This patch adds support for a new attribute, [[clang::lifetimebound]], that
indicates that the lifetime of a function result is related to one of the
function arguments. When walking an initializer to make sure that the lifetime
of the initial value is at least as long as the lifetime of the initialized
object, we step through parameters (including the implicit object parameter of
a non-static member function) that are marked with this attribute.
There's nowhere to write an attribute on the implicit object parameter, so in
lieu of that, it may be applied to a function type (where it appears
immediately after the cv-qualifiers and ref-qualifier, which is as close to a
declaration of the implicit object parameter as we have). I'm currently
modeling this in the AST as the attribute appertaining to the function type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49922
llvm-svn: 338464
in some member function calls.
Specifically, when calling a conversion function, we would fail to
create the AST node representing materialization of the class object.
llvm-svn: 338135
from that for a return value.
No functionality change intended: I don't believe any of the diagnostics
affected by this patch are reachable when initializing the result of
statement expression.
llvm-svn: 337728
This reinstates r337627, reverted in r337671, with a fix to correctly
handle the lvalueness of array subscript expressions on pointers.
llvm-svn: 337726
This reverts commit r337627.
After the change, clang started producing invalid warning on the following code:
struct foo {
foo(char *x) : x_(&x[10]) {}
private:
char *x_;
};
1.cpp:2:21: warning: initializing pointer member 'x_' with the stack address of parameter 'x' [-Wdangling-field]
llvm-svn: 337671
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a
reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The
standard wording here is imprecise, but we interpret it as meaning that
any time a mem-initializer would result in lifetime extension, the
program is ill-formed.
This reinstates r337226, reverted in r337255, with a fix for the
InitializedEntity alignment problem that was breaking ARM buildbots.
llvm-svn: 337329
This change breaks on ARM because pointers to clang::InitializedEntity are only
4 byte aligned and do not have 3 bits to store values. A possible solution
would be to change the fields in clang::InitializedEntity to enforce a bigger
alignment requirement.
The error message is
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:132:3: error: static_assert failed "PointerIntPair with integer size too large for pointer"
static_assert(IntBits <= PtrTraits::NumLowBitsAvailable,
include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:73:13: note: in instantiation of template class 'llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> >' requested here
Value = Info::updateInt(Info::updatePointer(0, PtrVal),
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:51:5: note: in instantiation of member function 'llvm::PointerIntPair<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, (anonymous namespace)::LifetimeKind, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *>, llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> > >::setPointerAndInt' requested here
setPointerAndInt(PtrVal, IntVal);
^
llvm/tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp:6237:12: note: in instantiation of member function 'llvm::PointerIntPair<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, (anonymous namespace)::LifetimeKind, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *>, llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> > >::PointerIntPair' requested here
return {Entity, LK_Extended};
Full log here:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-global-isel/builds/1330http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-full/builds/1394
llvm-svn: 337255
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a
reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The
standard wording here is imprecise, but we interpret it as meaning that
any time a mem-initializer would result in lifetime extension, the
program is ill-formed.
llvm-svn: 337226
Diagnostics for narrowing conversions in initializer lists are currently
DefaultIgnored in Microsoft mode. But MSVC 2015 did add warnings about
narrowing conversions (C2397), so clang-cl can remove its special case code if
MSCompatibilityVersion is new enough.
(In MSVC, C2397 is just a warning and in clang it's default-mapped to an error,
but it can be remapped, and disabled with -Wno-c++11-narrowing, so that should
be fine.)
Fixes PR37314.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48296
llvm-svn: 335082
It caused asserts, see PR37560.
> Use zeroinitializer for (trailing zero portion of) large array initializers
> more reliably.
>
> Clang has two different ways it emits array constants (from InitListExprs and
> from APValues), and both had some ability to emit zeroinitializer, but neither
> was able to catch all cases where we could use zeroinitializer reliably. In
> particular, emitting from an APValue would fail to notice if all the explicit
> array elements happened to be zero. In addition, for large arrays where only an
> initial portion has an explicit initializer, we would emit the complete
> initializer (which could be huge) rather than emitting only the non-zero
> portion. With this change, when the element would have a suffix of more than 8
> zero elements, we emit the array constant as a packed struct of its initial
> portion followed by a zeroinitializer constant for the trailing zero portion.
>
> In passing, I found a bug where SemaInit would sometimes walk the entire array
> when checking an initializer that only covers the first few elements; that's
> fixed here to unblock testing of the rest.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47166
llvm-svn: 333067
more reliably.
