explicit specialization to a warning for C++98 mode (this is a defect report
resolution, so per our informal policy it should apply in C++98), and turn
the warning on by default for C++11 and later. In all cases where it fires, the
right thing to do is to remove the pointless explicit instantiation.
llvm-svn: 280308
within the instantiation of that same specialization. This could previously
happen for eagerly-instantiated function templates, variable templates,
exception specifications, default arguments, and a handful of other cases.
We still have an issue here for default template arguments that recursively
make use of themselves and likewise for substitution into the type of a
non-type template parameter, but in those cases we're producing a different
entity each time, so they should instead be caught by the instantiation depth
limit. However, currently we will typically run out of stack before we reach
it. :(
llvm-svn: 280190
to DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate, teach hasVisibleDefinition to correctly
determine whether a function definition is visible, and mark both the function
and the template as visible when merging function template definitions to
provide hasVisibleDefinition with the relevant information.
The change to always pass the right declaration as the PatternDef to
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate also caused those checks to happen before other
diagnostics in InstantiateFunctionDefinition, giving worse diagnostics for the
same situations, so I sunk the relevant diagnostics into
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate. Those parts of this patch are based on changes
in reviews.llvm.org/D23492 by Vassil Vassilev.
This reinstates r279486, reverted in r279500, with a fix to
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate to only mark uninstantiable explicit
instantiation declarations as invalid if we actually diagnosed them. (When we
trigger an explicit instantiation of a class member from an explicit
instantiation declaration for the class, it's OK if there is no corresponding
definition and we certainly don't want to mark the member invalid in that
case.) This previously caused a build failure during bootstrap.
llvm-svn: 279557
to DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate, teach hasVisibleDefinition to correctly
determine whether a function definition is visible, and mark both the function
and the template as visible when merging function template definitions to
provide hasVisibleDefinition with the relevant information.
The change to always pass the right declaration as the PatternDef to
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate also caused those checks to happen before other
diagnostics in InstantiateFunctionDefinition, giving worse diagnostics for the
same situations, so I sunk the relevant diagnostics into
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate. Those parts of this patch are based on changes
in reviews.llvm.org/D23492 by Vassil Vassilev.
llvm-svn: 279486
Summary:
Space for storing the //constraint-expression// of the
//requires-clause// associated with a `TemplateParameterList` is
arranged by taking a bit out of the `NumParams` field for the purpose
of determining whether there is a //requires-clause// or not, and by
adding to the trailing objects tied to the `TemplateParameterList`. An
accessor is provided.
An appropriate argument is supplied to `TemplateParameterList::Create`
at the various call sites.
Serialization changes will addressed as the Concepts implementation
becomes more solid.
Drive-by fix:
This change also replaces the custom
`FixedSizeTemplateParameterListStorage` implementation with one that
follows the interface provided by `llvm::TrailingObjects`.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, faisalv, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, nwilson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19322
llvm-svn: 276069
After thinking about it, we don't really need to forbid
BuiltinTemplateDecls explicitly. The restriction doesn't really buy us
anything.
llvm-svn: 275078
This patch adds a __nth_element builtin that allows fetching the n-th type of a
parameter pack with very little compile-time overhead. The patch was inspired by
r252036 and r252115 by David Majnemer, which add a similar __make_integer_seq
builtin for efficiently creating a std::integer_sequence.
Reviewed as D15421. http://reviews.llvm.org/D15421
llvm-svn: 274316
See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28100.
In r266561 when I implemented allowing explicit specializations of function templates to override deleted status, I mistakenly assumed (and hence introduced a violable assertion) that when an explicit specialization was being declared, the corresponding specialization of the most specialized function template that it would get linked to would always be the one that was implicitly generated - and so if it was marked as 'deleted' it must have inherited it from the primary template and so should be safe to reset its deleted status, and set it to being an explicit specialization. Obviously during redeclaration of a deleted explicit specialization, in order to avoid a recursive reset, we need to check that the previous specialization is not an explicit specialization (instead of assuming and asserting it) and that it hasn't been referenced, and so only then is it safe to reset its 'deleted' status.
