LLDB changes argv[0] when debugging a symlink. Now we have the notion of argv0 in the target settings:
target.arg0 (string) =
There is also the program argument that are separate from the first argument that have existed for a while:
target.run-args (arguments) =
When running "target create <exe>", we will place the untouched "<exe>" into target.arg0 to ensure when we run, we run with what the user typed. This has been added to the ProcessLaunchInfo and all other needed places so we always carry around the:
- resolved executable path
- argv0
- program args
Some systems may not support separating argv0 from the resolved executable path and the ProcessLaunchInfo needs to carry all of this information along so that each platform can make that decision.
llvm-svn: 166137
XML comment for declarations which pretty-prints
declaration. I had to XFAIL one test annotate-comments.cpp.
This test is currently unmaintainable as written.
Dmitri G., can you see what we can do about this test.
We should change this test such that adding a new tag does not wreck
havoc to the test.
llvm-svn: 166130
- If the extracted vector has the same type of all vectored being concatenated
together, it should be simplified directly into v_i, where i is the index of
the element being extracted.
llvm-svn: 166125
any scheduling heuristics nor does it build up any scheduling data structure
that other heuristics use. It essentially linearize by doing a DFA walk but
it does handle glues correctly.
IMPORTANT: it probably can't handle all the physical register dependencies so
it's not suitable for x86. It also doesn't deal with dbg_value nodes right now
so it's definitely is still WIP.
rdar://12474515
llvm-svn: 166122
This actually looks through several kinds of expression, such as
OpaqueValueExpr and ExprWithCleanups. The idea is that binding and lookup
should be consistent, and so if the environment needs to be modified later,
the code doing the modification will not have to manually look through these
"transparent" expressions to find the real binding to change.
This is necessary for proper updating of struct rvalues as described in
the previous commit.
llvm-svn: 166121
In C++, rvalues that need to have their address taken (for example, to be
passed to a function by const reference) will be wrapped in a
MaterializeTemporaryExpr, which lets CodeGen know to create a temporary
region to store this value. However, MaterializeTemporaryExprs are /not/
created when a method is called on an rvalue struct, even though the 'this'
pointer needs a valid value. CodeGen works around this by creating a
temporary region anyway; now, so does the analyzer.
The analyzer also does this when accessing a field of a struct rvalue.
This is a little unfortunate, since the rest of the struct will soon be
thrown away, but it does make things consistent with the rest of the
analyzer.
This allows us to bring back the assumption that all known 'this' values
are Locs. This is a revised version of r164828-9, reverted in r164876-7.
<rdar://problem/12137950>
llvm-svn: 166120
All callers of these functions really want the isPhysRegOrOverlapUsed()
functionality which also checks aliases. For historical reasons, targets
without register aliases were calling isPhysRegUsed() instead.
Change isPhysRegUsed() to also check aliases, and switch all
isPhysRegOrOverlapUsed() callers to isPhysRegUsed().
llvm-svn: 166117
The previous MRI.isPhysRegUsed(YMM0) would also return true when the
function contains a call to a function that may clobber YMM0. That's
most of them.
Checking the use-def chains allows us to skip functions that don't
explicitly mention YMM registers.
llvm-svn: 166110
a pointer. A very bad idea. Let's not do that. Fixes PR14105.
Note that this wasn't *that* glaring of an oversight. Originally, these
routines were only called on offsets within an alloca, which are
intrinsically positive. But over the evolution of the pass, they ended
up being called for arbitrary offsets, and things went downhill...
llvm-svn: 166095
revision makes no sense. We cannot use the address space of the *post
indexed* type to conclude anything about a *pre indexed* pointer type's
size. More importantly, this index can never be over a pointer. We are
indexing over arrays and vectors here.
Of course, I have no test case here. Neither did the original patch. =/
llvm-svn: 166091
has ivars that require destruction, but none that require anything
except zero-initialization. This is common in ARC and (when true
throughout a class hierarchy) permits the elimination of an
unnecessary message-send during allocation.
llvm-svn: 166088
Richard Smith