Clang has two different ways it emits array constants (from InitListExprs and
from APValues), and both had some ability to emit zeroinitializer, but neither
was able to catch all cases where we could use zeroinitializer reliably. In
particular, emitting from an APValue would fail to notice if all the explicit
array elements happened to be zero. In addition, for large arrays where only an
initial portion has an explicit initializer, we would emit the complete
initializer (which could be huge) rather than emitting only the non-zero
portion. With this change, when the element would have a suffix of more than 8
zero elements, we emit the array constant as a packed struct of its initial
portion followed by a zeroinitializer constant for the trailing zero portion.
In passing, I found a bug where SemaInit would sometimes walk the entire array
when checking an initializer that only covers the first few elements; that's
fixed here to unblock testing of the rest.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47166
llvm-svn: 333044
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
This is not yet part of any C++ working draft, and so is controlled by the flag
-fchar8_t rather than a -std= flag. (The GCC implementation is controlled by a
flag with the same name.)
This implementation is experimental, and will be removed or revised
substantially to match the proposal as it makes its way through the C++
committee.
llvm-svn: 331244
When a '>>' token is split into two '>' tokens (in C++11 onwards), or (as an
extension) when we do the same for other tokens starting with a '>', we can't
just use a location pointing to the first '>' as the location of the split
token, because that would result in our miscomputing the length and spelling
for the token. As a consequence, for example, a refactoring replacing 'A<X>'
with something else would sometimes replace one character too many, and
similarly diagnostics highlighting a template-id source range would highlight
one character too many.
Fix this by creating an expansion range covering the first character of the
'>>' token, whose spelling is '>'. For this to work, we generalize the
expansion range of a macro FileID to be either a token range (the common case)
or a character range (used in this new case).
llvm-svn: 331155
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
When we synthesize an implicit inner initializer list when analyzing an outer
initializer list, we add it to the outer list immediately, and then fill in the
inner list. This gives the outer list no chance to update its *-dependence bits
with those of the completed inner list. To fix this, re-add the inner list to
the outer list once it's completed.
Note that we do not recompute the *-dependence bits from scratch when we
complete an outer list; this would give the wrong result for the case where a
designated initializer overwrites a dependent initializer with a non-dependent
one. The resulting list in that case should still be dependent, even though all
traces of the dependence were removed from the semantic form.
llvm-svn: 324537
When parsing C++ type construction expressions with list initialization,
forward the locations of the braces to Sema.
Without these locations, the code coverage pass crashes on the given test
case, because the pass relies on getLocEnd() returning a valid location.
Here is what this patch does in more detail:
- Forwards init-list brace locations to Sema (ParseExprCXX),
- Builds an InitializationKind with these locations (SemaExprCXX), and
- Uses these locations for constructor initialization (SemaInit).
The remaining changes fall out of introducing a new overload for
creating direct-list InitializationKinds.
Testing: check-clang, and a stage2 coverage-enabled build of clang with
asserts enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41921
llvm-svn: 322729
In C++, such initialization of std::array<T, N> types is guaranteed to work by
the standard, is completely idiomatic, and the "suggested" alternative from
Clang was technically invalid.
llvm-svn: 314838
When selecting constructors for initializing an object of type T from a single
expression of class type U, also consider conversion functions of U that
convert to T (rather than modeling such conversions as calling a conversion
function and then calling a constructor).
This approach is proposed as the resolution for the defect, and is also already
implemented by GCC.
llvm-svn: 314231
This commit fixes a bug that's tracked by PR 10758 and duplicates like PR 30343.
The bug causes clang to crash with a stack overflow while recursing infinitely
trying to perform copy-initialization on a type without a copy constructor but
with a constructor that accepts another type that can be constructed using the
original type.
The commit fixes this bug by detecting the recursive behavior and failing
correctly with an appropriate error message. It also tries to provide a
meaningful diagnostic note about the constructor which leads to this behavior.
rdar://28483944
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25051
llvm-svn: 303156
lambda capture used by the created block
The commit r288866 introduced guaranteed copy elision to C++ 17. This
unfortunately broke the lambda to block conversion in C++17 (the compiler
crashes when performing IRGen). This commit fixes the conversion by avoiding
copy elision for the capture that captures the lambda that's used in the block
created by the lambda to block conversion process.
rdar://31385153
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31669
llvm-svn: 299646
Summary:
I saw the same changes in the following review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17438
I don't know in that way I could determine that atomic variable was initialized by macro ATOMIC_VAR_INIT. Anyway I added check that atomic variables can be initialize only in global scope.
