Clarify that you should not introduce trailing whitespace when making a commit and that you should not remove trailing whitespace that's unrelated to code you are changing or are about to change. Then clarified the developer policy around what is considered an obvious whitespace commit.
llvm-svn: 339455
Summary:
Add a CommandGuide for llvm-objdump summarizing its usage along with some
general context.
Reviewers: beanz
Reviewed By: beanz
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50034
llvm-svn: 339250
The sphinx build bot is erroring on these examples for some unknown
reason, and really the dso_local doesn't seem to be relevant to the
example in any way so its cleaner to omit it. And now they will look
a bit more like other (successful) IR examples.
llvm-svn: 338998
highlighting syntax.
Most of them already were like this, and the Sphinx runs on the docs
build bot seems to be substantially more picky and/or not have support
for a bunch of the syntax here. Hopefully this will let it progress past
this.
My previous attempt to fix the syntax made the `opt` tool happy, but no
idea what the Sphinx stuff is really looking for, and the fact that
other blocks already just use `text` led me to this solution.
llvm-svn: 338983
Notably, just close two of the debug info metadata nodes early rather
than leaving them open with `...` which won't ever lex correctly. And
add the missing `:` on the count labels.
Slowly progressing through all of the warnings on the documentation
build bot. Sorry to do this one commit at a time, but despite my best
efforts I can't trigger these errors locally.
llvm-svn: 338982
Sphinx syntax highlighter.
This example also doesn't really make sense. There is no control flow or
clarification of what the `Safe:` block exists to do... If we want
examples here, we should make them much more clear in addition to making
them well formed IR sequences.
llvm-svn: 338981
This appears to produce a warning on the docs build bot. It doesn't
reproduce for me, likely because I have a newer (or more full featured)
pygments install.
llvm-svn: 338978
Sphinx.
We think the bot is updated now, so trying this again. I'm landing it
(with permission) as Michael is at a con at the moment.
Actual patch largely by Michael Spencer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44910
llvm-svn: 338977
This patch is a follow-up to r338702.
We don't need to use a map to model the wait/ready/issued sets. It is much more
efficient to use a vector instead.
This patch gives us an average 7.5% speedup (on top of the ~12% speedup obtained
after r338702).
llvm-svn: 338883
This patch replaces all the remaining occurrences of string "MCA" with
":program:`llvm-mca`". Somehow I missed those strings when I committed r338394.
This patch also improves section "Instruction Dispatch".
llvm-svn: 338881
Summary:
This patch mostly copies the existing Instruction Flow, and stage descriptions
from the mca README. I made a few text tweaks, but no semantic changes,
and made reference to the "default pipeline." I also removed the internals
references (e.g., reference to class names and header files). I did leave the
LSUnit name around, but only as an abbreviated word for the load-store unit.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon, gbedwell, filcab
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: tschuett, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49692
llvm-svn: 338319
This makes it easier for someone to copy-paste this line, change the path, and run the command.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49201
llvm-svn: 338254
This should make the semantics of DIExpressions within llvm.dbg.{addr,
declare, value} easier to understand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49572
llvm-svn: 338182
In light of the recent changes to SmallVector in r335421, r337514, and
r337820, document its advantages over std::vector (see r175906 and
r266909).
Also add a release note.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49748
llvm-svn: 338071
Violating the invariants specified by attributes is undefined behavior.
Maybe we could use poison instead for some of the parameter attributes,
but I don't think it's worthwhile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49041
llvm-svn: 337947
This new JIT event listener supports generating profiling data for
the linux 'perf' profiling tool, allowing it to generate function and
instruction level profiles.
Currently this functionality is not enabled by default, but must be
enabled with LLVM_USE_PERF=yes. Given that the listener has no
dependencies, it might be sensible to enable by default once the
initial issues have been shaken out.
I followed existing precedent in registering the listener by default
in lli. Should there be a decision to enable this by default on linux,
that should probably be changed.
Please note that until https://reviews.llvm.org/D47343 is resolved,
using this functionality with mcjit rather than orcjit will not
reliably work.
