Matches the ELF and COFF ports, which use ld.lld and lld-link, respectively.
While here, also move up `cleanupCallback` to match ELF / COFF.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97715
There was initially some concern around the correct handling of pcrel
section relocations with r_length != 2. But it looks like there are no such
relocations in practice -- x86_64's pcrel section relocs all have r_length == 2,
and ARM64 doesn't even have pcrel section relocs. So we can replace the TODO
with an assert.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97576
Only one of the two callers used the lastBinding parameter, so
do that work at that one call site. Extract a ordinalForDylibSymbol()
helper to make this tidy.
No behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97597
Bifurcate the `readFile()` API into ...
* `readRawFile()` which performs no checks, and
* `readLinkableFile()` which enforces minimum length of 20 bytes, same as ld64
There are no new tests because tweaks to existing tests are sufficient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97610
On arm64, UNSIGNED relocs are the only ones that use embedded addends
instead of the ADDEND relocation.
Also ensure that the addend works when UNSIGNED is part of a SUBTRACTOR
pair.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97105
Also add a few asserts to verify that we are indeed handling an
UNSIGNED relocation as the minued. I haven't made it an actual
user-facing error since I don't think llvm-mc is capable of generating
SUBTRACTOR relocations without an associated UNSIGNED.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97103
`llvm-mc` doesn't generate any relocations for subtractions
between local symbols -- they must be global -- so the previous test
wasn't actually testing any relocation logic. I've fixed that and
extended the test to cover r_length=3 relocations as well as both x86_64
and arm64.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97057
Dynamic lookup symbols are symbols that work like dynamic symbols
in ELF: They're not bound to a dylib like normal Mach-O twolevel lookup
symbols, but they live in a global pool and dyld resolves them against
exported symbols from all loaded dylibs.
This adds support for dynamical lookup symbols to lld/mac. They are
represented as DylibSymbols with file set to nullptr.
This also uses this support to implement the -U flag, which makes
a specific symbol that's undefined at the end of the link a
dynamic lookup symbol.
For -U, it'd be sufficient to just to a pass over remaining undefined symbols
at the end of the link and to replace them with dynamic lookup symbols then.
But I'd like to use this code to implement flat_namespace too, and that will
require real support for resolving dynamic lookup symbols in SymbolTable. So
this patch adds this now already.
While writing tests for this, I noticed that we didn't set N_WEAK_DEF in the
symbol table for DylibSymbols, so this fixes that too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97521
When parsing bitcode, convert LTO Symbols to LLD Symbols in order to perform
resolution. The "winning" symbol will then be marked as Prevailing at LTO
compilation time. This is similar to what the other LLD ports do.
This change allows us to handle `linkonce` symbols correctly, and to deal with
duplicate bitcode symbols gracefully. Previously, both scenarios would result in
an assertion failure inside the LTO code, complaining that multiple Prevailing
definitions are not allowed.
While at it, I also added basic logic around visibility. We don't do anything
useful with it yet, but we do check that its value is valid. LLD-ELF appears to
use it only to set FinalDefinitionInLinkageUnit for LTO, which I think is just a
performance optimization.
From my local experimentation, the linker itself doesn't seem to do anything
differently when encountering linkonce / linkonce_odr / weak / weak_odr. So I've
only written a test for one of them. LLD-ELF has more, but they seem to mostly
be testing the intermediate bitcode output of their LTO backend...? I'm far from
an expert here though, so I might very well be missing things.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, MaskRay, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94342
{D95809} introduced a mechanism for synthetic symbol creation of personality
pointers. When multiple section relocations referred to the same personality
pointer, it would deduplicate them. However, it neglected to consider that we
could have symbol relocations that also refer to the same personality pointer.
This diff fixes it.
In practice, this mix of relocations arises when there is a statically-linked
personality routine that is referenced from multiple object files. Within the
same object file, it will be referred to via section relocations, but
(obviously) other object files will refer to it via symbol relocations. Failing
to deduplicate these references resulted in us going over the
3-personality-pointer limit when linking some larger applications.
Fixes llvm.org/PR48389.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97245
The silent failures had confused me a few times.
I haven't added a similar check for platform yet as we don't yet have logic to
infer the platform automatically, and so adding that check would require
updating dozens of test files.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97209
I've adjusted the RelocAttrBits to better fit the semantics of
the relocations. In particular:
1. *_UNSIGNED relocations are no longer marked with the `TLV` bit, even
though they can occur within TLV sections. Instead the `TLV` bit is
reserved for relocations that can reference thread-local symbols, and
*_UNSIGNED relocations have their own `UNSIGNED` bit. The previous
implementation caused TLV and regular UNSIGNED semantics to be
conflated, resulting in rebase opcodes being incorrectly emitted for TLV
relocations.
2. I've added a new `POINTER` bit to denote non-relaxable GOT
relocations. This distinction isn't important on x86 -- the GOT
relocations there are either relaxable or non-relaxable loads -- but
arm64 has `GOT_LOAD_PAGE21` which loads the page that the referent
symbol is in (regardless of whether the symbol ends up in the GOT). This
relocation must reference a GOT symbol (so must have the `GOT` bit set)
but isn't itself relaxable (so must not have the `LOAD` bit). The
`POINTER` bit is used for relocations that *must* reference a GOT
slot.
