Those two decorators have identical behaviour. This removes
`not_remote_testsuite_ready` as `skipIfRemote` seems more consistent with the
other decorator names we have
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89376
Copy the recent improvements from the FreeBSDRemote plugin, notably:
- moving event reporting setup into SetupTrace() helper
- adding more debug info into SIGTRAP handling
- handling user-generated (and unknown) SIGTRAP events
- adding missing error handling to the generic signal handler
- fixing attaching to processes
- switching watchpoint helpers to use llvm::Error
- minor style and formatting changes
This fixes a number of tests, mostly related to fixed attaching.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91167
Make category-specifying files visible. There is really no good reason
to keep them hidden, and having them visible increases the chances
that someone will actually spot them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91065
Replace the plethora of ObjC-implied 'skipUnlessDarwin' decorators
with marking tests as 'objc' category (whenever missing), and skip all
ObjC tests on non-Darwin platforms. I have used '.categories' file
wherever it was present already or all (>1) tests were relying on ObjC,
and explicit add_test_categories() where there was only one test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91056
Use skipUnlessDarwin decorator for tests that are specific to Darwin,
instead of skipIf... for all other platforms. This should make it clear
that these tests are not supposed to work elsewhere. It will also make
these tests stop repeatedly popping up while I look for tests that could
be fixed on the platform in question.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91003
The new FreeBSDRemote plugin has reached feature parity on i386
and amd64 targets. Use it by default on these architectures, while
allowing the use of the legacy plugin via FREEBSD_LEGACY_PLUGIN envvar.
Revisit the method of switching plugins. Apparently, the return value
of PlatformFreeBSD::CanDebugProcess() is what really decides whether
the legacy or the new plugin is used.
Update the test status. Reenable the tests that were previously
disabled on FreeBSD and do not cause hangs or are irrelevant to FreeBSD.
Mark all tests that fail reliably as expectedFailure. For now, tests
that are flaky (i.e. produce unstable results) are left enabled
and cause unpredictable test failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90757
SBType::GetArrayElementType should return the actual type, not the
canonical type (e.g. int32_t, not the underlying int).
Added a test case to validate the new behavior. I also ran all other
tests on Linux (ninja check-lldb), they all pass.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90318
This test checks that the output of `SBTarget.GetDescription()` contains the
substrings `'a.out', 'Target', 'Module', 'Breakpoint'` in that order. This test
is currently failing on Apple simulators as apparently 'Module' can't be found
in the output after 'Target".
The reason for that is that the actual output of `SBTarget.GetDescription()` looks like this:
```
Target
Module /build/path/lldb-test-build.noindex/python_api/target/TestTargetAPI.test_get_description_dwarf/a.out
0x7ff2b6d3f990: ObjectFileMachO64, file = /build/path/lldb-test-build.noindex/python_api/target/TestTargetAPI.test_get_description
[...]
0x7ff307150000: BreakpointList with 0 Breakpoints:
<LLDB module output repeats for each loaded module>
```
Clearly the string order should be `'Target', 'Module', 'a.out', 'Breakpoint'`.
However, LLDB is also a bunch of system shared libraries (libxpc.dylib,
libobjc.A.dylib, etc.) when *not* running against a simulator, we end up
unintentionally finding the `'Target', 'Module', 'Breakpoint'` substrings in the
trailing descriptions of the system modules. When running against a simulator we
however don't load shared system libraries.
This patch just moves the substrings in the correct order to make this test pass
without having any shared library modules in the description output.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89698
Also, use the StructuredData::Dump method to print the StructuredData if there
is no plugin, rather than just returning an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88266
This test is flaky on Green Dragon as it often fails when the process state
is "Invalid" in the assert:
self.assertEqual(process.GetState(), lldb.eStateExited)
It seems this is related to just doing "run" which apparently invalidates
the Target's process in case it's still running and needs to be restarted.
Just doing 'continue' on the process (and ignoring the error in case it already
finished) prevents that and makes this consistently pass for me.
Just pushing this out to get Green Dragon back online.
Recently added TestTargetAPI.py test "test_launch_simple" is failing on
Arm/AArch64 Linux targets. Putting them to skip until fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85235
Currently SBTarget::LaunchSimple creates a new LaunchInfo which means it
ignores any target properties that have been set. Instead, it should
start from the target's LaunchInfo and populated the specified fields.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85235
The patch was reverted 27d52cd86a because of failures in
TestWeakSymbols.py. These have now been addressed in D83552.