Disregarding the previous comment, here's an example:
$ cat /tmp/expensive_loop.c
bool stupid_isprime(uint64_t num)
{
if (num == 2)
return true;
if (num < 1 || num % 2 == 0)
return false;
for(uint64_t i = 3; i < num / 2; i+= 2) {
if (num % i == 0)
return false;
}
return true;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int numprimes = 0;
for (uint64_t num = argc; num < 100000; num++)
{
if (stupid_isprime(num))
numprimes++;
}
return numprimes;
}
$ clang -ggdb -S -c -emit-llvm /tmp/expensive_loop.c -o
/tmp/expensive_loop.ll
$ perf record -o perf.data -g -k 1 ./bin/lli -jit-kind=mcjit /tmp/expensive_loop.ll 1
$ perf inject --jit -i perf.data -o perf.jit.data
$ perf report -i perf.jit.data
- 92.59% lli jitted-5881-2.so [.] stupid_isprime
stupid_isprime
main
llvm::MCJIT::runFunction
llvm::ExecutionEngine::runFunctionAsMain
main
__libc_start_main
0x4bf6258d4c544155
+ 0.85% lli ld-2.27.so [.] do_lookup_x
And line-level annotations also work:
│ for(uint64_t i = 3; i < num / 2; i+= 2) {
│1 30: movq $0x3,-0x18(%rbp)
0.03 │1 38: mov -0x18(%rbp),%rax
0.03 │ mov -0x10(%rbp),%rcx
│ shr $0x1,%rcx
3.63 │ ┌──cmp %rcx,%rax
│ ├──jae 6f
│ │ if (num % i == 0)
0.03 │ │ mov -0x10(%rbp),%rax
│ │ xor %edx,%edx
89.00 │ │ divq -0x18(%rbp)
│ │ cmp $0x0,%rdx
0.22 │ │↓ jne 5f
│ │ return false;
│ │ movb $0x0,-0x1(%rbp)
│ │↓ jmp 73
│ │ }
3.22 │1 5f:│↓ jmp 61
│ │ for(uint64_t i = 3; i < num / 2; i+= 2) {
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44892
llvm-svn: 337789
Summary: The original text was lifted from the MCA README. I re-ran the dot-product example and updated the output seen in the docs. I also added a few paragraphs discussing the instruction issued and retired histograms, as well as discussing the register file stats.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet, gbedwell, filcab
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: tschuett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49614
llvm-svn: 337648
For the most part, these changes were from the RFC. I made a few minor
word/structure changes, but nothing significant. I also regenerated the
example output, and adjusted the text accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49527
llvm-svn: 337496
Add some quick words for unroll and jam to the list of passes and add
unroll_and_jam metadata to the language ref.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49349
llvm-svn: 337448
Summary:
Updated and reorganized. Made the following additions:
1) How to see if ld.gold is installed, and whether it is the current
default.
2) How to install ld.gold as the default or alternatively use
-fuse-ld=gold.
3) Move the part about installing the newly built ld-new as the default
to the prior section and how to use --enable-gold=default to do it
automatically on install.
4) Add a note about ld.bfd supporting plugins but indicate that it is
not tested by the LLVM project and gold is the recommended linker for
use with the gold plugin.
Fixes PR32760.
Reviewers: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49490
llvm-svn: 337404
a Spectre v1 mitigation.
This was initially posted w/ the patch implementing this, got some basic
review there. Also, it is generated from a the Google doc that I shared
as part of the Speculative Load Hardening RFC and which has seen pretty
widespread review at this point.
However, as the patches are landing in LLVM, I wanted to land the docs
as well. But it seemed like a bad idea to have them in the same commit
in case of reverts or other things. So the docs are split out here.
Thanks for all the review so far, and further review and improvements to
the documentation here welcome. Please feel free to keep hammering on
the code review or Google document.
Note that this is a markdown document which Sphinx doesn't yet process.
But we can add support for that after and this should get picked up
(and I'm preparing patches for that). Also, this gets the document
itself into a nice shared place where we can iterate on it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49433
llvm-svn: 337391
We need to explicitly state what happens when an invariant promised by
load metadata is violated at runtime, since it's come up repeatedly.
It's possible we want to specify that the result of the load is poison
in some cases, rather than undefined behavior, if the constraint is
violated. That would allow preserving the metadata when the load is
hoisted, but doesn't allow propagating metadata based on control flow.
We currently do transforms based on control flow for nonnull metadata
(in PromoteMemToReg).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47854
llvm-svn: 337325
Clarify that violating nnan and ninf can lead to undefined behavior.
This allows more aggressive optimizations based on those assumptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47963
llvm-svn: 337323
We're going to work on this in a separate review focusing more on documenting
the View and probably removing some of the less-interesting/less-useful pieces.
This reverts r337219,337225
llvm-svn: 337295
As discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123292.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124400.html
We want to add rotate intrinsics because the IR expansion of that pattern is 4+ instructions,
and we can lose pieces of the pattern before it gets to the backend. Generalizing the operation
by allowing 2 different input values (plus the 3rd shift/rotate amount) gives us a "funnel shift"
operation which may also be a single hardware instruction.
Initially, I thought we needed to define new DAG nodes for these ops, and I spent time working
on that (much larger patch), but then I concluded that we don't need it. At least as a first
step, we have all of the backend support necessary to match these ops...because it was required.
And shepherding these through the IR optimizer is the primary concern, so the IR intrinsics are
likely all that we'll ever need.
There was also a question about converting the intrinsics to the existing ROTL/ROTR DAG nodes
(along with improving the oversized shift documentation). Again, I don't think that's strictly
necessary (as the test results here prove). That can be an efficiency improvement as a small
follow-up patch.
So all we're left with is documentation, definition of the IR intrinsics, and DAG builder support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49242
llvm-svn: 337221
This patch introduces a brief description of the components of MCA. The main
focus is on Views. This is a work in progress, and more descriptions will be
introduced later. I want to flesh-out the Views section more and provide a
detailed description of eventing in MCA. Eventually a brief code example of a
View should accompany the description.
Also, we should consider moving the MCA internals guide elsewhere at some point.
llvm-svn: 337219
Aaron Ballman