This is a resubmit of r303732, which was reverted due to a regression.
The original patch caused a regression in TestLoadUnload, which has only showed
up when running the remote test suite. The problem there was that we interrupted
the target just as it has hit the rendezvous breakpoint in the dlopen call. This
meant that the stop reason was set to "breakpoint" even though the event would
not have been broadcast if we had not stopped the process. I fix this by
checking StopInfo->ShouldNotify() before stopping.
I also add a new test for the handling of conditional breakpoints in
expressions, which I noticed to be broken (pr33164)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33283
llvm-svn: 303848
There are some differences between eh_frame and debug_frame formats that
are not considered by DWARFCallFrameInfo::GetFDEIndex. An FDE entry
contains CIE_pointer in debug_frame in same place as cie_id in eh_frame.
As described in dwarf standard (section 6.4.1), CIE_pointer is an
"offset into the .debug_frame section". So, variable cie_offset should
be equal cie_id for debug_frame.
FDE entries with zeroth CIE pointer (which is actually placed in cie_id
variable) shouldn't be ignored also.
I have also added a little change which allow to use debug_info section
when eh_frame is absent. This case really can take place on some platforms.
Patch from tatyana-krasnukha.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33504
llvm-svn: 303847
instrumenting code.
This is important in the new pass manager. The old pass manager's
inliner has a small DCE routine embedded within it. The new pass manager
relies on the actual GlobalDCE pass for this.
Without this patch, instrumentation profiling with the new PM results in
massive code bloat in the object files because the instrumentation
itself ends up preventing DCE from working to remove the code.
We should probably change the instrumentation (and/or DCE) so that we
can eliminate dead code even if instrumented, but we shouldn't even
spend the time generating instrumentation for that code so this still
seems like a good patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33535
llvm-svn: 303845
pass.
The original logic only considered direct successors of the hoisted
domtree nodes, but that isn't really enough. If there are other basic
blocks that are completely within the subtree, their successors could
just as easily be impacted by the hoisting.
The more I think about it, the more I think the correct update here is
to hoist every block on the dominance frontier which has an idom in the
chain we hoist across. However, this is subtle enough that I'd
definitely appreciate some more eyes on it.
Sadly, if this is the correct algorithm, it requires computing a (highly
localized) dominance frontier. I've done this in the simplest (IE, least
code) way I could come up with, but that may be too naive. Suggestions
welcome here, dominance update algorithms are not an area I've studied
much, so I don't have strong opinions.
In good news, with this patch, turning on simple unswitch passes the
LLVM test suite for me with asserts enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32740
llvm-svn: 303843
If Op is equal to array_lengthof, the lookup would be out of bounds, but we were only checking for greater than. I suspect nothing ever passes in the equal value because its a sentinel to mark the end of the builtin opcodes and not a real opcode.
So really this fix is just so that the code looks right and makes sense.
llvm-svn: 303840
having it internally allocate the loop.
This is a much more flexible API and necessary in the new loop unswitch
to reasonably support both new and old PMs in common code. It also just
seems like a cleaner separation of concerns.
NFC, this should just be a pure refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33528
llvm-svn: 303834
During some cleanup the test for whether the thread plan
accepted an iteration count was reversed, so we give a
warning when it will actually work, and don't when it won't.
<rdar://problem/32379280>
llvm-svn: 303832
Summary:
This patch fixes a number of issues with the analysis warnings emitted when a coroutine may reach the end of the function w/o returning.
* Fix bug where coroutines with `return_value` are incorrectly diagnosed as missing `co_return`'s.
* Rework diagnostic message to no longer say "non-void coroutine", because that implies the coroutine doesn't have a void return type, which it might. In this case a non-void coroutine is one who's promise type does not contain `return_void()`
As a side-effect of this patch, coroutine bodies that contain an invalid coroutine promise objects are marked as invalid.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, aaron.ballman, majnemer
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33532
llvm-svn: 303831
Summary:
This allows to keep handlers installed by sanitizers.
