Attempt to fix the 2 failing tests identifier in 48646.
Appears that python3 doesn't like nested double quotes in single quoted strings, hopefully nested single quotes in double quoted strings is a-ok.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93979
readability-container-size-empty currently modifies source code based on
AST nodes in template instantiations, which means that it makes
transformations based on substituted types. This can lead to
transforming code to be broken.
Change the matcher implementation to ignore template instantiations
explicitly, and add a matcher to explicitly handle template declarations
instead of instantiations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91302
Modify the cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init checker to ignore warnings from the move and copy-constructors when they are compiler defined with `= default` outside of the type declaration.
Reported as [LLVM bug 36819](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36819)
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93333
This lint check is a part of the FLOCL (FPGA Linters for OpenCL)
project out of the Synergy Lab at Virginia Tech.
FLOCL is a set of lint checks aimed at FPGA developers who write code
in OpenCL.
The altera single work item barrier check finds OpenCL kernel functions
that call a barrier function but do not call an ID function. These
kernel functions will be treated as single work-item kernels, which
could be inefficient or lead to errors.
Based on the "Altera SDK for OpenCL: Best Practices Guide."
Extend the check to not only look at the variable the unnecessarily copied
variable is initialized from, but also ensure that any variable the old variable
references is not modified.
Extend DeclRefExprUtils to also count references and pointers to const assigned
from the DeclRef we check for const usages.
Reviewed-by: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91893
Add methods for emitting diagnostics with no location as well as a special diagnostic for configuration errors.
These show up in the errors as [clang-tidy-config].
The reason to use a custom name rather than the check name is to distinguish the error isn't the same category as the check that reported it.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91885
While casting an (integral) pointer to an integer is obvious - you just get
the integral value of the pointer, casting an integer to an (integral) pointer
is deceivingly different. While you will get a pointer with that integral value,
if you got that integral value via a pointer-to-integer cast originally,
the new pointer will lack the provenance information from the original pointer.
So while (integral) pointer to integer casts are effectively no-ops,
and are transparent to the optimizer, integer to (integral) pointer casts
are *NOT* transparent, and may conceal information from optimizer.
While that may be the intention, it is not always so. For example,
let's take a look at a routine to align the pointer up to the multiple of 16:
The obvious, naive implementation for that is:
```
char* src(char* maybe_underbiased_ptr) {
uintptr_t maybe_underbiased_intptr = (uintptr_t)maybe_underbiased_ptr;
uintptr_t aligned_biased_intptr = maybe_underbiased_intptr + 15;
uintptr_t aligned_intptr = aligned_biased_intptr & (~15);
return (char*)aligned_intptr; // warning: avoid integer to pointer casts [misc-no-inttoptr]
}
```
The check will rightfully diagnose that cast.
But when provenance concealment is not the goal of the code, but an accident,
this example can be rewritten as follows, without using integer to pointer cast:
```
char*
tgt(char* maybe_underbiased_ptr) {
uintptr_t maybe_underbiased_intptr = (uintptr_t)maybe_underbiased_ptr;
uintptr_t aligned_biased_intptr = maybe_underbiased_intptr + 15;
uintptr_t aligned_intptr = aligned_biased_intptr & (~15);
uintptr_t bias = aligned_intptr - maybe_underbiased_intptr;
return maybe_underbiased_ptr + bias;
}
```
See also:
* D71499
* [[ https://www.cs.utah.edu/~regehr/oopsla18.pdf | Juneyoung Lee, Chung-Kil Hur, Ralf Jung, Zhengyang Liu, John Regehr, and Nuno P. Lopes. 2018. Reconciling High-Level Optimizations and Low-Level Code in LLVM. Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2, OOPSLA, Article 125 (November 2018), 28 pages. ]]
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91055
The check 'cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions' does not detect conversions
involving typedef. This notably includes the standard fixed-width integer types
like int32_t, uint64_t, etc. Now look through the typedefs at the desugared type.
This extends the check for default initialization in arrays added in
547f89d607 to include scalar types and exclude them from the suggested fix for
make_unique/make_shared.
Rewriting std::unique_ptr<int>(new int) as std::make_unique<int>() (or for
other, similar trivial T) switches from default initialization to value
initialization, a performance regression for trivial T. For these use cases,
std::make_unique_for_overwrite is more suitable alternative.
Reviewed By: hokein
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90392
Commit fbdff6f3ae0b in the Abseil tree adds an overload for
absl::StrContains to accept a single character needle for optimized
lookups.
