The nullability checker currently allows casts to suppress warnings when a nil
literal is passed as an argument to a parameter annotated as _Nonnull:
foo((NSString * _Nonnull)nil); // no-warning
It does so by suppressing the diagnostic when the *type* of the argument expression
is _Nonnull -- even when the symbolic value returned is known to be nil.
This commit updates the nullability checker to similarly honor such casts in the analogous
scenario when nil is returned from a function with a _Nonnull return type:
return (NSString * _Nonnull)nil; // no-warning
This commit also normalizes variable naming between the parameter and return cases and
adds several tests demonstrating the limitations of this suppression mechanism (such as
when nil is cast to _Nonnull and then stored into a local variable without a nullability
qualifier). These tests are marked with FIXMEs.
rdar://problem/23176782
llvm-svn: 256567
When the analyzer evaluates a CXXConstructExpr, it looks ahead in the CFG for
the current block to detect what region the object should be constructed into.
If the constructor was directly constructed into a local variable or field
region then there is no need to explicitly bind the constructed value to
the local or field when analyzing the DeclStmt or CXXCtorInitializer that
called the constructor.
Unfortunately, there were situations in which the CXXConstructExpr was
constructed into a temporary region but when evaluating the corresponding
DeclStmt or CXXCtorInitializer the analyzer assumed the object was constructed
into the local or field. This led to spurious warnings about uninitialized
values (PR25777).
To avoid these false positives, this commit factors out the logic for
determining when a CXXConstructExpr will be directly constructed into existing
storage, adds the inverse logic to detect when the corresponding later bind can
be safely skipped, and adds assertions to make sure these two checks are in
sync.
rdar://problem/21947725
llvm-svn: 255859
error: 'warning' diagnostics expected but not seen:
File clang/test/Analysis/padding_c.c Line 194 (directive at clang/test/Analysis/padding_c.c:193): Excessive padding in 'struct DefaultAttrAlign'
1 error generated.
llvm-svn: 255636
The intent of this checker is to generate a report for any class / structure
that could reduce its padding by reordering the fields. This results in a very
noisy checker. To reduce the noise, this checker will currently only warn when
the number of bytes over "optimal" is more than 24. This value is configurable
with -analyzer-config performance.Padding:AllowedPad=N. Small values of
AllowedPad have the potential to generate hundreds of reports, and gigabytes
of HTML reports.
The checker searches for padding violations in two main ways. First, it goes
record by record. A report is generated if the fields could be reordered in a
way that reduces the padding by more than AllowedPad bytes. Second, the
checker will generate a report if an array will cause more than AllowedPad
padding bytes to be generated.
The record checker currently skips many ABI specific cases. Classes with base
classes are skipped because base class tail padding is ABI specific. Bitfields
are just plain hard, and duplicating that code seems like a bad idea. VLAs are
both uncommon and non-trivial to fix.
The array checker isn't very thorough right now. It only checks to see if the
element type's fields could be reordered, and it doesn't recursively check to
see if any of the fields' fields could be reordered. At some point in the
future, it would be nice if "arrays" could also look at array new usages and
malloc patterns that appear to be creating arrays.
llvm-svn: 255545
SymbolReaper was destroying the symbol too early when it was referenced only
from an index SVal of a live ElementRegion.
In order to test certain aspects of this patch, extend the debug.ExprInspection
checker to allow testing SymbolReaper in a direct manner.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12726
llvm-svn: 255236
When a C++ lambda captures a variable-length array, it creates a capture
field to store the size of the array. The initialization expression for this
capture is null, which led the analyzer to crash when initializing the field.
