This patch disables memory-instruction vectorization for types that need padding
bytes, e.g., x86_fp80 has 10 bytes store size with 6 bytes padding in darwin on
x86_64. Because the load/store vectorization is performed by the bit casting to
a packed vector, which has incompatible memory layout due to the lack of padding
bytes, the present vectorizer produces inconsistent result for memory
instructions of those types.
This patch checks an equality of the AllocSize of a scalar type and allocated
size for each vector element, to ensure that there is no padding bytes and the
array can be read/written using vector operations.
Patch by Daisuke Takahashi!
Fixes PR15758.
llvm-svn: 180196
even if erroneously annotated with the parallel loop metadata.
Fixes Bug 15794:
"Loop Vectorizer: Crashes with the use of llvm.loop.parallel metadata"
llvm-svn: 180081
Also make some static function class functions to avoid having to mention the
class namespace for enums all the time.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 179886
A min/max operation is represented by a select(cmp(lt/le/gt/ge, X, Y), X, Y)
sequence in LLVM. If we see such a sequence we can treat it just as any other
commutative binary instruction and reduce it.
This appears to help bzip2 by about 1.5% on an imac12,2.
radar://12960601
llvm-svn: 179773
Pass down the fact that an operand is going to be a vector of constants.
This should bring the performance of MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p on x86
back. It had degraded to scalar performance due to my pervious shift cost change
that made all shifts expensive on x86.
radar://13576547
llvm-svn: 178809
We want vectorization to happen at -g. Ignore calls to the dbg.value intrinsic
and don't transfer them to the vectorized code.
radar://13378964
llvm-svn: 176768
The LoopVectorizer often runs multiple times on the same function due to inlining.
When this happens the loop vectorizer often vectorizes the same loops multiple times, increasing code size and adding unneeded branches.
With this patch, the vectorizer during vectorization puts metadata on scalar loops and marks them as 'already vectorized' so that it knows to ignore them when it sees them a second time.
PR14448.
llvm-svn: 176399
This properly asks TargetLibraryInfo if a call is available and if it is, it
can be translated into the corresponding LLVM builtin. We don't vectorize sqrt()
yet because I'm not sure about the semantics for negative numbers. The other
intrinsic should be exact equivalents to the libm functions.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D465
llvm-svn: 176188
Storing the load/store instructions with the values
and inspect them using Alias Analysis to make sure
they don't alias, since the GEP pointer operand doesn't
take the offset into account.
Trying hard to not add any extra cost to loads and stores
that don't overlap on global values, AA is *only* calculated
if all of the previous attempts failed.
Using biggest vector register size as the stride for the
vectorization access, as we're being conservative and
the cost model (which calculates the real vectorization
factor) is only run after the legalization phase.
We might re-think this relationship in the future, but
for now, I'd rather be safe than sorry.
llvm-svn: 175818
Adds a function to target transform info to query for the cost of address
computation. The cost model analysis pass now also queries this interface.
The code in LoopVectorize adds the cost of address computation as part of the
memory instruction cost calculation. Only there, we know whether the instruction
will be scalarized or not.
Increase the penality for inserting in to D registers on swift. This becomes
necessary because we now always assume that address computation has a cost and
three is a closer value to the architecture.
radar://13097204
llvm-svn: 174713
We don't want too many classes in a pass and the classes obscure the details. I
was going a little overboard with object modeling here. Replace classes by
generic code that handles both loads and stores.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 174646
In the loop vectorizer cost model, we used to ignore stores/loads of a pointer
type when computing the widest type within a loop. This meant that if we had
only stores/loads of pointers in a loop we would return a widest type of 8bits
(instead of 32 or 64 bit) and therefore a vector factor that was too big.
Now, if we see a consecutive store/load of pointers we use the size of a pointer
(from data layout).
This problem occured in SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash.cpp (reduced
test case is the first test in vector_ptr_load_store.ll).
radar://13139343
llvm-svn: 174377
We ignore the cpu frontend and focus on pipeline utilization. We do this because we
don't have a good way to estimate the loop body size at the IR level.
llvm-svn: 172964
This separates the check for "too few elements to run the vector loop" from the
"memory overlap" check, giving a lot nicer code and allowing to skip the memory
checks when we're not going to execute the vector code anyways. We still leave
the decision of whether to emit the memory checks as branches or setccs, but it
seems to be doing a good job. If ugly code pops up we may want to emit them as
separate blocks too. Small speedup on MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso.
Most of this is legwork to allow multiple bypass blocks while updating PHIs,
dominators and loop info.
llvm-svn: 172902
We don't have a detailed analysis on which values are vectorized and which stay scalars in the vectorized loop so we use
another method. We look at reduction variables, loads and stores, which are the only ways to get information in and out
of loop iterations. If the data types are extended and truncated then the cost model will catch the cost of the vector
zext/sext/trunc operations.
llvm-svn: 172178
Nadav Rotem