Summary: The GR740 provides an up cycle counter in the
registers ASR22 and ASR23. As these registers can not be
read together atomically we only use the value of ASR23
for llvm.readcyclecounter(). The ASR23 register holds the
32 LSBs of the up-counter.
Reviewers: jyknight, venkatra
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48638
llvm-svn: 339551
This reverts commit 55222c9183c6e07f53a54c4061677734f54feac1.
I missed that this patch has a dependency on https://reviews.llvm.org/D49219
that has not been approved yet.
llvm-svn: 337373
Summary: This is how it appears to be handled in GCC and it prevents a
"Unknown mismatch" error in the SelectionDAGBuilder.
Reviewers: venkatra, jyknight, jrtc27
Reviewed By: jyknight, jrtc27
Subscribers: eraman, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49218
llvm-svn: 337370
The ta instruction will always trap, regardless of the value
of the integer condition codes. TRAPri is marked as using icc,
so we cannot use a pattern for TRAPri to implement ta 1, as
verify-machineinstrs can complain that icc is not defined.
Instead we implement ta 1 the same way as ta 5.
llvm-svn: 337236
Summary: These are the names used in libgcc.
Reviewers: venkatra, jyknight, ekedaigle
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: joerg, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48915
llvm-svn: 337164
Summary: Software trap number one is the trap used for breakpoints
in the Sparc ABI.
Reviewers: jyknight, venkatra
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48637
llvm-svn: 337163
Summary:
If the high part of the load is not used the offset to the next element
will not be set correctly.
For example, on Sparc V8, the following code will read val2 from offset 4
instead of 8.
```
int val = __builtin_va_arg(va, long long);
int val2 = __builtin_va_arg(va, int);
```
Reviewers: jyknight
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48595
llvm-svn: 337161
Summary: When compiling with -fpic, in contrast to -fPIC, use only the
immediate field to index into the GOT. This saves space if the GOT is
known to be small. The linker will warn if the GOT is too large for
this method.
Reviewers: jyknight, venkatra
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: brad, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47136
llvm-svn: 334383
Summary: The fX version of floating-point registers only supports
single precision. We need to map the name to dX for doubles and qX
for long doubles if we want getRegForInlineAsmConstraint() to be
able to pick the correct register class.
Reviewers: jyknight, venkatra
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: eraman, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47258
llvm-svn: 333512
Setting the right SDLoc on a newly-created zextload fixes a line table
bug which resulted in non-linear stepping behavior.
Several backend tests contained CHECK lines which relied on the IROrder
inherited from the wrong SDLoc. This patch breaks that dependence where
feasbile and regenerates test cases where not.
In some cases, changing a node's IROrder may alter register allocation
and spill behavior. This can affect performance. I have chosen not to
prevent this by applying a "known good" IROrder to SDLocs, as this may
hide a more general bug in the scheduler, or cause regressions on other
test inputs.
rdar://33755881, Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45995
llvm-svn: 331300
Summary:
Reading Atmel's AT697E errata document this does not seem like a valid
workaround. While the text only mentions SDIV, it says that the ICC flags
can be wrong, and those are only generated by SDIVcc. Verification on
hardware shows that simply replacing SDIV with SDIVcc does not avoid
the bug with negative operands.
This reverts r283727.
Reviewers: lero_chris, jyknight
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45813
llvm-svn: 330397
Summary:
If a 64-bit register is used as an operand in inline assembly together
with a memory reference, the memory addressing will be wrong. The
addressing will be a single reg, instead of reg+reg or reg+imm. This
will generate a bad offset value or an exception in printMemOperand().
For example:
```
long long int val = 5;
long long int mem;
__asm__ volatile ("std %1, %0":"=m"(mem):"r"(val));
```
becomes:
```
std %i0, [%i2+589833]
```
The problem is that SelectInlineAsmMemoryOperand() is never called for
the memory references if one of the operands is a 64-bit register.