3. A similar situation occurs for TLV relocations.
4. ld64 supports both a pcrel and an absolute version of
ARM64_RELOC_POINTER_TO_GOT. But the semantics of the absolute version
are pretty weird -- it results in the value of the GOT slot being
written, rather than the address. (That means a reference to a
dynamically-bound slot will result in zeroes being written.) The
programs I've tried linking don't use this form of the relocation, so
I've dropped our partial support for it by removing the relevant
RelocAttrBits.
Reviewed By: alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97031
See discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D93263
-flat_namespace isn't implemented yet, and neither is -undefined dynamic,
so this makes -undefined pretty pointless in lld/MachO for now. But once
we implement -flat_namespace (which we need to do anyways to get check-llvm
to pass with lld as host linker), the code's already there.
Follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D93263#2491865
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96963
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95913
Usage: -bundle_loader <executable>
This option specifies the executable that will load the build output file being linked.
When building a bundle, users can use the --bundle_loader to specify an executable
that contains symbols referenced, but not implemented in the bundle.
Since we emit diagnostics for undefineds in Writer::scanRelocations()
and symbols referenced by -u flags aren't referenced by any relocations,
this needs some manual code (similar to the entry point).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94371
This is an initial base commit for ARM64 target arch support. I don't represent that it complete or bug-free, but wish to put it out for review now that some basic things like branch target & load/store address relocs are working.
I can add more tests to this base commit, or add them in follow-up commits.
It is not entirely clear whether I use the "ARM64" (Apple) or "AArch64" (non-Apple) naming convention. Guidance is appreciated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88629
The LSDA pointers are encoded as offsets from the image base,
and arranged in one big contiguous array. Each second-level page records
the offset within that LSDA array which corresponds to the LSDA for its
first CU entry.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95810
Note that there is a triple indirection involved with
personalities and compact unwind:
1. Two bits of each CU encoding are used as an offset into the
personality array.
2. Each entry of the personality array is an offset from the image base.
The resulting address (after adding the image base) should point within the
GOT.
3. The corresponding GOT entry contains the actual pointer to the
personality function.
To further complicate things, when the personality function is in the
object file (as opposed to a dylib), its references in
`__compact_unwind` may refer to it via a section + offset relocation
instead of a symbol relocation. Since our GOT implementation can only
create entries for symbols, we have to create a synthetic symbol at the
given section offset.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95809
The Mach kernel & codesign on arm64 macOS has strict requirements for alignment and sequence of segments and sections. Dyld probably is just as picky, though kernel & codesign reject malformed Mach-O files before dyld ever has a chance.
I developed this diff by incrementally changing alignments & sequences to match the output of ld64. I stopped when my hello-world test program started working: `codesign --verify` succeded, and `execve(2)` didn't immediately fail with `errno == EBADMACHO` = `"Malformed Mach-O file"`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94935
This extends {D92539} to work even when we are loading archive
members via `-force_load`. I uncovered this issue while trying to
force-load archives containing bitcode -- we were segfaulting.
In addition to fixing the `-force_load` case, this diff also addresses
the behavior of `-ObjC` when LTO bitcode is involved -- we need to
force-load those archive members if they contain ObjC categories.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95265
This makes our error messages more informative. But the bigger motivation is for
LTO symbol resolution, which will be in an upcoming diff. The changes in this
one are largely mechanical.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94316
Add per-reloc-type attribute bits and migrate code from per-target file into target independent code, driven by reloc attributes.
Many cleanups
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95121
Not sure what the difference is, but using the latter appears to cause
issues in standalone builds. See llvm.org/PR48853.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95359
I noticed that this option was not appearing at all in the `--help`
messages for `wasm-ld` or `ld.lld`.
Add help text and make it consistent across all ports.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94925
Just getting rid of some logspew as I test LLD under existing build
systems.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95213
Run the ObjCARCContractPass during LTO. The legacy LTO backend (under
LTO/ThinLTOCodeGenerator.cpp) already does this; this diff just adds that
behavior to the new LTO backend. Without that pass, the objc.clang.arc.use
intrinsic will get passed to the instruction selector, which doesn't know how to
handle it.
In order to test both the new and old pass managers, I've also added support for
the `--[no-]lto-legacy-pass-manager` flags.
P.S. Not sure if the ordering of the pass within the pipeline matters...
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94547
We were mishandling the case where both `__tbss` and `__thread_data` sections were
present.
TLVP relocations should be encoded as offsets from the start of `__thread_data`,
even if the symbol is actually located in `__thread_bss`. Previously, we were
writing the offset from the start of the containing section, which doesn't
really make sense since there's no way `tlv_get_addr()` can know which section a
given `tlv$init` symbol is in at runtime.
In addition, this patch ensures that we place `__thread_data` immediately before
`__thread_bss`. This is what ld64 does, likely for performance reasons. Zerofill
sections must also be at the end of their segments; we were already doing this,
but now we ensure that `__thread_bss` occurs before `__bss`, so that it's always
possible to have it contiguous with `__thread_data`.
Fixes llvm.org/PR48657.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94329
Nico Weber