These are similar patterns, but when you throw AVX512 onto the pile,
the number of variations explodes. For FP, we really don't care about
AVX1 vs. AVX2 for FP ops. There may be some superficial shuffle diffs,
but that's not what we're testing for here, so I removed those RUNs.
Separating by type also lets us specify 'sse3' for the FP file vs. 'ssse3'
for the integer file...because x86.
llvm-svn: 350357
As noted in PR39973 and D55558:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39973
...this is a partial implementation of a fold that we do as an IR canonicalization in instcombine:
// extelt (binop X, Y), Index --> binop (extelt X, Index), (extelt Y, Index)
We want to have this in the DAG too because as we can see in some of the test diffs (reductions),
the pattern may not be visible in IR.
Given that this is already an IR canonicalization, any backend that would prefer a vector op over
a scalar op is expected to already have the reverse transform in DAG lowering (not sure if that's
a realistic expectation though). The transform is limited with a TLI hook because there's an
existing transform in CodeGenPrepare that tries to do the opposite transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55722
llvm-svn: 350354
A DBG_VALUE between a two-address instruction and a following COPY
would prevent rescheduleMIBelowKill optimization inside
TwoAddressInstructionPass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55987
llvm-svn: 350289
The test cases are constructed to avoid folding the AND into a masked compare operation.
Currently we emit a KAND and a KORTEST for these cases.
llvm-svn: 350287
INC/DEC are pretty much the same as ADD/SUB except that they don't update the C flag.
This patch removes the special nodes and just pattern matches from ADD/SUB during isel if the C flag isn't being used.
I had to avoid selecting DEC is the result isn't used. This will become a SUB immediate which will turned into a CMP later by optimizeCompareInstr. This lead to the one test change where we use a CMP instead of a DEC for an overflow intrinsic since we only checked the flag.
This also exposed a hole in our RMW flag matching use of hasNoCarryFlagUses. Our root node for the match is a store and there's no guarantee that all the flag users have been selected yet. So hasNoCarryFlagUses needs to check copyToReg and machine opcodes, but it also needs to check for the pre-match SETCC, SETCC_CARRY, BRCOND, and CMOV opcodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55975
llvm-svn: 350245
Currently we expand the two nodes separately. This gives DAG combiner an opportunity to optimize the expanded sequence taking into account only one set of users. When we expand the other node we'll create the expansion again, but might not be able to optimize it the same way. So the nodes won't CSE and we'll have two similarish sequences in the same basic block. By expanding both nodes at the same time we'll avoid prematurely optimizing the expansion until both the division and remainder have been replaced.
Improves the test case from PR38217. There may be additional opportunities after this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56145
llvm-svn: 350239
By also promoting the input type we get a better idea for what scalar type to use. This can provide better results if the result of the extract is sign extended. What was previously happening is that the extract result would be legalized, sometime later the input of the sign extend would be legalized using the result of the extract. Then later the extract input would be legalized forcing a truncate into the input of the sign extend using a replace all uses. This requires DAG combine to combine out the sext/truncate pair. But sometimes we visited the truncate first and messed things up before the sext could be combined.
By creating the extract with the correct scalar type when we create legalize the result type, the truncate will be added right away. Then when the sign_extend input is legalized it will create an any_extend of the truncate which can be optimized by getNode to maybe remove the truncate. And then a sign_extend_inreg. Now DAG combine doesn't have to worry about getting rid of the extend.
This fixes the regression on X86 in D56156.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56176
llvm-svn: 350236
If x has multiple sign bits than it doesn't matter which one we extend from so we can sext from x's msb instead.
The X86 setcc-combine.ll changes are a little weird. It appears we ended up with a (sext_inreg (aext (trunc (extractelt)))) after type legalization. The sext_inreg+aext now gets optimized by this combine to leave (sext (trunc (extractelt))). Then we visit the trunc before we visit the sext. This ends up changing the truncate to an extractvectorelt from a bitcasted vector. I have a follow up patch to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56156
llvm-svn: 350235
Peek through shift modulo masks while matching double shift patterns.
I was hoping to delay this until I could remove the X86 code with generic funnel shift matching (PR40081) but this will do for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56199
llvm-svn: 350222
This was added at a time when i1 was a legal type with avx512f and there was a bug. i1 is no longer considered a legal type with avx512f so there should be no codegen difference.
llvm-svn: 350203
This makes it easier to keep the LowerBRCOND and LowerSELECT code in sync with LowerXALUO so they always pick the same operation for overflowing instructions.