To avoid this, use the size expression from the VLA type to determine the
initialization value.
rdar://problem/23748072
llvm-svn: 254962
This commit prevents MemRegion::getAsOffset() from crashing when the analyzed
program casts a symbolic region of a non-record type to some derived type and
then attempts to access a field of the base type.
rdar://problem/23458069
llvm-svn: 254806
clang converts C++ lambdas to blocks with an implicit user-defined conversion
operator method on the lambda record. This method returns a block that captures a copy
of the lambda. To inline a lambda-converted block, the analyzer now calls the lambda
records's call operator method on the lambda captured by the block.
llvm-svn: 254702
Don't warn about addresses of stack-allocated blocks escaping if the block
region was cast with CK_CopyAndAutoreleaseBlockObject. These casts, which
are introduced in the implicit conversion operator for lambda-to-block
conversions, cause the block to be copied to the heap -- so the warning is
spurious.
llvm-svn: 254639
Add tests demonstrating that the analyzer supports generalized lambda capture. This
support falls out naturally from the work Gábor Horváth did adding C++11 lambdas to
the analyzer.
llvm-svn: 254114
This prevents spurious dead store warnings when a C++ lambda is casted to a block.
I've also added several tests documenting our still-incomplete support for lambda-to-block
casts.
rdar://problem/22236293
llvm-svn: 254107
The nullability checker was not suppressing false positives resulting from
inlined defensive checks when null was bound to a nonnull variable because it
was passing the entire bind statement rather than the value expression to
trackNullOrUndefValue().
This commit changes that checker to synactically match on the bind statement to
extract the value expression so it can be passed to trackNullOrUndefValue().
rdar://problem/23575439
llvm-svn: 254007
The analyzer currently reports dead store false positives when a local variable
is captured by reference in a C++ lambda.
For example:
int local = 0; auto lambda = [&local]() {
local++;
};
local = 7; // False Positive: Value stored to 'local' is never read
lambda();
In this case, the assignment setting `local` to 7 is not a dead store because
the called lambda will later read that assigned value.
This commit silences this source of false positives by treating locals captured
by reference in C++ lambdas as escaped, similarly to how the DeadStoresChecker
deals with locals whose address is taken.
rdar://problem/22165179
llvm-svn: 253630
Conversions between unrelated pointer types (e.g. char * and void *) involve
bitcasts which were not properly modeled in case of static initializers. The
patch fixes this problem.
The problem was originally spotted by Artem Dergachev. Patched by Yuri Gribov!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14652
llvm-svn: 253532
Since we don't check functions in dependent contexts, we should skip blocks
in those contexts as well. This avoids an assertion failure when the
DeadStoresChecker attempts to evaluate an array subscript expression with
a dependent name type.
rdar://problem/23564220
llvm-svn: 253516
When calling a ObjC method on super from inside a C++ lambda, look at the
captures to find "self". This mirrors how the analyzer handles calling super in
an ObjC block and fixes an assertion failure.
rdar://problem/23550077
llvm-svn: 253176
The analyzer incorrectly treats captures as references if either the original
captured variable is a reference or the variable is captured by reference.
This causes the analyzer to crash when capturing a reference type by copy
(PR24914). Fix this by refering solely to the capture field to determine when a
DeclRefExpr for a lambda capture should be treated as a reference type.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24914
rdar://problem/23524412
llvm-svn: 253157
Summary:
VisitReturnStmt would create a new block with including Dtors, so the Dtors created
in VisitCompoundStmts would be in an unreachable block.
Example:
struct S {
~S();
};
void f()
{
S s;
return;
}
void g()
{
S s;
}
Before this patch, f has one additional unreachable block containing just the
destructor of S. With this patch, both f and g have the same blocks.
Reviewers: krememek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13973
llvm-svn: 253107
Function__builtin_signbit returns wrong value for type ppcf128 on big endian
machines. This patch fixes how value is generated in that case.
Patch by Aleksandar Beserminji.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14149
llvm-svn: 252307
This checker looks for unsafe constructs in vforked process:
function calls (excluding whitelist), memory write and returns.
This was originally motivated by a vfork-related bug in xtables package.
Patch by Yury Gribov.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14014
llvm-svn: 252285
Update RegionStoreManager::getBinding() to return UnknownVal when trying to get
the binding for a BlockDataRegion. Previously, getBinding() would try to cast the
BlockDataRegion to a TypedValueRegion and crash. This happened when a block
was passed as a parameter to an inlined function for which
StackHintGeneratorForSymbol::getMessage() tried to generate a stack hint message.
rdar://problem/21291971
llvm-svn: 252185
This commit creates a new 'optin' top-level checker package and moves several of
the localizability checkers into it.
