Summary:
Code that used to be formatted as `if (! + object) {` is now formatted as `if (!+object) {`
(we have a particular object in our codebase where unary `operator+` is overloaded to return the underlying value, which in this case is a `bool`)
We still preserve the TypeScript behavior where `!` is a trailing non-null operator. (This is already tested by an existing unit test in `FormatTestJS.cpp`)
It doesn't appear like handling of consecutive unary operators are tested in general, so I added another test for completeness
Patch contributed by @kevinl!
Reviewers: krasimir
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43312
llvm-svn: 326792
Summary:
In an effort to understand the function's operation, I've split it into logical
pieces. Parsing of a single segment is moved to a separate function (and the
parsing state that is carried from one segment to another is explicitly
captured in the SegmentParsingContext object). I've also extracted some pieces
of code which were already standalone (validation of the segment load command,
determining the section type, determining segment permissions) into
separate functions.
Parsing of a single section within the segment should probably also be a
separate function, but I've left that for a separate patch.
This patch is intended to be NFC.
Reviewers: clayborg, davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44074
llvm-svn: 326791
Summary:
Only instantiate anonymous records once all variable references in template
arguments have been resolved. This allows patterns like the new test case,
which in practice can appear in expressions like:
class IntrinsicTypeProfile<list<LLVMType> ty, int shift> {
list<LLVMType> types =
!listconcat(ty, [llvm_any_ty, LLVMMatchType<shift>]);
}
class FooIntrinsic<IntrinsicTypeProfile P, ...>
: Intrinsic<..., P.types, ...>;
Without this change, the anonymous LLVMMatchType instantiation would
never get resolved.
Another consequence of this change is that anonymous inline
instantiations are uniqued via the folding set of the newly introduced
VarDefInit.
Change-Id: I7a7041a20e297cf98c9109b28d85e64e176c932a
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43756
llvm-svn: 326788
Summary:
So that we will be able to generate new anonymous names more easily
outside the parser as well.
Change-Id: I28f396a7bdbc3ff0c665d466abbd3d31376e21b4
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43755
llvm-svn: 326787
Summary:
There are various places where resolving and constant folds can
get stuck, especially around casts. We don't always signal an
error for those, because in many cases they can legitimately
occur without being an error in the "untaken branch" of an !if.
Change-Id: I3befc0e4234c8e6cc61190504702918c9f29ce5c
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43754
llvm-svn: 326786
Summary:
Distinguish two relationships between types: is-a and convertible-to.
For example, a bit is not an int or vice versa, but they can be
converted into each other (with range checks that you can think of
as "dynamic": unlike other type checks, those range checks do not
happen during parsing, but only once the final values have been
established).
Actually converting initializers between types is subtle: even
when values of type A can be converted to type B (e.g. int into
string), it may not be possible to do so with a concrete initializer
(e.g., a VarInit that refers to a variable of type int cannot
be immediately converted to a string).
For this reason, distinguish between getCastTo and convertInitializerTo:
the latter implements the actual conversion when appropriate, while
the former will first try to do the actual conversion and fall back
to introducing a !cast operation so that the conversion will be
delayed until variable references have been resolved.
To make the approach of adding !cast operations to work, !cast needs
to fallback to convertInitializerTo when the special string <-> record
logic does not apply.
This enables casting records to a subclass, although that new
functionality is only truly useful together with !isa, which will be
added in a later change.
The test is removed because it uses !srl on a bit sequence,
which cannot really be supported consistently, but luckily
isn't used anywhere either.
Change-Id: I98168bf52649176654ed2ec61a29bdb29970cfe7
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43753
llvm-svn: 326785
Summary:
No functional change intended. The removed code has a loop for
recursive resolving, which is superseded by the recursive
resolving done by the Resolver implementations.
Add a test case which was broken by an earlier version of this
change.
