This is not a valid encoding - these instructions cannot do PC-relative addressing.
The underlying problem here is of whitelist in ARMISelDAGToDAG that unwraps ARMISD::Wrappers during addressing-mode selection. This didn't realise TargetConstantPool was actually possible, so didn't handle it.
llvm-svn: 283323
Summary:
This adds the AVR machine code backend (`AVRAsmBackend.cpp`). This will
allow us to generate machine code from assembled AVR instructions.
Reviewers: arsenm, kparzysz
Subscribers: modocache, japaric, wdng, beanz, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25029
llvm-svn: 283297
This should allow users of the library to get a range to iterate through
all the subcommands that are registered to the global parser. This
allows users to define subcommands in libraries that self-register to
have dispatch done at a different stage (like main). It allows for
writing code like the following:
for (auto *S : cl::getRegisteredSubcommands()) {
if (*S) {
// Dispatch on S->getName().
}
}
This change also contains tests that show this usage pattern.
Reviewers: zturner, dblaikie, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24489
llvm-svn: 283296
This reverts commit 062ace9764953e9769142c1099281a345f9b6bdc.
Issue with loop info and block removal revealed by polly.
I have a fix for this issue already in another patch, I'll re-roll this
together with that fix, and a test case.
llvm-svn: 283292
The tail duplication pass uses an assumed layout when making duplication
decisions. This is fine, but passes up duplication opportunities that
may arise when blocks are outlined. Because we want the updated CFG to
affect subsequent placement decisions, this change must occur during
placement.
In order to achieve this goal, TailDuplicationPass is split into a
utility class, TailDuplicator, and the pass itself. The pass delegates
nearly everything to the TailDuplicator object, except for looping over
the blocks in a function. This allows the same code to be used for tail
duplication in both places.
This change, in concert with outlining optional branches, allows
triangle shaped code to perform much better, esepecially when the
taken/untaken branches are correlated, as it creates a second spine when
the tests are small enough.
Issue from previous rollback fixed, and a new test was added for that
case as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18226
llvm-svn: 283274
Summary:
These are analog to the existing LLVMConstExactSDiv and LLVMBuildExactSDiv
functions.
Reviewers: deadalnix, majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25259
llvm-svn: 283269
Summary:
Attempting to fix PR30384.
Take the same approach as in compiler_rt and add a simplified version of __get_cpuid_max.
Including cpuid.h is no longer needed.
Reviewers: echristo, joerg
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24597
llvm-svn: 283265
The motivation for the change is that we can't have pseudo-global settings for
codegen living in TargetOptions because that doesn't work with LTO.
Ideally, these reciprocal attributes will be moved to the instruction-level via
FMF, metadata, or something else. But making them function attributes is at least
an improvement over the current state.
The ingredients of this patch are:
Remove the reciprocal estimate command-line debug option.
Add TargetRecip to TargetLowering.
Remove TargetRecip from TargetOptions.
Clean up the TargetRecip implementation to work with this new scheme.
Set the default reciprocal settings in TargetLoweringBase (everything is off).
Update the PowerPC defaults, users, and tests.
Update the x86 defaults, users, and tests.
Note that if this patch needs to be reverted, the related clang patch checked in
at r283251 should be reverted too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24816
llvm-svn: 283252
load commands that uses the MachO::encryption_info_command and
MachO::encryption_info_command types but not used in llvm libObject
code but used in llvm tool code.
This includes just LC_ENCRYPTION_INFO and
LC_ENCRYPTION_INFO_64 load commands.
llvm-svn: 283250
AArch64InstrInfo::shouldScheduleAdjacent() determines whether two
instruction can benefit from macroop fusion on apple CPUs. The list
turned out to be incomplete:
- the "rr" variants of the instructions were missing
- even the "rs" variants can have shift value == 0 and behave like the
"rr" variants
This also splits the MacropFusion target feature into
ArithmeticBccFusion and ArithmeticCbzFusion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25142
llvm-svn: 283243
The purpose of the YAML diagnostic output file is to collect information on
optimizations performed, or not performed, for later processing by tools that
help users (and compiler developers) understand how code was optimized. As
such, the diagnostics that appear in the file should not be coupled to what a
user might want to see summarized for them as the compiler runs, and in fact,
because the user likely does not know what optimization diagnostics their tools
might want to use, the user cannot provide a useful filter regardless. As such,
we shouldn't filter the diagnostics going to the output file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25224
llvm-svn: 283236
This patch corresponds to review:
The newly added VSX D-Form (register + offset) memory ops target the upper half
of the VSX register set. The existing ones target the lower half. In order to
unify these and have the ability to target all the VSX registers using D-Form
operations, this patch defines Pseudo-ops for the loads/stores which are
expanded post-RA. The expansion then choses the correct opcode based on the
register that was allocated for the operation.
llvm-svn: 283212
Treat soft-float as unsupported for fast-isel. Additionally, ensure we check
that lowering f32 arguments also considers the case of soft-float mode.
Reviewers: ehostunreach, vkalintiris, zoran.jovanovic
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24505
llvm-svn: 283209
The SMULO/UMULO DAG nodes, when not directly supported by the target,
expand to a multiplication twice as wide. In case that the resulting
type is not legal, an __mul?i3 intrinsic is used. Since the type is
not legal, the legalizer cannot directly call the intrinsic with
the wide arguments; instead, it "pre-lowers" them by splitting them
in halves.
The "pre-lowering" code in essence made assumptions about
the calling convention, specifically that i(N*2) values will be
split into two iN values and passed in consecutive registers in
little-endian order. This, naturally, breaks on a big-endian system,
such as our OR1K out-of-tree backend.
Thanks to James Miller <james@aatch.net> for help in debugging.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25223
llvm-svn: 283203
Hans Wennborg