what the current system is).
This is a re-application of r353319, which had been reverted due to
CI breakage. This time around, I made sure it didn't break our internal
CI before submitting.
This is also a partial undoing of r348296, in spirit at least. However,
with this patch, availability markup is enabled based on whether we're
using a system library or not, whereas previously one could enable
it or disable it arbitrarily. This was confusing as it led to testing
configurations that don't make sense (such as testing a system library
without availability markup, or trunk testing with availability markup).
llvm-svn: 355451
Summary:
A Lamdba with a return type template with a boolean literal (true,false) behaves differently to an integer literal
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40910
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: jkorous, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58922
llvm-svn: 355450
Summary:
- Replaces some uses of `MachineFunction::iterator(MBB)` with
`MBB->getIterator()` and `MachineBasicBlock::iterator(MI)` with
`MI->getIterator()`, which are simpler.
- Replaces some uses of `std::prev` of `std::next` that takes a
MachineFunction or MachineBasicBlock iterator with `getPrevNode` and
`getNextNode`, which are also simpler.
Reviewers: sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, sunfish, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58913
llvm-svn: 355444
Simon Pilgrim