This package is for checkers that are not alpha and that would normally be on by
default but where the driver does not have enough information to determine when
they are applicable. The localizability checkers fit this criterion because the
driver cannot determine whether a project is localized or not -- this is best
determined at the IDE or build-system level.
This new package is *not* intended for checkers that are too noisy to be on by
default.
The hierarchy under 'optin' mirrors that in 'alpha': checkers under 'optin'
should be organized in the hierarchy they would have had if they were truly top
level (e.g., optin.osx.cocoa.MyOptInChecker).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14303
llvm-svn: 252080
Summary:
Dear All,
We have been looking at the following problem, where any code after the constant bound loop is not analyzed because of the limit on how many times the same block is visited, as described in bugzillas #7638 and #23438. This problem is of interest to us because we have identified significant bugs that the checkers are not locating. We have been discussing a solution involving ranges as a longer term project, but I would like to propose a patch to improve the current implementation.
Example issue:
```
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) {...something...}
int *p = 0;
*p = 0xDEADBEEF;
```
The proposal is to go through the first and last iterations of the loop. The patch creates an exploded node for the approximate last iteration of constant bound loops, before the max loop limit / block visit limit is reached. It does this by identifying the variable in the loop condition and finding the value which is “one away” from the loop being false. For example, if the condition is (x < 10), then an exploded node is created where the value of x is 9. Evaluating the loop body with x = 9 will then result in the analysis continuing after the loop, providing x is incremented.
The patch passes all the tests, with some modifications to coverage.c, in order to make the ‘function_which_gives_up’ continue to give up, since the changes allowed the analysis to progress past the loop.
This patch does introduce possible false positives, as a result of not knowing the state of variables which might be modified in the loop. I believe that, as a user, I would rather have false positives after loops than do no analysis at all. I understand this may not be the common opinion and am interested in hearing your views. There are also issues regarding break statements, which are not considered. A more advanced implementation of this approach might be able to consider other conditions in the loop, which would allow paths leading to breaks to be analyzed.
Lastly, I have performed a study on large code bases and I think there is little benefit in having “max-loop” default to 4 with the patch. For variable bound loops this tends to result in duplicated analysis after the loop, and it makes little difference to any constant bound loop which will do more than a few iterations. It might be beneficial to lower the default to 2, especially for the shallow analysis setting.
Please let me know your opinions on this approach to processing constant bound loops and the patch itself.
Regards,
Sean Eveson
SN Systems - Sony Computer Entertainment Group
Reviewers: jordan_rose, krememek, xazax.hun, zaks.anna, dcoughlin
Subscribers: krememek, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12358
llvm-svn: 251621
The analyzer assumes that system functions will not free memory or modify the
arguments in other ways, so we assume that arguments do not escape when
those are called. However, this may lead to false positive leak errors. For
example, in code like this where the pointers added to the rb_tree are freed
later on:
struct alarm_event *e = calloc(1, sizeof(*e));
<snip>
rb_tree_insert_node(&alarm_tree, e);
Add a heuristic to assume that calls to system functions taking void*
arguments allow for pointer escape.
llvm-svn: 251449
This patch adds hashes to the plist and html output to be able to identfy bugs
for suppressing false positives or diff results against a baseline. This hash
aims to be resilient for code evolution and is usable to identify bugs in two
different snapshots of the same software. One missing piece however is a
permanent unique identifier of the checker that produces the warning. Once that
issue is resolved, the hashes generated are going to change. Until that point
this feature is marked experimental, but it is suitable for early adoption.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305
Original patch by: Bence Babati!
llvm-svn: 251011
Prevent invalidation of `this' when a method is const; fixing PR 21606.