All regression tests pass.
Thanks to Zhendong Su for reporting the bug and David Majnemer for tracking it to my commit r266561, and promptly bringing it to my attention.
llvm-svn: 272631
Crash reported in PR28023 is caused by the fact that non-type template
parameters are found by tag name lookup. In the code provided in that PR:
template<int V> struct A {
struct B {
template <int> friend struct V;
};
};
the template parameter V is found when lookup for redeclarations of 'struct V'
is made. Latter on the error about shadowing of 'V' is emitted but the semantic
context of 'struct V' is already determined wrong: 'struct A' instead of
translation unit.
The fix moves the check for shadowing toward the beginning of the method and
thus prevents from wrong context calculations.
This change fixes PR28023.
llvm-svn: 272366
Also make explicit instantiation decls not apply to nested classes when
targeting MSVC. That dll attributes are not inherited by inner classes
might be the explanation for MSVC's behaviour here.
llvm-svn: 270897
This matches what MSVC does, and should make compiles faster by avoiding to
unnecessarily emit a lot of code.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20608
llvm-svn: 270748
This is in preparation for C++ P0136R1, which switches the model for inheriting
constructors over from synthesizing a constructor to finding base class
constructors (via using shadow decls) when looking for derived class
constructors.
llvm-svn: 269231
declared before it is used. Because we don't use normal name lookup to find
these, the normal code to filter out non-visible names from name lookup results
does not apply.
llvm-svn: 268585
template<class T> void f(T) = delete;
template<> void f(int); // OK.
f(3); // OK
Implementation strategy:
When an explicit specialization of a function template, a member function template or a member function of a class template is declared, clang first implicitly instantiates the declaration of a specialization from the templated-entity being explicitly specialized (since their signatures must be the same) and then links the explicit specialization being declared as a redeclaration of the aforementioned specialization.
The problem was that when clang 'implicitly instantiates' the initial specialization, it marks the corresponding FunctionDecl as deleted if the corresponding templated-entity was deleted, rather than waiting to see whether the explicit specialization being declared provides a non-deleted body. (The eager marking of delete has advantages during overload resolution I suppose, where we don't have to try and instantiate a definition of the function to see if it is deleted).
The present fix entails recognizing that when clang knows that an explicit specialization is being declared (for whichever templated-entity), the prior implicit instantiation should not inherit the 'deleted' status, and so we reset it to false.
I suppose an alternative fix (amongst others) could consider creating a new context (ExplicitSpecializationDeclarationSubstitution or some such) that is checked during template-argument-deduction and final substitution, and avoid inheriting the deleted status during declaration substitution. But while conceptually cleaner, that would be a slightly more involved change (as could be some of the other alternatives: such as avoid tagging implicit specializations as deleted, and check their primary templates for the deleted status where needed), and so I chose a different path. Hopefully it'll prove to not be a bad choice.
llvm-svn: 266561
Summary: A program shall not declare an explicit instantiation (14.8.2), an explicit specialization (14.8.3), or a partial specialization of a concept definition.
Reviewers: rsmith, hubert.reinterpretcast, faisalv, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18221
llvm-svn: 265868
This is a fix for https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25561 which was a
crash on invalid. Change the handling of invalid decls to have a catch-all
case to prevent unexpecting decls from triggering an assertion.
llvm-svn: 265467
The prior diagnostic (err_template_arg_not_class_template) would state that the template argument to a template template parameter can only be a class template, when it can also be a template alias. The newly renamed diagnostic (err_template_arg_not_valid_template) mentions template aliases.
llvm-svn: 264522
This feature works outside of templates by forming a DeclRefExpr to a
FieldDecl instead of a MemberExpr, which requires a base object in
addition to the FieldDecl.
Previously, while building up the template AST before instantiation, we
formed a CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr, which always instantiates to a
MemberExpr. Now, in unevaluated contexts we form a
DependentScopeDeclRefExpr, which is a more flexible node that can
instantiate to either a MemberExpr or a DeclRefExpr depending on lookup
results.
