With this change, libFuzzer will ignore any arguments after a sigil
argument, but it will preserve these arguments at the end of the
command line when launching subprocesses. Using this, its possible to
handle positional and single-dash arguments to the program under test
by discarding everything up to -ignore_remaining_args=1 in
LLVMFuzzerInitialize.
llvm-svn: 308069
Some libFuzzer tests on Linux would fail with bizarre error messages
unless llvm-symbolizer binary is present.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35313
llvm-svn: 307826
The current code relies on the assumption that tests are included only
if LLVM_USE_SANITIZE_COVERAGE is enabled.
This commit makes it easier to relax the assumption in the future, as
the variable LIBFUZZER_FLAGS_BASE is used further in libFuzzer tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35314
llvm-svn: 307825
The warning is reproducible with GCC 4.8. Thanks to David Blaikie for
the suggested fix.
The reported warning was
```
/usr/local/google/home/echristo/sources/llvm/lib/Fuzzer/FuzzerExtFunctions.def:29:10: warning: ISO C++ forbids casting between pointer-to-function and pointer-to-object [-Wpedantic]
EXT_FUNC(__lsan_enable, void, (), false);
^
/usr/local/google/home/echristo/sources/llvm/lib/Fuzzer/FuzzerExtFunctionsWeak.cpp:44:24: note: in definition of macro ‘EXT_FUNC’
CheckFnPtr((void *)::NAME, #NAME, WARN);
^
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35243
llvm-svn: 307686
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Summary:
This allows to keep handlers installed by sanitizers.
In other cases third-party code can replace handlers after libFuzzer
initialization anyway.
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33522
llvm-svn: 303828
Summary:
It's not safe to assume that atexit handlers can be run once the app crashed.
Patch by Jochen Eisinger.
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32640
llvm-svn: 302076
This has been mysteriously failing since r301593, which cleaned up the
types of things like size_t and SIZE_MAX for freestanding targets. Reid
and Kostya suggested marking it as UNSUPPORTED on windows, given that no
one has been able to reproduce locally.
llvm-svn: 301719
There are two reasons why users might want to build libfuzzer:
- To fuzz LLVM itself
- To get the libFuzzer.a archive file, so that they can attach it to their code
This change always builds libfuzzer, and supports the second use case if the specified flag is set.
The point of this patch is to have something that can potentially be shipped with the compiler, and this also ensures that the version of libFuzzer is correct to use with that compiler.
Patch by George Karpenkov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32096
llvm-svn: 301054
There are two reasons why users might want to build libfuzzer:
- To fuzz LLVM itself
- To get the libFuzzer.a archive file, so that they can attach it to their code
This change always builds libfuzzer, and supports the second use case if the specified flag is set.
The point of this patch is to have something that can potentially be shipped with the compiler, and this also ensures that the version of libFuzzer is correct to use with that compiler.
Patch by George Karpenkov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32096
llvm-svn: 301010
Old Apple compilers do not support thread_local keyword. This patch adds -Dthread_local=__thread when the compiler doesn't support thread_local.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32312
llvm-svn: 301007
Older compilers (e.g. LLVM 3.4) do not support the attribute target("popcnt").
In order to support those, this diff check the attribute support using the preprocessor.
Patch by George Karpenkov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32311
llvm-svn: 300999
There are two reasons why users might want to build libfuzzer:
- To fuzz LLVM itself
- To get the libFuzzer.a archive file, so that they can attach it to their code
This change always builds libfuzzer, and supports the second use case if the specified flag is set.
The point of this patch is to have something that can potentially be shipped with the compiler, and this also ensures that the version of libFuzzer is correct to use with that compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32096
llvm-svn: 300789
The test fails on Darwin because Fuzzer::DeathCallback (which calls
DumpCurrentUnit("crash-")) is called before DumpCurrentUnit("oom-") is
called in Fuzzer::RssLimitCallback. DeathCallback is transitively called
from __sanitizer_print_memory_profile.
This should fix the fuzzer bot that has been failing for a while:
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/libFuzzer/
llvm-svn: 300127
Kostya Serebryany