Summary:
check-clang-tools will run check-clangd first, and then run the rest
tests. If clangd tests fails, check-clang-tools would be stopped.
This would block other clang-tools developers if clangd is broken.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52781
llvm-svn: 343608
Conditionally compile the parts of clang-tidy which depend on the static
analyzer.
Funnily enough, I made the patch to exclude this from the build in 2013,
and it was committed with the comment that the tool should not be fully
excluded, but only the parts of it which depend on the analyzer should
be excluded.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130617/081797.html
This commit implements that idea.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52334
llvm-svn: 343528
check-clangd is included via check-clang-tools, otherwise we will run two
instances of check-clangd in parallel when running 'check-all',
which may have race condition.
llvm-svn: 343526
Summary:
So we don't have to run "check-clang-tools" (which builds and tests all
clang tools) to verify our clangd-related change. It'd save waiting time for
clangd developers.
check-clangd (build ~1000 files, run ~340 tests) vs check-clang-tools (build
~3000 files, run ~1000 tests).
In the future, we probably want to add similar target for other
clang-tools (e.g. clang-tidy).
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52710
llvm-svn: 343474
Summary:
We can use cl::ResetCommandLineParser() to support different types of
command-lines, as long as we're careful about option lifetimes.
(I tried using subcommands, but the error messages were bad)
I found a mostly-reasonable pattern to isolate the fiddly parts.
Added -scope and -limit flags to the `find` command to demonstrate.
(Note that scope support seems to be broken in dex?)
Fixed symbol lookup to parse symbol IDs.
Caveats:
- with command help (e.g. `find -help`), you also get some spam
about required arguments. This is a bug in llvm::cl, which prints
these to errs() rather than the designated stream.
Reviewers: kbobyrev
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51989
llvm-svn: 342456
Summary:
Given that the indexer binary is put directly into ./bin directory
when built, 'clangd-' prefix seems to provide better context to the
reader than 'global-'.
The new name is also shorter and easier to type.
Reviewers: ioeric, sammccall, kadircet
Reviewed By: ioeric, sammccall
Subscribers: kbobyrev, ilya-biryukov, mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51987
llvm-svn: 342123
Setting up the mapper part of the frontend framework for a clang-doc
tool. It creates a series of relevant matchers for declarations, and
uses the ToolExecutor to traverse the AST and extract the matching
declarations and comments. The mapper serializes the extracted
information to individual records for reducing and eventually doc
generation.
For a more detailed overview of the tool, see the design document on the
mailing list: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-December/056203.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41102
llvm-svn: 327102
Summary:
The tools is used to generate global symbols for clangd (global code completion),
The format is YAML, which is only for **experiment**.
Usage:
./bin/global-symbol-builder </path/to/llvm-dir> > global-symbols.yaml
TEST:
used the tool to generate global symbols for LLVM (~72MB).
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ilya-biryukov, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41491
llvm-svn: 321358
Support running the extra clang tool tests when the static analyzer
is disabled. Disable the relevant clang-tidy tests and one include-fixer
test that require it to work.
Previously, the tests were disabled entirely with
CLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER being false. Now, the tests are being
enabled and the relevant tests are excluded and marked unsupported
appropriately.
In order to disable clang-tidy tests, the whole test directory is added
to the exclude lists, to avoid having to explicitly add 'REQUIRES' line
to every single test. If the other solution is preferable, I can update
the patch.
The yamldb_plugin include-fixer test is also updated to be disabled
without static analyzer. It fails in that case because clang is not
outputting a replacement suggestion -- but I don't know the exact
reason why it does not do that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37188
llvm-svn: 311983
clang-apply-replacements tests
The ClassReplacements.cpp test in the clang-rename tests uses
clang-apply-replacements. I moved it back to the clang-tools-extra repository
for now to ensure that the clang-rename tests can pass when clang is compiled
without clang-tools-extra.
llvm-svn: 306843
* Enforce 80 characters limit where appropriate
* Use slightly more descriptive names for searched locations
* Update docs to reflect D34269, which adds "Go To Declaration" functionality
llvm-svn: 306598
Use the LLVM_UTILS_PROVIDED variable to determine whether test tool
dependencies should be exposed for clang-tools-extra tests. If clang is
being built stand-alone and LLVM test tools (FileCheck, count and not)
are installed, the top-level CMakeLists.txt of clang sets this variable
to indicate that they will not be built as a part of this build,
and therefore no dependencies should be emitted for them. This fixes
the dependency errors when building clang stand-alone with tests
enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29851
llvm-svn: 297806
clangd is a language server protocol implementation based on clang. It's
supposed to provide editor integration while not suffering from the
confined ABI of libclang.