Fixes PR26893.
llvm-svn: 263279
Relands r260194 with a fix. If we have a template that transitions from
an extern template to an explicitly instantiated dllexport template, we
would add that class to the delayed exported class list without flushing
it.
For explicit instantiations, we can just flush the list of delayed
classes immediately. We don't have to worry about the bug fixed in
r260194 in this case because explicit instantiations can only occur at
file and namespace scope.
Fixes PR26490.
llvm-svn: 262056
diagnosing when 'concept' is specified on a function or template
specialization.
Since a concept can only be applied to a function or variable template,
the concept bit is stored in TemplateDecl as a PointerIntPair.
Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, aaron.ballman, hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13357
llvm-svn: 260074
Or, do not set Sema's CurContext to the template declaration's when substituting into default template arguments of said template declaration.
If we do push the template declaration context on to Sema, and the template declaration is at namespace scope, Sema can get confused and try and do odr analysis when substituting into default template arguments, even though the substitution could be occurring within a dependent context.
I'm not sure why this was being done, perhaps there was concern that if a default template argument referred to a previous template parameter, it might not be found during substitution - but all regression tests pass, and I can't craft a test that would cause it to fails (if some one does, please inform me, and i'll craft a different fix for the PR).
This patch removes a single line of code, but unfortunately adds more than it removes, because of the tests. Some day I still hope to commit a patch that removes far more lines than it adds, while leaving clang better for it ;)
Sorry that r253590 ("Change the expression evaluation context from Unevaluated to ConstantEvaluated while substituting into non-type template argument defaults") caused the PR!
llvm-svn: 258110
Summary:
Support for OpenCL 2.0 pipe type.
This is a bug-fix version for bader's patch reviews.llvm.org/D14441
Reviewers: pekka.jaaskelainen, Anastasia
Subscribers: bader, Anastasia, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15603
llvm-svn: 257254
underlying decls. Preserve the found declaration throughout, and only map to
the underlying declaration when we want to check whether it's the right kind.
This allows us to provide the right source location for the found declaration,
and prepares for the possibility of underlying decls with a different name
from the found decl.
llvm-svn: 256575
is complete (with an error produced if not) and a function that merely queries
whether the type is complete. Either way we'll trigger instantiation if
necessary, but only the former will diagnose and recover from missing module
imports.
The intent of this change is to prevent a class of bugs where code would call
RequireCompleteType(..., 0) and then ignore the result. With modules, we must
check the return value and use it to determine whether the definition of the
type is visible.
This also fixes a debug info quality issue: calls to isCompleteType do not
trigger the emission of debug information for a type in limited-debug-info
mode. This allows us to avoid emitting debug information for type definitions
in more cases where we believe it is safe to do so.
llvm-svn: 256049
`pass_object_size` is our way of enabling `__builtin_object_size` to
produce high quality results without requiring inlining to happen
everywhere.
A link to the design doc for this attribute is available at the
Differential review link below.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13263
llvm-svn: 254554
Also address a typo from a prior patch that performed a similar fix during Parsing of default non-type template arguments. I left the RAII ExpressionEvaluationContext variable Name as Unevaluated though we had switched the context to ConstantEvaluated.
There should be no functionality change here - since when expression evaluation context is popped off, for the most part these two contexts currently behave similarly in regards to lambda diagnostics and odr-use tracking.
Like its parsing counterpart, this patch presages the advent of constexpr lambda patches...
llvm-svn: 253590
We created a malformed TemplateSpecializationType: it was dependent but
had a RecordType as it's canonical type. This would lead getAs to
crash. r249090 worked around this but we should fix this for real by
providing a more appropriate template specialization type as the
canonical type.
This fixes PR24246.
llvm-svn: 253495
This new builtin template allows for incredibly fast instantiations of
templates like std::integer_sequence.
Performance numbers follow:
My work station has 64 GB of ram + 20 Xeon Cores at 2.8 GHz.
__make_integer_seq<std::integer_sequence, int, 90000> takes 0.25
seconds.
std::make_integer_sequence<int, 90000> takes unbound time, it is still
running. Clang is consuming gigabytes of memory.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13786
llvm-svn: 252036
Reid Kleckner