In bigger projects like an Operating System, the same source code is
often compiled in slightly different ways. This could be the difference
between PIC and non-PIC code for static vs dynamic libraries, it could
also be the difference between size optimised versions of tools for
ramdisk images. At the moment, the compilation database has no way to
distinguish such cases. As first step, add a field in the JSON format
for it and process it accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27138
llvm-svn: 288436
Specifically, if the RHS of a comma is a complex binary expression and
spans multiple lines, insert a line break before it. This usually is
often more readable compared to producing a hanging indent. See changes
in FormatTest.cpp for examples.
llvm-svn: 288120
On Windows, Clang is mangling lambdas in default member initializers
incorrectly. See PR31197.
This is causing redness on the self-host bots. Work around the problem
locally so we aren't blind to further issues.
llvm-svn: 288089
Add a set of unit tests for the distro detection code. The tests use an
in-memory virtual filesystems resembling release files for various
distributions supported. All release files are provided (not only the
ones directly used) in order to guarantee that one of the rules will not
mistakenly recognize the distribution incorrectly due to the additional
files (e.g. Ubuntu as Debian).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25869
llvm-svn: 288062
Summary:
If the `FromDecl` is a class forward declaration, the reference is
still considered as referring to the original definition given the nature
of forward-declarations, so we can't do a raw name replacement in this case.
Reviewers: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27132
llvm-svn: 287929
Summary:
For example, this case was missed when looking for different but canonical
namespaces. UseContext in this case should be considered as in the canonical
namespace.
```
namespace a { namespace b { <FromContext> } }
namespace a { namespace b { namespace c { <UseContext> } } }
```
Added some commenting.
Reviewers: bkramer
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27125
llvm-svn: 287924
Summary:
The new error information contains the type of error (e.g. overlap or bad file path)
and the replacement(s) that is causing the error. This enables us to resolve some errors.
For example, for insertion at the same location conflict, we need to know the
existing replacement which conflicts with the new replacement in order to calculate
the new position to be insert before/after the existing replacement (for merging).
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer
Subscribers: djasper, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26853
llvm-svn: 287639
This can be used to append alternative typo corrections to an existing diag.
include-fixer can use it to suggest includes to be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26745
llvm-svn: 287128
Actual regression was introduced in r272668. This revision fixes JS script, but
also regress Cpp case. It manifests with spaces added when template is followed
with array. Bug 30527 mentions case of array as a nested template type
(foo<bar<baz>[]>). Fix is to detect such case and to prevent treating it as
array initialization, but as a subscript case. However, before r272668, this
case was treated simple because we were detecting it as a StartsObjCMethodExpr.
Same was true for other similar case - array of templates (foo<int>[]). This
patch tries to address two problems: 1) fixing regression 2) making sure both
cases (array as a nested type, array of templates) which were entering
StartsObjCMethodExpr branch are handled now appropriately.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26163
Patch from Branko Kokanovic <branko@kokanovic.org>!
llvm-svn: 286507
Output generated by option -ast-print looks like C/C++ code, and it
really is for plain C. For C++ the produced output was not valid C++
code, but the differences were small. With this change the output
is fixed and can be compiled. Tests are changed so that output produced
by -ast-print is compiled again with the same flags and both outputs are
compared.
Option -ast-print is extensively used in clang tests but it itself
was tested poorly, existing tests only checked that compiler did not
crash. There are unit tests in file DeclPrinterTest.cpp, but they test
only terse output mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26452
llvm-svn: 286439
Summary:
This provides a better interface for clang-tidy and encapsulates the knowledge
about experimental checkers instead of leaving this to the clients.
Reviewers: zaks.anna
Subscribers: a.sidorin, NoQ, dcoughlin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26310
llvm-svn: 286218
Summary:
The current version does not deduplicate equivalent file paths correctly.
For example, a relative path and an absolute path are considered inequivalent.
Comparing FileEnry addresses these issues.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: alexshap, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26288
llvm-svn: 286096
Summary:
During clang-format source lexing >> and << operators are split and
treated as two less/greater operators but column position of following
tokens was not adjusted accordingly.
Fixes PR26887
Patch by Paweł Żukowski.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, mprobst, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25439
llvm-svn: 285934
Reasoning:
- ExpressionParser uses a lot of stack for these, bad in some environments.
- Our formatting algorithm is N^3 and gets really slow.
- The resulting formatting is unlikely to be any good.
- This is probably generated code we're formatting by accident.
We treat these as unparseable, and signal incomplete formatting. 50 is
an arbitrary number, I've only seen real problems from ~150 levels.
Patch by Sam McCall. Thank you.
llvm-svn: 285570
Summary:
The matcher
varDecl(hasDescendant(
callExpr(hasDeclaration(functionDecl(unless(isNoThrow()))))))
didn't match calls from default arguments because the expression
for a CXXDefaultArgExpr was not visited.
Reviewers: klimek, jdennett, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25992
llvm-svn: 285239
Summary:
clang-tidy's modernize-use-auto check uses the SourceRange of a
TypeLoc when replacing the type with auto.
This was producing the wrong result for multi-token builtin types
like long long:
-long long *ll = new long long();
+auto long *ll = new long long();
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, rsmith, Prazek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25363
llvm-svn: 284885
Summary:
Previously, automatic semicolon insertion would add an unwrapped line
when a template string contained a line break.
var x = `foo${
bar}`;
Would be formatted with `bar...` on a separate line and no indent.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25675
llvm-svn: 284807
Summary:
Remove colon and commas after replacing constructor body with = default.
Fix annotation of TT_CtorInitializerColon when preceded by a comment.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25768
llvm-svn: 284732
Summary:
If there are multiple <File, Replacements> pairs with the same file
path after removing dots, we only keep one pair (with path after dots being
removed) and discard the rest.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, hokein, bkramer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25565
llvm-svn: 284219
Summary:
append newline after code when inserting new headers at the end of the
code which does not end with newline.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21026
llvm-svn: 283330
Summary:
Now two replacements are considered order-independent if applying them in
either order produces the same result. These include (but not restricted
to) replacements that:
- don't overlap (being directly adjacent is fine) and
- are overlapping deletions.
- are insertions at the same offset and applying them in either order
has the same effect, i.e. X + Y = Y + X if one inserts text X and the
other inserts text Y.
Discussion about this design can be found in D24717
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Subscribers: omtcyfz, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24800
llvm-svn: 282577
Joerg Sonnenberger