I think that we can discuss this change.
Reviewers: Anastasia, cfe-commits
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Subscribers: bader, yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30643
llvm-svn: 299537
Summary: After examining the remaining uses of LangOptions.ObjCAutoRefCount, found a some additional places to also check for ObjCWeak not covered by previous test cases. Added a test file to verify all the code paths that were changed.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31007
llvm-svn: 299015
This change fixes a crash on initialization of a reference from ({}) during
template instantiation and incidentally improves diagnostics.
This reverts a prior attempt to handle this in r286721. Instead, we teach the
initialization code that initialization cannot be performed if a source type
is required and the initializer is an initializer list (which is not an
expression and does not have a type), and likewise for function-style cast
expressions.
llvm-svn: 298676
instantiation.
In preparation for converting the template stack to a more general context
stack (so we can include context notes for other kinds of context).
llvm-svn: 295686
After r264564, we allowed direct-list-initialization of an enum from an
integral value in C++1z mode, so long as that value can convert to the
enum's underlying type.
In this kind of initialization, we need a lvalue-to-rvalue conversion
for the initializer value if it is not a rvalue. This lets us accept the
following code:
enum class A : unsigned {};
A foo(unsigned x) { return A{x}; }
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29723
llvm-svn: 295266
such guides below explicit ones, and ensure that references to the class's
template parameters are not treated as forwarding references.
We make a few tweaks to the wording in the current standard:
1) The constructor parameter list is copied faithfully to the deduction guide,
without losing default arguments or a varargs ellipsis (which the standard
wording loses by omission).
2) If the class template declares no constructors, we add a T() -> T<...> guide
(which will only ever work if T has default arguments for all non-pack
template parameters).
3) If the class template declares nothing that looks like a copy or move
constructor, we add a T(T<...>) -> T<...> guide.
#2 and #3 follow from the "pretend we had a class type with these constructors"
philosophy for deduction guides.
llvm-svn: 295007
Contrary to the comment, DeclContext intends to guarantee that the lookup
results for a particular name will be stable across non-AST-mutating
operations, so a copy here should not be necessary. Further, if a copy *is*
necessary, the other four instances of this pattern within this file would also
be wrong, and we have no evidence of any problems with them; if this change
unearths problems, we should fix all the instances of this pattern.
llvm-svn: 293740
CheckDesignatedInitializer wasn't taking into account the base classes
when computing the index for the field in the derived class, which
caused the test case to crash during IRGen because of a malformed AST.
rdar://problem/26795040
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28705
llvm-svn: 292245
This implements something like the current direction of DR1581: we use a narrow
syntactic check to determine the set of places where a constant expression
could be evaluated, and only instantiate a constexpr function or variable if
it's referenced in one of those contexts, or is odr-used.
It's not yet clear whether this is the right set of syntactic locations; we
currently consider all contexts within templates that would result in odr-uses
after instantiation, and contexts within list-initialization (narrowing
conversions take another victim...), as requiring instantiation. We could in
principle restrict the former cases more (only const integral / reference
variable initializers, and contexts in which a constant expression is required,
perhaps). However, this is sufficient to allow us to accept libstdc++ code,
which relies on GCC's behavior (which appears to be somewhat similar to this
approach).
llvm-svn: 291318
argument even if the expression is value-dependent (we need to suppress the
final portion of the narrowing check, but the rest of the checking can still be
done eagerly).
This affects template template argument validity and partial ordering under
p0522r0.
llvm-svn: 290276
effect they would have in C++11. In particular, they do not prevent
value-initialization from performing zero-initialization, nor do they prevent a
struct from being an aggregate.
llvm-svn: 290229
This reverts commit r290171. It triggers a bunch of warnings, because
the new enumerator isn't handled in all switches. We want a warning-free
build.
Replied on the commit with more details.
llvm-svn: 290173
Summary: Enabling the compression of CLK_NULL_QUEUE to variable of type queue_t.
Reviewers: Anastasia
Subscribers: cfe-commits, yaxunl, bader
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27569
llvm-svn: 290171
constructs that can do so into the initialization code. This fixes a number
of different cases in which we used to fail to check for abstract types.
Thanks to Tim Shen for inspiring the weird code that uncovered this!
llvm-svn: 289753
copy constructors of classes with array members, instead using
ArrayInitLoopExpr to represent the initialization loop.