This is inspired by the helper functions used by ARM and AArch64 for the same purpose.
The test change is because LowerSELECT was not in sync with LowerXALUO with regard to INC/DEC for SADDO/SSUBO.
llvm-svn: 350198
This was added at a time when i1 was a legal type with avx512f and there was a bug. i1 is no longer considered a legal type with avx512f so there should be no codegen difference.
llvm-svn: 350195
When SADDO/SSUBO is used as a part of a condition, the X86 backend has to lower the instruction twice. One for the flags use and then once for the data use. These two selections should be kept in sync so they end up with one node providing the data and the flags. This doesn't seem to be happening for INC/DEC.
llvm-svn: 350194
This seems to be getting in the way more than its helping. This does mean we stop scalarizing some cases, but I'm not convinced the scalarization was really better.
Some of the changes to vsel-cmp-load.ll are a regression but D56156 should fix it.
llvm-svn: 350159
This allows us to sign extend to v4i32 first. And then share that extension to implement the final steps to v4i64 using a pcmpgt and punpckl and punpckh.
We already do something similar for SIGN_EXTEND with -x86-experimental-vector-widening-legalization.
llvm-svn: 350158
This was tricking us into making these operations and then letting them get scalarized later. But I can't prove that the scalarized version is actually better.
llvm-svn: 350141
Previously we emitted a multiply and some masking that was supposed to matched to PMULUDQ, but the masking could sometimes be removed before we got a chance to match it. So instead just emit the PMULUDQ directly.
Remove the DAG combine that was added when the ReplaceNodeResults code was originally added. Add a new DAG combine to avoid regressions in shrink_vmul.ll
Some of the shrink_vmul.ll test cases now pick PMULUDQ instead of PMADDWD/PMULLD, but I think this should be an improvement on most CPUs.
I think all of this can go away if/when we switch to -x86-experimental-vector-widening-legalization
llvm-svn: 350134
Create PMULDQ/PMULUDQ as long as the number of elements is a power of 2.
This seems to give some improvements in our ability to use SimplifyDemandedBits.
llvm-svn: 350084
This is an alternative to what I attempted in D56057.
GetDemandedBits is a special version of SimplifyDemandedBits that allows simplifications even when the operand has other uses. GetDemandedBits will only do simplifications that allow a node to be bypassed. It won't create new nodes or alter any of the other users.
I had to add support for bypassing SIGN_EXTEND_INREG to GetDemandedBits.
Based on a patch that Simon Pilgrim sent me in email.
Fixes PR40142.
llvm-svn: 350059
It's dangerous to knowingly create an illegal vector type
no matter what stage of combining we're in.
This prevents the missed folding/scalarization seen in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40146
llvm-svn: 350034
trunc (add X, C ) --> add (trunc X), C'
If we're throwing away the top bits of an 'add' instruction, do it in the narrow destination type.
This makes the truncate-able opcode list identical to the sibling transform done in IR (in instcombine).
This change used to show regressions for x86, but those are gone after D55494.
This gets us closer to deleting the x86 custom function (combineTruncatedArithmetic)
that does almost the same thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55866
llvm-svn: 350006
The missed load folding noticed in D55898 is visible independent of that change
either with an adjusted IR pattern to start or with AVX2/AVX512 (where the build
vector becomes a broadcast first; movddup is not produced until we get into isel
via tablegen patterns).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55936
llvm-svn: 350005
@bextr64_32_b1 is extracted from hotpath of real-world code
(RawSpeed BitStream<>::peekBitsNoFill()) after `clang -O3`.
@bextr64_32_b2/@bextr64_32_b0 is the same pattern,
but with trunc done last, showing how i think it can be handled:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/K4Bhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/qC9
It is possible that middle-end should do some of this, too.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36419
llvm-svn: 349998
This fixes the patterns that have or/and as a root. 'and' is handled differently since thy usually have a CMP wrapped around them.
I had to look for uses of the CF flag because all these nodes have non-standard CF flag behavior. A real or/xor would always clear CF. In practice we shouldn't be using the CF flag from these nodes as far as I know.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55813
llvm-svn: 349962
The BEXTR instruction documents the SF bit as undefined.
The TBM BEXTR instruction has the same issue, but I'm not sure how to test it. With the control being an immediate we can determine the sign bit is 0 or the BEXTR would have been removed.
