Summary:
Added more remarks to SLP pass, in particular "missed" optimization remarks.
Also proposed several tests for new functionality.
Patch by Vladimir Miloserdov!
For reference you may look at: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL302811
Reviewers: anemet, fhahn
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: javed.absar, lattner, petecoup, yakush, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38367
llvm-svn: 318307
Summary:
The New Pass Manager infrastructure was forgetting to keep around the optimization remark yaml file that the compiler might have been producing. This meant setting the option to '-' for stdout worked, but setting it to a filename didn't give file output (presumably it was deleted because compilation didn't explicitly keep it). This change just ensures that the file is kept if compilation succeeds.
So far I have updated one of the optimization remark output tests to add a version with the new pass manager. It is my intention for this patch to also include changes to all tests that use `-opt-remark-output=` but I wanted to get the code patch ready for review while I was making all those changes.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33951
Reviewers: anemet, chandlerc
Reviewed By: anemet, chandlerc
Subscribers: javed.absar, chandlerc, fhahn, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36906
llvm-svn: 311271
The approach I followed was to emit the remark after getTreeCost concludes
that SLP is profitable. I initially tried emitting them after the
vectorizeRootInstruction calls in vectorizeChainsInBlock but I vaguely
remember missing a few cases for example in HorizontalReduction::tryToReduce.
ORE is placed in BoUpSLP so that it's available from everywhere (notably
HorizontalReduction::tryToReduce).
We use the first instruction in the root bundle as the locator for the remark.
In order to get a sense how far the tree is spanning I've include the size of
the tree in the remark. This is not perfect of course but it gives you at
least a rough idea about the tree. Then you can follow up with -view-slp-tree
to really see the actual tree.
llvm-svn: 302811
The fix uniques the bundle of getelementptr indices we are about to vectorize
since it's possible for the same index to be used by multiple instructions.
The original commit message is below.
[SLP] Vectorize the index computations of getelementptr instructions.
This patch seeds the SLP vectorizer with getelementptr indices. The primary
motivation in doing so is to vectorize gather-like idioms beginning with
consecutive loads (e.g., g[a[0] - b[0]] + g[a[1] - b[1]] + ...). While these
cases could be vectorized with a top-down phase, seeding the existing bottom-up
phase with the index computations avoids the complexity, compile-time, and
phase ordering issues associated with a full top-down pass. Only bundles of
single-index getelementptrs with non-constant differences are considered for
vectorization.
llvm-svn: 257918
This patch seeds the SLP vectorizer with getelementptr indices. The primary
motivation in doing so is to vectorize gather-like idioms beginning with
consecutive loads (e.g., g[a[0] - b[0]] + g[a[1] - b[1]] + ...). While these
cases could be vectorized with a top-down phase, seeding the existing bottom-up
phase with the index computations avoids the complexity, compile-time, and
phase ordering issues associated with a full top-down pass. Only bundles of
single-index getelementptrs with non-constant differences are considered for
vectorization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14829
llvm-svn: 257800
Adam Nemet