This exposed a bug in the static analyzer where it was unable to differentiate
between zero-initialized and unknown array values, which has also been fixed
here.
llvm-svn: 289618
initialization of each array element:
* ArrayInitLoopExpr is a prvalue of array type with two subexpressions:
a common expression (an OpaqueValueExpr) that represents the up-front
computation of the source of the initialization, and a subexpression
representing a per-element initializer
* ArrayInitIndexExpr is a prvalue of type size_t representing the current
position in the loop
This will be used to replace the creation of explicit index variables in lambda
capture of arrays and copy/move construction of classes with array elements,
and also C++17 structured bindings of arrays by value (which inexplicably allow
copying an array by value, unlike all of C++'s other array declarations).
No uses of these nodes are introduced by this change, however.
llvm-svn: 289413
mirror the description in the standard. Per DR1295, this means that binding a
const / rvalue reference to a bit-field no longer "binds directly", and per
P0135R1, this means that we materialize a temporary in reference binding
after adjusting cv-qualifiers and before performing a derived-to-base cast.
In C++11 onwards, this should have fixed the last case where we would
materialize a temporary of the wrong type (with a subobject adjustment inside
the MaterializeTemporaryExpr instead of outside), but we still have to deal
with that possibility in C++98, unless we want to start using xvalues to
represent materialized temporaries there too.
llvm-svn: 289250
When an object of class type is initialized from a prvalue of the same type
(ignoring cv qualifications), use the prvalue to initialize the object directly
instead of inserting a redundant elidable call to a copy constructor.
llvm-svn: 288866
latter case, a temporary array object is materialized, and can be
lifetime-extended by binding a reference to the member access. Likewise, in an
array-to-pointer decay, an rvalue array is materialized before being converted
into a pointer.
This caused IR generation to stop treating file-scope array compound literals
as having static storage duration in some cases in C++; that has been rectified
by modeling such a compound literal as an lvalue. This also improves clang's
compatibility with GCC for those cases.
llvm-svn: 288654
Currently Clang allows partial initializer for C99 but not for OpenCL, e.g.
float a[16][16] = {1.0f, 2.0f};
is allowed in C99 but not allowed in OpenCL.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25335
llvm-svn: 283891
new expression, distinguish between the case of a constant and non-constant
initializer. In the former case, if the bound is erroneous (too many
initializer elements, bound is negative, or allocated size overflows), reject,
and take the bound into account when determining whether we need to
default-construct any elements. In the remanining cases, move the logic to
check for default-constructibility of trailing elements into the initialization
code rather than inventing a bogus array bound, to cope with cases where the
number of initialized elements is not the same as the number of initializer
list elements (this can happen due to string literal initialization or brace
elision).
This also fixes rejects-valid and crash-on-valid errors when initializing a
new'd array of character type from a braced string literal.
llvm-svn: 283406
copy-initialization. We previously got this wrong in a couple of ways:
- we only looked for copy / move constructors and constructor templates for
this copy, and thus would fail to copy in cases where doing so should use
some other constructor (but see core issue 670),
- we mishandled the special case for disabling user-defined conversions that
blocks infinite recursion through repeated application of a copy constructor
(applying it in slightly too many cases) -- though as far as I can tell,
this does not ever actually affect the result of overload resolution, and
- we misapplied the special-case rules for constructors taking a parameter
whose type is a (reference to) the same class type by incorrectly assuming
that only happens for copy/move constructors (it also happens for
constructors instantiated from templates and those inherited from base
classes).
These changes should only affect strange corner cases (for instance, where the
copy constructor exists but has a non-const-qualified parameter type), so for
the most part it only causes us to produce more 'candidate' notes, but see the
test changes for other cases whose behavior is affected.
llvm-svn: 280776
Taking the address of a packed member is dangerous since the reduced
alignment of the pointee is lost. This can lead to memory alignment
faults in some architectures if the pointer value is dereferenced.
This change adds a new warning to clang emitted when taking the address
of a packed member. A packed member is either a field/data member
declared as attribute((packed)) or belonging to a struct/class
declared as such. The associated flag is -Waddress-of-packed-member.
Conversions (either implicit or via a valid casting) to pointer types
with lower or equal alignment requirements (e.g. void* or char*)
will silence the warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561
llvm-svn: 278483
Currently Clang use int32 to represent sampler_t, which have been a source of issue for some backends, because in some backends sampler_t cannot be represented by int32. They have to depend on kernel argument metadata and use IPA to find the sampler arguments and global variables and transform them to target specific sampler type.