Fixes PR40060
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55807
llvm-svn: 349956
This is admittedly a narrow fix for the problem:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37502
...but as the XOP restriction shows, it's a maze to get this right.
In the motivating example, note that we have movddup before SSE4.1 and
again with AVX2. That's because insertps isn't available pre-SSE41 and
vbroadcast is (more generally) available with AVX2 (and the splat is
reduced to movddup via isel pattern).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55898
llvm-svn: 349937
This adds an AVX512 run as suggested in D55936.
The test didn't really belong with other build vector tests
because that's not the pattern here. I don't see much value
in adding 64-bit RUNs because they wouldn't exercise the
isel patterns that we're aiming to expose.
llvm-svn: 349920
This patch enables funnel shift -> rotate building for all ROTL/ROTR custom/legal operations.
AFAICT X86 was the last target that was missing modulo support (PR38243), but I've tried to CC stakeholders for every target that has ROTL/ROTR custom handling for their final OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55747
llvm-svn: 349765
Summary:
This allows expanding {7,11,13,14,15,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,31}-byte memcmp
in just two loads on X86. These were previously calling memcmp.
Reviewers: spatel, gchatelet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55263
llvm-svn: 349731
The (cmp (and X, Y) 0) pattern is greedy and ends up forming a TESTrr and consuming the and when it might be better to use one of the BMI/TBM like BLSR or BLSI.
This patch moves removes the pattern from isel and adds a post processing check to combine TESTrr+ANDrr into just a TESTrr. With this patch we are able to select the BMI/TBM instructions, but we'll also emit a TESTrr when the result is compared to 0. In many cases the peephole pass will be able to use optimizeCompareInstr to remove the TEST, but its probably not perfect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55870
llvm-svn: 349661
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38743
The function removeRedundantBlockingStores is supposed to remove any blocking stores contained in each other in lockingStoresDispSizeMap.
But it currently looks only at the previous one, which will miss some cases that result in assert.
This patch refine the function to check all previous layouts until find the uncontained one. So all redundant stores will be removed.
Patch by Pengfei Wang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55642
llvm-svn: 349660
Now that we use the generic ISD opcodes, we can use the generic intrinsics directly as well. This fixes the poor fast-isel codegen by not expanding to an easily broken IR code sequence.
I'm intending to deal with the signed saturation equivalents as well.
Clang counterpart: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55879
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55855
llvm-svn: 349630
Now that SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyDemandedVectorElts is simplifying vector elements, we're seeing more constant BUILD_VECTOR containing undefs.
This patch provides opt-in support for UNDEF elements in matchBinaryPredicate, passing NULL instead of the result ConstantSDNode* argument.
I've updated the (or (and X, c1), c2) -> (and (or X, c2), c1|c2) fold to demonstrate its use, which I believe is safe for undef cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55822
llvm-svn: 349629
As described on PR40091, we have several places where zext (and zext_vector_inreg) fold an undef input into an undef output. For zero extensions this is incorrect as the output should guarantee to least have the new upper bits set to zero.
SimplifyDemandedVectorElts is the worst offender (and its the most likely to cause new undefs to appear) but DAGCombiner's tryToFoldExtendOfConstant has a similar issue.
Thanks to @dmgreen for catching this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55883
llvm-svn: 349625
These are due to be upgraded soon, but good to replace them with generic llvm sadd_sat/ssub_sat intrinsics now.
The avx512 masked cases need doing as well but require a bit of tidyup first.
llvm-svn: 349621
Now that SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyDemandedVectorElts are simplifying vector elements, we're seeing more constant BUILD_VECTOR containing UNDEFs.
This patch provides opt-in handling of UNDEF elements in matchUnaryPredicate, passing NULL instead of the ConstantSDNode* argument.
I've updated SelectionDAG::simplifyShift to demonstrate its use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55819
llvm-svn: 349616
These are already being autoupgraded, currently to an IR sequence, but best to replace them with generic llvm uadd_sat/usub_sat intrinsics (which D55855 will be doing shortly anyhow).
The avx512 masked cases need doing as well but require a bit of tidyup first.
llvm-svn: 349615
SelectionDAG currently changes these intrinsics to function calls, but that won't work
for other ISel's. Also we want to eventually support nonlazybind and weak linkage coming
from the front-end which we can't do in SelectionDAG.
llvm-svn: 349552
We already had BSF here as part of __builtin_ffs improvements and I was just wondering yesterday whether we should have BSR there.