A patch by Sean Eveson!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13099
llvm-svn: 250237
These test updates almost exclusively around the change in behavior
around enum: enums without a definition are considered incomplete except
when targeting MSVC ABIs. Since these tests are interested in the
'incomplete-enum' behavior, restrict them to %itanium_abi_triple.
llvm-svn: 249660
Change the analyzer's modeling of memcpy to be more precise when copying into fixed-size
array fields. With this change, instead of invalidating the entire containing region the
analyzer now invalidates only offsets for the array itself when it can show that the
memcpy stays within the bounds of the array.
This addresses false positive memory leak warnings of the kind reported by
krzysztof in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22954
(This is the second attempt, now with assertion failures resolved.)
A patch by Pierre Gousseau!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12571
llvm-svn: 248516
This patch ignores malloc-overflow bug in two cases:
Case1:
x = a/b; where n < b
malloc (x*n); Then x*n will not overflow.
Case2:
x = a; // when 'a' is a known value.
malloc (x*n);
Also replaced isa with dyn_cast.
Reject multiplication by zero cases in MallocOverflowSecurityChecker
Currently MallocOverflowSecurityChecker does not catch cases like:
malloc(n * 0 * sizeof(int));
This patch rejects such cases.
Two test cases added. malloc-overflow2.c has an example inspired from a code
in linux kernel where the current checker flags a warning while it should not.
A patch by Aditya Kumar!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9924
llvm-svn: 248446
Various improvements to the localization checker:
* Adjusted copy to be consistent with diagnostic text in other Apple
API checkers.
* Added in ~150 UIKit / AppKit methods that require localized strings in
UnlocalizedStringsChecker.
* UnlocalizedStringChecker now checks for UI methods up the class hierarchy and
UI methods that conform for a certain Objective-C protocol.
* Added in alpha version of PluralMisuseChecker and some regression tests. False
positives are still not ideal.
(This is the second attempt, with the memory issues on Linux resolved.)
A patch by Kulpreet Chilana!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12417
llvm-svn: 248432
Various improvements to the localization checker:
* Adjusted copy to be consistent with diagnostic text in other Apple
API checkers.
* Added in ~150 UIKit / AppKit methods that require localized strings in
UnlocalizedStringsChecker.
* UnlocalizedStringChecker now checks for UI methods up the class hierarchy and
UI methods that conform for a certain Objective-C protocol.
* Added in alpha version of PluralMisuseChecker and some regression tests. False
positives are still not ideal.
A patch by Kulpreet Chilana!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12417
llvm-svn: 248350
Currently realloc(ptr, 0) is treated as free() which seems to be not correct. C
standard (N1570) establishes equivalent behavior for malloc(0) and realloc(ptr,
0): "7.22.3 Memory management functions calloc, malloc, realloc: If the size of
the space requested is zero, the behavior is implementation-defined: either a
null pointer is returned, or the behavior is as if the size were some nonzero
value, except that the returned pointer shall not be used to access an object."
The patch equalizes the processing of malloc(0) and realloc(ptr,0). The patch
also enables unix.Malloc checker to detect references to zero-allocated memory
returned by realloc(ptr,0) ("Use of zero-allocated memory" warning).
A patch by Антон Ярцев!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9040
llvm-svn: 248336
This fixes PR16833, in which the analyzer was using large amounts of memory
for switch statements with large case ranges.
rdar://problem/14685772
A patch by Aleksei Sidorin!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5102
llvm-svn: 248318
Summary:
`TypeTraitExpr`s are not supported by the ExprEngine today. Analyzer
creates a sink, and aborts the block. Therefore, certain bugs that
involve type traits intrinsics cannot be detected (see PR24710).
This patch creates boolean `SVal`s for `TypeTraitExpr`s, which are
evaluated by the compiler.
Test within the patch is a summary of PR24710.
Reviewers: zaks.anna, dcoughlin, krememek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12482
llvm-svn: 248314
Summary:
Name `Out` refers to the parameter. It is moved into the member `Out`
in ctor-init. Dereferencing null pointer will crash clang, if user
passes '-analyzer-viz-egraph-ubigraph' argument.
Reviewers: zaks.anna, krememek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12119
llvm-svn: 248050
The analyzer trims unnecessary nodes from the exploded graph before reporting
path diagnostics. However, in some cases it can trim all nodes (including the
error node), leading to an assertion failure (see
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24184).