By calling SelectInlineAsmMemoryOperands() in tryInlineAsm() the Sparc
version of SelectInlineAsmMemoryOperand() gets called for each memory
reference.
Reviewers: jyknight, venkatra
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: eraman, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45761
llvm-svn: 330392
Re-enable commit r323991 now that r325931 has been committed to make
MachineOperand::isRenamable() check more conservative w.r.t. code
changes and opt-in on a per-target basis.
llvm-svn: 326208
Enable multiple COPY hints to eliminate more COPYs during register allocation.
Note that this is something all targets should do, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38128.
Review: James Y Knight
llvm-svn: 326028
Global Dynamic and Local Dynamic call relocations only implicitly
reference __tls_get_addr; there is no connection in the ELF file between
the relocations and the symbol other than the specification for the
relocations' semantics. However, it still needs to be in the symbol
table despite the lack of explicit references to the symbol table entry,
since it needs to be bound at link time for these relocations, otherwise
any objects will fail to link.
For details, see https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22832.
Path by: James Clarke (jrtc27)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43271
llvm-svn: 325688
This reverts commit r323991.
This commit breaks target that don't model all the register constraints
in TableGen. So far the workaround was to set the
hasExtraXXXRegAllocReq, but it proves that it doesn't cover all the
cases.
For instance, when mutating an instruction (like in the lowering of
COPYs) the isRenamable flag is not properly updated. The same problem
will happen when attaching machine operand from one instruction to
another.
Geoff Berry is working on a fix in https://reviews.llvm.org/D43042.
llvm-svn: 325421
Summary:
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding
and adds an additional run of the pass to the default pass pipeline just
after register allocation.
This version of this patch uses the newly added
MachineOperand::isRenamable bit to avoid forwarding registers is such a
way as to violate constraints that aren't captured in the
Machine IR (e.g. ABI or ISA constraints).
This change is a continuation of the work started in D30751.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa, tstellar
Subscribers: tpr, mgorny, mcrosier, nhaehnle, nemanjai, jyknight, hfinkel, arsenm, inouehrs, eraman, sdardis, guyblank, fedor.sergeev, aheejin, dschuff, jfb, myatsina, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41835
llvm-svn: 323991
Summary: This was broken long ago in D12208, which failed to account for
the fact that 64-bit SPARC uses a stack bias of 2047, and it is the
*unbiased* value which should be aligned, not the biased one. This was
seen to be an issue with Rust.
Patch by: jrtc27 (James Clarke)
Reviewers: jyknight, venkatra
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: jacob_hansen, JDevlieghere, fhahn, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39425
llvm-svn: 323643
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always use `printReg` to print all kinds of registers.
Updated the tests using '_' instead of '%noreg' until we decide which
one we want to be the default one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40421
llvm-svn: 319445
Summary:
while investigating performance degradation of imagick benchmark
there were found inefficient pattern for UINT_TO_FP conversion.
That pattern causes RAW hazard in assembly code. Specifically,
uitofp IR operator results in poor assembler :
st %i0, [%fp - 952]
ldd [%fp - 952], %f0
it stores 32-bit integer register into memory location and then
loads 64-bit floating point data from that location.
That is exactly RAW hazard case. To optimize that case it is
possible to use SPISD::ITOF and SPISD::XTOF for conversion from
integer to floating point data type and to use ISD::BITCAST to
copy from integer register into floating point register.
The fix is to write custom UINT_TO_FP pattern using SPISD::ITOF,
SPISD::XTOF, ISD::BITCAST.
Patch by Alexey Lapshin
Reviewers: fedor.sergeev, jyknight, dcederman, lero_chris
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36875
llvm-svn: 318704
Issues addressed since original review:
- Avoid bug in regalloc greedy/machine verifier when forwarding to use
in an instruction that re-defines the same virtual register.
- Fixed bug when forwarding to use in EarlyClobber instruction slot.
- Fixed incorrect forwarding to register definitions that showed up in
explicit_uses() iterator (e.g. in INLINEASM).