Change-Id: Ib208d037b77a8bbb725977f1388601fc984723d8
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43655
llvm-svn: 326784
Summary:
Allow RecordRecTy to represent the type "subclass of N superclasses",
where N may be zero. Furthermore, generate RecordRecTy instances only
with actual classes in the list.
Keeping track of multiple superclasses is required to resolve the type
of a list correctly in some cases. The old code relied on the incorrect
behavior of typeIsConvertibleTo, and an earlier version of this change
relied on a modified ordering of superclasses (it was committed in
r325884 and then reverted because unfortunately some of clang-tblgen's
backends depend on the ordering).
Previously, the DefInit for each Record would have a RecordRecTy of
that Record as its type. Now, all defs with the same superclasses will
share the same type.
This allows us to be more consistent about type checks involving records:
- typeIsConvertibleTo actually requires the LHS to be a subtype of the
RHS
- resolveTypes will return the least supertype of given record types in
all cases
- different record types in the two branches of an !if are handled
correctly
Add a test that used to be accepted without flagging the obvious type
error.
Change-Id: Ib366db1a4e6a079f1a0851e469b402cddae76714
Reviewers: arsenm, craig.topper, tra, MartinO
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43680
llvm-svn: 326783
Summary: `CheckBufferAccess()` calls `CheckNonNull()`, so there are some calls to `CheckNonNull()` that are useless.
Reviewers: dcoughlin, NoQ, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: szepet, rnkovacs, MTC, a.sidorin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44075
llvm-svn: 326782
Patch contributed by @EricMarti!
Summary: I noticed that the example for SpaceAfterCStyleCast does not match its description. I fixed the example after testing it out.
Reviewers: rsmith, krasimir
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43731
llvm-svn: 326781
I obviously messed up arguments to MachineOperand::CreateReg
in rL326769. This should make it work as intended.
Thanks to RKSimon for spotting this.
llvm-svn: 326780
In case PredBB == BB and StopAt == BB's terminator, StopAt != &*BI will
fail, because BB's terminator instruction gets replaced.
By using BB.getTerminator() we get the current terminator which we can use
to compare.
Reviewers: sanjoy, anna, reames
Reviewed By: anna
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43822
llvm-svn: 326779
Summary:
There is a problem with analyzer that a wrong value is given when modeling the increment operator of the operand with type bool. After `rL307604` is applied, a unsigned overflow may occur.
Example:
```
void func() {
bool b = true;
// unsigned overflow occur, 2 -> 0 U1b
b++;
}
```
The use of an operand of type bool with the ++ operators is deprecated but valid untill C++17. And if the operand of the increment operator is of type bool, it is set to true.
This patch includes two parts:
- If the operand of the increment operator is of type bool or type _Bool, set to true.
- Modify `BasicValueFactory::getTruthValue()`, use `getIntWidth()` instead `getTypeSize()` and use `unsigned` instead `signed`.
Reviewers: alexshap, NoQ, dcoughlin, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: xazax.hun, szepet, a.sidorin, cfe-commits, MTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43741
llvm-svn: 326776
Summary:
- reg_nums were missing the end marker entry
- marked FP test to be skipped for ppc64
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: alexandreyy, lbianc, nemanjai, kbarton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43767
Patch by Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 326775
Before I started maintaining the AVR backend, this instruction
never originally used to have an earlyclobber flag.
Some time afterwards (years ago), I must've added it back in, not realising that it
was left out for a reason.
This pseudo instrction exists solely to work around a long standing bug
in the register allocator.
Before this commit, the LDDWRdYQ pseudo was not actually working around
any bug. With the earlyclobber flag removed again, the LDDWRdYQ pseudo
now correctly works around PR13375 again.
llvm-svn: 326774
Summary:
This is a workaround for pr36417
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36417
LiveDebugVariables will now verify that the DBG_VALUE instructions
are sane (prior to register allocation) by asking LIS if a virtual
register used in the DBG_VALUE is live (or dead def) in the slot
index before the DBG_VALUE. If it isn't sane the DBG_VALUE is
discarded.