This patch uses opaque pointer type opencl.sampler_t* for sampler_t. For each use of file-scope sampler variable, it generates a function call of __translate_sampler_initializer. For each initialization of function-scope sampler variable, it generates a function call of __translate_sampler_initializer.
Each builtin library can implement its own __translate_sampler_initializer(). Since the real sampler type tends to be architecture dependent, allowing it to be initialized by a library function simplifies backend design. A typical implementation of __translate_sampler_initializer could be a table lookup of real sampler literal values. Since its argument is always a literal, the returned pointer is known at compile time and easily optimized to finally become some literal values directly put into image read instructions.
This patch is partially based on Alexey Sotkin's work in Khronos Clang (3d4eec6162).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21567
llvm-svn: 277024
This patch implements PR#22821.
Taking the address of a packed member is dangerous since the reduced
alignment of the pointee is lost. This can lead to memory alignment
faults in some architectures if the pointer value is dereferenced.
This change adds a new warning to clang emitted when taking the address
of a packed member. A packed member is either a field/data member
declared as attribute((packed)) or belonging to a struct/class
declared as such. The associated flag is -Waddress-of-packed-member.
Conversions (either implicit or via a valid casting) to pointer types
with lower or equal alignment requirements (e.g. void* or char*)
silence the warning.
This change also adds a new error diagnostic when the user attempts to
bind a reference to a packed member, regardless of the alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561
llvm-svn: 275417
- Added new Builtins: enqueue_kernel, get_kernel_work_group_size
and get_kernel_preferred_work_group_size_multiple.
These Builtins use custom check to diagnose parameters of the passed Blocks
i. e. variable number of 'local void*' type params, and check different
overloads specified in Table 6.31 of OpenCL v2.0.
- IR is generated as an internal library call for each OpenCL Builtin,
reusing ObjC Block implementation.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20249
llvm-svn: 274540
constructor would be; this is effectively required by P0136R1. This has the
effect of exposing the validity of the base class initialization steps to
SFINAE checks.
llvm-svn: 274088
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
These ExprWithCleanups are added for holding a RunCleanupsScope not
for destructor calls; rather, they are for lifetime marks. This requires
ExprWithCleanups to keep a bit to indicate whether it have cleanups with
side effects (e.g. dtor calls).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20498
llvm-svn: 272296
This is in preparation for C++ P0136R1, which switches the model for inheriting
constructors over from synthesizing a constructor to finding base class
constructors (via using shadow decls) when looking for derived class
constructors.
llvm-svn: 269231
Given the following test case:
typedef struct {
const char *name;
id field;
} Test9;
extern void doSomething(Test9 arg);
void test9() {
Test9 foo2 = {0, 0};
doSomething(foo2);
}
With a release compiler, we don't emit any message and silently ignore the
variable "foo2". With an assert compiler, we get an assertion failure.
The root cause —————————————
Back in r140457 we gave InitListChecker a verification-only mode, and will use
CanUseDecl instead of DiagnoseUseOfDecl for verification-only mode.
These two functions handle unavailable issues differently:
In Sema::CanUseDecl, we say the decl is invalid when the Decl is unavailable and
the current context is available.
In Sema::DiagnoseUseOfDecl, we say the decl is usable by ignoring the return
code of DiagnoseAvailabilityOfDecl
So with an assert build, we will hit an assertion in diagnoseListInit
assert(DiagnoseInitList.HadError() &&
"Inconsistent init list check result.");
The fix -------------------
If we follow what is implemented in CanUseDecl and treat Decls with
unavailable issues as invalid, the variable decl of “foo2” will be marked as
invalid. Since unavailable checking is processed in delayed diagnostics
(r197627), we will silently ignore the diagnostics when we find out that
the variable decl is invalid.
We add a flag "TreatUnavailableAsInvalid" for the verification-only mode.
For overload resolution, we want to say decls with unavailable issues are
invalid; but for everything else, we should say they are valid and
emit diagnostics. Depending on the value of the flag, CanUseDecl
can return different values for unavailable issues.
rdar://23557300
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15314
llvm-svn: 263149
C++11 requires const objects to have a user-provided constructor, even for
classes without any fields. DR 253 relaxes this to say "If the implicit default
constructor initializes all subobjects, no initializer should be required."
clang is currently the only compiler that implements this C++11 rule, and e.g.
libstdc++ relies on something like DR 253 to compile in newer versions. This
change makes it possible to build code that says `const vector<int> v;' again
when using libstdc++5.2 and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60284).
Fixes PR23381.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16552
llvm-svn: 261297
Richard Smith