Reviewed By: hokein
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92810
Checks for some thread-unsafe functions against a black list
of known-to-be-unsafe functions. Usually they access static variables
without synchronization (e.g. gmtime(3)) or utilize signals
in a racy way (e.g. sleep(3)).
The patch adds a check instead of auto-fix as thread-safe alternatives
usually have API with an additional argument
(e.g. gmtime(3) v.s. gmtime_r(3)) or have a different semantics
(e.g. exit(3) v.s. __exit(3)), so it is a rather tricky
or non-expected fix.
An option specifies which functions in libc should be considered
thread-safe, possible values are `posix`, `glibc`,
or `any` (the most strict check). It defaults to 'any' as it is
unknown what target libc type is - clang-tidy may be run
on linux but check sources compiled for other *NIX.
The check is used in Yandex Taxi backend and has caught
many unpleasant bugs. A similar patch for coroutine-unsafe API
is coming next.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90944
The idea of suppressing naming checks for variables is to support code bases that allow short variables named e.g 'x' and 'i' without prefix/suffixes or casing styles. This was originally proposed as a 'ShortSizeThreshold' however has been made more generic with a regex to suppress identifier naming checks for those that match.
Reviewed By: njames93, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90282
std::string_view("") produces a string_view instance that compares
equal to std::string_view(), but requires more complex initialization
(storing the address of the string literal, rather than zeroing).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91009
Consider this code:
```
if (Cond) {
#ifdef X_SUPPORTED
X();
#else
return;
#endif
} else {
Y();
}
Z();```
In this example, if `X_SUPPORTED` is not defined, currently we'll get a warning from the else-after-return check. However If we apply that fix, and then the code is recompiled with `X_SUPPORTED` defined, we have inadvertently changed the behaviour of the if statement due to the else being removed. Code flow when `Cond` is `true` will be:
```
X();
Y();
Z();```
where as before the fix it was:
```
X();
Z();```
This patch adds checks that guard against `#endif` directives appearing between the control flow interrupter and the else and not applying the fix if they are detected.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91485
Do not warn for "pointer to aggregate" in a `sizeof(A) / sizeof(A[0])`
expression if `A` is an array of pointers. This is the usual way of
calculating the array length even if the array is of pointers.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91543
This allows for matching the constructors std::string has in common with
std::string_view.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91015
LLVM style puts both gtest and gmock to the end of the include list.
But llvm-include-order-check was only moving gtest headers to the end, resulting
in a false tidy-warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91602
This fixes false positive cases where a non-const reference is passed to a
std::function but interpreted as a const reference.
Fix the definition of the fake std::function added in the test to match
std::function and make the bug reproducible.
Reviewed-by: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90042
The altera kernel name restriction check finds kernel files and include
directives whose filename is "kernel.cl", "Verilog.cl", or "VHDL.cl".
Such kernel file names cause the Altera Offline Compiler to generate
intermediate design files that have the same names as certain internal
files, which leads to a compilation error.
As per the "Guidelines for Naming the Kernel" section in the "Intel FPGA
SDK for OpenCL Pro Edition: Programming Guide."
This reverts the reversion from 43a38a6523.
Add IgnoreMainLikeFunctions to the per file config. This can be extended for new options added to the check easily.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90832
SIG30-C. Call only asynchronous-safe functions within signal handlers
First version of this check, only minimal list of functions is allowed
("strictly conforming" case), for C only.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87449
Let clang-tidy to read config from specified file.
Example:
$ clang-tidy --config-file=/some/path/myTidyConfig --list-checks --
...this will read config from '/some/path/myTidyConfig'.
ClangTidyMain.cpp reads ConfigFile into string and then assigned read data to 'Config' i.e. makes like '--config' code flow internally.
May speed-up tidy runtime since now it will just look-up <file-path>
instead of searching ".clang-tidy" in parent-dir(s).
Directly specifying config path helps setting build dependencies.
Thanks to @DmitryPolukhin for valuable suggestion. This patch now propose
change only in ClangTidyMain.cpp.
Reviewed By: DmitryPolukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89936
The altera kernel name restriction check finds kernel files and include
directives whose filename is "kernel.cl", "Verilog.cl", or "VHDL.cl".
Such kernel file names cause the Altera Offline Compiler to generate
intermediate design files that have the same names as certain internal
files, which leads to a compilation error.
