which warns on compound conditionals that always evaluate to the same value.
For instance, (x > 5 && x < 3) will always be false since no value for x can
satisfy both conditions.
This patch also changes the CFG to use these tautological values for better
branch analysis. The test for -Wunreachable-code shows how this change catches
additional dead code.
Patch by Anders Rönnholm.
llvm-svn: 205665
obviously won't work. Specifically, don't suggest methods (static or
not) from unrelated classes when the expression is a method call
through a specific object.
llvm-svn: 205653
better. This warning will now trigger on the following conditionals:
bool b;
int i;
if (b > 1) {} // always false
if (0 <= (i > 5)) {} // always true
if (-1 > b) {} // always false
Patch by Per Viberg.
llvm-svn: 205608
No functionality change.
When determining the pattern for instantiating a generic lambda call operator specialization - we must not go drilling down for the 'prototype' (i.e. as written) pattern - rather we must use our partially transformed pattern (whose DeclRefExprs are wired correctly to any enclosing lambda's decls that should be mapped correctly in a local instantiation scope) that is the templated pattern of the specialization's primary template (even though the primary template might be instantiated from a 'prototype' member-template). Previously, the drilling down was haltted by marking the instantiated-from primary template as a member-specialization (incorrectly).
This prompted Richard to remark (http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784?id=4687#inline-10272)
"It's a bit nasty to (essentially) set this bit incorrectly. Can you put the check into getTemplateInstantiationPattern instead?"
In my reckless youth, I chose to ignore that comment. With the passage of time, I have come to learn the value of bowing to the will of the angry Gods ;)
llvm-svn: 205543
meaningful to odr-use the VarDecl inside a variable template. (Separately, it'd
be nice to track referenced-ness for templates, and warn on unused ones, but
that's really a distinct issue...)
Move a test that generates and tests a warning-suppressing error out to its own
test file, so it doesn't have weird effects on the other tests in the same file.
llvm-svn: 205448
For namespaces, this is consistent with mangling and GCC's debug info
behavior. For structs, GCC uses <anonymous struct> but we prefer
consistency between all anonymous entities but don't want to confuse
them with template arguments, etc, so we'll just go with parens in all
cases.
llvm-svn: 205398
A redeclaration may not add dllimport or dllexport attributes. dllexport is
sticky and can be omitted on redeclarations while dllimport cannot.
llvm-svn: 205197
Summary:
Declaring a function as inline after it has been defined is in violation
of [dcl.fct.spec]p4. The program would get a strong definition instead
of getting a function with linkonce_odr linkage.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3220
llvm-svn: 205129
This adds Clang support for the ARM64 backend. There are definitely
still some rough edges, so please bring up any issues you see with
this patch.
As with the LLVM commit though, we think it'll be more useful for
merging with AArch64 from within the tree.
llvm-svn: 205100
Taking a hint from -Wparentheses, use an extra '()' as a sigil that
a dead condition is intentionally dead. For example:
if ((0)) { dead }
When this sigil is found, do not emit a dead code warning. When the
analysis sees:
if (0)
it suggests inserting '()' as a Fix-It.
llvm-svn: 205069
The main difference between __va_start and __builtin_va_start is that
the address of the va_list has already been taken, and the va_list is
always a char*.
__va_end and __va_arg are not needed.
llvm-svn: 204821
specialization from a module. (This can also happen for function template
specializations in PCHs if they're instantiated eagerly, because they're
constexpr or have a deduced return type.)
llvm-svn: 204547
The exception is return statements that include control-flow,
which are clearly doing something "interesting".
99% of the cases I examined for -Wunreachable-code that fired
on return statements were not interesting enough to warrant
being in -Wunreachable-code by default. Thus the move to
include them in -Wunreachable-code-return.
This simplifies a bunch of logic, including removing the ad hoc
logic to look for std::string literals.
llvm-svn: 204307
Richard Trieu