This implementation is limited to the bare minimum functionality of
doing (whole-document) formatting and rangeFormatting. The JSON parsing
is based on LLVM's YAMLParser but yet most of the code of clangd is
currently dealing with JSON serialization and deserialization.
This was only tested with VS Code so far, mileage with other LSP clients
may vary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29451
llvm-svn: 294291
Summary:
A tool for changing surrouding namespaces of class/function definitions while keeping
references to types in the changed namespace correctly qualified by prepending
namespace specifiers before them.
Example: test.cc
namespace na {
class X {};
namespace nb {
class Y { X x; };
} // namespace nb
} // namespace na
To move the definition of class Y from namespace "na::nb" to "x::y", run:
clang-change-namespace --old_namespace "na::nb" \
--new_namespace "x::y" --file_pattern "test.cc" test.cc --
Output:
namespace na {
class X {};
} // namespace na
namespace x {
namespace y {
class Y { na::X x; };
} // namespace y
} // namespace x
Reviewers: alexfh, omtcyfz, hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, klimek, djasper, beanz, alexshap, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24183
llvm-svn: 281918
This diff adds v0 of clang-reorder-fields tool to clang/tools/extra.
The main idea behind this tool is to simplify and make less error-prone refactoring of large codebases when
someone needs to change the order fields of a struct/class (for example to remove excessive padding).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279
llvm-svn: 280456
This diff adds v0 of clang-reorder-fields tool to clang/tools/extra.
The main idea behind this tool is to simplify and make less error-prone refactoring of large codebases when
someone needs to change the order fields of a struct/class (for example to remove excess padding).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279
llvm-svn: 280431
This doesn't really do much at the moment. You can load it via libclang
and set the -checks via an extra command line argument as illustrated in
the test case. Support for other options (including headers check) is
currently missing. Also when using this with libclang some checks may
not work with the precompiled preamble in place.
This can be used to easily show clang-tidy warnings in an editor
integration as all that's needed is adding command line flags that are
passed into libclang. Warnings and FixIts are exposed via the existing
CXDiagnostic machinery.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17807
llvm-svn: 262595
Summary:
clang-modernize transforms have moved to clang-tidy. Removing
the old tool now.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15606
llvm-svn: 255886
Summary:
Note that this code is still grossly under-tested - the next steps will
be to add significantly better test coverage.
Patch by Matthew Plant.
Test Plan:
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 215839
This tool is for interactive exploration of the Clang AST using AST matchers.
It currently allows the user to enter a matcher at an interactive prompt
and view the resulting bindings as diagnostics, AST pretty prints or AST
dumps. Example session:
$ cat foo.c
void foo(void) {}
$ clang-query foo.c --
clang-query> match functionDecl()
Match #1:
foo.c:1:1: note: "root" binds here
void foo(void) {}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 match.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2098
llvm-svn: 194227
There is no reason to expect this tool to be limited to C++11, it seems
very likely to be of on-going interest. It seems likely to be useful for
modernizing even as new libraries come out in TSes and other formats
than a complete standard. Fundamentally, we need something a bit more
general. After some discussion on the list, going with
'clang-modernize'.
I've tried to do a reasonably comprehensive job of fixing up the names,
but I may still have missed some. Feel free to poke me if you spot any
fallout here. Things I've tried reasonably hard to find and fix:
- cpp11-migrate -> clang-modernize
- Migrator -> Modernizer
- Clean up the introductory documentation that was C++11 specific.
I'll also point out that this tool continues to delight me. =] Also,
a huge thanks to those who have so carefully, thoroughly documented the
tool. The docs here are simply phenomenal. Every tool should be this
well documented. I hope I have updated the documentation reasonably
well, but I'm not very good at documentation, so review much
appreciated.
llvm-svn: 189960
Made changes throughout clang-tools-extra for the renaming of
clang-replace to clang-apply-replacements as per feedback from
community.
llvm-svn: 189832
Introducing new tool 'clang-replace' that finds files containing
serialized Replacements and applies those changes after deduplication
and detecting conflicts.
Currently the tool does not apply changes. It stops just after the
deduplication and conflict report phase. Forthcoming patches will
complete functionality.
Both build systems updated for new tool.
Includes a conflict test case.
clang-replace added to Doxygen build.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1424
llvm-svn: 189008
This is the first version of a possible clang-tidy architecture. The
purpose of clang-tidy is to detect errors in adhering to common coding
patterns, e.g. described in the LLVM Coding Standards.
This is still heavily in flux.
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D884
llvm-svn: 187345
Haojian Wu