The original commit message was:
This function was documented to overwrite entries with D76111, which was
adding a couple of similar functions. However, this function (unlike the
functions added in that patch) was/is not actually overwriting variables
-- any pre-existing variables would get ignored.
This behavior does not seem to be intentional. In fact, before the refactor in
D41359, this function could introduce duplicate entries, which could
have very surprising effects both inside lldb and on other applications
(some applications would take the first value, some the second one; in
lldb, attempting to unset a variable could make the second variable
become active, etc.).
Overwriting seems to be the most reasonable behavior here, so change the
code to match documentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83306
Always clean up subprocesses on tear down instead of relying on the
caller to do so. This is not only less error prone but also means the
tests can be more concise.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83787
Summary:
This function was documented to overwrite entries with D76111, which was
adding a couple of similar functions. However, this function (unlike the
functions added in that patch) was/is not actually overwriting variables
-- any pre-existing variables would get ignored.
This behavior does not seem to be intentional. In fact, before the refactor in
D41359, this function could introduce duplicate entries, which could
have very surprising effects both inside lldb and on other applications
(some applications would take the first value, some the second one; in
lldb, attempting to unset a variable could make the second variable
become active, etc.).
Overwriting seems to be the most reasonable behavior here, so change the
code to match documentation.
Reviewers: clayborg, wallace, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83306
Summary:
A lot of our tests do 'self.assertTrue(error.Success()'. The problem
with that is that when this fails, it produces a completely useless
error message (False is not True) and the most important piece of
information -- the actual error message -- is completely hidden.
Sometimes we mitigate that by including the error message in the "msg"
argument, but this has two additional problems:
- as the msg argument is evaluated unconditionally, one needs to be
careful to not trigger an exception when the operation was actually
successful.
- it requires more typing, which means we often don't do it
assertSuccess solves these problems by taking the entire SBError object
as an argument. If the operation was unsuccessful, it can format a
reasonable error message itself. The function still accepts a "msg"
argument, which can include any additional context, but this context now
does not need to include the error message.
To demonstrate usage, I replace a number of existing assertTrue
assertions with the new function. As this process is not easily
automatable, I have just manually updated a representative sample. In
some cases, I did not update the code to use assertSuccess, but I went
for even higher-level assertion apis (runCmd, expect_expr), as these are
even shorter, and can produce even better failure messages.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82759
After this patch all remaining tests should pass on macOS when replayed
from a reproducer.
To capture the reproducers:
./bin/llvm-lit ../llvm-project/lldb/test/ --param lldb-run-with-repro=capture
To replay the reproducers:
./bin/llvm-lit ../llvm-project/lldb/test/ --param lldb-run-with-repro=replay
Many tests use (commented out) print statement for debugging the test
itself. This patch adds a new trace method to lldbtest to reuse the
existing tracing infrastructure and replace these print statements.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80448
Remove commented out code, fix the indentation and always use the full
path to the executable. The latter is necessary for the test to pass
from reproducer replay.
This patch marks following tests as xfail for arm-linux target.
lldb/test/API/functionalities/load_using_paths/TestLoadUsingPaths.py
lldb/test/API/python_api/thread/TestThreadAPI.py
lldb/test/Shell/Recognizer/assert.test
Bugs have been filed for all of them for the corresponding failing
component.
This skips some tests that pass with active replay (which doesn't check
the output) but fail with passive replay. Valid reasons for this
include:
- Checking the output of the process (which doesn't run during replay),
- Checking files that cannot be captured in the VFS (non-existing or
unreadable files or files that are removed during test),
Unfortunately there's no good way to mark a test as supported for active
replay but unsupported for passive replay because the number and order
of API calls needs to be identical during capture and replay. I don't
think this is a huge loss however.
Add the skipIfReproducer decorator to the remaining tests that fail to
replay because the GDB remote packets diverge during replay. This is
*not* expected and should be fixed, but figuring out exactly what caused
the divergence has proven pretty difficult to track down.
I've marked these tests as skipped for now so we can get clean results
and detect new regressions. I have no evidence to believe that these
failures have the same root cause, so I've not assigned them a PR.
Summary:
On most hosts we were running shell commands with an empty environment.
The only exception was windows, which was inheriting the host enviroment
mostly by accident.
Running the commands in an empty environment does not sound like a
sensible default, so this patch changes Host::RunShellCommand to inherit
the host environment. This impacts both commands run via
SBPlatform::Run (in case of host platforms), as well as the "platform
shell" CLI command.
Reviewers: jingham, friss
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77123
Michał Górny