This commit addresses the issue by adding two new APIs to CheckerContext to
explicitly create error nodes. Unless the client provides a custom tag, these
APIs tag the node with the checker's tag -- preventing it from being trimmed.
The generateErrorNode() method creates a sink error node, while
generateNonFatalErrorNode() creates an error node for a path that should
continue being explored.
The intent is that one of these two methods should be used whenever a checker
creates an error node.
This commit updates the checkers to use these APIs. These APIs
(unlike addTransition() and generateSink()) do not take an explicit Pred node.
This is because there are not any error nodes in the checkers that were created
with an explicit different than the default (the CheckerContext's Pred node).
It also changes generateSink() to require state and pred nodes (previously
these were optional) to reduce confusion.
Additionally, there were several cases where checkers did check whether a
generated node could be null; we now explicitly check for null in these places.
This commit also includes a test case written by Ying Yi as part of
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12163 (that patch originally addressed this issue but
was reverted because it introduced false positive regressions).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12780
llvm-svn: 247859
In Objective-C, method calls with nil receivers are essentially no-ops. They
do not fault (although the returned value may be garbage depending on the
declared return type and architecture). Programmers are aware of this
behavior and will complain about a false alarm when the analyzer
diagnoses API violations for method calls when the receiver is known to
be nil.
Rather than require each individual checker to be aware of this behavior
and suppress a warning when the receiver is nil, this commit
changes ExprEngineObjC so that VisitObjCMessage skips calling checker
pre/post handlers when the receiver is definitely nil. Instead, it adds a
new event, ObjCMessageNil, that is only called in that case.
The CallAndMessageChecker explicitly cares about this case, so I've changed it
to add a callback for ObjCMessageNil and moved the logic in PreObjCMessage
that handles nil receivers to the new callback.
rdar://problem/18092611
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12123
llvm-svn: 247653
Add an option (-analyzer-config min-blocks-for-inline-large=14) to control the function
size the inliner considers as large, in relation to "max-times-inline-large". The option
defaults to the original hard coded behaviour, which I believe should be adjustable with
the other inlining settings.
The analyzer-config test has been modified so that the analyzer will reach the
getMinBlocksForInlineLarge() method and store the result in the ConfigTable, to ensure it
is dumped by the debug checker.
A patch by Sean Eveson!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12406
llvm-svn: 247463
This is making our internal build bot fail because it results in extra warnings being
emitted past what should be sink nodes. (There is actually an example of this in the
updated malloc.c test in the reverted commit.)
I'm working on a patch to fix the original issue by adding a new checker API to explicitly
create error nodes. This API will ensure that error nodes are always tagged in order to
prevent them from being reclaimed.
This reverts commit r246188.
llvm-svn: 247103
Change the analyzer's modeling of memcpy to be more precise when copying into fixed-size
array fields. With this change, instead of invalidating the entire containing region the
analyzer now invalidates only offsets for the array itself when it can show that the
memcpy stays within the bounds of the array.
This addresses false positive memory leak warnings of the kind reported by
krzysztof in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22954
A patch by Pierre Gousseau!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11832
llvm-svn: 246345
The assertion is caused by reusing a “filler” ExplodedNode as an error node.
The “filler” nodes are only used for intermediate processing and are not
essential for analyzer history, so they can be reclaimed when the
ExplodedGraph is trimmed by the “collectNode” function. When a checker finds a
bug, they generate a new transition in the ExplodedGraph. The analyzer will
try to reuse the existing predecessor node. If it cannot, it creates a new
ExplodedNode, which always has a tag to uniquely identify the creation site.
The assertion is caused when the analyzer reuses a “filler” node.
In the test case, some “filler” nodes were reused and then reclaimed later
when the ExplodedGraph was trimmed. This caused an assertion because the node
was needed to generate the report. The “filler” nodes should not be reused as
error nodes. The patch adds a constraint to prevent this happening, which
solves the problem and makes the test cases pass.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11433
Patch by Ying Yi!
llvm-svn: 246188
Add checkers that detect code-level localizability issues for OS X / iOS:
- A path sensitive checker that warns about uses of non-localized
NSStrings passed to UI methods expecting localized strings.