- Moved removal of dead instructions found by
LiveIntervals::shrinkToUses() outside of loop iterating over
instructions to avoid instructions being deleted while pointed to by
iterator.
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 314729
Summary: Also add support for some older Myriad CPUs that were missing.
Reviewers: jyknight
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37552
llvm-svn: 314705
Issues addressed since original review:
- Moved removal of dead instructions found by
LiveIntervals::shrinkToUses() outside of loop iterating over
instructions to avoid instructions being deleted while pointed to by
iterator.
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 312328
It caused PR34387: Assertion failed: (RegNo < NumRegs && "Attempting to access record for invalid register number!")
> Issues identified by buildbots addressed since original review:
> - Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
> - The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
> doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
> register number of the use.
> - The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
> can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
> end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
>
> [MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
>
> This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
>
> This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
> be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
> assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
> allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
> through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 312178
Issues identified by buildbots addressed since original review:
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 312154
Two issues identified by buildbots were addressed:
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa
Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits, nhaehnle, mcrosier, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30751
llvm-svn: 311135
This reverts commit r311038.
Several buildbots are breaking, and at least one appears to be due to
the forwarding of physical regs enabled by this change. Reverting while
I investigate further.
llvm-svn: 311062
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa
Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits, nhaehnle, mcrosier, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30751
llvm-svn: 311038
Summary:
Also enable no-fsmuld for sparcv7 (which doesn't have the
instruction).
The previous code which used a post-processing pass to do this was
unnecessary; disabling the instruction is entirely sufficient.
Reviewers: jacob_hansen, ekedaigle
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35576
llvm-svn: 308661
Added a feature to the Sparc back-end that replaces the integer multiply and
divide instructions with calls to .mul/.sdiv/.udiv. This is a step towards
having full v7 support.
Patch by: Eric Kedaigle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35500
llvm-svn: 308343
This also reverts follow-ups r303292 and r303298.
It broke some Chromium tests under MSan, and apparently also internal
tests at Google.
llvm-svn: 303369
Summary: Moving LiveRangeShrink to x86 as this pass is mostly useful for archtectures with great register pressure.
Reviewers: MatzeB, qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: jholewinski, jyknight, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33294
llvm-svn: 303292
Summary:
In SelectionDAG, when a store is immediately chained to another store
to the same address, elide the first store as it has no observable
effects. This is causes small improvements dealing with intrinsics
lowered to stores.
Test notes:
* Many testcases overwrite store addresses multiple times and needed
minor changes, mainly making stores volatile to prevent the
optimization from optimizing the test away.
* Many X86 test cases optimized out instructions associated with
associated with va_start.
* Note that test_splat in CodeGen/AArch64/misched-stp.ll no longer has
dependencies to check and can probably be removed and potentially
replaced with another test.
Reviewers: rnk, john.brawn
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, qcolombet, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33206
llvm-svn: 303198
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
When functions are terminated by unreachable instructions, the last
instruction might trigger a CFI instruction to be generated. However,
emitting it would be be illegal since the function (and thus the FDE
the CFI is in) has already ended with the previous instruction.
Darwin's dwarfdump --verify --eh-frame complains about this and the
specification supports this.
Relevant bits from the DWARF 5 standard (6.4 Call Frame Information):
"[The] address_range [field in an FDE]: The number of bytes of
program instructions described by this entry."
"Row creation instructions: [...]
The new location value is always greater than the current one."
The first quotation implies that a CFI cannot describe a target
address outside of the enclosing FDE's range.
rdar://problem/26244988
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32246
llvm-svn: 301219
Summary: By using reg_nodbg_empty() to determine if a function can be
treated as a leaf function or not, we miss the case when the register
pair L0_L1 is used but not L0 by itself. This has the effect that
use_all_i32_regs(), a test in reserved-regs.ll which tries to use all
registers, gets treated as a leaf function.
Reviewers: jyknight, venkatra
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: davide, RKSimon, sepavloff, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27089
llvm-svn: 297285
Daniel Cederman