This addresses one issue from PR40090.
llvm-svn: 349531
Migrate the X86 backend from X86ISD opcodes ADDS and SUBS to generic
ISD opcodes SADDSAT and SSUBSAT. This also improves scodegen for
@llvm.sadd.sat() and @llvm.ssub.sat() intrinsics.
This is a followup to D55787 and part of PR40056.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55833
llvm-svn: 349520
InstCombine seems to canonicalize or PSUB patter into a max with the cosntant and an add with an inverse of the constant.
This patch recognizes this pattern and turns it into PSUBUS. Future work could improve undef element handling.
Fixes some of PR40053
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55780
llvm-svn: 349519
Replace the X86ISD opcodes ADDUS and SUBUS with generic ISD opcodes
UADDSAT and USUBSAT. As a side-effect, this also makes codegen for
the @llvm.uadd.sat and @llvm.usub.sat intrinsics reasonable.
This only replaces use in the X86 backend, and does not move any of
the ADDUS/SUBUS X86 specific combines into generic codegen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55787
llvm-svn: 349481
For opcodes not covered by SimplifyDemandedVectorElts, SimplifyDemandedBits might be able to help now that it supports demanded elts as well.
llvm-svn: 349466
This fold was incredibly specific - replace with a SimplifyDemandedBits fold to remove a VSRAI if only the original sign bit is demanded (its guaranteed to stay the same).
Test change is merely a rescheduling.
llvm-svn: 349459
Convert VSRAI to VSRLI is the sign bit is known zero and improve KnownBits output for all shift instruction.
Fixes the poor codegen comments in D55768.
llvm-svn: 349407
This allows a TEST to be used and can be combined with any AND that may already exist as an input to the shift.
This was already done in EmitTest, but was easily tricked by multiple uses because the setcc might be used by multiple instructions. Once the SETCC and users are legalized then we can look for the shift to be used by a single CMP, but the CMP itself can have multiple users.
This appears to fix the case in PR39968.
llvm-svn: 349385
This is an initial patch to add the necessary support for a DemandedElts argument to SimplifyDemandedBits, more closely matching computeKnownBits and to help improve vector codegen.
I've added only a small amount of the changes necessary to get at least one test to update - a lot more can be done but I'd like to add these methodically with proper test coverage, at the same time the hope is to slowly move some/all of SimplifyDemandedVectorElts into SimplifyDemandedBits as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55768
llvm-svn: 349374
I'd like to try to move a lot of the flag matching out of EmitTest and push it to isel or isel preprocessing. This is a step towards that.
The test-shrink-bug.ll changie is an improvement because we are no longer interfering with test shrink handling in isel.
The pr34137.ll change is a regression, but the IR came from -O0 and was not reduced by InstCombine. So it contains a lot of redundancies like duplicate loads that made it combine poorly.
llvm-svn: 349315
The transform performs a bitwise logic op in a wider type followed by
truncate when both inputs are truncated from the same source type:
logic_op (truncate x), (truncate y) --> truncate (logic_op x, y)
There are a bunch of other checks that should prevent doing this when
it might be harmful.
We already do this transform for scalars in this spot. The vector
limitation was shared with a check for the case when the operands are
extended. I'm not sure if that limit is needed either, but that would
be a separate patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55448
llvm-svn: 349303
Also exposes an issue in DAGCombiner::visitFunnelShift where we were assuming the shift amount had the result type (after legalization it'll have the targets shift amount type).
llvm-svn: 349298
Use consistent rules for when to lower to SHLD/SHRD for slow machines - fixes a weird issue where funnel shift gets expanded but then X86ISelLowering's combineOr sees the optsize and combines to SHLD/SHRD, but now with the modulo amount guard......
llvm-svn: 349285
Summary:
Make machine PHIs optimization to work for single value register taken from
several different copies. This is the first step to fix PR38917. This change
allows to get rid of redundant PHIs (see opt_phis2.mir test) to make
the subsequent optimizations (like CSE) possible and simpler.
For instance, before this patch the code like this:
%b = COPY %z
...
%a = PHI %bb1, %a; %bb2, %b
could be optimized to:
%a = %b
but the code like this:
%c = COPY %z
...
%b = COPY %z
...
%a = PHI %bb1, %a; %bb2, %b; %bb3, %c
would remain unchanged.
With this patch the latter case will be optimized:
%a = %z```.
Committed on behalf of: Anton Afanasyev anton.a.afanasyev@gmail.com
Reviewers: RKSimon, MatzeB
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54839
llvm-svn: 349271
Implement options in clang to enable recording the driver command-line
in an ELF section.