In other cases third-party code can replace handlers after libFuzzer
initialization anyway.
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33522
llvm-svn: 303828
Coverage instrumentation which does not instrument full post-dominators
and full-dominators may skip valid paths, as the reasoning for skipping
blocks may become circular.
This patch fixes that, by only skipping
full post-dominators with multiple predecessors, as such predecessors by
definition can not be full-dominators.
llvm-svn: 303827
Summary:
Frontend generates store instructions after allocas, for example:
```
define i8* @f(i64 %this) "coroutine.presplit"="1" personality i32 0 {
entry:
%this.addr = alloca i64
store i64 %this, i64* %this.addr
..
%hdl = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(token %id, i8* %alloc)
```
Such instructions may require spilling into coro.frame, but, coro-frame address is only available after coro.begin and thus needs to be moved after coro.begin.
The only instructions that should not be moved are the arguments of coro.begin and all of their operands.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, majnemer
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: llvm-commits, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33527
llvm-svn: 303825
There are some VectorShuffle Nodes in SDAG which can be selected to XXSLDWI
instruction, this patch recognizes them and does the selection to improve the
PPC performance.
llvm-svn: 303822
This change allows llvm-nm to print symbols found in import libraries,
in part by allowing COFFImportFiles to be casted to SymbolicFiles.
Patch by Dave Lee!
llvm-svn: 303821
The swapped operands in the first test is a manifestation of an
inefficiency for vectors that doesn't exist for scalars because
the IRBuilder checks for an all-ones mask for scalars, but not
vectors.
llvm-svn: 303818
This is a different implementation than r303225 (which was reverted
in r303270, re-submitted in r303304 and then re-reverted in r303527).
In the previous patch, I tried to add Live bit to each dllimported
symbol. It turned out that it didn't work with "oldnames.lib" which
contains a lot of weak aliases to dllimported symbols.
The way we handle weak aliases is to check if undefined symbols
can be resolved using weak aliases, and if so, memcpy the Defined
symbols to weak Undefined symbols, so that any references to weak
aliases automatically see defined symbols instead of undefined ones.
This memcpy happens before MarkLive kicks in.
That means we may have multiple copies of dllimported symbols. So
turning on one instance's Live bit is not enough.
This patch moves the Live bit to dllimport file. Since multiple
copies of dllsymbols still point to the same file, we can use it as the
central repository to keep track of liveness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33520
llvm-svn: 303814
It is not clear why a synthetic section wants to use padding defined
in the linker script. The padding is for the space between sections.
It was also missing a test.
llvm-svn: 303812
It seems we are still spending too much time on rare inputs, which continue to
timeout the AOSP buildbot. Let's see if a further reduction is sufficient.
llvm-svn: 303807
Summary:
Simple types like int are handled by LLVM Coroutines just fine.
But for non-scalar parameters we need to create copies of those parameters in the coroutine frame and make all uses of those parameters to refer to parameter copies.
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF, GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33507
llvm-svn: 303803
There's a Microsoft header in the Windows SDK which won't
compile with clang because it uses an operator name (and)
as a field name. This patch allows that file to compile by
setting the option which disables operator names.
The header which doesn't compile <Query.h> C:/Program Files (x86)/
Windows Kits/10/include/10.0.14393.0/um\Query.h:259:40:
error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers
/* [case()] */ NODERESTRICTION or;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
1 error generated.
Contributed for Melanie Blower
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D33505
llvm-svn: 303798
This is the only place we use threads for ICF. The intention of this code
was to split an input vector into 256 shards and process them in parallel.
What the code was actually doing was to split an input into 257 shards,
process the first 256 shards in parallel, and the remaining one in serial.
That means this code takes ceil(256/n)+1 instead of ceil(256/n) where n
is the number of available CPU cores. The former converges to 2 while
the latter converges to 1.
This patches fixes the above issue.
llvm-svn: 303797
Pavel Labath