- A syntax checker that warns against not including a comment in
NSLocalizedString macros.
A patch by Kulpreet Chilana!
(This is the second attempt with the compilation issue on Windows and
the random test failures resolved.)
llvm-svn: 245093
This reverts commit fc885033a30b6e30ccf82398ae7c30e646727b10.
Revert all localization checker commits until the proper fix is implemented.
llvm-svn: 244394
Add checkers that detect code-level localizability issues for OS X / iOS:
- A path sensitive checker that warns about uses of non-localized
NSStrings passed to UI methods expecting localized strings.
- A syntax checker that warns against not including a comment in
NSLocalizedString macros.
A patch by Kulpreet Chilana!
llvm-svn: 244389
The ObjCSuperCallChecker issues alarms for various Objective-C APIs that require
a subclass to call to its superclass's version of a method when overriding it.
So, for example, it raises an alarm when the -viewDidLoad method in a subclass
of UIViewController does not call [super viewDidLoad].
This patch fixes a false alarm where the analyzer erroneously required the
implementation of the superclass itself (e.g., UIViewController) to call
super.
rdar://problem/18416944
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11842
llvm-svn: 244386
BlockDecl has a poor AST representation because it doesn't carry its type
with it. Instead, the containing BlockExpr has the full type. This almost
never matters for the analyzer, but if the block decl contains static
local variables we need to synthesize a region to put them in, and this
region will necessarily not have the right type.
Even /that/ doesn't matter, unless
(1) the block calls the function or method containing the block, and
(2) the value of the block expr is used in some interesting way.
In this case, we actually end up needing the type of the block region,
and it will be set to our synthesized type. It turns out we've been doing
a terrible job faking that type -- it wasn't a block pointer type at all.
This commit fixes that to at least guarantee a block pointer type, using
the signature written by the user if there is one.
This is not really a correct answer because the block region's type will
/still/ be wrong, but further efforts to make this right in the analyzer
would probably be silly. We should just change the AST.
rdar://problem/21698099
llvm-svn: 241944
A patch by Karthik Bhat!
This patch fixes a regression introduced by r224398. Prior to r224398
we were able to analyze the following code in test-include.c and report
a null deref in this case. But post r224398 this analysis is being skipped.
E.g.
// test-include.c
#include "test-include.h"
void test(int * data) {
data = 0;
*data = 1;
}
// test-include.h
void test(int * data);
This patch uses the function body (instead of its declaration) as the location
of the function when deciding if the Decl should be analyzed with path-sensitive
analysis. (Prior to r224398, the call graph was guaranteed to have a definition
when available.)
llvm-svn: 240800
Addresses a conflict with glibc's __nonnull macro by renaming the type
nullability qualifiers as follows:
__nonnull -> _Nonnull
__nullable -> _Nullable
__null_unspecified -> _Null_unspecified
This is the major part of rdar://problem/21530726, but does not yet
provide the Darwin-specific behavior for the old names.
llvm-svn: 240596
That is,
void cf2(CFTypeRef * __nullable p CF_RETURNS_NOT_RETAINED);
is equivalent to
void cf2(CFTypeRef __nullable * __nullable p CF_RETURNS_NOT_RETAINED);
More rdar://problem/18742441
llvm-svn: 240186
Includes a simple static analyzer check and not much else, but we'll also
be able to take advantage of this in Swift.
This feature can be tested for using __has_feature(cf_returns_on_parameters).
This commit also contains two fixes:
- Look through non-typedef sugar when deciding whether something is a CF type.
