By supporting the vectorization of PHINodes with more than two incoming values we can increase the complexity of nested if statements.
We can now vectorize this loop:
int foo(int *A, int *B, int n) {
for (int i=0; i < n; i++) {
int x = 9;
if (A[i] > B[i]) {
if (A[i] > 19) {
x = 3;
} else if (B[i] < 4 ) {
x = 4;
} else {
x = 5;
}
}
A[i] = x;
}
}
llvm-svn: 181037
It is preferable for a unit test to be responsible for creating its own input
data instead of relying on checked-in data files. Now the IncludeExcludeTest
for cpp11-migrate does this.
- Removed old data files.
- Updated build system and lit files to remove references to old data files.
llvm-svn: 181029
Another step towards reinstating the SystemZ backend. I'll commit
the configure changes separately (TARGET_HAS_JIT etc.), then commit
a patch to enable the MCJIT tests on SystemZ.
llvm-svn: 181015
The llvm::sys::AddSignalHandler function (as well as related routines) in
lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc currently registers a signal handler routine
via "sigaction". When this handler is called due to a SIGSEGV, SIGILL or
similar signal, it will show a stack backtrace, deactivate the handler,
and then simply return to the operating system. The intent is that the
OS will now retry execution at the same location as before, which ought
to again trigger the same error condition and cause the same signal to be
delivered again. Since the hander is now deactivated, the OS will take
its default action (usually, terminate the program and possibly create
a core dump).
However, this method doesn't work reliably on System Z: With certain
signals (namely SIGILL, SIGFPE, and SIGTRAP), the program counter stored
by the kernel on the signal stack frame (which is the location where
execution will resume) is not the instruction that triggered the fault,
but then instruction *after it*. When the LLVM signal handler simply
returns to the kernel, execution will then resume at *that* address,
which will not trigger the problem again, but simply go on and execute
potentially unrelated code leading to random errors afterwards.
To fix this, the patch simply goes and re-raises the signal in question
directly from the handler instead of returning from it. This is done
only on System Z and only for those signals that have this particular
problem.
llvm-svn: 181010
Build attribute sections can now be read if they exist via ELFObjectFile, and
the llvm-readobj tool has been extended with an option to dump this information
if requested. Regression tests are also included which exercise these features.
Also update the docs with a fixed ARM ABI link and a new link to the Addenda
which provides the build attributes specification.
llvm-svn: 181009
MSVC provides __wchar_t, either as an alias for the built-in wchar_t
type, or as a separate type depending on language (C vs C++) and flags
(-fno-wchar).
In -fms-extensions, Clang will simply accept __wchar_t as an alias for
whatever type is used for wide character literals. In -fms-compatibility, we
try to mimic MSVC's behavior by always making __wchar_t a builtin type.
This fixes PR15815.
llvm-svn: 181004
a lambda.
Bug #1 is that CGF's CurFuncDecl was "stuck" at lambda invocation
functions. Fix that by generally improving getNonClosureContext
to look through lambdas and captured statements but only report
code contexts, which is generally what's wanted. Audit uses of
CurFuncDecl and getNonClosureAncestor for correctness.
Bug #2 is that lambdas weren't specially mapping 'self' when inside
an ObjC method. Fix that by removing the requirement for that
and using the normal EmitDeclRefLValue path in LoadObjCSelf.
rdar://13800041
llvm-svn: 181000
FindLastStoreBRVisitor is responsible for finding where a particular region
gets its value; if the region is a VarRegion, it's possible that value was
assigned at initialization, i.e. at its DeclStmt. However, if a function is
called recursively, the same DeclStmt may be evaluated multiple times in
multiple stack frames. FindLastStoreBRVisitor was not taking this into
account and just picking the first one it saw.
<rdar://problem/13787723>
llvm-svn: 180997
There were actually two bugs here:
- if we decided to look for an interesting lvalue or call expression, we
wouldn't go find its node if we also knew we were at a (different) call.
- if we looked through one message send with a nil receiver, we thought we
were still looking at an argument to the original call.
Put together, this kept us from being able to track the right values, which
means sub-par diagnostics and worse false-positive suppression.
Noticed by inspection.
llvm-svn: 180996
thread before UnwindLLDB::AddOneMoreFrame calls it quits. We have
a couple of reports of unending backtraces in the field and we
haven't been able to collect any information about what kind of
backtrace is causing this. We've found on Mac OS X that it's tricky
to get more than around 200k stack frames before a process exceeds
its stack space so we're starting with a hard limit of 300,000 frames.
<rdar://problem/13383069>
llvm-svn: 180995
SWIG is smart enough to recognize that C++ operators == and != mean __eq__ and __ne__ in Python and do the appropriate translation
But it is not smart enough to recognize that mySBObject == None should return False instead of erroring out
The %pythoncode blocks are meant to provide those extra smarts (and they play some SWIG&Python magic to find the right function to call behind the scenes with no risk of typos :-)
Lastly, SBBreakpoint provides an == but never provided a != operator - common courtesy is to provide both
llvm-svn: 180987
Without any conversion, this is pretty straightforward. Most of the
fields can be zeros. The order is:
- field offset or pointer
- nonvirtual adjustment (for MI functions)
- vbptr offset (for unspecified)
- virtual adjustment offset (for virtual inheritance)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D699
llvm-svn: 180985
- Use the debug location of the return expression for the cleanup code
if the return expression is trivially evaluatable, regardless of the
number of stop points in the function.
- Ensure that any EH code in the cleanup still gets the line number of
the closing } of the lexical scope.
- Added a testcase with EH in the cleanup.
rdar://problem/13442648
llvm-svn: 180982
Nadav Rotem