Implement a new special named metadata, llvm.commandline, to support
frontends embedding their command-line options in IR/ASM/ELF.
This differs from the GCC implementation in some key ways:
* In GCC there is only one command-line possible per compilation-unit,
in LLVM it mirrors llvm.ident and multiple are allowed.
* In GCC individual options are separated by NULL bytes, in LLVM entire
command-lines are separated by NULL bytes. The advantage of the GCC
approach is to clearly delineate options in the face of embedded
spaces. The advantage of the LLVM approach is to support merging
multiple command-lines unambiguously, while handling embedded spaces
with escaping.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54487
Clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54489
llvm-svn: 349155
It costs nothing to spill an IMPLICIT_DEF value (the only spill code that's
generated is a KILL of the value), so when creating split constraints if the
live-out value is IMPLICIT_DEF the exit constraint should be DontCare instead
of PrefReg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55652
llvm-svn: 349151
This is a retry of rL349051 (reverted at rL349056). I changed the check for dead-ness from
number of uses to an opcode test for DELETED_NODE based on existing similar code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55655
llvm-svn: 349058
There's still a couple of minor SimplifyDemandedElts regressions in some of the shift amount splats that will be fixed in future patches.
llvm-svn: 349052
Summary:
All targets either just return false here or properly model `Fast`, so I
don't think there is any reason to prevent CodeGen from doing the right
thing here.
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55365
llvm-svn: 349016
MULX has somewhat improved register allocation constraints compared to the legacy MUL instruction. Both output registers are encoded instead of fixed to EAX/EDX, but EDX is used as input. It also doesn't touch flags. Unfortunately, the encoding is longer.
Prefering it whenever BMI2 is enabled is probably not optimal. Choosing it should somehow be a function of register allocation constraints like converting adds to three address. gcc and icc definitely don't pick MULX by default. Not sure what if any rules they have for using it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55565
llvm-svn: 348975
A future patch may stop using MULX by default so use MIR to ensure we're always testing MULX.
Add the 32-bit case that we couldn't do in the 64-bit mode IR test due to it being promoted to a 64-bit mul.
llvm-svn: 348972
I'm hoping we can just replace SETCC_CARRY with SBB. This is another step towards that.
I've explicitly used zero as the input to the setcc to avoid a false dependency that we've had with the SETCC_CARRY. I changed one of the patterns that used NEG to instead use an explicit compare with 0 on the LHS. We needed the zero anyway to avoid the false dependency. The negate would clobber its input register. By using a CMP we can avoid that which could be useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55414
llvm-svn: 348959
This extends the code that handles 16-bit add promotion to form LEA to also allow 8-bit adds.
That allows us to combine add ops with register moves and save some instructions. This is
another step towards allowing add truncation in generic DAGCombiner (see D54640).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55494
llvm-svn: 348946
If either of the operand elements are zero then we know the result element is going to be zero (even if the other element is undef).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55558
llvm-svn: 348926
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 signed integers with the scale of them provided
as the third argument and performs fixed point multiplication on them.
This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic in clang where some of
the more complex operations will be implemented as intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54719
llvm-svn: 348912
Summary:
When doing X86CondBrFolding::analyzeCompare, it will meet the SUB32ri instruction as below to use the global address for its operand,
%733:gr32 = SUB32ri %62:gr32(tied-def 0), @img2buf_normal, implicit-def $eflags
JNE_1 %bb.41, implicit $eflags
so the assertion "assert(MI.getOperand(ValueIndex).isImm() && "Expecting Imm operand")" is not correct and change the assert to if make X86CondBrFolding::analyzeCompare return false as not finding the compare for this
Patch by Jianping Chen
Reviewers: smaslov, LuoYuanke, liutianle, Jianping
Reviewed By: Jianping
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54250
llvm-svn: 348853
Summary:
All targets either just return false here or properly model `Fast`, so I
don't think there is any reason to prevent CodeGen from doing the right
thing here.
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55365
llvm-svn: 348843
This patch restricts the capability of G_MERGE_VALUES, and uses the new
G_BUILD_VECTOR and G_CONCAT_VECTORS opcodes instead in the appropriate places.
This patch also includes AArch64 support for selecting G_BUILD_VECTOR of <4 x s32>
and <2 x s64> vectors.
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53629
llvm-svn: 348788
If all the demanded elements of the SimplifyDemandedVectorElts are known to be UNDEF, we can simplify to an ISD::UNDEF node.