- When (cf|ns)_returns(_not)?_retained is applied to invalid properties,
refer to "property" instead of "method" in the error message.
rdar://problem/18742441
llvm-svn: 240185
Update ObjCContainersChecker to be notified when pointers escape so it can
remove size information for escaping CFMutableArrayRefs. When such pointers
escape, un-analyzed code could mutate the array and cause the size information
to be incorrect.
rdar://problem/19406485
llvm-svn: 239709
Based on previous discussion on the mailing list, clang currently lacks support
for C99 partial re-initialization behavior:
Reference: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-April/029188.html
Reference: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_253.htm
This patch attempts to fix this problem.
Given the following code snippet,
struct P1 { char x[6]; };
struct LP1 { struct P1 p1; };
struct LP1 l = { .p1 = { "foo" }, .p1.x[2] = 'x' };
// this example is adapted from the example for "struct fred x[]" in DR-253;
// currently clang produces in l: { "\0\0x" },
// whereas gcc 4.8 produces { "fox" };
// with this fix, clang will also produce: { "fox" };
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5789
llvm-svn: 239446
Emit warning when operand to `delete` is allocated with `new[]` or
operand to `delete[]` is allocated with `new`.
rev 2 update:
`getNewExprFromInitListOrExpr` should return `dyn_cast_or_null`
instead of `dyn_cast`, since `E` might be null.
Reviewers: rtrieu, jordan_rose, rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4661
llvm-svn: 237608
This reverts commit 742dc9b6c9686ab52860b7da39c3a126d8a97fbc.
This is generating multiple segfaults in our internal builds.
Test case coming up shortly.
llvm-svn: 237391
Emit warning when operand to `delete` is allocated with `new[]` or
operand to `delete[]` is allocated with `new`.
Reviewers: rtrieu, jordan_rose, rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4661
llvm-svn: 237368
TODO: support realloc(). Currently it is not possible due to the present realloc() handling. Currently RegionState is not being attached to realloc() in case of a zero Size argument.
llvm-svn: 234889
Again, this is being applied in a separate commit so that the previous commit
can be reverted while leaving the test in place.
rdar://problem/20335433
llvm-svn: 233593
This is imitating a pre-r228174 state where ivars are not considered tracked by
default, but with the addition that even ivars /with/ retain count information
(e.g. "[_ivar retain]; [ivar _release];") are not being tracked as well. This is
to ensure that we don't regress on values accessed through both properties and
ivars, which is what r228174 was trying to fix.
The issue occurs in code like this:
[_contentView retain];
[_contentView removeFromSuperview];
[self addSubview:_contentView]; // invalidates 'self'
[_contentView release];
In this case, the call to -addSubview: may change the value of self->_contentView,
and so the analyzer can't be sure that we didn't leak the original _contentView.
This is a correct conservative view of the world, but not a useful one. Until we
have a heuristic that allows us to not consider this a leak, not emitting a
diagnostic is our best bet.
This commit disables all of the ivar-related retain count tests, but does not
remove them to ensure that we don't crash trying to evaluate either valid or
erroneous code. The next commit will add a new test for the example above so
that this commit (and the previous one) can be reverted wholesale when a better
solution is implemented.
Rest of rdar://problem/20335433
llvm-svn: 233592
Give up this checking in order to continue tracking that these values came from
direct ivar access, which will be important in the next commit.
Part of rdar://problem/20335433
llvm-svn: 233591
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20744
struct A {
A() = default;
};
Previously the source range of the declaration of A ended at the ')'. It should
include the '= default' part as well. The same for '= delete'.
Note: this will break one of the clang-tidy fixers, which is going to be
addessed in a follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8465
llvm-svn: 233028
Similarly, don't assume +0 if the property's setter is manually implemented.
In both cases, if the property's ownership is explicitly written, then we /do/
assume the ivar has the same ownership.
rdar://problem/20218183
llvm-svn: 232849
CloudABI also supports the arc4random() function. We can enable compiler
warnings for rand(), random() and *rand48() on this system as well.
llvm-svn: 231914
In theory we could assume a CF property is stored at +0 if there's not a custom
setter, but that's not really worth the complexity. What we do know is that a
CF property can't have ownership attributes, and so we shouldn't assume anything
about the ownership of the ivar.
rdar://problem/20076963
llvm-svn: 231553
Devin Coughlin