Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
Adding a matcher for BinaryOperator and cxxOperatorCallExpr to be able to
decide whether it is any kind of assignment operator or not. This would be
useful since allows us to easily detect assignments via matchers for static
analysis (Tidy, SA) purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44893
llvm-svn: 328618
Currently hasArgument works with both ObjC messages and function calls,
but not hasAnyArgument.
This patch fixes that discrepancy, as it's often more convenient to use
hasAnyArgument.
On a more general note, it would be great to have a common superclass
for objc-call and function call, and a matcher matching that, but that's
probably a job for another commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44169
llvm-svn: 326865
Two new matchers for `CXXNewExpr` are added which may be useful e.g. in
`clang-tidy` checkers. One of them is `isArray` which matches `new[]` but not
plain `new`. The other one, `hasArraySize` matches `new[]` for a given size.
llvm-svn: 318909
Summary:
Allow the `isDefinition()` matcher to apply to `ObjCMethodDecl` nodes, in
addition to those it already supports. For whatever reason, `ObjCMethodDecl`
does not inherit from `FunctionDecl` and so this is specialization is necessary.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, malcolm.parsons, alexshap
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39948
llvm-svn: 318152
The wording in the documentation for the matcher isExternC
appears to be misleading since this matcher
is applicable to functions and variables as well.
This diff changes the comment and regenerates the html file.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38151
llvm-svn: 314022
Originally, we weren't able to match on Type nodes themselves (only QualType),
so the hasDeclaration matcher was initially written to give what we thought are
reasonable results for QualType matches.
When we chagned the matchers to allow matching on Type nodes, it turned out
that the hasDeclaration matcher was by chance written templated enough to now
allow hasDeclaration to also match on (some) Type nodes.
This patch change the hasDeclaration matcher to:
a) work the same on Type and QualType nodes,
b) be completely explicit about what nodes we can match instead of just allowing
anything with a getDecl() to match,
c) explicitly control desugaring only one level in very specific instances.
d) adds hasSpecializedTemplate and tagType matchers to allow migrating
existing use cases that now need more explicit matchers
Note: This patch breaks clang-tools-extra. The corresponding patch there
is approved and will land in a subsequent patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27104
llvm-svn: 309809
documentation.
Trying to match integerLiteral(-1) will silently fail, because an numeric
literal is always positive.
- Update the documentation to explain how to match negative numeric
literals.
- Add a unit test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35196
llvm-svn: 307663
Summary:
This allows the clang-query tool to use matchers like
"integerLiteral(equals(32))". For this to work, an overloaded function
is added for each possible parameter type.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33094
llvm-svn: 305022
Summary:
This adds a new ASTMatcher for CXXStdInitializerListExprs that matches C++ initializer list expressions.
The primary motivation is to use it to fix [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 | PR32896 ]] (review here [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D32767 | D32767 ]]).
Reviewers: alexfh, Prazek, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32810
llvm-svn: 302287
Summary:
I needed to know whether a FieldDecl had an in-class
initializer for D26453. I used a narrowing matcher there, but a
traversal matcher might be generally useful.
Reviewers: sbenza, bkramer, klimek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, Prazek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28034
llvm-svn: 290492
George Karpenkov