Zero constant folding will be handled in a future patch - its a little trickier as we often have bitcasted zero values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55511
llvm-svn: 348784
This triggers an assert when combining concat_vectors of a bitcast of
merge_values.
With asserts disabled, it fails to select:
fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: 0x7ff19d000e90: i32 = any_extend 0x7ff19d000ae8
0x7ff19d000ae8: f64,ch = CopyFromReg 0x7ff19d000c20:1, Register:f64 %1
0x7ff19d000b50: f64 = Register %1
In function: d
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55507
llvm-svn: 348759
This is a fix for PR39896, where dbg.value's of SDNodes that have been
optimised out do not lead to "DBG_VALUE undef" instructions being created.
Such undef instructions are necessary to terminate earlier variable
ranges, otherwise variable values leak past the point where they're valid.
The "invalidated" flag of SDDbgValue is currently being abused to mean two
things:
* The corresponding SDNode is now invalid
* This SDDbgValue should not be emitted
Of which there are several legitimate combinations of meaning:
* The SDNode has been invalidated and we should emit "DBG_VALUE undef"
* The SDNode has been invalidated but the debug data was salvaged, don't
emit anything for this SDDbgValue
* This SDDbgValue has been emitted
This patch introduces distinct "Emitted" and "Invalidated" fields to the
SDDbgValue class, updates users accordingly, and generates "undef"
DBG_VALUEs for invalidated records. Awkwardly, there are circumstances
where we emit SDDbgValue's twice, specifically DebugInfo/X86/dbg-addr-dse.ll
which I've preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55372
llvm-svn: 348751
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39926.
The size of the first copy was computed as
std::abs(std::abs(LdDisp2) - std::abs(LdDisp1)), which results in
skipped bytes if the signs of LdDisp2 and LdDisp1 differ. As far as
I can see, this should just be LdDisp2 - LdDisp1. The case where
LdDisp1 > LdDisp2 is already handled in the code above, in which case
LdDisp2 is set to LdDisp1 and this subtraction will evaluate to
Size1 = 0, which is the correct value to skip an overlapping copy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55485
llvm-svn: 348750
Both intrinsics do the exact same thing so we really only need one.
Earlier in the 8.0 cycle we changed the signature of this intrinsic without renaming it. But it looks difficult to get the autoupgrade code to allow me to merge the intrinsics and change the signature at the same time. So I've renamed the intrinsic slightly for the new merged intrinsic. I'm skipping autoupgrading from the previous new to 8.0 signature. I've also renamed the subborrow for consistency.
llvm-svn: 348737
Previously we had to take the carry in and add -1 to it to set the carry flag so we could use it with ADC/SBB. But if we know its 0 then we don't need to bother.
This should go a long way towards fixing PR24545.
llvm-svn: 348727
The existing code tries to handle an undef operand while transforming an add to an LEA,
but it's incomplete because we will crash on the i16 test with the debug output shown below.
It's better to just give up instead. Really, GlobalIsel should have folded these before we
could get into trouble.
# Machine code for function add_undef_i16: NoPHIs, TracksLiveness, Legalized, RegBankSelected, Selected
bb.0 (%ir-block.0):
liveins: $edi
%1:gr32 = COPY killed $edi
%0:gr16 = COPY %1.sub_16bit:gr32
%5:gr64_nosp = IMPLICIT_DEF
%5.sub_16bit:gr64_nosp = COPY %0:gr16
%6:gr64_nosp = IMPLICIT_DEF
%6.sub_16bit:gr64_nosp = COPY %2:gr16
%4:gr32 = LEA64_32r killed %5:gr64_nosp, 1, killed %6:gr64_nosp, 0, $noreg
%3:gr16 = COPY killed %4.sub_16bit:gr32
$ax = COPY killed %3:gr16
RET 0, implicit killed $ax
# End machine code for function add_undef_i16.
*** Bad machine code: Reading virtual register without a def ***
- function: add_undef_i16
- basic block: %bb.0 (0x7fe6cd83d940)
- instruction: %6.sub_16bit:gr64_nosp = COPY %2:gr16
- operand 1: %2:gr16
LLVM ERROR: Found 1 machine code errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54710
llvm-svn: 348722
The test file shows a case where the avoid store forwarding block
pass misses to copy a range (-1..1) when the load displacement
changes sign.
Baseline test for D55485.
llvm-svn: 348712
Sanjay Patel