As per the "Guidelines for Naming the Kernel" section in the "Intel FPGA
SDK for OpenCL Pro Edition: Programming Guide."
On Windows the --use-color option cannot be used for its originally
intended purpose of forcing color when piping stdout, since Windows
does not use ANSI escape codes by default. This change turns on ANSI
escape codes on Windows when forcing color to a non-displayed stdout
(e.g. piped).
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D80531 landed, a subtle bug was introduced where the test would fail if `LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR` was set. This just silences that error so the test case runs correctly, down the line it may be worth not enabling `-Werror` for clang-tidy tests even if the cmake flag is passed.
Make check_clang_tidy.py not just pass -format-style=none by default
but a full -config={}. Without this, with a build dir outside of
the llvm root dir and a .clang-tidy config further up that contains
CheckOptions:
- key: modernize-use-default-member-init.UseAssignment
value: 1
these tests would fail:
Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer-modernize-use-default-member-init.cpp
Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/checkers/modernize-use-default-member-init-bitfield.cpp
Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/checkers/modernize-use-default-member-init.cpp
After this change, they pass fine, despite the unrelated
.clang-tidy file further up.
Since its call operator is const but can modify the state of its underlying
functor we cannot tell whether the copy is necessary or not.
This avoids false positives.
Reviewed-by: aaron.ballman, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89332
Added option `ScopedEnumConstant(Prefix|Case|Suffix)` to readability-identitied-naming.
This controls the style for constants in scoped enums, declared as enum (class|struct).
If this option is unspecified the EnumConstant style will be used instead.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89407
new test: parsing and using compile_commands
new test: export fixes to yaml file
old test extended with CHECK-MESSAGES in order to ensure that they "fail as intended"
Enables support for transforming loops of the form
```
for (auto I = Cont.rbegin(), E = Cont.rend(); I != E;++I)
```
This is done automatically in C++20 mode using `std::ranges::reverse_view` but there are options to specify a different function to reverse iterator over a container.
This is the first step, down the line I'd like to possibly extend this support for array based loops
```
for (unsigned I = Arr.size() - 1;I >=0;--I) Arr[I]...
```
Currently if you pass a reversing function with no header in the options it will just assume that the function exists, however as we have the ASTContext it may be as wise to check before applying, or at least lower the confidence level if we can't find it.
Reviewed By: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82089
Currently, there is basically just one clang-tidy check to impose
some sanity limits on functions - `clang-tidy-readability-function-size`.
It is nice, allows to limit line count, total number of statements,
number of branches, number of function parameters (not counting
implicit `this`), nesting level.
However, those are simple generic metrics. It is still trivially possible
to write a function, which does not violate any of these metrics,
yet is still rather unreadable.
Thus, some additional, slightly more complicated metric is needed.
There is a well-known [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclomatic_complexity | Cyclomatic complexity]], but certainly has its downsides.
And there is a [[ https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf | COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY by SonarSource ]], which is available for opensource on https://sonarcloud.io/.
This check checks function Cognitive Complexity metric, and flags
the functions with Cognitive Complexity exceeding the configured limit.
The default limit is `25`, same as in 'upstream'.
The metric is implemented as per [[ https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf | COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY by SonarSource ]] specification version 1.2 (19 April 2017), with two notable exceptions:
* `preprocessor conditionals` (`#ifdef`, `#if`, `#elif`, `#else`,
`#endif`) are not accounted for.
Could be done. Currently, upstream does not account for them either.
* `each method in a recursion cycle` is not accounted for.
It can't be fully implemented, because cross-translational-unit
analysis would be needed, which is not possible in clang-tidy.
Thus, at least right now, i completely avoided implementing it.
There are some further possible improvements:
* Are GNU statement expressions (`BinaryConditionalOperator`) really free?
They should probably cause nesting level increase,
and complexity level increase when they are nested within eachother.
* Microsoft SEH support
* ???
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36836
Some projects do not use the TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY macro but define their
own one, as not to depend on glibc / Bionic details. By allowing the
user to override the list of macros, these projects can also benefit
from this check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83144
Create targets `check-clang-extra-clang-tidy`, `check-clang-extra-clang-query`
similar to how `check-clang-sema`, `check-clang-parser`, etc. are
auto-generated from the directory structure.
This allows running only a particular sub-tool's tests, not having to wait
through the entire `check-clang-tools` execution.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D84176
Stephen Kelly