One pass that was identified as introducing non-sane DBG_VALUE
instructtons, when analysing pr36417, was the DAG->DAG Instruction
Selection. It sometimes inserts DBG_VALUE instructions referring to
a virtual register that is defined later in the same basic block.
So it is a use before def kind of problem. The DBG_VALUE is
typically inserted in the beginning of a basic block when this
happens. The problem can be seen in the test case
test/DebugInfo/X86/dbg-value-inlined-parameter.ll
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk, probinson
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: vsk, davide, alexcrichton, Ka-Ka, eraman, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43956
llvm-svn: 326769
Summary: define RLIMIT_AS constant until it s defined in the future
Patch by: David Carlier
Reviewers: krytarowski, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44068
llvm-svn: 326768
The MC layer doesn't currently emit relocations in offset
order for the entire code section so this check was causing
failures on the wasm waterfall.
Perhaps we can re-instate this check if we divide the relocations
per-function, or add extra ordering the MC object writer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44136
llvm-svn: 326765
EAX can turn out to be alive here, when shrink wrapping is done
(which is allowed when using dwarf exceptions, contrary to the
normal case with WinCFI).
This fixes PR36487.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43968
llvm-svn: 326764
This is triggering "functions that differ only in their return type
cannot be overloaded" error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44126
llvm-svn: 326759
DWARF v5 specifies that the root file (also given in the DW_AT_name
attribute of the compilation unit DIE) should be emitted explicitly to
the line table's list of files. This makes the line table more
independent of the .debug_info section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44054
llvm-svn: 326758
were originally written by Chris Bieneman, they've undergone a
number of changes since then.
Also including the debugserver bridgeos support, another arm
environment that runs Darwin akin to ios. These codepaths are
activated when running in a bridgeos environment which we're not
set up to test today.
There's additional (small) lldb changes to handle bridgeos binaries
that still need to be merged up.
Tested on a darwin system with avx512 hardware and without.
<rdar://problem/36424951>
llvm-svn: 326756
The 'hasOneUse' check is a giveaway that something's not right.
We never need to check that in InstSimplify because we don't
create new instructions here.
These are all handled as icmp simplifies which then trigger
existing select simplifies, so there's no need to duplicate
a composite fold of the two.
llvm-svn: 326750
Summary:
Fabs is a common floating-point operation, especially for some expansions. This patch adds
a new generic opcode for llvm.fabs.* intrinsic in order to avoid building/matching this intrinsic.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, rovka
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43864
llvm-svn: 326749
Summary:
RewriteStatepointsForGC collects parse points for further processing.
During the collection if a callsite is found in an unreachable block
(DominatorTree::isReachableFromEntry()) then all unreachable blocks are
removed by removeUnreachableBlocks(). Some of the removed blocks could
have been reachable according to DominatorTree::isReachableFromEntry().
In this case the collected parse points became stale and resulted in a
crash when accessed.
The fix is to unconditionally canonicalize the IR to
removeUnreachableBlocks and then collect the parse points.
The added test crashes with the old version and passes with this patch.
Patch by Yevgeny Rouban!
Reviewed by: Anna
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43929
llvm-svn: 326748
rdar://37312818
NB: The checker does not care about the ordering of callbacks, see the
relevant FIXME in tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44059
llvm-svn: 326746
Starting with the Fall Creators Update, Windows 10 Desktop can run on
machines that are powered by aarch64 processors.
Microsoft call the aarch64 architecture "arm64". This patch maps
ArchType::aarch64 to "arm64" to allow the MSVC toolchain driver to find
the aarch64 / arm64 cross-compiler.
Patch by Chris January
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44087
llvm-svn: 326744
LLDB.framework to point to the build directory where it is expected by
the top-level CMakeLists.txt.
This should be a no-op in any other configurations.
rdar://problem/38005302
llvm-svn: 326743
Krasimir Georgiev