Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjoy Das 3336f681e3 [Verifier] Add verification for TBAA metadata
Summary:
This change adds some verification in the IR verifier around struct path
TBAA metadata.

Other than some basic sanity checks (e.g. we get constant integers where
we expect constant integers), this checks:

 - That by the time an struct access tuple `(base-type, offset)` is
   "reduced" to a scalar base type, the offset is `0`.  For instance, in
   C++ you can't start from, say `("struct-a", 16)`, and end up with
   `("int", 4)` -- by the time the base type is `"int"`, the offset
   better be zero.  In particular, a variant of this invariant is needed
   for `llvm::getMostGenericTBAA` to be correct.

 - That there are no cycles in a struct path.

 - That struct type nodes have their offsets listed in an ascending
   order.

 - That when generating the struct access path, you eventually reach the
   access type listed in the tbaa tag node.

Reviewers: dexonsmith, chandlerc, reames, mehdi_amini, manmanren

Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26438

llvm-svn: 289402
2016-12-11 20:07:15 +00:00
David Majnemer 7fddeccb8b Move the personality function from LandingPadInst to Function
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.

This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
  personality routine.  This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
  first has an operand which produces no additional information.

- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
  LandingPadInst.  Moving the personality routine off of any one
  particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
  than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
  exceptional function.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429

llvm-svn: 239940
2015-06-17 20:52:32 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith be7ea19b58 IR: Make metadata typeless in assembly
Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly.  These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.

  - Only use the `metadata` type when referencing metadata from a call
    intrinsic -- i.e., only when it's used as a `Value`.

  - Stop pretending that `ValueAsMetadata` is wrapped in an `MDNode`
    when referencing it from call intrinsics.

So, assembly like this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 %v}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 7}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !1, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{metadata !3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = metadata !{metadata !2}
    !1 = metadata !{i32* @global}
    !2 = metadata !{metadata !3}
    !3 = metadata !{}

turns into this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 %v, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 7, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32* @global, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{!3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = !{!2}
    !1 = !{i32* @global}
    !2 = !{!3}
    !3 = !{}

I wrote an upgrade script that handled almost all of the tests in llvm
and many of the tests in cfe (even handling many `CHECK` lines).  I've
attached it (or will attach it in a moment if you're speedy) to PR21532
to help everyone update their out-of-tree testcases.

This is part of PR21532.

llvm-svn: 224257
2014-12-15 19:07:53 +00:00
Bill Wendling 9b7942a543 Convert tests to the new EH model.
llvm-svn: 144048
2011-11-08 00:09:27 +00:00
Bill Wendling 2a40131f6b SjLj EH could produce a machine basic block that legitimately has more than one
landing pad as its successor.

SjLj exception handling jumps to the correct landing pad via a switch statement
that's generated right before code-gen. Loosen the constraint in the machine
instruction verifier to allow for this. Note, this isn't the most rigorous check
since we cannot determine where that switch statement came from. But it's
marginally better than turning this check off when SjLj exceptions are used.
<rdar://problem/9187612>

llvm-svn: 130881
2011-05-04 22:54:05 +00:00